Tag: United Kingdom

  • Government to axe payment systems regulator as quango purge begins

    The body charged with overseeing the regulation of payments systems will be abolished, the government has announced. 

    The Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) — which governs payment systems like Faster Payments and Mastercard — is set to be consolidated into the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).

    It follows reports of complaints from businesses that the regulatory environment was too complex, with payment system firms having to engage with three different regulators.

    Downing Street has said this is the latest step in the prime minister’s drive to create an environment that will kickstart economic growth.

    The PSR is given regulatory powers under the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013, which created the body, as well as competition powers under the Competition Act 1998. Within its remit, it can issue requirements to different parties, and take action against those who breach relevant regulations and directions. The quango (meaning quasi-autonomous non-governmental organisation) claims to deliver safe, competitive and innovative payment systems.

    The body came into force in 2015 and is currently chaired by Aidene Walsh, ex-boss of financial wellbeing charity, the Fairbanking Foundation. The PSR employs roughly 160 people, according to its website.

    However, it has been criticised by industry and politicians over its regulatory approach, including in relation to fraud reimbursement by financial services firms.

    ***Politics.co.uk is the UK’s leading digital-only political website. Subscribe to our daily newsletter for all the latest news and analysis.***

    Announcing the plan, Keir Starmer said: “For too long, the previous government hid behind regulators – deferring decisions and allowing regulations to bloat and block meaningful growth in this country.

    “And it has been working people who pay the price of this stagnation.

    “This is the latest step in our efforts to kickstart economic growth, which is the only way we can fundamentally drive-up living standards and get more money in people’s pockets.

    “That’s why it is the priority in the plan for change, and it’s why I’m not letting anything get in its way.”

    Chancellor Rachel Reeves added: “The regulatory system has become burdensome to the point of choking off innovation, investment and growth. 

    “We will free businesses from that stranglehold, delivering on our plan for change to kickstart economic growth and put more money into working people’s pockets.”

    The government has said that the announcement will not result in any immediate changes to the Payment Systems Regulator’s remit or ongoing programme of work. Rather, the regulator will continue to have access to its statutory powers until legislation is passed by parliament to enact these changes.

    In the interim period, it is said that the PSR and the FCA will work closely to deliver a smooth transition of responsibilities to ensure the market remains competitive.

    The government has vowed to continue to review the entire UK regulatory landscape in a bid to kickstart economic growth.

    The PSR announcement comes after the prime minister told cabinet ministers Tuesday that they must take more responsibility for decisions and stop “outsourcing” them to regulators.

    Starmer said he wants to reverse what he described as a “trend” under the previous government of decisions being made by other bodies.

    A No 10 readout of the prime minister’s contribution to cabinet read: “[Starmer] emphasised that recent global events had shown the pace at which the world is changing, and the impact that global insecurity has domestically. 

    “He said that to deliver security and renewal we must go further and faster to reform the state, to deliver a strong, agile and active state that delivers for working people. 

    “This included cabinet assessing processes and regulations that play no part in delivering the plan for change, and the government taking responsibility for decisions rather than outsourcing them to regulators and bodies as had become the trend under the previous government.”

    ***Politics.co.uk is the UK’s leading digital-only political website. Subscribe to our daily newsletter for all the latest news and analysis.***

    In December last year, the prime minister and chancellor wrote to around fifteen major regulators — including Ofcom, Ofgem and Ofwat — demanding ideas for how to remove bureaucracy from the economy and more proactively encourage growth.

    Speaking in January, business secretary Jonathan Reynolds signalled that a number of watchdogs could be abolished, saying: “We’ve got to genuinely ask ourselves the question: have we got the right number of regulators?”

    Also in January, the chairman of the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), Marcus Bokkerink, was ousted by ministers amid concerns that the body was paying too little heed to UK competitiveness. He was replaced by former Amazon executive Doug Gurr — and the chairman and the chief executive of the Financial Ombudsman Service later confirmed plans to step down.

    The Financial Times reported in February that cabinet ministers were to be instructed to carry out a comprehensive audit of the UK’s roughly 130 regulators, with a view to potentially scrapping some of them.

    The announcement of the decision to scrap the Payment Systems Regulator comes ahead of a planned “intervention” on Thursday in which the prime minister is expected to announce plans to overhaul how the British state works.

    Speaking in the House of Commons on Tuesday, Labour MP Jonathan Hinder argued that governments in recent years have “given too much power away” to unelected bodies.

    Addressing the controversy relating to the new guidelines handed down by the Sentencing Council, Hinder said: “As the secretary of state [for justice] has said, this parliament is sovereign, and the fact is, we’ve given too much power away to these unelected bodies in recent years.”

    Shabana Mahmood, the justice secretary, responded: “I am very much looking forward to my meeting with the Sentencing Council later this week.

