Tag: General News

  • Tinubu’s Appointment Spree Continues As NAHCON Gets New CEO

    Alhaji-Jalal-Ahmad-Arabi

    President Bola Tinubu has appointed a new Chief Executive Officer for the National Hajj Commission of Nigeria (NAHCON) and dissolved the commission’s board, as part of a series of appointments he has made in recent days.

    The new CEO, Alhaji Jalal Ahmad Arabi, will serve a four-year term in the first instance.

    Arabi will assume office on October 18 in acting capacity until January 17, 2024, when his appointment will take full effect.

    The outgoing NAHCON CEO, Alhaji Zikrullah Kunle Hassan, has been directed to proceed on a three-month pre-retirement leave, leading to his eventual retirement from service on January 17, 2024.

    Tinubu’s media adviser, Ajuri Ngelale, who made the announcement on Wednesday, said the president also ordered the dissolution of the NAHCON board.

    The appointment is the latest in a series of appointments made by President Tinubu in recent days.

    He had previously appointed heads and management of the Federal Roads Maintenance Agency (FERMA), Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC), Nigeria Export Promotion Council (NEPC), and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), among others.

    Source

  • Video: FactChecking Social Media Misinformation

    Hearst Television, which has been one of our media partners since 2019, recently featured our work in a “Get the Facts” segment on how to detect social media misinformation.

    The segment includes two of our recent articles about the Israel-Hamas war — one about a viral video clip that took former President Donald Trump’s remarks about Israel out of context and another about social media posts that shared a doctored “memorandum” from the White House on aid to Israel.

    In her segment, Hearst Washington correspondent Jackie DeFusco also provides tools and best practices that we use to separate fact from fiction. For instance, TinEye — a reverse image search tool — can determine whether an image has been previously published online and, if so, where and when.

    Source

  • Uneven but engrossing drama from Scorsese – Paradise Post

    Getting your arms all the way around “Killers of the Flower Moon” is a tricky endeavor.

    That isn’t only because of the film’s length — nearly three-and-a-half hours — although that’s certainly part of it.

    An epic Western crime drama based on real and entirely stomach-turning events from roughly a century ago, the latest film from acclaimed director Martin Scorsese could be seen as so many things. Among them: a treatise on greed and exploitation and a character study of the extremely flawed man at the center of the story, Ernest Burkhart.

    And while it excels at being neither of those, Scorsese’s chronicling of the so-called “Reign of Terror” experienced by the Osage nation — during which many of its members were systematically killed by those wishing to obtain the Native American group’s oil-related wealth — it nonetheless is a largely compelling and engaging cinematic experience.

    In theaters this week and bound for Apple TV+ at some point down the line, “Flower Moon” moves more fluidly than Scorsese’s previous film, the sometimes tedious and barely longer 2019 affair “The Irishman.” 

    This time, one of the stars of the latter, Robert De Niro, shares the screen with another Scorsese regular, Leonardo DiCaprio. It is an acting tandem that first starred opposite one another 30 years ago in “This Boy’s Life.” While the actors get plenty of screen time together here, DiCaprio is front and center Earnest, who arrives in Fairfax, Oklahoma, to work for his cattle-farming uncle, De Niro’s William “King” Hale.

    Robert De Niro and Leonardo DiCaprio starea scene in "Killers of the Flower Moon." (Courtesy of Apple)
    Robert De Niro and Leonardo DiCaprio starea scene in “Killers of the Flower Moon.” (Melinda Sue Gordon/Apple TV+/TNS)

    After Scorsese shows us the 1894 discovery of the oil beneath the land belonging to the Osage nation — which, according to the film’s production notes, had been relocated to “Indian Territory” in Oklahoma by the American government — we see the immense wealth that follows for its people.

    Ernest is one of many whites flooding into the town in the 1920s looking for a piece of the action. At first, he drives a cab for his uncle, which is how he first encounters Mollie Kyle (Lily Gladstone), a member of a wealthy Osage family. William encourages Ernest to get to know Mollie; were they to marry, he suggests, it would put Ernest on a path to a lucrative inheritance.

    Mollie seems to know what Ernest is — a “coyote,” as she puts it — but she clearly is amused by him, and wed they do.

    William’s scheming goes far beyond his plans for Ernest, of course, and at his direction, Osage nation members, many in their 20s and 30s, die mysteriously — and without investigation. Scorsese presents some of the murders, although he doesn’t seem as interested as he has at times in the past in portraying the violence in the most arresting manner possible.

