Tag: United States

  • Fact Check: Altered video appears to show President Joe Biden calling a child “sexy.” He didn’t.

    A recent video declares President Joe Biden “thee stupidest president” for getting caught on video telling a child, “You’re one sexy kid.”

    Biden then appears to caution the child not to “tell mommy what I told you.” 

    But the video has been altered.

    An Oct. 11 Instagram post sharing it was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    In the original video, shared on TikTok in June, he tells a child a woman is holding, “Let me whisper you a secret,” and then says, “Don’t tell mommy what I told you.” 

    Biden had signed an executive order June 9 at Fort Liberty, North Carolina, related to economic security for military families. He was surrounded by people.

    In response to someone asking on TikTok what Biden said, the video’s poster wrote: “I don’t think he told him anything because I didn’t hear him say anything I think he just pretended to say something.” 

    We rate claims that Biden was recorded calling a child “sexy” Pants on Fire!



    Source

  • 'Let’s fight to the death': Idaho woman accused of stabbing ex-boyfriend multiple times with scissors

    VICTOR, Idaho (TCD) — Deputies arrested a 48-year-old woman accused of stabbing her ex-boyfriend all over his body, kicking him off his bed, and hitting him on two separate occasions.

    According to the Teton County Sheriff’s Office, on Sept. 17, Luna Nicoya Phaedra Serrano allegedly went to Derek Hawkes’ house and stabbed him with a pair of scissors, which caused injuries to his side. She faces a charge of aggravated battery in connection with that incident.

    Then, on Oct. 2 at approximately 11 p.m., deputies responded to a residence on Kestrel Hill Road and found Serrano “subdued and detained” by Hawkes, who was injured again. Medics transported Hawkes to a nearby hospital for treatment.

    The Sheriff’s Office alleges Serrano went to Hawkes’ home with the intent of killing him. She allegedly attacked him with scissors again and struck his head, chest, neck, and torso. Then, she reportedly pushed him off his loft and onto the kitchen counter and floor.

    Court records cited by Cowboy State Daily say Serrano allegedly texted Hawkes saying, “Let’s fight to the death.” A woman inside Hawkes’ cabin reportedly fled outside, sought shelter under a truck, and called 911.

    When deputies arrived, they found Serrano wearing two jackets, one of which was on backwards, and a headlamp. Hawkes was naked except for a pair of underwear and was reportedly “bleeding significantly” due to the wounds on his neck. Serrano also reportedly had blood on her body and clothing.

    Hawkes reportedly told deputies he was asleep when Serrano made her way into the cabin, but he woke up when she allegedly started stabbing him in the head. Cowboy State Daily reports Hawkes obtained documents to file a restraining order against Serrano the same day he was attacked.

    Hawkes’ girlfriend reportedly said Serrano stole her phone after she broke in another time.

    Deputies looked inside the cabin and found a “significant amount of blood” on the floor, couch, and blankets.

    Hawkes reportedly claimed Serrano had threatened him with scissors in the past. The two had known each other for about 15 years and were in intimate relationship for several weeks, but that ended about a week before the Oct. 2 incident.

    Serrano is reportedly homeless because she was banned from going back to Hawkes’ cabin.

    Court records show Serrano was taken into custody on one count of attempted murder, two counts of aggravated battery causing great bodily harm, and one count of burglary.

    The Teton County Sheriff’s Office said a judge set Serrano’s bond at $250,000. The Sheriff’s Office said she will be required to report to pre-trial supervision, wear an ankle monitor, and not make any contact with Hawkes.

    Source

  • Fact Check: Are West Virginia Republicans correct that real wages have fallen since Joe Biden took office?

    As the 2024 election approaches, Republicans nationwide are running against incumbent president and likely Democratic nominee Joe Biden by focusing on the economy, and particularly the unusually high levels of inflation on his watch.

    In summer 2022, inflation reached about 9%, a level unseen in four decades. That represented a hit to consumers.

    In an Aug. 17 post on X, formerly known as Twitter, the West Virginia Republican Party listed several statistics it sees as undercutting Biden’s record on the economy:

    “You are paying the price for Biden’s energy agenda. Since Biden took office:

    ” Gas is more than $1/gallon more expensive

    ” Americans have lost over $10k in increased cost of living

    ” Nearly 20M households behind on utility bills

    ” Real wages have fallen monthly.”

    PolitiFact West Virginia recently fact-checked another statement about gasoline prices, that “gas prices have skyrocketed since Joe Biden took office and continue to do so everyday.” That was rated Half True. 

    Here, we’ll examine another of the post’s claims: “Since Biden took office … real wages have fallen monthly.” 