    “And as I’ve made clear, I am looking into the roles and powers of the council and I will not hesitate to legislate if I need to do so.”

    Josh Self is Editor of Politics.co.uk, follow him on Bluesky here.

    Politics.co.uk is the UK’s leading digital-only political website. Subscribe to our daily newsletter for all the latest news and analysis.

    Labour MP says governments have ‘given too much power away’ to quangos

    Source: Politics

  • SQE results day reactions are taking over TikTok — and it’s emotional chaos

    ‘POV: you just opened your SQE1 results and…’

    Earlier this week, aspiring solicitors across the country received their results for the first stage of the Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE). But this year, checking results wasn’t the only thing on their minds—many chose to record the moment and share it on social media!

    In true 2025 fashion, the exam day drama has spilled over onto TikTok, with videos showing the highs, lows and unfiltered stress of SQE1 results day racking up thousands of views.

    Some TikTokers nervously filmed their screens, visibly shaking as they opened their results. Others screamed, cried or collapsed in relief when the word “PASS” (or not) appeared.

    @legallystef Never thought I’d post myself ugly crying on the internet, but at least it’s happy tears THANK YOU GOD!!! Congratulations to everyone who passed and so sorry to those of you who didn’t, but your journey is not over yet! #lawstudent #exams #sqe #examresults #sqe1 #lawschool ♬ 7 years latch – favsoundds

    One student nervously checks her screen for the results, before breaking down in tears of joy after passing.

    @issssaayyy12Open my SQE 1 results with me – these exams were genuinely the hardest things I’ve ever done in my life so I’m feeling extremely proud of myself ♬ suara asli – favmusicvibes

    Another recorded the moment they found out they didn’t pass, letting her followers know that “it wasn’t meant to be this time – remember that’s okay!”.

    @kiraa_gulliver Nerves are in full swing ! Good luck everyone ! ##sqe1##sqeresults##law##lawschool##lawyersoftiktok ♬ original sound – shavie

    This TikTok trend follows a growing culture of law students sharing their SQE journeys online — from prep course reviews to “day in the life” vlogs and brutally honest debriefs. But the results day clips might just be the rawest content yet.

    @austindoeslaw no more multiple choice questions for SQE1 anymore, big big step on the way to becoming a lawyer #sqe1 #sqe1results #lawstudent ♬ original sound – austin

    Legal Cheek has previously reported on the chaos that can follow when results go wrong — including a rounding error last year which led to some students being wrongly told they’d failed, with firms even pulling training contracts as a result.

    The SQE Hub: Your ultimate resource for all things SQE

    And the SQE isn’t exactly getting cheaper. As reported this week, exam fees are set to rise again in September 2025. SQE1 will go up to £1,934 and SQE2 to £2,974, taking the total cost to nearly £5k — just for the assessments. The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) says the price hike is to cover inflation and translating the exams into Welsh.

    So while TikTok might be the place to laugh (or cry) through SQE1 results day, it’s also a reminder that qualifying as a solicitor can be an expensive — and emotional — rollercoaster.

    The post SQE results day reactions are taking over TikTok — and it’s emotional chaos appeared first on Legal Cheek.

    Source: Legal Cheek

  • The state is ‘weaker than ever’ — Keir Starmer’s speech-in-full as NHS England axed

    Keir Starmer has announced the government will abolish NHS England, the quango that manages the health service.

    In a major speech in Hull, he said: “In government there was a clear moment when the Tories crossed the Rubicon, it was early, and it was decisive and it sent a signal across Whitehall that was never undone.

    “So today I’m going to reverse it because I don’t see why decisions about £200 billion of taxpayer money on something as fundamental to our security as the NHS should be taken by an arms-length body, NHS England.

    “And I can’t in all honesty explain to the British people why they should spend their money on two layers of bureaucracy.

    “That money could and should be spent on nurses, doctors, GP appointments. So today I can announce we’re going to cut bureaucracy across the state… I’m bringing management of the NHS back under democratic control by abolishing the arms-length body NHS England. That will put the NHS at the heart of government where it belongs.”

    Read the prime minister’s full speech below: 

    It’s really fantastic to be here and to see you. And to celebrate what you’re doing.

    This must be an incredibly exciting place to work.

    Because as Angela said, I went and saw the first bottle of Dettol that you have just in the room around the corner, I think it was 1833 that that bottle was made.

    And for sepsis what a breakthrough that was.

    And then so much that’s happened in the intervening years.

    And as we are here, we’ve got scientists in the labs, probably working on the next breakthrough that you will be involved in.

    So it’s really fantastic to come here to talk to you.

    I’ve just got a few words to say about the way I see the government playing its part in taking our country forward, and then we’ve got some questions from you.

    Let me start with the pledge that we put before you and everybody in the country at the election.

