Tucker Wrecks ‘Ambush Journalist’ for Calling Carlson Racist | The Liberty Beacon

Tucker Wrecks ‘Ambush Journalist’ for Calling Carlson Racist | The Liberty Beacon

Tucker Wrecks ‘Ambush Journalist’ for Calling Carlson Racist

“How Do They Get People This Stupid?”

(Tyler Durden Reports) – Tucker Carlson absolutely dismantled an Australian journalist while taking questions at the sold-out Australian Freedom Conference in Canberra, as part of his Australian tour.

Tucker Wrecks ‘Ambush Journalist’ for Calling Carlson Racist | The Liberty Beacon

After discussing a wide range of topics – including the release of Julian Assange, woke corporations, and corrupt pharmaceutical companies (watch here), Carlson took questions. from the audience – two of whom were antagonistic journalists.

Kat Wong of the Australian Associated Press launched into an attack of Carlson, saying “So, you talked a little bit about immigration, and, in the past, you’ve talked about how white Australians, Americans, Europeans, are being replaced by non-white immigrants in what is often referred to as the Great Replacement Theory,”

To which Carlson interrupted, saying “Have I said that whites are being replaced? I don’t think I said that.

Wong then went into full ‘ACKCHYUALLY‘ mode, firing back that “It’s been mentioned on your show 4,000 times” (it hasn’t).

“Really? When did I say that?” Carlson replied. “I said, ‘Whites are being replaced’?”

Wong doubled down, insisting that Carlson had made the ‘replacement’ theory about race – to which Carlson completely dismantled herThe Blaze reports.

I said, ‘Native-born Americans are being replaced, including blacks,’” Carlson shot back. “Native-born Americans … like black Americans have been — African-Americans have been in the United States for, in many cases, their families, over 400 years. And their concerns are every bit as real and valid and alive to me as the concerns of white people whose families have been there 400 years. So, I’ve never said that whites are being replaced.

My concern is that the people who are born in the country are the main responsibility of its leaders. And as noted earlier, when those leaders shift their concern from the people whose responsibility it is to take care of, to people around the world — to put their priorities above that of their own citizens, that’s immoral. And they are being replaced in my country, people who were born in the United States and the birth rate tells the whole story. They are not at replacement rate.

So the U.S. population is growing because we’re importing people from other countries. My view is that happy people have children. And a functioning economy allows them to do that. We don’t have that. So, you need to fix the economy and fix the culture, and make it so that people who want to have kids can. You don’t just go for the quick sugar fix of importing new people. And if you think that’s racist, that’s your problem.”

After that mic drop, Wong tried to claim she wasn’t calling Carlson a racist… only to pivot to blaming him for a mass shooting.

“This is the same theory or, as you say, idea, that’s inspired the New York, Buffalo, shooting,” said Wong.

“Come on,” Carlson replied. “How do they get people this stupid in the media? I guess it doesn’t pay well. … I don’t mean to call you stupid — maybe you’re just pretending to be.

Carlson underscored there was nothing bigoted about his views, adding that they centered on a “deep concern for Americans, actually. Americans aren’t having kids because they can’t afford to and nobody in charge cares. And so that’s my position. That doesn’t ‘inspire’ mass shootings.”

The fertility rate in the U.S. last year was 1.784. By way of contrast, in 1960, the U.S. fertility rate was 3.7. For a population to maintain stability and replenish itself without need for an influx of foreign nationals, a fertility rate of 2.1 is needed. -The Blaze

Wong then steered the conversation into a ravine over gun control.

Needless to say: Tucker: 1, Establishment Hacks: 0

The next liberal ambush came from Paul Sakkal of the Sydney Morning Herald, who suggested that Carlson should feel “shame” and “regret” for interviewing Russian President Vladimir Putin – noting that conservatives have called Putin “reprehensible.”

Carlson suggested that his criticism of the Ukraine war should not be conflated with support for the Russian leader – and indicated that he does not in fact support him, but that if he did, it shouldn’t matter because free citizens in free countries should be able to support whomever they choose.

Tucker: 2, Establishment Hacks: 0

*********

(TLB) published this article/video report as posted by Tyler Durden at ZeroHedge

Header featured image (edited) credit:  Carlson/picture credit: Paige Fusco

Emphasis added by (TLB)

••••

Tucker Wrecks ‘Ambush Journalist’ for Calling Carlson Racist | The Liberty Beacon

••••

Stay tuned tuned…

Tucker Wrecks ‘Ambush Journalist’ for Calling Carlson Racist | The Liberty Beacon

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.



Source