GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP, N.J. (TCN) — A 26-year-old woman faces charges after allegedly trying to hire someone to kill her 53-year-old ex-boyfriend and his 19-year-old daughter.
On April 3, the Camden County Prosecutor’s Office first learned about the possible murder-for-hire plot orchestrated by Jaclyn Diiorio. According to a criminal complaint obtained by WCAU-TV, Diiorio met a confidential informant on Tinder and offered to pay him $12,000 to kill her ex — a police officer with the Philadelphia Police Department — and his teen daughter.
Diiorio allegedly said she’d pay the informant $500 up front to carry out the slayings, and then she planned to provide the rest in installments. On April 4, Diiorio reportedly met with the informant and gave him the $500 advance. Gloucester Township Police then took her into custody. Prosecutors noted that she was also in possession of a bottle of suspected alprazolam pills.
Diiorio’s ex-boyfriend reportedly told New Jersey detectives that he and the suspect broke off their relationship on March 6.
Prosecutors announced that they charged Diiorio with two counts of first-degree attempted murder, one count of first-degree conspiracy to commit murder, and one count of third-degree possession of a controlled dangerous substance. Diiorio was booked into the Camden County Correctional Facility and is scheduled for a detention hearing on April 9.
Runnemede Woman Charged in Murder-for-Hire Plot – Camden County Prosecutor’s Office
Woman accused of trying to hire guy she met on Tinder to kill ex and his daughter – WCAU
Straughn Junior Varsity fishing team makes final stop of season
Published 4:47 pm Tuesday, April 8, 2025
Pictured are, from left, Gavin Odom, Walker Faust, Lane Landon, and Landon Nash
On Saturday, March 29, the Straughn Junior High Bass Fishing Team made their fourth and final stop of the 2025 tournament season with the Alabama Bass Nation High School trail at Beeswax Landing on Lay Lake.
Lay Lake is a 12,000-acre reservoir located thirty-five minutes south of Birmingham off I-65 and 15 miles south of Columbiana in east-central Alabama.
Lay Lake borders St. Clair, Talladega, Shelby, Coosa, and Chilton counties. The primary uses for this reservoir are hydroelectric generation and recreation. Lay Lake is popular for tournament fishing and boating recreation.
Since being impounded in 1914 by the Alabama Power Company, Lay Lake is best known for its spotted bass and largemouth bass fishing. A high quality largemouth bass and spotted bass fishery exists at Lay Reservoir.
Largemouth bass up to 18-inches are abundant and with moderate numbers of larger bass. Spotted bass up to 18-inches are very abundant with moderate numbers of larger fish. The best fishing for largemouth bass occurs in creeks and shallow water sloughs. Anglers targeting spotted bass should fish riverine portions of the lake.
All three teams fished on Lake Martin two teams weighed in fish. There was a total of 69 boats participating in the Junior division.
The team of Lane Landon/Landon Nash finished 22nd with three fish weighing in 5.08 pounds.
The team of Gavin Odom/Walker Faust finished 38th with one fish weighing in 2.93 pounds.
All three Junior division teams’ scores for the year qualified them to compete in the Alabama Bass Nation High School State Championship tournament on Neely Henry on May 3, 2025.
SCOTUS slapdown of Judge Boasberg sends message to Fed Judges on overreach
In a 5-4 decision, the justices opted both to overturn the Boasberg TRO halting Trump’s enforcement of the AEA, but also declared the D.C. District of Columbia an inappropriate venue for the case in light of the convicts’ detention in Texas.
By Ben Whedon
The Supreme Court decision reversing U.S. District Judge James Boasberg’s block on President Donald Trump’s deportation of gang members under the Alien Enemies Act sent a stern message to federal judges nationwide that overreach and venue shopping won’t be tolerated.
The Trump administration has witnessed a record number of temporary restraining orders (TROs) against its policies, with lower-level federal judges imposing sweeping blocks on executive actions, notably those involving immigration.
The Department of Justice has repeatedly urged the Supreme Court to narrow the scope of federal injunctions or to clarify the extent of lower court judges’ authority to interfere in executive branch operations.
In a 5-4 decision, the justices opted Monday both to overturn the Boasberg order halting Trump’s enforcement of the AEA, but also declared the D.C. District of Columbia an inappropriate venue for the case in light of the gang member’s detention in Texas.