    Because it was a really simple pledge, it was on every leaflet, on every advert, on every speech we all gave.

    That word and pledge was Change. Change.

    And that wasn’t just about an offer to British people.

    It was actually a statement about the world we now live in.

    Change.

    Because we’re in a changing world.

    You can feel it everyday, great forces buffeting and impacting on the lives of working people.

    Particularly at the moment globally, where there’s an instability, I think that we can feel that’s hasn’t been there for years.

    Developing before our very eyes, in relation to the impact it has on the insecurity of working people across the country.

    And that’s why everything we’re doing in relation to Ukraine is so important.

    And you’ve seen the developments in the recent weeks, this week, going on even today.

    Because I profoundly believe that if we don’t secure a just peace and a lasting peace, then that insecurity that we’ve already felt will continue.

    And that means here, higher prices, higher bills and the cost of living crisis going on for even longer – like a chokehold on our future which will be much much harder for us to tackle.

    We know some basics, Putin’s appetite for conflict and for chaos is already there and it will only grow.

    And Russia is already menacing our skies, our waters, our streets, and our national security.

    That’s why I believe that the fundamental task of politics right now is to you take tough decisions on security.

    And that’s why we raised our defence spending.

    Which we also need to use as opportunity to renew our communities.

    Because more now than ever, national security is economic security.

    And strength abroad, and we definitely need that more than ever at the moment, but that demands security back at home.

    Because look, you’re not strong if your energy security is exploited by Putin.

    You’re not strong if 1 in 8 young people are not in education or work.

    And you’re not strong if you lose control of your public finances.

    And you can’t build your industries.

    So that is the test of our times.

    The goal of my Plan for Change.

    National security for national renewal.

    And look – we are making a start, we’re already delivering on this, securing the future though our Plan for Change.

    On the priorities that matter to you and to working people across the country.

    So wages are now going up faster than prices.

    We’re clearing the asylum backlog at a record rate.

    And NHS waiting lists are coming down.

    Now when we started preparing for today I was going to say that NHS waiting lists were coming down four months.

    I can tell you today, the statistics have just come out, that that is 5 months in a row.

    And that’s in winter, it’s really hard to get waiting lists down in winter.

    As you know the pressure on the NHS is much greater in winter.

    Now that’s 5 months of the NHS waiting lists coming down.

    So that is the beginning of the delivery we need.

    But given what has happened globally, given the insecurity in our country, now is the time in my belief for greater urgency and to go further and faster on security and renewal.

    So every pound spent, every regulation and every decision must deliver for working people.

    And I don’t just mean efficiency, although doing what you’re doing you’ll know how important efficiency is, I mean something else, it’s allowing the state to operate at max power.

    Reforming it so it’s closer to communities, tearing down the walls in Westminster and inviting the British people in as partners in business of change.

    To some extent you’re already doing that in the work you’re doing with the NHS – being partners in the change we need to do.

    Having National missions that galvanise the entire country behind them.

    Business, unions, charities pulling together.

    The pride that we all have in our country, harnessed – to rebuild Britain.

    I believe in the power of government.

    I’ve always believed in the power of government.

    I’ve seen it at its best.

    I’ll give you one example last year in the summer when we had those terrible riots, what we saw then in response was dynamic, it was strong and it was urgent.

    It’s what I call active government, on the pitch doing what was needed.

    But for many of us the feeling is that we don’t really have that everywhere, all of the time, at the moment.

    At the moment the state employs more people than it has in decades.

    And yet – look around country

    Do you see good value everywhere?

    Because I don’t.

    I actually think its weaker than it’s ever been.

    Overstretched, unfocussed, trying to do too much, doing it badly, unable to deliver the security that people need.

    I believe that working people want active government – they don’t want a weak state.

    They want it to secure our future.

    They want it to take the big decisions so can get on with their lives.

    We don’t want bigger state, or an intrusive state, an ever-expanding state.

    A state that demands more and more from people as it fails to deliver on core purposes.

    So we’ve got to change things.

    Now the good news is technology can massively help.

    If we push forward with digital reform of government – and we are going to do that, we can make massive savings, £45 billion savings in efficiency.

    AI is a golden opportunity.

    You will already be thinking about how you use it in your work.

    That’s an opportunity we are determined to seize.

    So we are going to get the best of best on AI working across government

    I’m going to send teams into every government department with a clear mission from me to make the state more innovative and efficient.

    But we also need to go further and faster on regulation.

    I want to be really clear about this, it’s not about questioning the dedication or the effort of civil servants.

    It is about the system that we’ve got in place.

    That system was created by politicians.

    The buck stops with us.

    But that’s just it.

    Over a number of years politicians chose to hide behind a vast array of quangos, arms length bodies and regulators, you name it.

