Tag: United Kingdom

  • Drew Hendry: ‘Be warned, Labour’s silence over the cost of living crisis is deafening’

    A new poll has found eight in 10 people expect January will turn out to be the toughest month yet financially.

    With rents and mortgages, food costs and energy bills still putting a strain on everyone’s finances, it’s no wonder folk are disillusioned with the Westminster bubble.

    The survey, conducted by Nationwide, showed that 84% of people in the UK are worried about January spending, with 43% blaming high energy costs and 37% blaming the cost of living crisis.

    It comes following Labour leader, Sir Keir Starmer, confirming his party would not redistribute wealth from the richest to the poorest if they win the next general election, nor properly invest in renewable energy.

    Over the past year, Sir Keir has forensically dismantled Labour’s policy platform and performed a series of screeching U-turns.

    Free university tuition? Scrapping tax breaks for private schools? Abolishing the bedroom tax and two child cap? Taxing higher earners? Investing £28 billion in the just transition? Voters have watched on in horror as the Labour leadership has jettisoned each and every policy.

    The Labour Party in now indistinguishable from the Tories when it comes to policy. Starmer was even unwilling to stand up and call for a ceasefire in Gaza until there were similar noises from Tory politicians. Now he’s even given up on their right to statehood.

    Dumping policies, forsaking values and dodging decisions are all that characterises the Labour leader, whom the public rightly do not trust. As such, Labour is failing working people while the Tories scramble to the hard right of the political spectrum and sink into internecine conflict.

    It’s clearer than ever before that neither of the Westminster parties are focused on the people’s priorities – they’re too preoccupied with image, internal squabbles and their own electoral prospects. Even during the progress of the Finance bill, the process following the Chancellor’s Autumn statement, the Labour party have refused to bring their own or support SNP initiatives to help people, now, during their time of need. 

    We’ve asked for last year’s £400 energy bill rebate to be reintroduced, since bills are even higher than 12 months ago, we’ve asked for intervention on food prices, which is happening in other countries and indeed for a range of measures on rents, mortgages and more. They even abstained from an SNP motion to add to the finance bill, a requirement for the Tories to report on the effects of the budget on the cost of living.

    The silence from Labour is not only deafening it is a warning for the future. The fact is that, once in power, it is an open secret that they will continue with the harsh austerity programme of the Tories. There is not one tangible measure of support for struggling households to give them help, when they need it, which is now – and in the immediate future on offer from the Labour Party. Their rhetoric is indistinguishable from that of the Tories under Cameron. Just like Brexit, their selling point is that they will, somehow do the public self harm of austerity ‘better’

    It is a sales pitch straight to Tory voters and an abandonment of basic principles, not only to the poor but the growing number of struggling families who are being dragged into financial crisis.

    With each passing day, it’s clear that only the SNP are offering voters an alternative to this Westminster-made cost of living crisis.

    Households across the nations of the UK are crying out for support, this, the toughest month yet, should see that support given, and, whilst it is hardly a surprise that the Tories have no compassion on this issue surely those in opposition should be fighting for it. The SNP are, where are Labour? They are abstaining to avoid offence to those who they seek to recruit.

    And for many of them, it will be. It will certainly feel like it, as the temperatures dip, prices remain high and Westminster leaves them to suffer.

    Only the SNP are championing the investment needed to boost economic growth, expand our exciting renewable sector, and protect our NHS for households right across Scotland.

    This election can’t come soon enough – and when it does, it’ll be clear to voters in Scotland that Labour and the Tories are just two sides of the same coin.

    The SNP stand to actually make a real difference for people and deliver the change they need. Goodness knows that after decades of boom and bust with this lot, they badly need it.

    Source

  • ‘Lecturing’ Rishi Sunak rebuked as House of Lords votes to delay Rwanda treaty

    The House of Lords voted 214-171 last night in favour of delaying Rishi Sunak’s flagship UK-Rwanda immigration treaty.

    The votes centred on delay motions from Labour peer Lord Goldsmith, who serves as chairman of the chamber’s International Agreements Committee. 

