Tag: General News

  • All-Star Game Or All-Star Shame?

    Damian Lillard #0 of the Milwaukee Bucks and Eastern Conference All-Stars reacts during the 2024 NBA All-Star Game at Gainbridge Fieldhouse on February 18, 2024 in Indianapolis, Indiana (Photo by Stacy Revere/Getty Images) Credit: Getty Images

    by John Celestand

    I couldn’t let another minute go by before I turned off the game. It was bothering me so much that I figured I would just write about it.  I was going to kill the NBA and the All-Star game for maybe the worst display of basketball I’ve seen in a long time. Then I reconsidered and thought I’d just forget it, erase it from my brain, move on, ignore it, and just wait for the NBA playoffs, when the players usually seem to raise their intensity levels.  

    The problem was that the basketball purist inside my soul held me hostage and made sure I would do exactly as I was told. I was going to write this piece for every foolish half-court shot I witnessed, for every half-hearted sorry attempt at defense I watched, for every 50-point quarter that happened in the game, and for every minute that went by with the best basketball players in the world not giving a damn.

    Yet the truth is, I was still concerned with being called a hater — which, in my opinion, is one of the most overused words in the last 20 years. I knew there were trollers out there who would say that these are some of the greatest athletes in the world, playing a “meaningless game” not worthy of a twisted ankle, a sprained knee, or something worse that could end their season.  

    To watch our peers, our heroes combine for an All-Star game record of 397 points was utterly disgusting

    To accept this, though, is to disregard the fans who have made this game as popular as it is today. To accept this would be to disrespect myself, a former NBA player who shot for hours in the summer on the blacktop as a youth. Accepting this would ridicule my own efforts, a young kid who shot outside in the summer mimicking the great players of the 80s and early 90s until the soles of my shoes had holes in them. It’s a slap in the face to those who respect the game, showed up early to practice, or maybe stayed late honing their skills to one day be considered one of the best in the world.   

    For all of us ballers who dreamed of playing basketball at the highest level in the world and one day becoming an all-star to compete on the greatest basketball stage in the land, to watch our peers, our heroes combine for an All-Star game record of 397 points was utterly disgusting. 

    Reminisce with me for a second and think about how excited Magic Johnson was to compete in the All-Star game in 1992 after being diagnosed with HIV.  Johnson was awarded MVP after going one-on-one down the stretch with all-time greats like Michael Jordan and Isiah Thomas. Now, to compare that to what we witnessed during Sunday’s game is downright embarrassing.  

    Last night, I went to YouTube and pulled up the 2001 All-Star game just to watch Allen Iverson, Kobe Bryant, Stephon Marbury, and Kevin Garnett play as if they were about to be eliminated from the NBA Finals. I had to watch those highlights just to “Men in Black” zap the memory of that despicable display from my brain. To watch Damian Lillard hoist the MVP Trophy he “earned” with little to no resistance from defenders, to watch him lift a trophy named after the late great Kobe Bryant, who was maybe the most intense, hard-working, no-days-off player of our generation, almost made me want to throw up. 

    The Black man in me feels like a sellout for pointing this out.

    But this is not a shot at Damian Lillard, who won his first All-Star MVP,  but more so, a shot to each player that participated, or better yet barely participated, in what used to be one of the most anticipated games of an NBA season.  

    Yet, what I love about the NBA is how invested the league is in their actual players.  No other professional sports league takes care of its players like the NBA does.  There is no better Players Association that represents and looks out for the players like the NBPA.  There is no other league that is as global and popular worldwide as the National Basketball Association. 

    And yet, one must wonder, has this gone to the players’ heads? To be a great NBA player, you must have some sort of ego; you have to have a decent level of arrogance and bravado.  But has the power and ability to demand and veto trades, the exorbitant amount of money the players are being paid, the endorsements, the worldwide popularity, and the load management ultimately hurt the game?  

    I can’t help but think what it meant for all of us when we played for more than the money.