    “Real wages” means wages adjusted for inflation. When real wages are falling, inflation is rising faster than wages. When real wages are rising, wages are rising faster than inflation.

    The West Virginia Republican Party did not respond to inquiries for this article, but we were able to assess the statement’s accuracy using commonly cited economic data.

    The most applicable federal wage data that is calculated monthly is known as average hourly earnings for all private-sector employees. This can be tracked against the standard measure of inflation, the consumer price index, which is also calculated monthly.

    From January to March 2021 — Biden’s first three months in office — wages rose faster than inflation. After that, however, inflation accelerated. 

    We have previously reported that rising inflation was initially driven by COVID-19-related labor market disruptions and supply-chain difficulties. The war in Ukraine, which led to a spike in gasoline prices, worsened inflation. Economists say that Biden’s 2021 coronavirus relief bill, the American Rescue Plan Act, also worsened inflation by putting more money in Americans’ hands after the pandemic had begun to wane; this meant too much money was chasing too few goods.

    For the following two years — April 2021 to April 2023 — inflation rose faster than wages. That means real (or inflation-adjusted) wages were falling.

    So, the post has a point that under Biden, “real wages have fallen monthly.” But that ceased to be accurate a few months ago.

    From May to July 2023 — the final three months for which data would have been known at the time of the tweet — wages rose faster than inflation. That pattern continued in August 2023

    Meanwhile, another measure of wages — median usual weekly inflation-adjusted earnings for full-time wage and salary workers, ages 16 and older — showed a similarly mixed pattern on Biden’s watch, contrary to the West Virginia GOP’s tweet. This measure is released quarterly rather than monthly. 

    For this measure, inflation-adjusted earnings fell for the first six quarters of Biden’s presidency but have climbed (or for one quarter, remained the same) for the most recent four quarters. The measure also fell for the final two quarters of Donald Trump’s presidency.

    Our ruling

    The West Virginia Republican party said, “Since Biden took office … real wages have fallen monthly.”

    Inflation has outpaced wages for most of Biden’s tenure in office —  two full years, to be exact. 

    But that has not been the case for every month he’s been president. Wages outpaced inflation for Biden’s first three months, as well as over the past four months, when real wages seem to have turned a corner as inflation has receded.

    We rate the statement Mostly True.



    Source

  • Ind. woman arrested after young girl falls off the roof of car while suspect was driving

    PORTAGE, Ind. (TCD) — A 36-year-old woman was arrested on multiple charges after a young girl was reportedly injured after falling off the roof of the suspect’s car.

    The Times of Northwest Indiana reports on Aug. 3, Portage Police went to the 100 block of Coral Avenue after receiving a report about an injured girl. Officers went to Katy Newboles’ home and located an 11-year-old crying and suffering from several injuries. Paramedics transported her to a nearby hospital for treatment.

    She reportedly sustained a skull fracture, concussion, and other cuts and wounds.

    Police reportedly wrote in a report that Newboles lets the girl and her 9-year-old “hang on to the back of her 2011 Ford Fusion passenger vehicle and ride skateboards.”

    Newboles allegedly said she was only driving about 4 to 5 mph when the girl fell off her board and struck her head on the ground, so she drove her back to their home.

    The court document alleges, “Katy stated that she did not call 911 because she was freaking out and didn’t think to call the police.”

    The skateboards, however, were reportedly nowhere to be found. Police spoke with the 9-year-old boy, and when they spoke with him, he allegedly responded, “What skateboards?”

    A witness allegedly told officers he saw the children atop the car, which he has seen “multiple times before.”

    According to the Times of Northwest Indiana, the little girl reportedly said, “Hi, I’m going to fall.”

    She reportedly became unconscious when she git the ground. Then, the witness allegedly saw Newboles “grab Victim 1 by one of her arms and drag her towards the vehicle.”

    Court records show a warrant went out for Newboles’ arrest Oct. 5, and she was taken into custody on two counts of neglect of a dependent, two counts of criminal recklessness, and false informing. She is not allowed to have contact with the victims.

    Newboles remains in custody at the Portage County Jail.

    Source

  • Fact Check: No, CNN didn’t stage an attack near the Israel-Gaza border

    A video of CNN journalists reporting from near the Israel-Gaza border has spread on social media as evidence the network staged an attack there for viewers. 

    “CNN busted faking attack in Israel for the camera!” reads the text in a screenshot of an Oct. 10 X post from The Quartering, which describes itself on X as a “news & content organization.” 

    The post’s video shows a camera following a CNN team, including the network’s chief international correspondent, Clarissa Ward, running and taking shelter on a roadside.