    Lord Goldsmith’s committee previously presented a report identifying ten sets of issues where “significant additional legal and practical steps are needed in order to implement the protections the treaty is designed to provide.”

    The motion is not binding on the government, but support for it in the Lords is suggestive of the battles to come for Rishi Sunak, as the Conservative Party navigates the Rwanda scheme through the House.

    Speaking in the debate yesterday, Lord Goldsmith added: “We are not saying the treaty should never be ratified but we are saying that Parliament should have the opportunity to scrutinise the treaty and its implementing measures in full before it makes a judgement about Rwanda is safe.”

    It comes after the prime minister framed the progress of his flagship Rwanda deportation plan as a battle between the “will of the people” and “unelected” peers in a press conference last week. 

    “Will the opposition in the appointed House of Lords try and frustrate the will of the people as expressed by the elected house?”, the PM told the press conference. 

    He added: “Or will they get on board and do the right thing? It’s as simple as that.”

    Sunak delivered the press conference after he dodged a rebellion from the Conservative right, which saw the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill sent to the Lords with a majority of 44.

    In a statement ahead of the vote, Labour peer Lord Coaker, who serves as a spokesperson for home affairs, accused the prime minister of “lecturing” and defended the upper chamber as acting in its “proper constitutional role”.

    Lord Coaker said: “What we’ve seen today is not a House of Lords seeking to block, to act in an anti-democratic way, to actually do anything other than to do its job – which is to say to the government: where we believe that you should think again, where we believe that you might actually reflect on what you are doing”.

    “That, as a revising chamber, as an advisory chamber, is absolutely what we should be doing. And nobody, least of all the prime minister, should hold press conferences, lecturing us about what our role is, when all we seek to do is to improve it, and to act in our proper constitutional role.”

    After the vote, former Ukip leader Nigel Farage weighed in, saying: “We must sack all current members of the House of Lords”.

    Lord Sharpe of Estom, a Home Office minister, said it was “critical to the Government’s plan to establish an effective deterrent to dangerous crossings, and to stop the boats”, before being laughed at by other peers as he began to recap “what this policy sets out to achieve”.

    Source

  • Solicitor suspended for eight years for jury internet research

    Ex-Irwin Mitchell associate spent four weeks in prison 


    A solicitor has been suspended from practice for eight years after carrying out her own research whilst sat on a jury.

    Caroline Mitchell, a former associate at Irwin Mitchell, spent four weeks in prison for her actions after admitting to intentionally disclosing to other jury members information obtained in contravention of the Juries Act 1974. 

    Mitchell, who previously had an unblemished 25-year career, was selected in March 2021 to sit on a jury in a case involving multiple allegations of historic sexual abuse. 

    An issue within the trial related to whether the complainant shared a bedroom with his brother. With the offence dating back 40 years, neither the prosecution nor defence were able to offer the dimensions of the bedroom at the time of the alleged incident. The jury were instructed not to speculate about the size of the room, and not to carry out any independent research.

    The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) heard that whilst at home on property website Rightmove, Mitchell said that “without thinking about the propriety of doing so”, she searched for the property in question and obtained a floor plan of a neighbouring house. She then showed this to another juror in subsequent discussions. 

    The jury were discharged, and the case reheard eight months later, with the complainant and defendant required to give evidence for a second time. Mitchell was then prosecuted and sentenced to two months in prison, of which she served four weeks.

    The 2024 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

    At the time of sentencing, HHJ Kearn noted how Mitchell was “highly regarded by many not only for [her] work as a solicitor by [her] colleagues and counsel but also in the community.” The judge continued that she was “honest, kind and compassionate both in a personal and professional environment”, and that she was “committed”, and had “a high degree of skill” in her field. 

    It was also stressed by Mitchell that “her actions were not a deliberate act in defiance of those [the judge’s] directions and warnings. They were mistakes made at the end of a hard day, sitting as a juror on a difficult case. She had not thought about what she was doing and it had not occurred to her, until it was pointed out, that what she had done was wrong.”

    However, although the judge found that she has not intended to undermine the course of justice “that was the effect of what you were doing and so it is against that background that I must determine the sentence to be passed”.