    The basketball purist in me says yes, but the Black man in me feels like a sellout for pointing this out. Regardless of how much money the players make, or the lack of interest the players show in competing, the NBA is still raking in an enormous amount of revenue off the backs of these same talented athletes, the majority of them Black. A lackluster effort in an All-Star game won’t change any of that.  

    Yet I can’t help but think what it meant for all of us when we played for more than the money. When players didn’t think about endorsements, our upcoming contracts, if we may get hurt, or how much we had to lose more than we thought about competing and how badly we wanted to win. Would a player show up to a summer league game at Rucker Park in Harlem, or the Drew League in LA and give 25% effort like they did in the All-Star game? Highly unlikely.  

    Today, we love to have debates about eras and which one is better. Folks love debating who the real GOAT is, Lebron or Jordan. Some folks feel that today’s players are more skilled and athletic. Some feel the players in the 90s played better defense, or at least were more physical and beat each other to a bloody pulp.  Others think the players today handle the ball and shoot the three-point shot much better than those from the 80s. In 2044, we may be debating if Lebron James or Kevin Durant were even good players. The blasphemy is that by that time, Michael Jordan may even be called a scrub. 

    To me, it’s all white noise from talking heads and barbershop experts. You can’t prove any of it. 

    But what one can surmise from Sunday’s lethargic effort in the All-Star game is that NBA players of today may be missing one of the most important attributes that players from the past possessed.   

    Integrity.  

    John Celestand is the program director of the Knight x LMA BloomLab, a $3.2 million initiative that supports the advancement and sustainability of local Black-owned news publications. He is a former freelance sports broadcaster and writer who covered the NBA and college basketball for multiple networks such as ESPN Regional Television, SNY, and Comcast Sportsnet Philadelphia. John was a member of the 2000 Los Angeles Lakers NBA Championship Team, playing alongside the late great Kobe Bryant and Shaquille O’Neal. He currently resides in Silver Spring, Maryland, with his wife and son. 

    Source

  • Teamsters donate $45,000 to RNC, records show

    The Teamsters political action group donated $45,000 to the Republican National Committee (RNC) late last month, according to Federal Election Commission records, a rare case of the labor union supporting the GOP.

    Teamsters President Sean O’Brien met with former President Trump at his Mar-a-Lago club in mid-January, with the donation following days later. The union’s full leadership group met with Trump in Washington just after the donation was made.

    The donation represents Trump’s strategy to split Democrats’ historical hold over organized labor, and came a day after United Auto Workers endorsed President Biden’s reelection.

    The Teamsters union has not endorsed any presidential candidate for 2024, and has continued to donate hundreds of thousands of dollars to Democratic causes in recent months, according to FEC filings, but the RNC donation buoys an organization that has struggled to fundraise in the 2024 cycle.

    The union has historically endorsed and donated to Democrats, backing Biden in 2020, Hillary Clinton in 2016 and former President Obama in 2012 and 2008. It is now one of the few national unions that is yet to endorse a presidential candidate.

    President Biden has made organized labor a focus of the 2024 cycle, walking with striking autoworkers in Michigan last year and ultimately winning the UAW’s endorsement.

    Biden has referred to himself as the “the most pro-union president in American history,” and has repeatedly met with labor leaders nationwide in efforts to garner support. The AFL-CIO, the country’s largest labor union, endorsed Biden last June. 

    After Trump met with Teamsters leaders last month, he speculated that he could receive a rare GOP endorsement from the group.

    “Stranger things have happened,” he told reporters.

    “Usually a Republican wouldn’t get that endorsement,” he said. “But in my case it’s different because I’ve employed thousands of Teamsters and I thought we should come over and pay our respects.”

    The Hill has reached out to the Teamsters and the RNC for comment.

    Copyright 2024 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

    Source

  • Watch: President Bukele Blasts BBC Reporter Criticizing El Salvador’s Crime Crackdown


    Reporter criticized policies despite them successfully turning El Salvador into a safer country.