    “OK, Jerry, tell the cameraman to keep Clarissa in shot,” a narrator can be heard saying. “It’s not ‘The Blair Witch Project.’”

    “Look around, Jerry, look around as if you’re in danger,” the voice later says. “Try to look nice and scared, yeah, that’s it, catching your breath. … OK, that’s beautiful, that’s the money shot.”  

    And still later: “Can you boost the volume on those explosions please?”

    Instagram posts sharing this video were flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    The audio is fake. 

    It doesn’t appear in the original Oct. 9 broadcast, which CNN described on its site as showing Ward and her team taking shelter from rockets near the Israel-Gaza border. Instead, the voice of CNN anchor Kate Bolduan can be heard describing what’s happening in the footage. 

    The Quartering said on X that “of course the voice over isn’t real.” 

    We rate claims that it is, and evidence of CNN staging an attack, False.

     



    Source

  • Wis. woman allegedly threatened to 'shoot up' McDonald’s because her french fries were burned

    WAUKESHA, Wis. (TCD) — A woman was arrested a month after she allegedly made threatening comments to McDonald’s employees because some of her french fries were burned.

    WITI-TV reports Breneida Gottschalk went to the fast-food chain in Brookfield, purchased a sandwich, soda, and fries, then ate her meal. When she finished, she allegedly approached the counter and started criticizing the fact that there was a “burnt end” on some of her leftover fries. She allegedly attempted to make her way into the McDonald’s kitchen to get a new order.

    Court documents cited by the Waukesha County Freeman allege an employee tried to stop Gottschalk from entering the kitchen because she was not allowed in there. Gottschalk allegedly argued with the employee and claimed the McDonald’s worker was a drug dealer. She reportedly continued to make her way back and insisted all the employees were selling drugs and would get arrested.

    The criminal complaint reportedly said Gottschalk claimed “she had a weapon and she was going to shoot up the restaurant.”

    Gottschalk was reportedly exiting the McDonald’s when police arrived.

    According to WITI, police did not find any weapons on her.

    Prosecutors filed the criminal complaint Oct. 6. Waukesha County court records show she is being charged with disorderly conduct. Her next court date is scheduled for Oct. 19.

    Source

  • Fact Check: Vice President Kamala Harris is a natural-born citizen and eligible for the presidency

    Vice President Kamala Harris is next in line for the presidency if President Joe Biden were ever unable to carry out his official duties. 

    But a recent Instagram post retreads old misinformation when it claims that she’s ineligible for the job. 

    “Kamala Harris is NOT a ‘natural born citizens’ per Art II Sec. 1 par 5 of the US constitution,” the Oct. 12 post says. “Both parents were foreign nationals, NOT U.S. citizens when Kamala was born in Oakland, CA. She is missing 2 of the 3 legs of the ‘natural born citizen’ test. Kamala can’t be president!”

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    We’ve dug into similar claims before. 

    The section of the U.S. Constitution cited in the Instagram post says that “no person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President.”

    Harris’ father and mother were born in Jamaica and India, respectively. But because Harris was born in Oakland, California, experts say that Harris meets the definition of a natural-born citizen.

    “If you are born in the U.S., you are automatically a natural-born U.S. citizen under the Constitution, Harvard Law professor Einer Elhuage told PolitiFact in 2019.

    Sarah Duggin, a Catholic University law professor, told us: “Her birth in the United States, to someone other than a member of a foreign diplomatic corps or otherwise not subject to U.S. jurisdiction, makes her a U.S. citizen. … There is no reason to look at where her parents came from, how long her parents were U.S. residents before she was born, or where she was raised.”  

    The 14th Amendment says that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”

    8 U.S. Code § 1401 says people born in the United States are “nationals and citizens.”

    And then there’s an 1898 Supreme Court decision that ruled people born on U.S. soil — with a few exceptions that aren’t relevant in Harris’ case — qualify for citizenship under the 14th Amendment. 

    We rate claims Harris isn’t a natural-born citizen, and thus ineligible for the presidency, Pants on Fire!

     



    Source

  • Woman accused of stabbing taxi driver, Delta employee, and police officer at Atlanta airport

    ATLANTA (TCD) – Police have arrested a woman who allegedly stabbed a taxi driver and two other individuals at an Atlanta airport this week.

    According to Atlanta Police Sgt. John Chafee, on Wednesday, Oct. 10, at around 4:45 p.m., officers at the Hartsfield–Jackson Atlanta International Airport confronted a knife-wielding female outside the security checkpoint near the west crossover as she was proceeding toward the South Terminal.