    Mitchell explained that she was “terrified” during her time in prison, having been advised by prison officers to “keep her head down”. Despite this, “she used her time to assist the other inmates, giving advice on family matters and helping to write CV’s. Ms Mitchell found her incarceration to be educational and an opportunity for self-reflection.”

    In deciding to suspend her from practice for eight years, the SDT took note of the trial judges reasoning, holding that she “had been motivated by her investment in the case and trying to obtain a just outcome”.

    Nevertheless, the tribunal found that the conduct was “extremely serious and had caused significant harm.” In particular, it had “impacted the trust placed by victims in the justice system and in the solicitors’ profession”, and “caused significant delays in the proper administration of Justice.” 

    The eight-year suspension prevents Mitchell from working as a solicitor until the end of her disqualification from jury service. She was also ordered to pay costs of £5,000.

    The post Solicitor suspended for eight years for jury internet research appeared first on Legal Cheek.

    Source

  • Keir Starmer not briefed ahead of fresh strikes on Houthis, shadow minister says

    Unlike the previous joint strikes by the US and UK, with support from allies, the government did not brief the opposition, the Labour Party has said.

    A shadow minister said senior Labour figures had not been briefed ahead of fresh allied strikes against Houthi targets in Yemen last night.

    Karin Smyth, who serves in Labour’s shadow health team, told GB News: “We don’t know why the Government haven’t spoken to us on the usual terms. We would expect them to do that.”

    Starmer and the House of Commons speaker were consulted 10 days ago with regard to previous action against the Houthis.

    However, appearing to contradict Smyth’s account, rail minister Huw Merriman said it was his understanding that Keir Starmer was briefed.

    Merriman told Sky News: “Well, I can confirm that the Leader of the Opposition and indeed the Speaker were again given that information in the same way that they were the first time around so I do not believe that to be a correct interpretation.”

    He added: “My understanding is that information was conveyed, … I have been told by inside government.”

    Lord Cameron the foreign secretary has said the fresh set of US and UK airstrikes against Houthi targets in Yemen were intended to “send the clearest possible message that Britain backs its words and our warnings with action”.

    “Since we last took action 10 days ago, there have been over 12 attacks on shipping by the Houthis in the Red Sea”, he told the BBC.

    He added: “These attacks are illegal, they are unacceptable. What we have done again is send the clearest possible message that we will continue to degrade their ability to carry out these attacks while sending the clearest possible message that we back our words and our warnings with action.”

    It comes as Rishi Sunak is expected to make a statement to parliament today, where Labour will likely press for further details of the government’s strategy.

    On the media round today, Merriman said the PM will address the House of Commons today.

    He told LBC: “The prime minister will be in the House of Commons today, as he was on the previous day following the first round, to account to parliament.

    He also reiterated his claim that both Keir Starmer and Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle were informed about the strikes.

    He said: “They were both informed, is my understanding”.

    Source

  • Tasty tax law: Walkers’ poppadoms are actually crisps, judge rules

    VAT issue


    A court has found that Walkers’ Poppadoms are crisps, and not in fact the popular Indian starter for the purposes of tax law.

    The ruling, which will result in VAT being due on the Walkers product, was handed down by judge Anne Fairpo in the First-Tier Tribunal Tax Chamber earlier this month after being heard in June of last year.

    Walkers, part of food and drinks giant PepsiCo, put forward a range of creative arguments as to why their product shouldn’t come within the category of “potato crisps, potato sticks, potato puffs, and similar products made from the potato, or from potato flour, or from potato starch”.

    Whilst it was suggested that the name ‘poppadom’ should put the product beyond the reach of VAT, the tribunal weren’t persuaded. “Nominative determinism is not a characteristic of snack foods,’ Fairpo said, following up with the comment that “calling a snack food “Hula Hoops” does not mean that one could twirl that product around one’s midriff, nor is “Monster Munch” generally reserved as a food for monsters.”