They did, however, assert that the Venezuelans in custody had the right to challenge their deportations.
“Regardless of whether the detainees formally request release from confinement, because their claims for relief ‘necessarily imply the invalidity’ of their confinement and removal under the AEA, their claims fall within the ‘core’ of the writ of habeas corpus and thus must be brought in habeas,” the judges wrote. “The detainees are confined in Texas, so venue is improper in the District of Columbia. As a result, the Government is likely to succeed on the merits of this action.”
“For all the rhetoric of the dissents, today’s order and per curiam confirm that the detainees subject to removal orders under the AEA are entitled to notice and an opportunity to challenge their removal,” they added. “The only question is which court will resolve that challenge. For the reasons set forth, we hold that venue lies in the district of confinement.”
Texas courts are part of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, one of the most conservative courts in the nation. The change of venue represents a partial win for Trump as the courts are far more likely to be receptive to government arguments on immigration authority.
The need for due process, however, will slow the deportation process to a degree. Trump had hoped to use the AEA to speedily remove members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, which gained notoriety in 2024 for its takeover of several apartment complexes in Colorado.
Trump did notch a bonus win, however, after Chief Justice John Roberts blocked a deadline Boasberg imposed to repatriate an illegal alien from Venezuela whom the administration sent to El Salvador.
Trump allies acknowledged that the decision represented a victory, but stopped short of celebrating in light of its limited scope.
Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., told Just the News that “this ruling provides only a temporary reprieve in one case among many where partisan Federal District Court judges are throwing up roadblocks to frustrate President Trump’s efforts to honor his campaign promise to secure the border and deport illegal immigrants.
“It’s welcome, but the Supreme Court needs to do far more to rein in district judges who are exceeding their constitutional authority,” he added.
Harvard Law School Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz, moreover, opined that “[i]t looks like SCOTUS will rule that Trump has broad substantive power to deport but he must exercise that power within due process constraints.”
The decisions on Monday represent one of the first actions from the nation’s nine justices to chastise lower courts over forum shopping and the excessive issuance of TROs.
An April 2024 study from the Harvard Law Review found that 96 TROs had been issued since President George W. Bush took office up until the publication date. Sixty-four of those were under Trump’s first term. Biden faced only 14 and Trump’s second term has already exceeded that total.
The administration previously highlighted to the court that “District courts have issued more universal injunctions and TROs during February 2025 alone than through the first three years of the Biden Administration.”
“That sharp rise in universal injunctions stops the Executive Branch from performing its constitutional functions before any courts fully examine the merits of those actions, and threatens to swamp this Court’s emergency docket,” acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris writer in March.
Harris had asked the justices to narrow the scope of several lower court orders blocking Trump’s executive order directing federal agencies to interpret the 14th Amendment as not granting citizenship to the children of illegal aliens.
While the Boasberg case and the challenges to the birthright citizen executive order address different legal issues, the justices’ decision on Monday could signal how they may approach some of the other appeals.
The condemnation of the case being brought in the District of Columbia rather than Texas, for instance, could suggest the court appears poised to take a more cynical view of cases brought in venues traditionally favorable to the party out of power.
The Harvard Law Review study found that 86.5% of the TROs issued from the Bush presidency through 2024 were issued by justices appointed by a president of the opposite party from the one in power at the time.
Some of the more conservative justices previously warned of the need to address the scope of a lower court judge’s authority, with Associate Justice Samuel Alito issuing a scathing dissent in early March in which he raged over the court’s decision to keep in place a lower court order demanding that the administration distribute USAID funds.
“Does a single district-court judge who likely lacks jurisdiction have the unchecked power to compel the Government of the United States to pay out (and probably lose forever) 2 billion taxpayer dollars?” he wrote. “The answer to that question should be an emphatic ‘No,’ but a majority of this Court apparently thinks otherwise. I am stunned.”
Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, for his part, wrote in 2018 of TROs that “[i]f their popularity continues, this court must address their legality.” The Monday order sidestepped the issue and made no determination as to the legitimacy of TROs in general.
In the meantime, Republican lawmakers have explored alternative means of reining in federal judges absent a Supreme Court decision. Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, for instance, has introduced legislation to limit judicial injunctions to the parties in the case, rather than allow them to issue a nationwide rule.