    Based on investigative journalist David Grann’s 2017 book “Killers of the Flower Moon: The Osage Murders and the Birth of the FBI,” the film has been in development for years by Scorsese, who was recruited for it by DiCaprio. Early on, Scorsese was crafting a narrative centered around Tom White, an FBI investigator portrayed in the film by “Irishman” alum Jesse Plemons. However, the final screenplay — co-written by Eric Roth (“Forrest Gump,” “The Insider”) shifts the focus to Ernest and, to a lesser degree, Mollie. It was a wise decision — as Scorsese says, we’ve seen similar lawman-focused approaches many times before.

    Unfortunately, though, Ernest, an admitted lover of women and money, is a bit of a frustrating figure. He’s certainly in on his uncle’s nefarious mission, but he also seems to care, at least on some level, about Mollie — despite some actions that suggest otherwise. You could argue he’s a complex character, but he never becomes all that interesting, which is surprising given the talents of DiCaprio (“The Revenant,” “Gangs of New York”).

    Meanwhile, De Niro’s William, a constant manipulator, is borderline-cartoonish, which is obviously disappointing. Scorsese and De Niro now have collaborated on 10 features, and you’ll find stronger work in the previous nine, especially in 1976’s “Taxi Driver” and 1990’s “Goodfellas.”

    JaNae Collins, Lily Gladstone, Cara Jade Myers and Jillian Dion star in "Killers of the Flower Moon."
    From left, JaNae Collins, Lily Gladstone, Cara Jade Myers and Jillian Dion in “Killers of the Flower Moon.” (Melinda Sue Gordon/Apple TV+/TNS)

    On the other hand, Gladstone (“Certain Women,” “Fancy Dance”) — who was raised on the Blackfeet Reservation in northwestern Montana and is from the Blackfeet and Nez Perce Tribal Nations — is the standout of the film. Unfortunately, Mollie is relegated to the sidelines for a good chunk of “Flower Moon,” but, still, Gladstone’s performance lends humanity to the proceedings. If her work isn’t the film’s heart, it is its soul.

    Numerous supporting players bring a little something to “Flower Moon,” including Scott Shepherd (“The Last of Us”) as Ernest’s murderous brother, Byron; John Lithgow (“Bombshell”) and Brendan Fraser (“The Whale”) as attorneys on opposite sides of a case; and several well-known musicians, including Jack White, Jason Isbell, Pete Yorn and Sturgill Simpson, the latter playing a larger role than the others.

    Even as you wish for the sum of its parts to be greater, there is much to appreciate with this film, including interestingly constructed scene after interestingly constructed scene, as well as consultations with today’s Osage people, the inclusion of Osage cast members and the shooting of “Flower Moon” on location in Oklahoma on the Osage reservation.

    Following Grann’s highly regarded book, the film further sheds light on a horrific chapter of history previously known to too few.

    An Academy Award winner for 2006’s “The Departed,” Scorsese saves some of his best work for its coda, in which he appears and which places final punctuation on what happened and why it matters.

    “Killers of the Flower Moon” isn’t ultimately among his strongest work — and, no, it need not be as lengthy as it is — but it’s still stronger than that of myriad other filmmakers.

    ‘Killers of the Flower Moon’

    Where: Theaters.

    When: Oct. 20.

    Rated: R for violence, some grisly images, and language.

    Runtime: three hours, 26 minutes.

    Stars (of four): 3.

     

     

    Source

  • BREAKING: Tinubu Sacks Bolaji Owasanoye As ICPC Chairman, Names Musa Adamu Aliyu Successor

    Bola-Tinubu-

    President Bola Tinubu has approved the appointment of a new management team for the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), pending Senate confirmation.

    The new Chairman of the ICPC is Dr. Musa Adamu Aliyu, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria and the current Attorney General of Jigawa State.

    The new Secretary to the Commission is Mr. Clifford Okwudiri Oparaodu, a lawyer with over 30 years of experience.

    Tinubu ordered the outgoing Chairman of the ICPC, Professor Bolaji Owasanoye, to proceed on pre-end of tenure leave beginning on November 4, 2023, ahead of the expiration of his tenure on February 3, 2024.

    In a press release issued on October 17, 2023, the Special Adviser to the President on Media and Publicity, Ajuri Ngelale, said Tinubu urged the new management team of the ICPC to be above board and discharge their duties without fear or favour.

    Source

  • 4 ways married couples can use tax breaks to build wealth – Paradise Post

    By Elizabeth Ayoola | NerdWallet

    The investing information provided on this page is for educational purposes only. NerdWallet, Inc. does not offer advisory or brokerage services, nor does it recommend or advise investors to buy or sell particular stocks, securities or other investments.