    Officers tried to negotiate with the female, who WSB-TV identified as Damaris Milton.

    Milton allegedly stabbed a taxi driver in the chest prior to entering the terminal, then threw the driver’s phone out of the window.

    WSB reports Milton stabbed a Delta employee inside the terminal as well.

    According to WAGA-TV, an officer tried to Tase Milton, but she was wearing more than one pair of pants, so it didn’t make contact with her skin. Atlanta Police Lt. David Cannon reportedly tried to pepper spray her, but he slipped, and Milton stabbed him in the leg.

    Chafee said an officer eventually tackled Milton to the ground, and she was taken into custody.

    All three victims were transported to the hospital and are in stable condition.

    Chafee said investigators are trying to figure out what led up to the stabbings. The incident caused “minimal impact to airport operations” but areas around the scene were blocked off.

    Milton remains held in the Clayton County Jail on four counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. Records show Milton is from Orlando.

    Source

  • Judicial Watch: U.S. Capitol Police Federal Court Filing Reveals Officials Were Aware of the Potential for a Significant Disturbance on January 6

    ‘McCarthy Congress’ Wants to Hide All Jan 6 Videos and Emails as Security Information and Non-Public Records, Asserts Sovereign Immunity from ‘Right to Know’ Court Challenge

    (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it received the court-ordered declaration of James W. Joyce, senior counsel in the Office of the General Counsel for the Capitol Police, in which he describes emails among senior officials of the United States Capitol Police (USCP) in January 2021 that show warnings of possible January 6 protests that could lead to serious disruptions at the U.S. Capitol.

    The declaration comes in a lawsuit Judicial Watch brought under the common law right of access to public records (Judicial Watch v. United States Capitol Police (No. 1:21-cv-00401)). The suit requests:

    Email communications between the U.S. Capitol Police Executive Team and the Capitol Police Board concerning the security of the Capitol on January 6, 2021. The timeframe of this request is from January 1, 2021 through January 10, 2021.

    Email communications of the Capitol Police Board with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. Department of Justice, and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security concerning the security of the Capitol on January 6, 2021. The timeframe of this request is from January 1, 2021through January 10, 2021.

    All video footage from within the Capitol between 12 pm and 9 pm on January 6, 2021.

    After an August 15, 2023, hearing, in which U.S. District Judge Ana C. Reyes ordered the Capitol Police to provide Judicial Watch more detailed descriptions of certain emails that had been withheld, the U.S. Capitol Police filed a seven-page “second declaration,” which describes email discussions of evacuations and relocations of people from certain buildings, arrests, and other security matters.

    The U.S. Capitol Police describe “situational security update” emails at issue as follows:

    a. A January 3, 2021 email, with attachment, from the USCP Deputy Chief to a Board member and others at USCP and in Congress providing a detailed “special event assessment” of anticipated protest activity in advance of the January 6, 2021 Joint Session of Congress. The attached document is marked on each page “For Official Use Only/Law Enforcement Sensitive.”

    b. A January 5, 2021 email, with map attachment, from the USCP Chief to two Board members detailing a proposed “bike rack” security perimeter for January 6, 2021, and proposing further discussion.

    c. A January 5, 2021 email, with map attachment, from the USCP Chief to two Board members detailing a proposed security perimeter for January 6, 2021.

    d. A January 5, 2021 email, with social media post and map attachments, from the USCP Deputy Chief to a Board member and others at USCP and in Congress reporting “a significant uptick in new visitors” to a “historical website” containing information on Capitol system tunnels. The Deputy Chief describes proposed attempts by unauthorized individuals to block members of Congress from entering the Capitol building, through tunnels or otherwise.

    e. A January 5, 2021 email from the USCP Deputy Chief to a Board member and others at USCP and in Congress alerting them to an online website soliciting information on high-level government officials and their expected whereabouts on January 6, 2021, and linking to the website’s article entitled Why the Second American Revolution Starts Jan 6.

    f. A January 6, 2021 email from the USCP Chief to Board members and others at USCP and in Congress relaying that the President had completed a speech at the Ellipse and that a large group was preparing to approach the Capitol.

    g. A January 6, 2021 email thread between the USCP Chief, two Board members, and congressional staffers responding to questions on the status of evacuations and relocations of certain buildings on the Capitol Grounds on January 6, 2021, and relaying information on crowds gathering near the Washington Monument and on Capitol Grounds on January 6, 2021.

    h. A series of four January 6, 2021 emails from the USCP Deputy Chief to a Board member and others at the USCP and in Congress providing four updates throughout the course of January 6, 2021. These updates contain intelligence assessments, information on arrests, coordination with other law enforcement agencies, crowd estimates, scheduling of high-level government officials, threat and incident reports, medical responses, and officer deployment status.

    i. A January 7, 2021 email, with photo attachment, from the USCP Deputy Chief to Board member and others in Congress providing an update on the arrest and subsequent charging of an armed individual found in a “suspicious vehicle” on January 6, 2021.