“When a national injunction is put in place, it affects all the other 92 district federal district courts, I should say, court districts throughout the country,” Grassley told Just the News.
“It becomes national. We want to limit what the judge can do to that district and to the people before it. And the second thing is, we want it to be appealable very quickly, so if the judge screws up constitutionally, we can do something about it.”
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
McKINNEY, Texas (TCN) — A 35-year-old man will spend the rest of his life behind bars for fatally strangling his pregnant wife on Christmas Day in 2023.
The Collin County Criminal District Attorney’s Office announced April 8 that Nasib Ahsan was sentenced to life in prison in connection with the death of Nawreen Tuli after prosecutors secured a guilty plea.
On Dec. 25, 2023, the defendant’s family members reportedly called McKinney Police because Ahsan told them over the phone that he had killed his wife following an argument. According to KDFW-TV, Ahsan told responding officers that Tuli was asleep, but they later found her deceased in a bedroom with apparent signs of manual strangulation. Prosecutors noted that Tuli was several months pregnant at the time.
Investigators reportedly learned that Ahsan had been arrested approximately two months prior for allegedly assaulting his wife. Tuli allegedly told police the defendant “had grown controlling and violent, refusing to let her drive to work and attempting to force her into the apartment.” Neighbors heard screams and called law enforcement. Tuli said she didn’t want police to arrest Ahsan, but they did anyway.
In a statement, District Attorney Greg Willis said, “This was a vicious, premeditated act of domestic violence that stole the life of a young woman and her unborn child. My team fought to hold him fully accountable and ensure he can never harm another woman. This life sentence reflects our resolve to stand with victims, protect the vulnerable, and — when appropriate — deliver justice in the strongest way without putting families through the agony of trial.”
DA Greg Willis’s Office Secures Life Sentence for McKinney Man Who Murdered His Pregnant Wife on Christmas Day – Collin County District Attorney’s Office
McKinney man sentenced to life for strangling pregnant wife on Christmas day – KDFW
Local educator, former Andalusia city councilman passes away at 85
Published 4:51 pm Tuesday, April 8, 2025
Dr. James Krudop, a lifelong resident of Andalusia, a longtime educator at LBW Community College and a former city councilman, passed away on Friday, April 4, at the age of 85.
A 1965 graduate of Andalusia High School, Krudop spent 50 years as an educator, including 40 years at LBW. Dr. Krudop earned his bachelor’s degree at Auburn University and then earned a master’s degree and a Doctor of Philosophy Degree from the University of Alabama.
He began his career teaching Speech and English courses at Andalusia High School before going to the University of Alabama for graduate studies. After earning his master’s and doctorate degrees, he accepted the position of director of school relations at Birmingham-Southern College in 1974.He joined the LBW staff as dean of students in 1978.
During his time at LBW, Krudop served in a variety of executive level positions in instruction, finance, and institutional advancement. He served as interim president on two occasions and was the second-in-command for many years. He retired from LBW in 2018. In honor of his service, he was designated vice-president emeritus of LBW by the Alabama Community College System.
“Jim was a very dedicated and loyal employee of LBW,” said Seth Hammett, former college president. “During thetime I served as president, he was my right-hand man. I could tell Jim what we should do, and I never had to think about it again. He would get it done.
“He was always a real pleasure to work with. He did a lot of work that the people didn’t recognize as his work, or have forgotten that he did. He loved not only LBW, his God, and his family, but he also loved Andalusia, and worked to make it a better place.”
In addition to his contributions in education, Dr. Krudop served two terms as a member of the Andalusia City Council, from 1980 to 1988. Andalusia Mayor Earl Johnson knew Krudop since the two were 5-years-old and were classmates in AHS’s Class of 1965. Johnson ordered that flags in the city be flown at half-staff in honor of Krudop.
“We went through East Three Notch Elementary together; we went through high school together; and when we went to Auburn, we lived on the same hall,” Johnson said.
Both returned to their hometown to pursue careers.
“Jimmy Krudop was one ofthe most straight-arrow guys I’ve ever known,” Johnson said. “He always tried to make things better. He was a smart guy, a community leader, a leader in his profession, and an all-around good person. I never had a better friend.”