    The 2024 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

    The tribunal was equally unimpressed by the suggestion that the poppadoms have a distinct flavour, separate from crisps. “In a world which contains crisps with flavours as diverse as hedgehog, haggis, sweet chilli, sour cream, and ‘cheese & port’, we are not convinced by the argument that there are any flavours which could be said to be distinct from those used for potato crisps.”

    Similarly, neither the shape nor texture were enough avoid tax liability. “The products were described as being shaped to make it easier to pick up chutney or dips, compared to potato crisps. In practice, we did not consider that they were significantly different to potato crisps with regard to their ability to convey dips etc”, the tribunal concluded.

    And, whilst “the products are crunchy at the first bite; they then become somewhat softer thereafter although they did not dissolve completely in the mouth. We did not consider that they were significantly different to comparator potato crisps provided for us to test.”

    Even the argument that the font on the packaging was “evocative of Indian text” couldn’t save the company from VAT, the tribunal holding firm that this wasn’t a sufficient distinction from other Walkers crisps.

    Whilst authentic poppadoms are made from gram flour, the Walkers variation use a significantly larger amount of potato granules, potato starch, and modified potato starch, distinguishing them from the popular Indian starter that is exempt from VAT.

    Other exempt snacks include Skips, Twiglets, Doritos, and, famously, Jaffa Cakes.

    The post Tasty tax law: Walkers’ poppadoms are actually crisps, judge rules appeared first on Legal Cheek.

    Source

  • Labour’s clean energy plans will bring a secure future to the communities who need it most

    The coming twelve months presents a huge opportunity to change the direction of our country. One where we can create jobs, rebuild our forgotten communities, and create a fairer, greener Scotland that works for everyone. This is the opportunity to harness our exceptional energy potential and invest in a future that spreads its benefits to all corners of our country.

    It is well known that Scotland has some of the best on- and off-shore wind potential in the world, and that by harnessing it we can become a global renewable superpower. And it is not just wind — we also have massive potential for green hydrogen, solar and hydroelectric power. However, the lack of investment and joined-up thinking has left many wondering when they will see the benefits of these opportunities, and many communities have voiced their concerns that they will be left behind yet again.

    When I meet businesses, community groups and other organisations one of the first things they say is that there is a lack of joined up thinking. That our sectors are not working in conjunction with each other, that government lacks a strategic approach that utilises all aspects of our society in driving forward a clean energy future. For example, because we lack the manufacturing capability to design and develop wind turbines here in Scotland, we have to import them from abroad, increasing our reliance on other countries. This is a travesty for a country with a proud industrial history, known worldwide for our manufacturing and world class industry. If we are going to utilise our energy potential we have to look at it in the round by developing an industrial strategy that builds resilience and capacity across all sectors.

    This also means working across all levels of Government. If local and central Government are not working in tandem, it means that both small- and large-scale energy projects are unable to thrive. By working with our councils, Government can support innovative projects that use existing infrastructure to benefit the communities around them. For example, the Edinburgh Solar Co-operative has installed solar panels on schools and other council buildings delivering green electricity and delivering community benefits. A roll out across the country of projects like this could generate jobs, lower energy bills and meet our net zero targets.

    However, all of this requires the right mix of skills and the investment in education to make this happen. This is not just about teaching young people the skills they need for the workplace, it’s about working with businesses to upgrade and utilise the skills of those already in employment. By learning from our builders, plumbers and engineers we can retain and create thousands of jobs, and develop the skills needed for the jobs of the future. If we are to achieve net zero and make the switch to cleaner energy, we have to create this framework for lifelong learning that empowers working people to take advantage of these opportunities.

    Just like the opportunities for individuals, the opportunities for communities are vast. There are already countless examples of communities seeing the benefits of the renewable energy potential around them. When I visited the Western Isles earlier this year, I saw first-hand how their community owned wind farm is not only providing energy to residents on the island but by selling it back to the grid it is driving revenue that can be invested back into the local community, to build local community centres and invest in community projects. We have a growing number of such projects across the country but we are missing the huge benefits that could be delivered if there were incentives for council and cooperatively owned projects to be developed. We need to make the most of our natural resources and our homes and buildings – onshore wind, solar heat and electricity, and heat networks. The Scottish Government can and should provide further support for community organisations to take advantage of these opportunities and develop schemes that could reduce energy prices and reap the benefits for our cities, towns, and rural communities.