    “Two is better than one” is an old adage that translates to finances, too. Two incomes can go much further than one, especially between married couples.

    People who say “I do” also have access to various tax breaks that can give them a financial edge when it comes to building wealth. For instance, married couples filing their taxes jointly get a standard deduction of $27,700 in 2023, while single filers get a $13,850 deduction.

    How can married couples act on the many tax breaks they have access to and use them to build wealth? Two certified public accountants share a few strategies for couples to consider.

    Strategy 1: Investing

    When married couples get a tax deduction or tax credit, there’s an opportunity to invest that extra money. There are a string of ways to invest the money, but couples could benefit from investing in themselves, says Sheneya Wilson, a CPA and founder of Fola Financial in the Bronx in New York City. Couples may choose to use their tax savings to invest in courses that improve their skills, market value and salaries, she says.

    Retirement accounts like 401(k)s, IRAs or regular brokerage accounts are also an option for couples. Investing those extra dollars from tax breaks means couples have more money that can potentially grow and enjoy the benefits of compound interest.

    Wilson adds that married folks can also consider alternative investments, such as commodities, gold, silver, royalties or music catalogs.

    Ultimately, couples can choose investments that align with their goals and legacy.

    “The best investments are going to be in line with how that person wants to leave an influence on the world,” Wilson says.

    Strategy 2: Real estate

    Married couples who own a property may be able to sell it and exclude some of the real estate capital gains tax from their income. For married couples filing jointly, that means they can keep up to $500,000 of the profit tax-free. Single filers, on the other hand, are capped at $250,000.

    Now think about what you can do with around $500,000 of tax-free income,” says Williams. That extra money could go toward investing in another property, she adds.

    Note that couples have to own the house, use it as their main home, live there for at least two of the five years before selling and meet other rules in order to qualify for the exclusion.

    Strategy 3: 529 plans

    529 plans — investing plans for education that allow tax-free growth and withdrawals — are another way couples can use tax breaks to build wealth, says Jasmine Young, a CPA and founder of Southern Heritage Financial Group in Atlanta.

    “It could be your niece, your nephew, your cousin, it could be you, whoever’s gonna use the money for educational expenses,” Young says. ”That’s one way for you to reduce your tax liability and put the money somewhere that’s going to give you a resource to build generational wealth.”

    Some states offer deductions or credits for 529 plan contributions. A perk for married couples is that in many states, joint filers can deduct double the amount than single filers, lowering their taxable income. The amount joint filers can deduct varies from state to state.

    Another way married people can benefit from 529 plan tax benefits is with the federal gift tax exclusion. While 529 plans don’t have an annual contribution limit, contributions are considered “gifts” by the IRS, which means gifting over a certain amount could lead to extra paperwork at tax time. In 2023, those married filing jointly could gift $34,000 without needing to file a gift tax return versus $17,000 for single people.

    Married couples who take advantage of this larger limit can save more annually for their kids or loved one’s kids and potentially help them grow wealth faster.

    Another wealth-building strategy couples can potentially use beginning in 2024 is rolling unused funds in a 529 account into a Roth IRA account for the beneficiary. By rolling unused funds into a Roth IRA, the beneficiary — be it a child or family member — can get a head start on saving for retirement. There are several conditions account owners must meet to do this, so consult a financial advisor beforehand.

    Strategy 4: Entrepreneurship

    If one spouse is an entrepreneur, or a couple runs a joint venture, there’s an opportunity to write off business losses during tax season, Wilson says.

    “If you are married, filing jointly and your spouse is investing in starting a business, there may be a net loss from that business venture on the joint tax return because that spouse was investing in maybe educational courses [to] start their business,” she says.

    In 2023, married couples with their own business can take a loss of up to $524,000, compared with $262,000 for single filers. The dollars that may have gone to paying taxes can be funneled into growing an existing business, starting a new one, or paying down debt.

    Couples curious about exploring more strategies they can implement may want to speak with a finance professional like a tax advisor or financial planner.

    This article was written by NerdWallet and was originally published by The Associated Press.

     

    Source

  • Blow For LGBTQ+ As India’s Supreme Court Rejects Appeal Seeking Legalisation Of Same-Sex Marriage

    The Supreme Court of India Tuesday rejected an appeal seeking the legalisation of same-sex marriage across the country.