    A sort of cottage industry of checkers and blockers using taxpayer money to stop the government delivering on taxpayer priorities.

    Now take our plan build 1.5 million homes.

    That is to restore the dream of home ownership .

    The opportunity and aspiration that home ownership gives people.

    I’d describe it as a base camp for life.

    1.5 million homes we’ve said we will build.

    Now that is a controversial policy.

    There are people across the country who don’t think we should do that.

    We always knew it was contentious.

    We knew that before the election.

    That’s why we put it front and centre in manifesto.

    Because we knew that needed a clear democratic mandate to do what we needed to do.

    And we got that in the election.

    And now we’ve put it in our Plan for Change.

    Yet some parts of the state haven’t got the memo.

    I’ll give you an example – there is an office conversion in Bingley Yorkshire.

    That is an office conversion that will create 139 homes.

    But now the future is uncertain.

    Because regulator was not properly consulted on the power of cricket balls.

    That’s 139 homes.

    Think of the people, the families that want those homes to make their life and now they’re held up.

    Why?

    You’ll decide if this is a good reason.

    I quote: ‘The ball strike assessment doesn’t appear to have been undertaken by a specialist qualified consultant’.

    So that’s what’s holding up these 139 homes.

    Right across Britain people are frustrated, they don’t think politics works for them because it doesn’t deliver on promises.

    How can you justify that?

    That parts of the state see their job as blocking the government from doing the very things it was elected to do.

    You can’t justify it.

    And it’s a pattern.

    Giving you another example – environment regulators stopping clean energy investment.

    Think about that, clean energy, really good for the environment.

    Struggling to get done because of environmental regulators.

    It doesn’t make sense.

    ‘Jumping spiders’ stopping an entire new town.

    I’ve not made that example up, it’s where we’ve got to.

    Infrastructure projects requiring planning documents longer than entire works Shakespeare.

    We’ve created a watchdog state – completely out of whack with the priorities of the British people.

    And it’s unfit for the volatile and insecure world that we live in.

    And I don’t think for one second what public servants want to do

    If you walk around Whitehall, I know we’re recruiting some of best talent in country.

    People who join civil service because they want to serve their country by delivering change.

    Yet somehow – we take that energy, that pride, that patriotism and we misdirect it into blocking.

    Well that’s got to end, no more.

    We were elected to take on blockers and deliver change.

    And that is what we’ll do.

    Well stop the legal challenges that stop building, cut statutory consultees who can veto government activity, hack back the thicket of red tape that stop us getting things done.

    And look, there’s no need to compromise on things like building standards.

    And there’s no good reason building and nature pitted against each other on every single site.

    We can have the best of both, less regulation, more building and a massive scale up in nature with the new Nature Restoration Fund.

    And if you think it’s hard enough for the government and state, and it is and were frustrated and going to change it.

    Imagine what it feels like for small businesses.

    Now I speak to small businesses a lot, and I spoke to a brewer.

    She’s called Alison from Carlisle, she brews beer.

    She tells me it’s ‘proper beer’ – I’ll take her up on that and test it.

    But I’m really struck by how difficult it makes it for the most enterprising people in country to just get on with the job.

    Trading standards advice which changes constantly.

    Long forms on business rates, not able get clear advice when trying to help.

    The example she gave was a boiler grant – and nobody could advise whether their business was eligible for it or not.

    Turns out it wasn’t.

    But she only found that out after hours and hours filling in paperwork.

    That is precious time and money – wasted.

    So that has just got to stop.

    That’s why today I am issuing a new target for our government.

    We will make sure compliance costs for businesses are cut by a quarter.

    Yes that’s 25% compliance costs that are going to go – and they will.

    That’s less red tape, more delivery, renewing our country with growth.

    And look, some people are going to say good luck.

    We’ve heard all this before and we’ve heard some of that this week.

    And to some extent they’re right.

    Because the Tories did talk tough and failed to deliver.

    But that raises question, why is this time different? What was that all about?

    First – as ever, you can’t discount the chaos that we had under the last government.

    Then there is the ideology.

    They never really believed in getting Britain building.

    Don’t believe in power of government, which I do.

    Quite happy to be enfeeble with regulation.

    But I think there is something deeper about Westminster politics here.

    There is a knee jerk response to difficult questions, to difficult lobbies.

    The response goes like this, let’s create an agency, start a consultation, make it statutory, have a review.

    Until slowly, almost by stealth, democratic accountability is swept under a regulatory carpet.

    Politicians almost not trusting themselves, outsourcing everything to different bodies because things have happened along the way – to the point you can’t get things done.

    I accept that all parties have done a bit of this.

    Even the Labour party.

    So today has to be a line in the sand for all of us.

    But also think in government there was a clear moment when the Tories crossed the Rubicon.