Krudop was an active member and volunteer with a variety of local organizations, including the Andalusia Area Chamber of Commerce, the Andalusia High School Scholarship Foundation, Andalusia Health Services Board, and the LBW Foundation. He was also involved in other state and national organizations, including serving on the board of Camp ASCAA.
Krudop also is remembered as an outstanding Rotarian, who had served as president of both the Andalusia and Greenville Rotary clubs, and had been active at the district level, as well.
“Jim was perhaps the best Rotarian in our club,” Johnson said. “Even after his health declined and it was too difficult for him to attend weekly meetings in person, he participated through Zoom weekly, up until two days before he passed.”
Krudop helped carry on an Andalusia Rotary Club tradition begun by his father, Bellaire Krudop, at Christmas, when club members bring gifts to exchange. When the senior Krudop began the tradition, he would bring items like fresh greens or pepper sauce.
In addition, Krudop was a longtime member of First Baptist Church of Andalusia.
Dr. Krudop is survived by his wife of 54 years, Hollace Moore Krudop, and two children, Dr. Ashley Krudop Powell and Dr. Hadyn Krudop Swecker.
A funeral service for Dr. Krudop was held Tuesday, April 8, with a graveside service following at Andalusia Memorial Cemetery. For more details see today’s obituaries on Page 3.
Inever set out to be an advocate. I wasn’t a doctor, scientist, or policy expert. I was just a regular person who, like so many, blindly trusted that our healthcare system was designed to protect us.
But life has a way of pulling us into the arena when we least expect it.
After the tragic and unexpected loss of my husband Woody to the antidepressant Zoloft he was prescribed for insomnia, I was thrust into a world I never imagined—one where medicine wasn’t solely about healing, but deeply entangled in a system that prioritizes profit over safety, buries harms, and keeps the public in the dark.
For over two decades, I’ve had a front-row seat to how this system truly operates—not the illusion of rigorous oversight we see in medical journals or glossy pharmaceutical ads, but the reality of how industry influence is woven into every stage.
I’ve met with regulators, testified before the FDA and Congress, filed a wrongful death and failure-to-warn lawsuit against Pfizer, and earned a seat on the FDA’s Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee as a consumer representative.
I’ve also spoken at and participated in global conferences like Selling Sickness, Too Much Medicine, and the Harms in Medicine meeting in Erice, Italy—where some of the world’s leading experts acknowledge what few in mainstream medicine dare to say:
Our healthcare system isn’t about health—it’s about business.
And in this business, harm isn’t an accident. It’s built into the system.
The more I uncovered, the more I realized:
We aren’t just patients. We are customers.
And we are all trapped in Big Pharma’s spiderweb of influence.
The Spiderweb of Influence
The more I learned, the more I saw just how deeply embedded the pharmaceutical industry is—not just in drug development and marketing but in every corner of our healthcare system.
That’s why I created the Big Pharma Spider Web of Influence—to visually map out how the system is designed not to prioritize health but to sell sickness while minimizing, downplaying, or outright hiding harms.
From clinical trial design to regulatory approval, from direct-to-consumer advertising to medical education, from controlling medical journals to silencing dissenting voices, the industry has built an intricate and self-reinforcing web—one that traps doctors, patients, and even regulators in a cycle of pharmaceutical dependence.
How the Web Works
Clinical trials are often designed, funded, and controlled by the very companies that stand to profit. They manipulate data to exaggerate benefits and obscure risks, ensuring that negative results are buried, spun, or never published at all.
Regulatory agencies like the FDA are deeply entangled with the industry they’re supposed to oversee. More than 50% of the FDA’s budget comes from industry-paid user fees, and a revolving door ensures that many key decision-makers come from—and later return to—pharmaceutical companies.
Medical journals depend on pharmaceutical funding through advertising, reprint sales, and industry-sponsored studies—severely limiting independent scrutiny of drug safety. Many studies are ghostwritten or crafted by paid “key opinion leaders” (KOLs) who serve as pharma’s trusted messengers.
Doctors receive education through industry-funded programs, learning “best practices” based on treatment guidelines crafted by the very system that profits from overprescription.
Patient advocacy groups, once independent grassroots organizations, have been co-opted by industry money, ensuring that the loudest voices often serve pharma’s interests rather than patients’ needs. I call them “astroturf” patient groups—they look like real grassroots organizations, but they’re anything but.