    A group of Lesbian, Gay Bi-sexual, Transgender and Queer (LGBTQ) activists approached the top court a few months back seeking a declaration that the government’s failure to recognise same-sex unions amounts to a violation of LGBTQ people’s constitutional rights.

    But the legal representatives of the Prime Minister Narendra Modi administration raised objection against the application, saying legalizing same-sex union will cause “havoc” against India’s historical and societal values.

    “Living together as partners and having sexual relationship by same-sex individuals … is not comparable with the Indian family unit concept of a husband, a wife and children,” the government told the court.

    Ruling on the case, a five-man of the apex court led by Chief Justice Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud declined the activists’ appeal, saying such legalisation remains the exclusive reserve of the legislative arm of government.

    “The court, in the exercise of the power of judicial review, must steer clear of matters, particularly those impinging on policy, which fall in the legislative domain,” the judge ruled.

    The court, however, advised the government to set up a panel that will look into the rights of same-sex people.

    Chandrachud further held that the legislature and the executive should provide protection for all in line with their constitutional fundamental rights, irrespective of their sexual orientation.

    “Choosing a life partner is an integral part of choosing one’s course of life.

    “Some may regard this as the most important decision of their life. This right goes to the root of the right to life and liberty under Article 21 (of India’s constitution),” the judge held.

    Source

  • What’s the best state to move to in 2023? – Paradise Post

    During the past two years, 1.6 million Californians left for other states.

    I figured they might want some help choosing a new place to live. So, I embarked on my “Leaving California” voyage — seven columns ranking the potential of other states for ex-Californian wannabes.

    My trusty spreadsheet examined stats on state economies, demographics, health, climate and politics to weigh appropriate landing spots. The 49 other states were graded for costs, wellness, jobs, fun, culture and safety. And just to make sure I didn’t goof, other “best state” rankings also were reviewed.

    What did I learn? When those seven scorecards were combined, the top state for an exiting Californian was New Hampshire. It scored three, top-five grades among the seven rankings.

    Next on my scorecard for a highly compatible California exit were Utah, Minnesota, Utah, Idaho, and Washington.

    At the other end of this spectrum, the top state to avoid was Mississippi. It had four grades in the bottom five. The next lowest were Arkansas, Louisiana, Alabama and New Mexico.

    And by the way, some states that are popular destinations for Golden State exits scored middling grades: Florida was No. 17 while Texas was 28th. Plus there’s Oregon (No. 26), Arizona (No. 27), and Nevada (No. 34).

    • EXODUS SLOWDOWN?: California exits drop 3%, arrivals rose 10%. READ HERE!

    As you digest this scorecard, think about the variety of folks who might bolt from the Golden State. It’s a flock that includes young adults just starting out, families seeking better opportunities and seniors seeking a cheaper place or slower pace.

    Yet no scorecard can fit any one person’s exact needs. These rankings are broad compilations of various medians, averages and indexes – mathematical cliches for the commoner.

    These grades, at best, speak to the “typical” Californian. You tell me who that is?

    The math

    This best-place-to-relocate scorecard reflects my spreadsheet’s seven previous rankings of the 49 other states. These 2023 gradings looked at the pros and cons of places for a Californian’s relocation.

    Here’s what those rankings found …

    Best bargain: Where would your dollars go the furthest, mixing incomes and cost of living? The top states were Colorado, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Illinois and Utah. The worst? Hawaii, Mississippi, Arkansas, New Mexico and Maine.

    Healthiest: Where will you find ideal medical services and statewide wellness? Tops were Massachusetts, Hawaii, Minnesota, New Jersey and Maryland. Worst? West Virginia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Oklahoma.

    Best job market: For those seeking employment, where is your best chance at a solid paycheck? Tops were Nevada, Utah, Idaho, Arizona and Texas. Worst? Connecticut, Rhode Island, Michigan, Ohio and West Virginia.

    Most fun: Where’s the best mix of indoor entertainment and outdoor activities? No. 1 is Florida, then Hawaii, Massachusetts, Colorado and Minnesota. Last for leisure was Indiana, Alabama, West Virginia, Kansas and Kentucky.

    • AFFORDABILITY: Who can afford to live here? What’s being done? CLICK HERE!

    Best culture: Where can you find the most anti-California vibe? The best fits were in South Dakota, North Dakota, Tennessee, Oklahoma and Idaho. And New York, Connecticut, New Jersey, Massachusetts and Illinois had the worst scores.

    Safest: Where might you feel the most secure from risks of crime, climate or collisions? Tops were Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine and Rhode Island. Worst? Louisiana, Arkansas, South Carolina, Mississippi and Oklahoma.