    It was early – and it was decisive.

    It sent a signal across Whitehall that was never undone.

    So today I’m going to reverse it.

    Because I don’t see why the decision about £200 billion of taxpayer money on something as fundamental to our security as the NHS should be taken by an arms-length body, NHS England.

    And can’t in all honesty explain to British people why we should spend their money on two layers of bureaucracy.

    That money could and should be spent on nurses, doctors, operation and GP appointments.

    So today – I can announce we’re going to cut bureaucracy across state.

    Focus government on the priorities of the working people and shift money to the frontline.

    So I am bringing management of the NHS back into democratic control.

    By abolishing the arms-length body – NHS England.

    That will put the NHS back at the heart of government where it belongs.

    Freeing it – to focus on patients.

    Less bureaucracy, with more money for nurses, an NHS refocussed on cutting waiting times at your hospital.

    Now, tough choices won’t just stop there.

    In this era, they will keep on coming.

    Our task is clear.

    National security.

    National renewal.

    Driving change forward with a Plan for Change.

    Focussed on the interests of working people.

    Securing our future, together.

    Thank you for listening.

    Politics.co.uk is the UK’s leading digital-only political website. Subscribe to our daily newsletter for all the latest news and analysis.

    Source: Politics

  • Business Secretary ‘corrects record’ on Addleshaw solicitor claim

    Addresses House of Commons

    Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds

    Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds has corrected the parliamentary record after scrutiny over a speech in which he described himself as having worked as a solicitor.

    In a point of order raised in the House of Commons on Tuesday, Reynolds said it had “come to [his] attention” that in a speech delivered over a decade ago on 28 April 2014 he had referred to his “experience of using our local transport system in Greater Manchester ‘when I worked as a solicitor in Manchester city centre’”.

    “I should have made clear that, specifically, … that was a reference at the time to being a trainee solicitor,” Reynolds said. “This was an inadvertent error, and although this speech was over a decade ago, as it has been brought to my attention, I would like to formally correct the record.”

    The clarification comes after Reynolds’ use of the title “solicitor” was questioned, given that publicly available records do not show him on the roll of solicitors.

    Reynolds completed a law degree and undertook a training contract at Addleshaw Goddard, but did not qualify into practice. Under the Solicitors Act 1974, only individuals admitted to the roll are entitled to call themselves solicitors.

    Previously, Reynolds downplayed the controversy in comments made while on a trade trip to India. “I apologise for that,” he said, referring to his past references to himself as a solicitor, “but again, I don’t think anyone would have interpreted that in any way that I was misrepresenting myself professionally… I don’t think it’s a huge deal, but I should apologise for that if anyone has misunderstood that.”

    The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has reopened its investigation into his use of the title.

    The post Business Secretary ‘corrects record’ on Addleshaw solicitor claim appeared first on Legal Cheek.

    Source: Legal Cheek

  • Saqib Bhatti: ‘Stop and search saves lives — we cannot afford to be sensitive about it’

    Every life lost is tragic — but every life lost through violent crime is, in-part, a failure on the state.

    As a Member of Parliament for the West Midlands, I’m regrettably no stranger to the devastating impact of knife crime. In 2023, the region recorded the highest rate of knife crime offences in England and Wales for the whole of 2023.

    When I was recently elected, there was the tragic case of Jack Donoghue who was punched, kicked and stabbed in the chest in a four-on-one attack near Popworld in Solihull in 2020. In October last year, 17 year old Reuben Higgins was stabbed on Station Road in Marston Green near Solihull. And just last week, the friends and family of 12 year old schoolboy Leo Ross out their son to rest after he was stabbed in the stomach.

    These devastating incidents, which are sadly far from isolated, means tackling knife crime must be one of parliament’s top priorities.

    I am very clear that stop and search should play an important part in this. There is strong consensus amongst police chiefs and academics that it saves lives. That’s why I was pleased to lead a Westminster Hall debate on stop and search.

    Stop and search allows the police to pre-empt dangerous situations and offers an effective and credible deterrent to violent criminals who might think about carrying a dangerous weapon. Critically, stop and search not only protects the public but might stop a potential perpetrator from crossing the Rubicon and taking part in illegal activity.

    The case for stop and search is backed up by research from the Oxford Journal of Policing which found that stop and search can cut the number of attempted murders by 50 per cent or more. In my view, there is clearly a correlation between stop and search to drop by 44% over two years and the fact that, since he took office, knife crime offences in London has increased by 38%.

    I also believe the work of Professor Lawrence Sherman, former Chief Scientific Officer for the Metropolitan Police, provides some useful insight into the effectiveness of stop and search. Sherman suggests we should focus on areas that are deemed to be ‘high-risk’ and that the effective use of stop and search requires it to be legitimate and supported by local people. To that end, he suggests that targeted stop and search in high-risk areas is necessary and has the scope to be effective. Crucially, Sherman argues that whilst using data and bias might be controversial, the need to protect people comes first.