Screenings and guidelines continuously expand the definitions of disease, turning more people into lifelong customers.
This isn’t about one bad actor or isolated corruption—it’s a systemic issue. The entire structure is designed to push more drugs onto the market, medicalize normal human experiences, and only acknowledge harm when it becomes too big to ignore.
It’s a brilliant business model—but a catastrophic public health strategy.
“To Sell to Everyone:” The Business Model of Medicine
If this sounds like a conspiracy, consider the bold admission made by Henry Gadsden, former CEO of Merck, in a 1976 interview with Fortune Magazine:
“The problem we have had is limiting the potential of drugs to sick people. We could be more like Wrigley’s Gum…it has long been my dream to make drugs for healthy people. To sell to everyone.”
– Former Merck CEO Henry Gadsden
Let that sink in.
This wasn’t about curing disease—it was about expanding markets. Gadsden’s vision wasn’t just to treat illness, but to medicalize everyday life—creating a cradle-to-grave model where every person, healthy or sick, became a customer for life. Just like selling a variety of gum—something for everyone. Juicy Fruit, Big Red, Doublemint, Spearmint, and so on.
And that’s exactly what happened.
Today, we live in a system where:
Everyday emotions—sadness, worry, shyness—are rebranded as medical conditions requiring treatment.
Preventive medicine often means lifelong prescriptions, not lifestyle changes.
Drugs are marketed to the “worried well”, turning normal human experiences into diagnoses.
This isn’t just theory—it’s well documented. In Selling Sickness: How the World’s Biggest Pharmaceutical Companies Are Turning Us All into Patients, Ray Moynihan and Alan Cassels expose how pharmaceutical companies create diseases, expand diagnostic criteria, and convince the public that normal life experiences require medical intervention.
The goal?
Make medication the default—not the last resort.
Harms Are Always an Afterthought
Harms from medication are not rare, nor are they unexpected.
But in this system, they are treated as acceptable collateral damage—something to be dealt with only after the damage is done, after lives are lost or forever changed.
I’ve sat in FDA Advisory Committee meetings, reviewing new drug applications, and have seen firsthand how safety concerns are often dismissed in favor of “innovation” or “unmet medical need.”
I’ve heard industry representatives and advisory committee members argue that safety signals can be addressed post-market, meaning after a drug is already in circulation and causing harm or a required REMS (Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies) program upon approval.
But by the time post-market safety issues are acknowledged, it’s often too late.
We’ve seen this play out over and over:
Opioids—marketed as “non-addictive” and pushed aggressively onto patients, leading to an epidemic of addiction and death.
SSRIs and antidepressants—long linked to increased risks of suicide and violence, particularly in young people, yet downplayed or dismissed for decades. Other hidden harms include withdrawal syndromes and Post-SSRI Sexual Dysfunction (PSSD), conditions that many patients were never warned about.
Antipsychotics—widely prescribed for off-label use, leading to severe metabolic and neurological side effects.
Covid-19 vaccines—an experimental mRNA platform rushed to market, mandated, and imposed on society despite limited long-term safety data and growing concerns over harms.
Every time, the pattern is the same:
The industry sells the benefits while downplaying the risks—until those risks become too big to ignore.
By then, the drug is a blockbuster, billions have been made, and the system moves on to the next new “breakthrough.”
More Than Degrees: The Truth of Lived Experience
One of the biggest lessons I’ve learned in this fight is that real-world experience matters just as much as credentials.
Over the years, I’ve been invited to speak at medical schools, PhD programs, and universities, thanks to brave academics willing to challenge the narrative. I share my journey as an accidental advocate—someone who didn’t have a medical degree but discovered America’s broken drug system the hard way.
But let’s be honest—the medical world is driven by credentials. Or, as I like to say, the alphabet soup.
At conferences, attendees wear name tags listing their titles—MD, PhD, JD, MPH. It’s a quick way to size someone up, to assess credibility before even speaking. And I’ve seen it happen: people glance at my name tag, see no impressive letters after my name, and walk right by.
Years ago, I was speaking at the Preventing Overdiagnosis Conference and noticed my badge read: Kim Witczak, BA.
I was horrified. Was that really necessary? Did my name tag need to remind everyone that I only had a BA?