    Unfortunately, neither of Scotland’s Governments are doing enough to make it a reality. Labour has already committed to establishing GB Energy, a publicly owned clean energy company headquartered in Scotland, and along with our Green Prosperity Plan, a future Labour Government would invest in the infrastructure, skills and technology that would create jobs, reduce prices, and achieve net zero. Our Local Power Plan would deliver the projects and benefits that in other European countries would be commonplace. A Green Prosperity Plan can only be delivered by a Labour Government in the UK and in Scotland and can’t come soon enough.

    This essay from Sarah Boyack MSP was first included in a collection from the Labour Climate and Environment Forum entitled: ‘Climate, Justice and Jobs: What a Green Prosperity Plan means for the UK’. 

    Source

  • Sadiq Khan attacks Labour’s Brexit ‘omerta’ over rejoining EU customs union

    Sadiq Khan has criticised the government’s “extreme hard Brexit”, while hitting out at the Labour’s Party “omerta”, or pact of silence, over the issue. 

    Calling on his party to discuss potential economic reintegration with Brussels, the London mayor said it is time to have “the conversation” about meaningful alignment with the EU. 

    Khan, who is seeking a third term in May’s mayoral election, has previously called for Britain to consider signing up again to the bloc’s customs union and economic single market.

    Labour Party leader Sir Keir Starmer has repeatedly insisted that a Labour government will not seek to rejoin the single market or customs union if it is elected later this year. 

    He has also ruled out a deal to re-establish freedom of movement as a “red line”.

    Speaking at the Fabian Society conference in London this weekend, Khan said rejoining the EU’s economic alliance, which would ease trade with Europe, should be on the table when the current Brexit deal comes up for review in 2025.

    He said: “I’m not saying today we should rejoin the EU. What I’m saying is that [shadow foreign secretary] David Lammy is onto something when he’s saying we should have a closer relationship with the European Union.”

    He went on to criticise the “omerta” that means “you can’t talk about being close to the European Union, joining the single market, joining the customs union”.

    The London mayor added that “the economic cost of this extreme hard Brexit is huge”.

    It came after a study by Cambridge Econometrics, commissioned by the London mayor’s office, found that Brexit has already cost the UK economy £140 billion.

    The study also suggested that Britain’s decision to leave the EU is set to leave Britain’s economy £311 billion worse off by the middle of the next decade.

    Meanwhile, another senior Labour figure has said the EU will breathe a “sigh of relief” if his party wins the upcoming general election.

    Shadow Northern Ireland secretary Hilary Benn has claimed told the Fabian Society conference: “Brexit has of course affected politics in the UK. But it’s also affected politics in the European Union.

    “The EU is a bit tired of negotiating with Britain. They’ve got lots of other things on their plate.

    “And we have to recognise that while the EU has loads of experience of negotiating agreements with countries coming towards it, never before has it had to do a deal … with a big country that’s walked out.

    “Now I am a great believer in the healing qualities of time. And there is no doubt that the arrival of a Labour Government, if we win … will be greeted in the EU with a big and audible sigh of relief.”

    The Leeds Central MP added: “I think eventually there is going to be a moment when we look at each other across the Channel and say ‘you know what, we’re still big and important trading partners, we’re still friends and allies, we are co-operating on foreign policy and security and we need to do more of that … so wouldn’t it make sense to have a closer relationship?’

    “And why does this matter so much? Well, clearly it matters economically but there’s something else that is even more important, and that is building alliances in a dangerous world.”

    Source

  • Post Office Scandal: Urgent action against lawyers not necessary, says regulator 

    Public not at risk


    The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has said that there is no evidence indicating that any solicitor linked to the Post Office scandal poses an ongoing risk to the public that requires “urgent action”.

    In update on Friday, the regular said it has been gathering evidence through various means, including obtaining a court order compelling the Post Office and Royal Mail Group to hand over relevant documents, and reviewing information shared publicly through the inquiry.

    So far, the SRA says it has reviewed tens-of-thousands of pages of information and evidence.