    Not only is stop and search an effective tool for the police, it is also overwhelmingly backed by the public. In a November 2022 survey, Crest Advisory found that stop and search has a high level of support all ethnic groups. It found that a total of 86 per cent of adult respondents supported the police’s right to stop and search someone if they are suspected of having a weapon on them. Of these, 77 percent of Black adults supported the police having the right to stop and search to find weapons and 71 percent to find Class A drugs.

    Any debate about tackling the knife-crime epidemic must also focus on prevention. Stop and search can’t be the only tool the police and civil authorities have to tackle the scourge of violent crime. The slippery slope that drags too many people, particularly young boys, into violent crime must be broken.

    I have taken interest in the Centre for Social Justices’ illuminating new report, Lost Boys, published last week. It highlights the issues that drive young boys, who overwhelmingly make up the numbers of victims of knife crime, into criminal gangs. These are certainly questions that need addressing if we are to wean people away from violent crime and the gangs that incite this sickening violence.

    But this should not prevent us from having a serious and open debate about the role of stop and search. There’s clearly consensus that it can help to drive down crime and for that reason the police should have no shame in using it to keep the public safe.

    Politics.co.uk is the UK’s leading digital-only political website. Subscribe to our daily newsletter for all the latest news and analysis.

    Source: Politics

  • ‘Failed SQE1 and lost my training contract — what now?’

    SQE student seeks advice

    In our latest Career Conundrum, an SQE student wants to know if anyone else is in the same pickle, and for your advice on what their next steps should be.

    “I sat SQE1 in January and, unfortunately, while I passed FLK1, I did not pass FLK2 by a couple marks. As a result, my firm has confirmed that they are rescinding my training contract, despite my mitigating circumstances and request for reconsideration. I completely understand that firms have policies in place, but it has still been a difficult and disheartening experience.”

    The SQE Hub: Your ultimate resource for all things SQE

    “I would love to hear more about how other firms have handled similar situations and whether there are any examples of firms taking a more flexible approach. Have you received insights from other aspiring solicitors who have faced this? I’m keen to understand my options moving forward, whether that’s securing another training contract post-SQE or looking at alternative routes into the profession.”

    “I’d really appreciate any guidance or perspectives you can share. Thank you.”

    If you have a career conundrum, email us at tips@legalcheek.com.

    The post ‘Failed SQE1 and lost my training contract — what now?’ appeared first on Legal Cheek.

    Source: Legal Cheek

  • Blake Stephenson: ‘Thameslink rail service is not good enough — passengers deserve so much better’

    “It’s got the stage that we dread using the service” — that’s what one of my constituents told me about the performance of Thameslink’s services to and from Mid Bedfordshire. It’s simply not good enough and that’s why I’ve been working so hard down in parliament to hold Thameslink and ministers to account.

    With the government planning to nationalise our railways, we need to ensure they are aware of the many issues commuters are facing on a regular basis so I was pleased to be able to secure a debate in parliament to highlight these problems. While the delays and cancellations are something we need to fix now, we also need to make sure we are focused on the challenges of the future with more houses being built and potential projects like the Universal Studios project adding to demand.

    A high-performing Thameslink service is vital to support economic growth in the Oxford to Cambridge growth corridor, which is one of this government’s central missions. Thameslink services already link London to Cambridge, but they will one day also link London with East West Rail at Cambridge, Tempsford and Bedford. If we want to maximise the return on investment of that infrastructure project, its connections into the wider train network need to be fast and reliable.

    We also have the prospect of an expanding Luton Airport to plan for, with many more passengers passing through our area. And with East West Rail on the horizon, we need a Thameslink service that is reliable enough for people to be able to count on making their connection train at Bedford.

    These are the challenges, and of course the opportunities, the government has to focus on if it plans to nationalise our railway system. But there is much to do to improve the service now.

    About 1.5 million passengers use Harlington and Flitwick stations in my constituency each year to get to work, meet friends and go shopping. And if they happen to use the 7.43 am service from Flitwick, their train would have been cancelled 28% of the time in the last 100 days and arrived late 42% of the time. That is simply not good enough.

    Statistics tell one story, but it’s listening to local people where you truly feel the impact of this failure. To make sure the point hit home to the minister I asked local people to share their stories with me in a survey on my website. And the hundreds of responses I received in just a few days showed me just how strong people feel about the performance of rail services in Bedfordshire. 80% of those who responded told me that they had been impacted by a cancellation in the past month, and 88% told me that they had experienced a delay of more than 10 minutes. We should be encouraging people to use our railways, not pushing them onto our congested roads or worse, staying at home.