    The U.S. Capitol Police describe “updates on police personnel issues” emails at issue as follows:

    a. A January 7, 2021 email from the USCP Chief to all Board members and others at the USCP and in Congress providing an update on the medical condition of a USCP officer following the events of January 6, 2021.

    b. A January 7, 2021 email from the USCP Chief to all Board members and others at USCP and in Congress providing an update on the medical condition of a USCP officer following the events of January 6, 2021.

    c. A January 7, 2021 email from the USCP Chief to all Board members and others at USCP and in Congress providing an update on the death of a USCP officer following the events of January 6, 2021.

    d. A January 8, 2021 email from the USCP Chief to a Board member and others at USCP and in Congress concerning the lowering of flags to half-staff in recognition of a USCP officer who died in the line of duty on January 6, 2021.

    e. A January 9, 2021 email from the USCP Acting Chief to all Board members providing an update on when autopsy results could be expected for a deceased USCP officer following the events of January 6, 2021.

    Another email is described under the category of “updates about news media reports:”

    A January 7, 2021 email, with attachment, from the USCP Chief to all Board members and others at USCP and in Congress providing an anticipated statement by the USCP on the events that transpired at the Capitol on January 6, 2021.

    On September 29, 2023, the Capitol Police filed a motion to dismiss Judicial Watch’s common law right of access lawsuit that asks for over 14,000 hours of video footage, arguing that the USCP has a sovereign immunity exemption from lawsuits asserting a common law right of access to public information. The latest filing goes further than prior Pelosi Congress secrecy arguments in this litigation by newly asserting even if a lawsuit were allowed to go forward, all January 6 videos and emails would be exempt from disclosure as “security information.”

    Judicial Watch also received the January 7, 2021, resignation letter of Steven A. Sund, chief of the Capitol Police on January 6, who left the position at the request of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

    “It is urgent that the January 6 videos and related U.S. Capitol Police emails be released to the American public. I would hope the next House speaker takes a different approach than Nancy Pelosi and Kevin McCarthy and affirms the public’s lawful ‘right to know’ – and stops working with the Biden Justice Department to hide this January 6 evidence,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said.

    Judicial Watch is extensively investigating the events of January 6.

    Last month it received records from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys, a component of the Department of Justice, in a FOIA lawsuit that detail the extensive apparatus the Biden Justice Department set up to investigate and prosecute January 6 protestors.

    A previous review of records from that lawsuit highlighted the prosecution declination memorandum justifying the decision not to prosecute U.S. Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd for the shooting death of Babbitt.

    In January 2023, documents from the Department of the Air Force, Joint Base Andrews, MD, showed U.S. Capitol Police Lieutenant Michael Byrd was housed at taxpayer expense at Joint Base Andrews after he shot and killed U.S. Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt inside the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.

    In November 2021, Judicial Watch released multiple audiovisual and photo records from the DC Metropolitan Police Department about the shooting death of Babbitt on January 6, 2021, in the U.S. Capitol Building. The records included a cell phone video of the shooting and an audio of a brief police interview of the shooter, Byrd.

    In October 2021, United States Park Police records related to the January 6, 2021, demonstrations at the U.S. Capitol showed that on the day before the January 6 rally featuring President Trump, U.S. Park Police expected a “large portion” of the attendees to march to the U.S. Capitol and that the FBI was monitoring the January 6 demonstrations, including travel to the events by “subjects of interest.”

    ###

    Source

  • Fact Check: ‘Lies and fakes news;’ Saint Porphyrius Church in Gaza wasn’t destroyed

    Rumors about the Israel-Hamas war have run rampant on social media, and among them is a claim that Israel reduced a church in Gaza to rubble. 

    “Israel just bombed and destroyed the third oldest church in the world and the biggest church in Palestine,” an Oct. 9 Instagram post said, sharing a photo of St. Porphyrios Orthodox Church. 

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    The church responded to the unfounded claims on Facebook. 

    “We inform you that the church of St. Porphyrios in Gaza is in the best condition,” read an English Facebook translation of the church’s Oct. 9 post. “And the news you spread is nothing more than rumors.” 

    It went on to call the claims “lies and fake news.” 

    Subsequent posts from the church haven’t contradicted this. 

    We rate claims the church was destroyed False.

     



    Source