    Other ‘best’ grades: As a double-check of my thinking, other “best state” rankings were reviewed. My composite “best of best” said the top states were New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Minnesota. At the bottom were Louisiana, Mississippi, Arkansas, New Mexico and Alabama.

    Bottom line

    Do not forget that scorecard creators are human.

    Look, there’s bias in any “best state” scorecard no matter how hard an author tries. The choice of data and how the math is applied can sway the final results – intentionally or not.

    Let’s contrast my relocation rankings with the “best of best” composite grades I created from other similar scorecards.

    Four states got the same grades, including No. 1 New Hampshire plus Nebraska (15), Oregon (26) and West Virginia (41). Seven others had a one-rank difference: Montana (my No. 24 vs. No. 25 “best of best”), Tennessee (31 vs. 32), Kentucky (44 vs. 43), New Mexico (45 vs. 46), Alabama (46 vs. 45), Arkansas (48 vs. 47), and Mississippi (49 vs. 48).

    Politely speaking, there seems to be lots of agreement on where Californians should NOT go. For 14 states, however, there was a gap of 10 ranking spots or more.

    My grades were far kinder to Utah (No. 3 for me vs. No. 21 “best of best”), Idaho (4 vs. 18), Maryland (10 vs. 23), South Dakota (11 vs. 22), North Carolina (19 vs. 30), Georgia (23 vs. 34), Arizona (27 vs. 37) and Texas (28 vs. 38).

    Meanwhile, I was harsher on Vermont (No. 16 vs. No. 2 “best of best”), Maine (20 vs. 8), Connecticut (21 vs. 11), New York (32 vs. 13), Delaware (35 vs. 20) and Ohio (43 vs. 33).

    My excuse? Well, it appears I primarily favored states with strong anti-California vibes.

    Remember, though, I had a built-in bias. My goal was to find the best state for a departing Californian.

    Jonathan Lansner is the business columnist for the Southern California News Group. He can be reached at jlansner@scng.com

    Source

  • ICPC Inaugurates Anti-corruption Unit In Prototype Engineering Development Institute

    The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission at its Osun State office, has inaugurated an Anti-Corruption and Transparency Unit (ACTU) in Prototype Engineering Development Institute (PEDI).

    According to Demola Bakare, the Resident Anti-Corruption Commissioner (RACC), the unit is an institutional ethics and anti-corruption instrument designed to operate as an autonomous unit.

    Bakare further explained that the unit has some “functional linkages with the office of the Chief Executive to help in fighting corruption and eliminating corrupt practices in the workplace.”

    He said ACTU is not intended to subsume the authority of the management under its wings, rather it is to compliment them.

    He particularly mentioned that it is aimed at mainstreaming a positive anti-corruption culture where it may be lacking.

    During his lecture on “Compliance With FG’s Circular(s) on Anti-corruption Programme by MDAs ( fostering Management’s Support for ACTU)”, Bakare disclosed that attitude towards implementation of Federal Government’s Circular(s) and active support of ACTU will boost Nigeria’s anti-corruption efforts.

    He also noted that it will directly improve the overall performance (ranking) and reputation of the organisation.

    Source

  • Fact Check: Why Barack Obama’s sexuality became a news story, and then a conspiracy theory

    He spent eight years in the White House, nearly every move recorded by press and watched by staff. But six years after former President Barack Obama left office, some conservative media figures aggressively circulated a salacious rumor: that Obama is secretly gay.

    The claim percolated across social media and conservative news sites for weeks throughout August and reverberated throughout September.

    An Aug. 3 headline in the Tucker Carlson-founded Daily Caller said “Obama once wrote to ex-girlfriend that he ‘repeatedly fantasizes about making love to men,’ biographer says.” A day later, Infowars, the website founded by conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, published a similar story. 

    By Aug. 15, conservative news sites had published over 20 stories with headlines about the former president’s “gay sex fantasies” or his “gay sex fantasy confession.” Carlson, the former Fox News host, on Aug. 30 told podcaster Adam Carolla that, “In 2008, it became really clear that Barack Obama had been having sex with men.”

    Really clear? As part of PolitiFact’s work reporting on misinformation online, we found this claim to be anything but.

    By the time Carlson made this statement, speculation about Obama’s sexuality had fused into even broader online conspiracy theories, including that Obama had murdered both his chef Tafari Campbell and comedian Joan Rivers to keep his secret.