    As a regular commuter from the constituency to Westminster myself, I know that these stories are all too common. And in fact just the day before my debate I had to deal with two cancellations and a severe delay on my way in, and further disruption including having to leave at Finsbury Park on the way home.

    Taking all of this into account, I can only imagine the frustration my constituents felt when mere days after my debate we learned that rail fares are set to be hiked again this year. If fares are going to increase, commuters and all railway users deserve a reliable and efficient service. Sadly, that is not the standard they are receiving in Mid Bedfordshire, and I’m sure the same can be said across much of the country.

    Rail services are not good enough at the moment and there are many challenges to come, but if we get this right there are great opportunities to deliver a better experience for commuters and to deliver economic growth — a key aim of this government.

    Politics.co.uk is the UK’s leading digital-only political website. Subscribe to our daily newsletter for all the latest news and analysis.

    Source: Politics

  • Law firm earnings up, but it’s taking longer for clients to pay

    Law Society research

    Law firms’ earnings are on the rise but they’re waiting longer to get paid, new research produced by the Law Society has found.

    The Law Society’s 2025 Financial Benchmarking Survey reports a 6.1% increase in firm earnings for 2024, slightly below the 6.8% growth seen in 2023. Meanwhile, the average time for firms to receive payment has risen to 146 days, up from 143.

    The report collected data from 145 firms and highlights costs per lawyer increased by almost £4,000 to more than £67,000. This comes as the number of legal professionals has increased by 3.4%.

     The 2025 Legal Cheek Firms Most List

    Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: “Despite rising costs and a slowing growth rate, law firms are still performing well. The legal sector remains healthy, continues to be a powerhouse of the UK economy and a significant employer. Solicitors and law firms are committed to helping to build a robust economy that competes internationally while contributing to the country’s prosperity and supporting local communities.”

    Overall, the legal sector contributes £74.4 billion to the economy. This financial snapshot follows a report from late last year showing the legal sector experienced 50% growth in a decade.

    The post Law firm earnings up, but it’s taking longer for clients to pay appeared first on Legal Cheek.

    Source: Legal Cheek

  • Liz Saville Roberts: ‘Deflection tactics won’t salvage Labour’s reputation in Wales’

    We are now eight months into this UK Labour government in Westminster. So let’s ask ourselves, what has changed?

    Keir Starmer and his government have certainly made headlines, but all too often for their screeching policy u-turns and jaw-dropping before-and-after general election hypocrisy. From slashing the winter fuel payment for millions of pensioners and maintaining the Tories’ cruel two-child cap to denying state pension injustice compensation to 1950s-born women, the poor get poorer while the bankers get to keep their uncapped bonuses.

    We are yet to see their big, dazzling promises for ‘change’ delivered. For most people, it just feels rather like more of the same. As the cost of living continues to bite — with energy and water bills, food prices, and council tax rising in most areas — hardworking people are still feeling the squeeze.

    Labour’s decisions have exacerbated these effects on families already struggling to make ends meet, although it’s true to observe that these cost-of-living challenges are not unique to the UK. Rising costs and social hardship — all compounded by the current geopolitical instability — are forcing countries across Europe to change track in order to serve the best interests of their people.

    Starmer recently announced his intention to ramp up defence spending “in light of the grave threats that we face”. With the public purse already under severe strain, however, this proposed increase comes at the expense of welfare and international aid, both of which face huge cuts by the UK government. While the UK government chooses to double down on economic austerity, other European countries have opted for more socially-responsible solutions: committing to protecting peace in Europe while simultaneously prioritising the wellbeing of their people.

    Germany, for example, has taken a markedly different route, with Friedrich Merz’s new government changing its fiscal rules and creating a 500-billion-euro fund to boost investment in core infrastructure – including transport and education — to stimulate economic growth. Following 14 years of Tory austerity, it’s difficult to ignore the irony of a centre-right party in Germany investing in the country’s future, while the UK’s supposedly centre-left Labour is busy making cuts in the very areas which will kickstart the economy.

    That is why I highlighted Germany’s plans in last week’s PMQs, and asked whether the UK government would consider a similar approach by focusing on strategic investment rather than imposing further hardship on the very poorest people through cuts to welfare and international aid.

    Sad to say, the PM’s response was disappointing in the extreme. Despite recent commendable diplomatic efforts on the international stage, the prime minister’s domestic strategy remains dishearteningly divisive. Cooperation across the House is essential to tackle the major economic and social challenges facing the UK. Yet, instead of fostering a collaborative environment, the PM chose to play political games, using PMQs as an opportunity to attack Plaid Cymru rather than engage with the legitimate concerns raised regarding the gravity of the current domestic and international situation.