Later, I was telling the story to a doctor friend, and he laughed.
“Next time, tell them BA stands for Bad Ass.”
And he was right.
Because real expertise doesn’t always come from an advanced degree—it comes from lived experience, from asking the right questions, from refusing to accept the status quo.
The Counterargument: But Don’t We Need Experts?
Of course, some will argue that only experts with MDs and PhDs should be trusted to shape healthcare policy.
But that assumes that the system they operate in is free from bias, conflicts of interest, or financial incentives.
The reality is that many of those with the most letters after their names are also the ones benefiting from pharma funding—whether through consulting fees, research grants, or advisory roles.
Meanwhile, patients and their families—the ones living with the consequences—are too often ignored.
That needs to change.
Asking Better Questions: Reclaiming Our Power
If there’s one thing I’ve learned on this journey, it’s this: no one is coming to save us. The institutions meant to protect us are too entangled in the web to act with true independence.
My late husband, Woody, used to say: “Follow the money.” And when you do, the truth becomes impossible to ignore. Pharmaceutical profits—not patient well-being—drive the system. That’s why the only way to create real change is through awareness, transparency, and fundamentally shifting how we think about medicine and health.
That starts with asking better questions:
Who funded this research?
Does this person or institution have financial ties, intellectual bias, or self-interest that could impact their recommendations?
Who benefits from this treatment?
What aren’t we being told?
What are the long-term consequences of this drug or intervention?
Are there safer, non-drug alternatives being ignored because they aren’t profitable?
But asking the right questions isn’t enough.
We have to stop outsourcing our health to a system built on financial incentives and guided by corporate interests.
We must demand full transparency, challenge the status quo, and recognize that sometimes the best medicine isn’t a pill but a deeper understanding of what our bodies truly need.
Because once you see the web, you can’t unsee it.
And once you recognize how deeply medicine has been shaped by profit, you’ll realize the most important question isn’t just “What can I take?”—it’s“Who benefits if I do?”
Final Thoughts: Tearing Down the Web
I never wanted to be in this fight, but once you see the web, you can’t unsee it. That’s why I continue to speak out, to challenge the system, and to push for real accountability.
Because the stakes aren’t theoretical. They’re deeply personal.
For me, this fight began over two decades ago with Woody. But for countless others, it begins the moment they or someone they love is caught in the web—trusting a system that was never truly designed to protect them.
It’s time to tear down the web.
And it starts with seeing it for what it really is.
***
Republished from the author’s Substack
Kim Witczak Leading global drug safety advocate, Consumer Rep on FDA Advisory Committee, and speaker with over 25 years professional experience in advertising and marketing communications.
Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
_________
(SOURCE)
Header featured image (edited) credit: Org. post content. Emphasis added by (TLB)
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
In this episode of “True Crime News,” a jealous girlfriend’s deadly plot leads to a fatal cartel catfish scheme, resulting in the death of a family and a fiery highway crash. Also, a wrongful conviction sends Kimberly Long to prison for the death of her boyfriend. Lastly, Dr. Phil sits down with “True Crime News” to discuss his support for Robert Roberson, who was on death row for killing his daughter due to “shaken baby syndrome.” Dr. Phil argues there isn’t enough evidence to convict him.
Fauci (Follow the Science) Touts “The Next Outbreak”
“A respiratory disease that’s easily transmissible, that has a significant degree of morbidity”
Steve Watson | Modernity.news
Footage has emerged of Anthony Fauci telling an audience at the New Orleans Book Festival, where he was hawking his COVID book, that there will be a new pandemic in the near future, and that it will be a new respiratory virus with a higher rate of morbidity than COVID.
“The next outbreak will be of a respiratory disease that’s easily transmissible, that has a significant degree of morbidity,” Fauci asserted.
The last one wasn’t an outbreak, it came out of a lab where people you funded were f*cking around with pathogens to make them more deadly to humans.
Does this guy ever stop?
NEW – Anthony Fauci says “the next outbreak will be of a respiratory disease that’s easily transmissible, that has a significant degree of morbidity” pic.twitter.com/psUrIGwB45
Header featured image (edited) credit: Org. post content. Emphasis added by (TLB)
••••
••••
Stay tuned tuned…
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
SHREVEPORT, La. (TCN) — Authorities recently arrested a couple on suspicion of leaving their teen daughter alone in a hotel room for weeks.