    Media scrutiny around the scandal has intensified in recent weeks following the airing of Mr Bates v The Post Office, an ITV drama which documents how hundreds of innocent sub-postmasters and postmistresses were wrongly accused of theft, fraud and false accounting due to a defective IT system known as Horizon.

    The 2024 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

    “We will take action where we find evidence that solicitors have fallen short of the standards the public expects,” the SRA said.

    “Our investigation covers multiple, multifaceted issues where there may have been potential misconduct,” it continued. “New issues and evidence are coming to light on an ongoing basis, particularly from the public inquiry. We expect further relevant evidence from the inquiry in the coming months, when it will look at issues such as the conduct of the group litigation and governance.”

    “We expect to be in the best position to take any meaningful action to get the right outcome after the full facts and all the relevant issues have been aired through the inquiry,” the SRA added.

    The regulator said it’s keeping its position under constant review and that at present, “we do not have evidence to show that any solicitor presents an ongoing risk to the public that needs to be addressed through urgent action”.

    The inquiry into what went wrong first launched in 2020 and is being led by retired High Court judge Sir Wyn Williams. A number of lawyers have already given evidence as to their role in the prosecutions. No end date for the inquiry has been set.

    The post Post Office Scandal: Urgent action against lawyers not necessary, says regulator  appeared first on Legal Cheek.

    Source

  • ‘A society of service’ — Read Keir Starmer’s speech to the Civil Society Summit in full

    Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer today delivered a speech to the Civil Society Summit, hosted by Pro Bono Economics, in which he responded to the “divisive” pursuit of culture war politics by the government. Read the address in full below:

    Thank you for inviting me here today.

    And thank you to Pro Bono Economics, not just for organising this event, but for all your work on the Civil Society Commission driving the conversations on how civil society can thrive in this country.

    I must say, it’s quite nice to be among civil society, you don’t get much of that in Westminster.

    And it’s great to be here at St John’s Waterloo.

    As you probably know, during the Second World War, this church was bombed. This room was totally destroyed. But in the crypt below us, 150 people were hiding, and all of them survived.

    Now after the war, it was rebuilt. And a Labour government recognised that this country had to work for the people who had been through so much.

    You all know what happened next. They set up the NHS, the welfare state. They transformed this country so it could face the future.

    But long before the government was involved, it was people, faith groups, and organisations like you who supported people through sickness, who educated our children and who protected people living in poverty.

    Because it has always been people like you who have recognised the dignity of every single person. And that’s the history and heart of the Labour party too. Community organisers, campaigners, and charitable movements, who fought for people to live better lives in a better country.

    When the Labour government set up the welfare state, they were influenced by people like William Beveridge who recognised that the government couldn’t – and shouldn’t – do everything by themselves.

    And that civil society and faith groups play a unique and vital role in this country, building the relationships and the shared values that shape our national life.

    And we’ve seen – and can still see today – what partnership can achieve. Look at Young Futures hubs to support vulnerable teenagers. Free breakfast clubs in primary schools. Speech and language therapy for young people.

    These are areas where civil society spoke out, and Labour listened. Because we know it’s people on the ground, people with skin in the game, who understand the problems best and have the best answers. You are the glue that bridges the gaps and binds government, business, and communities together.

    You reach into the places that the public and private sectors can’t. Creating the space, literally, for people to come together. In church halls, community centres, museums, leisure centres – you name it – all around the country, as well as creating the space for conversations and campaigns that change lives.

    But let’s be honest, for too long, your voice has been ignored between the shouts of the market and the state.

    One Conservative Prime Minister said there was ‘no such thing as society.’ And then we watched individualism run rampant.

    Cameron talked about the Big Society. A great idea, in principle. But when austerity kicked in, we ended up with the Poor Society.

    Now we need a new vision for a new era. A renewed social contract. A new focus on those who build the bonds that connect us, the communities that nurture us, and the local institutions that support us.

    A Society of Service.

    Because when I look around, 14 years of chaos and crisis have pushed people to the brink, stretched charities like yours beyond their limits and damaged the social fabric that ties us together.