    The political landscape in Wales is changing fast. Labour may have won the last general election with a ‘landslide’ victory but their support in Wales plummeted. Despite the media’s obsession with Reform, Plaid Cymru is the real opposition to Labour in Wales with recent polls showing that we hold the lead ahead of the 2026 Senedd elections. Labour is struggling to fight the changing tide, and Keir Starmer’s petty diversion tactic speaks volumes.

    Labour has been the biggest party in Wales for over a century, but in just over a year’s time, they know that they are at risk of making history for failing to maintain that record. The people of Wales are frustrated and disillusioned and with good reason. After 25 years in power, Labour has failed the people of Wales. We are a country grappling with an overstretched NHS, struggling schools, rising child poverty, and stagnant living standards. While Reform UK may be capitalising on this frustration, they offer no real solutions. Politicians of protest feed off despair and hopelessness while Labour politicians’ promises of change ring hollow when they’ve squandered decades in self-satisfied inactivity. Plaid Cymru is providing radical solutions grounded in a true knowledge of our communities. We are the only credible alternative — offering a fresh vision rooted in hope, fairness, and ambition, and Labour knows it.

    While Labour continues to put party before country, Plaid Cymru has proven time and again that we are the only party that stands up for Wales, both in the Senedd and in Westminster. Plaid Cymru presented an amendment to the Crown Estate Bill calling on the UK Treasury to devolve responsibility of the Crown Estate in Wales to the Welsh government to allow any profits generated to stay in our communities for the benefit of our people. This is official Welsh Labour policy but not a single Labour MP voted in favour of the amendment. The so called ‘partnership in power’ is just a hollow slogan. More and more people in Wales see right through it.

    Keir Starmer may be attacking Plaid Cymru, but his party’s betrayal of the people of Wales is entirely of their own doing. The people of Wales deserve better and know that Labour will not offer any real answers to their problems with further cuts and U-turns. They will not even equip Wales with the powers to enable us to grow our own economy out of begging bowl status. More and more people are waking up to the realisation that Plaid Cymru is the only party that will prioritise the people of Wales and deliver for them.

    Labour is clearly struggling to counter the political shift in Wales, but I should like to remind the PM that it would be worthwhile to focus on providing real solutions to the UK’s problems rather than scrambling to get pre-scripted petty political digs.

    Politics.co.uk is the UK’s leading digital-only political website. Subscribe to our daily newsletter for all the latest news and analysis.

    Source: Politics

  • Oxford law student convicted of modern slavery offences

    Human rights specialist awaits sentencing

    A law PhD student at the University of Oxford has been found guilty of offences related to modern slavery.

    Lydia Mugambe, 49, joined Pembroke College, Oxford, in 2020 for a DPhil. In 2021, she was Treasurer in Pembroke’s Middle Common Room (MCR) and is listed in the “Hall of Fame” — but is now in serious hot water after being convicted of requiring a person to perform forced labour, among other offences.

    According to a now-deleted page, Mugambe was involved with the Oxford Human Rights Hub. She was also one of 57 “eminent experts in international law and human rights” of the Abidjan Principles on the human rights obligations of States providing and regulating education. As well as serving as a judge in the High Court of Uganda, Mugambe had most recently had been appointed to a UN international war crimes tribunal, in May 2023.

    But in February 2023 Thames Valley Police received a report that a woman was being held as a slave by Mugambe.

    Police uncovered that the victim was supposed to work for John Mugerwa, the Deputy High Commissioner at the Ugandan Embassy. Instead she became Mugambe’s unpaid domestic maid, nanny, servant, and slave in exchange for assisting Mugerwa in a separate court case ongoing in Uganda.

    Commander for Oxfordshire, Chief Superintendent Ben Clark said: “Mugambe used her position of power as well as her knowledge of the law to take advantage of the victim, ensuring that she would become her unpaid domestic servant.”

    Police bodycam footage shows Mugambe asserting she had a “diplomatic passport” and “immunity” from arrest. According to Clark, any immunity Mugambe may have enjoyed as a UN Judge has been “waived” by the UN Secretary General.

    Bodycam footage shows the moment police arrested Mugambe

    Credit: Thames Valley Police via BBC News

    Despite his involvement, and facilitating the visa obtained by Mugambe, John Mugerwa couldn’t be charged due to diplomatic immunity — which the Ugandan government refused to waive.

    Following a three-week trial, a jury found Mugambe guilty on all four charges. On 13 March 2025 she was convicted at Oxford Crown Court of: arranging or facilitating travel of another person with a view to exploitation; requiring a person to perform forced or compulsory labour; conspiracy to intimidate a witness; and conspiring to do an act to facilitate the commission of a breach of UK immigration law by a non-UK national.

    Mugambe is set to be sentenced on 2 May.

    The post Oxford law student convicted of modern slavery offences appeared first on Legal Cheek.

    Source: Legal Cheek