    Videos on Facebook revived the 15-year-old unsubstantiated allegations of Larry Sinclair, a man with a criminal history of fraud and forgery who in 2008 claimed to have had drug-fueled sex with Obama in 1999. 

    On Sept. 6, Carlson fanned interest in Obama’s sexuality, releasing on X a new interview with Sinclair in which Sinclair repeated his allegations.


    (Screenshot of X post)

    This narrative’s dominance online prompted us to explore this renewed speculation’s source and spread. We learned that the two pieces of “evidence” fueling this claim — a letter and Sinclair’s statements — need more context than the headlines supply. 

    Experts told us that although social media helped accelerate these claims, the political debate about sexuality and gender helped them thrive.

    “This is really neatly entangled with the upcoming electoral cycles, the ongoing political assaults on LGBTQ+ and in particular trans people,” said TJ Billard, assistant professor of communication at Northwestern University. Anxiety that people in power are pushing a secret “gay agenda,” helps fuel theories that those powerful people are themselves secretly gay, Syracuse University associate professor Joshua P. Darr said.

    It also weaves into existing conspiracies. Allegations by Sinclair include drug use, secret limo rendezvous and murder, drawing on broader, QAnon-like fears of hidden and violent sexual behavior by powerful people. That conspiracy theory holds that powerful, left-leaning figures from politics, business and entertainment are part of a cabal that engages in pedophilia and cannibalism.

    These claims about Obama’s sexuality are rooted in two sources, both which need more explanation and neither of which serve as proof. 

    The love letter 

    On Nov. 20, 1982 — seven years before he met Michelle Robinson, his future wife of 31 years  — Obama wrote a four-and-a-half-page letter to then-girlfriend, Alex McNear.

    The letter, now stored at Emory University’s Stuart A. Rose Manuscript, Archives, and Rare Book Library in Atlanta, shows Obama, then 21, exploring where cruelty comes from, whether cruelty is intrinsic to being a man in Western society and how people cope with the pain of existence and eventual death. He also expresses romantic affection for McNear and satisfaction at meeting an intellectual match.

    Much of the letter seems to be a continuation of a conversation with McNear. Neither McNear nor Obama responded to PolitiFact’s requests for comment. 

    The paragraph that Obama’s detractors focused on is on the fourth page: “In regards to homosexuality, I must say that I believe this is an attempt to remove oneself from the present, a refusal, perhaps, to perpetuate the farce of earthly life. You see, I make love to men daily, but in the imagination. My mind is androgynous to a great extent, and I hope to make it more so, until I can think of people, not women as opposed to men. But returning to the body, I see that I have been made a man, and physically, in life, I choose to accept that contingency.”

    Fast-forward 28 years to 2010, when McNear shared the letter (and several others) with Pulitzer Prize-winning author David Garrow, who was working on a 1,472-page Obama biography.

    McNear had redacted the paragraph in question, Garrow told PolitiFact, but later paraphrased its contents in time for Garrow to publish his 2017 book, “Rising Star: The Making of Barack Obama.” In the book, Garrow included a sentence about the letter that said Obama had “considered gayness.” The comment generated minor news coverage at the time.

    Once the letters became public at Emory in fall 2017, Garrow sent a longtime friend and Emory professor Harvey Klehr to transcribe the redacted portion. The June 2018 paperback edition of Garrow’s book newly contained several lines from the letter, including parts of this paragraph.

    Garrow told PolitiFact he included the passage in the paperback because, “My whole attitude is you just put things on the record.” But the paragraph did not change the biographer’s view of Obama or his sexuality.

    “My substantive view is that this is not in any way remarkable,” Garrow said. 

    In the five years since they were published, the letter’s partial contents garnered almost no media attention.

    Larry Sinclair’s statements

    Sinclair’s involvement goes back to Obama’s first campaign for president. 

    On June 18, 2008, Sinclair, then 46 and living in Duluth, Minnesota, held a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. He opened it by describing himself as “a former recreational drug user, drug trafficker and I’m a convicted felon for crimes of forgery, bad checks and theft by check.” He also said he’d had three legal name changes. 

    Sinclair reiterated claims he had initially made in a since-deleted YouTube video — that during a 1999 trip to Chicago, a limo driver introduced him to Obama, then a state senator. Sinclair said he and Obama did drugs and had a sexual encounter in the limo and again the next day.

    Sinclair’s story further alleged that a former choir director at Obama’s Chicago church had an intimate relationship with Obama — one that Sinclair suggested ended in the director’s murder.