    And look, I’m not here to talk about the Tories today.

    But I know, over the last 14 years, you’ve carried the burdens of their failure. The Trussell Trust expected to provide more than a million emergency food parcels this winter.

    I know that during the pandemic, you saved lives. I think of the vaccination clinics I visited in places of worship.

    I know that, during a decade of division, you held communities together, like the neighbourhood groups who knocked on doors during Covid, checking in on people they didn’t even know, just to make sure they were alright.

    And instead of seeing this as a model that should inspire us, the Tories seem set on sabotaging civil society to save their own skins.

    They’ve got themselves so tangled up in culture wars of their own making, that instead of working with the Royal National Lifeboat Institution, an organisation the late Queen was patron of for 70 years, to find real solutions to stop the small boats. Their rhetoric has helped demonise them.

    Instead of working with the National Trust so more people can learn about – and celebrate – our culture and our history, they’ve managed to demean their work.

    In its desperation to cling onto power at all costs, the Tory Party is undertaking a kind of weird McCarthyism, trying to find woke agendas in the very civic institutions they once regarded with respect.

    Let me tell you. Waging a war on the proud spirit of service in this country isn’t leadership. It’s desperate. It’s divisive. It’s damaging.

    It comes to something when the Tories are at war with the National Trust. That’s what happens when politics of self-preservation prevail over commitment to service.

    People who are getting on with the things that actually matter – saving lives, supporting those in need, serving others – get caught in the crosshairs of division and distraction.

    So the relationship between government and civil society needs a reset.

    Because you should feel that you can speak up on behalf of the people you serve without fear, call out injustice where you see it, and continue to push us all to be and do better.

    And there are two stories of the past 14 years, aren’t there? There’s the story we hear in the news every single day: crisis, cronyism, chaos – a government that has stoked division for its own ends and seen the privilege of service as an opportunity for self-advancement.

    And then there is the other story. The story that gives me hope. The story of ordinary people in this country doing what our government hasn’t done. Looking out for each other. Looking after one another.

    The story of charities that have met the needs of local people – like Compassion in Action.

    I met the founder, Pam, a couple of weeks ago, and she told me how it started. Initially as a foodbank and now as a hub for the local community providing food, accommodation, and training for those who need it.

    Everywhere I go, I hear stories of courage, compassion and community. Stories of service that could fill every paper in the country.

    But civil society is not just a nice news story in a local paper, something we can feel warm and fluffy about. It’s essential if we’re going to get our economy back on track and achieve the highest sustained growth in the G7.

    Look at the thousands of charities across the UK supporting people back into work. The organisations facilitating local regeneration. Or providing more than 6 million volunteering opportunities and employing almost a million people.

    And look – you should not have to clean up the mess your government created.

    But it is to your credit, and to the credit of this country, that you have always held up your end of the social contract.

    So, to those of you in this room, and to the people and organisations across the UK whose work so often goes unsung, I want to say thank you. Thank you for all that you’ve done.

    But imagine for a moment. Imagine a government committed to working with people, not doing things to people.

    Imagine if we could turn our attention from firefighting every day to the long term renewal this country needs.

    That’s our pledge to you: that if we are privileged to be elected to serve this year, we will work with you on our mission for a decade of national renewal.

    Every word of that phrase is important.

    A decade, because – realistically – that is how long it will take. And civil society knows better than anyone that lasting change takes longer than an election cycle.

    National, because this will need every one of us to play our part. Labour will not write off the contribution of civil society. We know that you are often the link between the local and the national.

    And finally, renewal, because we don’t just want to tinker with the symptoms of this Government’s failure. We want to tackle the causes so that this country is fit to face the future.

    I want today to mark an important milestone towards implementing an action plan on how, together, a future Labour government would work with civil society for a society of service.

    Because we will work with you on every single one of Labour’s missions. Getting the NHS back on its feet. Tearing down barriers to opportunity. Growing the economy in all parts of the country. Getting to clean power by 2030. Making our streets safe.

    Mission-led government is about partnership. About devolving power to communities. Setting long term targets and working with people to get there. Giving people the responsibility they deserve and the support they need.