According to the Shreveport Police Department, on April 2, officers responded to the Royal Inn and found a 15-year-old female victim who had allegedly been “left alone and unsupervised in a hotel room for approximately two weeks.” Police called the victim’s living conditions “deplorable,” and they noticed she had a “strong odor indicating poor hygiene.”
The juvenile reportedly told police that her mother, 50-year-old Angela Herring, left her at the hotel and said, “I love you, be back soon,” but she never returned. The victim allegedly apologized for her appearance and told officers she “had not bathed in two weeks but had managed to find food on her own.”
According to police, the 15-year-old said her father, 52-year-old Carey Herring, was banned from the hotel, and she hadn’t seen him since. Hotel management reportedly informed officers that Herring was removed from the property on March 19 and isn’t allowed back.
The victim also allegedly claimed she hadn’t been to school in around three weeks.
On April 2, detectives obtained arrest warrants for Angela Herring and Carey Herring on charges of improper supervision of a juvenile and criminal neglect of family. They were both booked into the Caddo Parish Correctional Center.
SPD Arrest Two for Child Neglect After Teen Found Abandoned in Hotel Room – Shreveport Police Department
Meta Keeps Big MAGA Accounts on Ban List as Zuckerberg Lobbies Trump
A number of high-profile, pro-MAGA voices are still banned on Meta’s Facebook and Instagram platforms
BREITBART
Mark Zuckerberg is reportedly lobbying the Trump administration to drop a pivotal FTC case against the company, in what would amount to a major political favor for Meta. Despite Zuckerberg’s multiple olive branches to the Turmp administration, a number of high-profile, pro-MAGA voices are still banned on Meta’s Facebook and Instagram platforms.
The Wall Street Journal recently reported that Mark Zuckerberg has made regular visits to the White House urging the president to lean on the FTC to drop its case against Meta. If the FTC were to prevail in the case, Meta could be forced to divest from WhatsApp and Instagram, breaking up the company.
In January, Zuckerberg made several public overtures to the Trump administration, praising parts of its policy platform in an appearance on the Joe Rogan Experience, and criticizing the outgoing Biden administration for its censorship demands during COVID. Zuckerberg also announced a policy pivot at Meta, promising to “get back to our roots” of supporting free speech.
Despite these pledges, several prominent anti-establishment figures remain banned on Meta platforms:
Laura Loomer, investigative journalist and former Republican congressional candidate who was recently credited with influencing a shakeup at the NSC.
Tommy Robinson, the prominent British political activist and critic of Islam.
Alex Jones
Paul Joseph Watson
Gavin McInnes
Milo Yiannopoulos, self-styled “civil rights icon” and former Breitbart News editor.
It is also unclear if Meta still maintains its “hate agents” list of prominent anti-establishment voices uncovered by Breitbart News in 2019 that included political candidates. Or if the company has taken any steps to remedy the mass-censorship of WhatsApp accounts in Brazil, which extended to Flavio Bolsonaro, son of persecuted former president Jair Bolsonaro. In a comment to Breitbart News, the company denied it has continued to maintain its documented list of hate agents.
As the FTC trial date draws closer, Meta has drawn flak from the conservative commentariat.
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg Lobbies Trump to Avoid Antitrust Trial
Zuckerberg is full of shit. And so are all of the so called “conservatives” he brought on now that Trump is back. L
Facebook lied to me & said my account would be restored. I’m still banned.
“Zuckerberg is full of shit,” said Laura Loomer in an X post yesterday. “And so are all of the so called “conservatives” he brought on now that Trump is back. Facebook lied to me & said my account would be restored. I’m still banned.”
Zuckerberg spent hundreds of millions – billions – of dollars supporting open borders, “criminal justice reform” (think – George Floyd riots) and election-fixing for Democrats and now he wants favors from the Trump administration.
“Zuckerberg spent hundreds of millions — billions — of dollars supporting open borders, “criminal justice reform” (think – George Floyd riots) and election-fixing for Democrats and now he wants favors from the Trump administration,” said War Room reporter Natalie Winters….
CONTINUE READING SOURCE ARTICLE & WATCH VIDEO
Header featured image (edited) credit: Org. post content. Emphasis added by (TLB)
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