    Taking reporters’ questions, Sinclair said he planned to provide phone records, financial records, and a list of his doctors on his website larrysinclair.org, some as soon as that afternoon. An archived version of the site from August 2009 shows no such information posted. The website links to a PDF showing a receipt from a Comfort Inn in Gurnee, Illinois, in 1999, and a PDF showing a limousine company business registration. It also includes an unsigned affidavit by Sinclair that is addressed to the Chicago police. 

    “The burden is now off of me,” Sinclair said at the press event. “I am now done. It is for others to find the corroborating evidence of my story.” He gave a name for the limo driver and provided several phone numbers he said he was using during the fall of 2007, saying he hoped that someone could “connect the dots.”


    (Screenshot of YouTube video)

    PolitiFact’s attempts to contact Sinclair were unsuccessful. We found no additional evidence to substantiate his claims, and we couldn’t locate a person by the limo driver’s name. 

    In 2008, the media largely dismissed Sinclair’s allegations as lacking credibility. His lack of corroborating evidence and past criminal history made him hard to trust, judging by the news coverage and the comments from people who remember the event: In a 2008 story, Politico reported that Sinclair’s criminal record spanned close to three decades and revealed what it described as “a specialty in crimes involving deceit.” 

    Public records show arrests for Sinclair in Colorado, Florida and South Carolina on charges that include grand larceny, forgery, fraud and disorderly conduct, many from the mid-’80s. He says he was sentenced to 16 years in Colorado, but only served only some of that sentence; Colorado records show he was held on forgery and fraud charges at the time. In 2014, Florida Department of Law Enforcement records show, he was arrested on a charge of larceny as an out-of-state fugitive. 

    Sinclair’s allegations have kept circulating. In 2009, he wrote and self-published a now hard-to-find book titled “Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder?” In 2018, he ran unsuccessfully for mayor in Cocoa, Florida. Sinclair has since maintained a presence on X, formerly Twitter, describing himself as an investigative journalist. 

    Sinclair’s claims have popped up on Facebook videos online over several years. They gained steam as the 1982 letter gained attention. 

    When the Carlson interview resurfaced Sinclair’s claims, more than 36 million people viewed it on X, exposing his allegations to a new generation of social media users who offered their commentary, speculations on Sinclair’s credibility, and reactions. 

    Why now?

    Online claims about Obama’s sexuality resurfaced after Aug. 2, when the Jewish magazine Tablet posted a wide-ranging interview with Garrow. In it, the biographer mentioned the redacted letter and its reference to homosexuality.

    As news about the story spread across the conservative media ecosystem, Garrow said he received 20-plus media requests including from Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, and Lou Dobbs.

    Online media networks are built to amplify stories like these, said Joel Penney, associate professor of communication at Montclair State University. So, when they get picked up, they get “very big very fast.” 


    (Screenshots of news headlines)

    Soon, the claims devolved into conspiratorial Facebook videos with false captions such as “Obama chef ELIMINATED for knowing Obama’s gay secret!” and “Joan Rivers was sacrificed after she exposed Barack Obama being gay!!!”

    There is no evidence supporting either claim.

    Jenny Rice, associate professor of writing, rhetoric, and digital media at the University of Kentucky, said conspiracy theorists may have also found intrigue in the way the paragraph from Obama’s 1982 letter came to light.

    In the world of conspiracy theories, Rice said, “things that are secret and hidden, become almost de facto proof that something very nefarious or evil is happening.”

    Penney said, “In general, the pleasure of conspiracy theory is the sense of satisfaction or pleasure of knowing the real story is not the one that they’re telling you.” 

    Obama, the first and only Black president in U.S. history, has long been a magnet for conspiracy theories with racist roots, most notably regarding claims that his birth certificate is fake. (It’s real.) 

    Penney said Obama also challenges traditional stereotypes of masculinity, making him an easier target for this claim: “He’s an intellectual. He’s a college professor. He’s kind of skinny. He’s not like a big muscle guy.”

    Obama remains popular in recent polls. In 2018, a Pew survey asked people to say which president they believed had done “the best job during your lifetime.” Obama took first place, trailed by Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan. In 2022, people polled by NBC News said they had more positive feelings toward Obama than they did toward at least six other public figures, including Donald Trump and President Joe Biden.

    Because Biden was Obama’s vice president, Obama also serves as a proxy for attacks against Biden. Former Fox News commentator Megyn Kelly, for example, said that some believe Biden is a “shadow puppet” for Obama. Podcaster and Trump ally Dan Bongino argued Obama is “the real president” now.

    “He’s out of power,” Penney said of Obama, “but I still think that in the national imagination, he still has this very strong image.” 