    We don’t want to crowd out the social entrepreneurs – we want to encourage them.

    We want to harness civil society as one of the three key engines for renewal, working alongside the public and private sectors.

    Take crime, for example. When I was this country’s chief prosecutor – Director of Public Prosecutions – I fought for a justice system that worked for people. But it isn’t working for anyone under the Tories, is it?

    I’ve sat with too many parents who have lost their child to knife crime. I’ve heard too many horrifying tales of domestic abuse from women who never got the justice they deserved.

    Later this week I’ll be on the road, talking to people about Labour’s plan to tackle knife crime. Our plan to halve violence against women and girls.

    Yes, it’s ambitious. But it’s necessary.

    And we know we will need the partnership of organisations on the ground to make this a reality. I’ve delivered on this before. We’ll do it again, together.

    With organisations like Wolverhampton Wrestling Club – I’ve been there twice – who mentor vulnerable children and teach them sport. Or Women’s Aid, supporting victims of domestic violence.

    My government won’t accept business as usual. We can’t.

    Halving violence against women and girls is incredibly difficult. I know that – I worked on this for five years as Chief Prosecutor working with many organisations, including some in this room.

    No government or opposition has ever committed to this before. So, we’ll need to work in new ways – and with steely determination.

    But we want you to push new ideas on policies that will work for the people of Britain, rather than picking up the pieces of bad policies.

    So, on vital issues that will support our missions, like child poverty, we will bring together experts – including people in this room – to look at every cause and contributor to child poverty so we can offer a long term, strategic solution.

    This is a politics that focuses on the issues people really care about, not tries to distract people from the problems the government has created.

    A politics that brings people together to work for the common good, not seeking to divide and demonise a common enemy.

    A politics that serves others.

    Because the biggest problem we face is the erosion of trust in politics and politicians. The exhaustion people feel at the daily soap opera the government seems to think our public life should be. We need to restore the foundations of trust, fairness and respect in our national life.

    Because politics can influence people’s attitudes. It can encourage us to serve others. To make sacrifices for others. Or it can undermine the sense of community, the commitment to each other that’s at the heart of civil society.

    And that’s what I worry we have seen – that people who have made sacrifices, worked hard, played by the rules – feel as though the people in charge have been laughing at them for doing the right thing.

    Feel as though people who break the rules and take what they can are rewarded, whilst working people, people doing the right things, get nothing to show for it.

    In a society of service, doing the right thing should be rewarded. Working hard should pay off for people. And building caring, compassionate communities should make our country stronger, more prosperous, fairer for everyone.

    If you serve others, this country should serve you.

    This is a once in a generation chance: a mission-led government, a partnership between government and civil society.

    Our door is open. We will welcome anyone who wants to make our national life better to take their place at the table, to shape the future.

    And I’ll be frank with you – this isn’t just an invitation. It’s an ask. Because this is an opportunity for hope.

    A chance to protect those who are vulnerable, like this building once did.

    To rebuild our country, just like this church was rebuilt.

    To create a Society of Service for a decade of national renewal.

    To get Britain’s future back.

    Thank you.

    Source

  • 95 lawyers gain silk status 

    Latest comp attracted 283 applications


    Ninety-five lawyers have been elevated to the status of King’s Counsel (KC), it was confirmed on Friday.

    This year’s competition attracted 283 applicants, the vast majority of whom were barristers. The 2024 success rate came in at 33.6%, slightly down on last year’s 34.1%.

    Of those to make grade, 30 are women, 13 declared an ethnic origin other than white, and eight declared a disability.

    Just one solicitor secured the KC title this year; Withers’ international arbitration partner Hussein Haeri.

    To be considered for the honorific, candidates must cough up an application fee of £1,975, excluding VAT, and a further £3,325 if they’re successful.

    The process is overseen by the KC Appointments body which accesses aspiring silks on range of criteria including: advocacy work, cases of substance and complexity, understanding and using the law, and working with others.

    You can check out the full list of new KCs here.

    The post 95 lawyers gain silk status  appeared first on Legal Cheek.

    Source