    Georgia-based reporter Jeff Amy and PolitiFact Researcher Caryn Baird contributed to this report.



    Source

  • How much does experience matter in managerial search?

    After meeting with at least three internal candidates for their vacant managerial post, the San Francisco Giants reportedly widened their search Monday to the first potential successor to Gabe Kapler from outside the organization.

    Stephen Vogt, the popular ex-catcher, was set to meet with club officials Monday, according to the San Francisco Chronicle.

    Vogt, 39, was raised a Giants fan in the Central Valley and was considered manager material for years before he retired in 2022 after 10 big-league seasons — seven in the Bay Area and three with Farhan Zaidi. But, having only hung up his cleats last year, it would be a quick ascension to one of only 30 available jobs in baseball’s top uniformed post.

    That gives him something in common with the three internal candidates reported to have interviewed — bench coach Kai Correa, third base coach Mark Hallberg and assistant Alyssa Nakken — whose only major-league coaching experience came on Kapler’s staff the past four seasons.

    In his first post-retirement venture, Vogt, a two-time All-Star with the A’s, served as the Seattle Mariners’ bullpen coach this past season.

    While the search is only just getting under way, previous coaching experience won’t be the be-all and end-all. In fact, when he was asked how he felt about hiring a first-time skipper, the Giants’ top baseball decision-maker didn’t dismiss the idea and quickly pivoted to a more important qualification, in his mind.

    “We are open (to it),” Zaidi said. “I would anticipate that we interview a couple people that don’t have managerial experience.”

    In the absence of experience, Zaidi said, the Giants would value “somebody who can be an effective recruiter.”

    “Like every organization, we want to build the brand of players wanting to come here and play here, and I think the manager is a big part of that,” he said. “There are guys who don’t have managerial experience but maybe they just ended long playing careers and they have relationships and they can be effective recruiters and be sort of attractive leaders for players.”

    Somebody such as a recently retired catcher? Somebody widely respected by his peers? Somebody such as … Stephen Vogt?

    He reportedly got his shot Monday, and time will tell if he’s invited back for a second round. Either way, a variety of candidates should parade through Oracle Park this month. Managerial searches can be valuable, if for no other reason than as a focus group of sorts, a chance to hear contrasting opinions and styles for how to operate an organization, and how it’s perceived from the outside, so it’s wise to cast a wide net.

    Zaidi said he needs to “rethink everything.”

    These folks have some ideas.

    Some may still be coaching their current teams in the playoffs (Donnie Ecker? Joe Espada?), some may have managerial experience (Craig Counsell? Buck Showalter? Mark Kotsay?) and others, like Vogt, may not (Mark DeRosa? Rodney Linares?). They won’t include Padres manager Bob Melvin or Rangers bench coach Will Venable, two rumored candidates who both said they will remain with their current clubs. (Venable is viewed as the successor to Bruce Bochy, and Espada may be similarly difficult to pry away from Houston as the presumed next-in-line to Dusky Baker.)

    How much should past experience matter?

    Take this year’s postseason field, for example.

    The ongoing ALCS showdown between Bruce Bochy and Dusty Baker is surely conjuring all sorts of emotions for Giants fans. Envy, regret, nostalgia chief among them. The two managers to precede Kapler in San Francisco were hired by their current clubs for the Hall-of-Fame résumés they have built over the past three decades. But every other postseason club? They went in different directions.

    Ten of the 12 playoff teams were led by someone whom, at one point, they made a first-time manager, an even larger swath than the league-wide sample.

    Across MLB, only eight teams this season — including Kapler’s Giants — were helmed by managers with previous experience. They won fewer of their games (.486 winning percentage) than teams run by first-time skippers (.505). But the latter group runs the gamut from Rob Thomson, a baseball lifer who found instant success with the Phillies after being given his first opportunity to manage at age 58, to his opposition in the NLCS, Torey Lovullo, finally seeing the dividends of a rebuild in his sixth season with the Diamondbacks, to the Kotsay (A’s), Matt Quatraro (Royals) and Pedro Grifol (White Sox), who all oversaw 100-loss clubs in their first seasons.

    That group also includes David Ross, another recently retired catcher, widely respected by his peers, in the same mold as Vogt. Even Ross waited three years between retiring as a Cub and taking over as their manager. He’s four years in and still seeking his first playoff win. Between his playing and coaching career, Ross, 46, worked as a commentator for ESPN, the same role Aaron Boone held before the Yankees plucked him off the airwaves and made him their manager.

    Source