    The President of El Salvador Nayib Bukele torched a BBC reporter who questioned his successful tough-on-crime policies.

    During a press conference Tuesday, the BBC reporter asked Bukele if he was concerned with human rights organizations’ criticisms over his crackdown on crime.

    Bukele proceeded to slam the reporter for suggesting he follow a one-size-fits-all crime strategy tried in other nations, noting those methods have consistently failed and result in soaring crime, unlike his own heavy-handed approach which has turned El Salvador into one of safest countries in the Western Hemisphere.

    Check out the exchange going viral on social media:

    Read a transcript of some of Bukele’s remarks to the reporter below:

    Do you expect that we, because we’re Salvadorans or something, because we’re second-class citizens or something, we have to die? They have to kill our families? They have to kill our children? They have to… because your liberal ideas of what a democracy should be have to be respected, and since we’re not using your recipe, then we have to be killed, we have to let their children be killed, we have to let the bloodshed go on for 50 years because of imported policies from your countries. Because your countries’ electors — in the ’80s, the war you had, a fight with the Soviet Union, had nothing to do with us. What did you do? You financed El Salvador to fight a war between us, between brothers… and we killed each other, and 85,000 Salvadorans died.

    After that, a million displaced, they went to the US, into ghettos, they formed the gangs, then they deport the gangs, gangs come here, you send us another recipe, law to [not] arrest minors. Okay, but all the gang members were minors at the time, so gangs grew, and then they terrorized the country, they started killing people, and we became the murder capital of the world. Nobody could solve it.

    We took the recipes from the OAS, we took the recipes from the UN, we took the recipes from the European Union, we took the recipes from the United States. None of the recipes worked. More bloodshed, more people were dying. So what do we do? Okay, we do something, and we save people, and now we’re the safest country in the Western Hemisphere. But suddenly something’s bad. Oh, but you shouldn’t do that, you should do what I think you should do. Why? If, not only we have the right to do what we think it’s right and what the Salvadorian people are going to decide whether or not they want this in free elections, but also we’ve proven it works, and you haven’t proven that your system works in our country. It might work in yours; I don’t know, but it doesn’t work in ours.

    The El Salvadoran president continued:

    El Salvador was turned from the most dangerous place in the world to the safest in the Western Hemisphere. That’s not a small feat, and that’s not done easily, and nobody in the world has ever done it before so fast and so clean as we have done it here, with no civilian casualties. So I don’t know. I know it’s different. I know the numbers from the UK and ours will be different for maybe a couple of decades, but we’re doing our best here, and we’re really trying, and the Salvadorian people today are going to vote freely in free and fair elections and in full democracy and choose their own path.

    Bukele posted the full video of his epic response to the BBC reporter’s question on his YouTube channel:





    Source

  • ABCON Set To Automate Forex Trade With Customers, Says Nationwide Raid On BDCs Targeted At Speculators

    BDC Operator Counting Dollar and EFCC

    The Association of Bureau De Change Operators of Nigeria (ABCON) said that the nationwide raid on Bureau de Change traders by security and anti-graft agencies is not targeted at its members.

    The President of ABCON, Mr. Aminu Gwadabe, said this after another raid was conducted on Wednesday in Abuja, Kano, the south east and other major forex market hubs.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) had on Monday raided Zone 4, a popular BDC hub in Abuja and arrested traders.

    The Central Bank of Nigeria and government authorities claim BDCs are at the heart of foreign exchange speculations, which had led to the depreciation of the naira to N1,900 as of Wednesday, February 21, 2024.

    But the raid on their operation has led to mixed reactions among Nigerians.

    “We have witnessed a lot of raids and arrests. I want to draw a caveat unfortunately there is stigmatisation and criminalisation of the sector due to lack of understanding even with the security agencies there is a lack of clarification between who is licensed and who is not.

    “For us, we are licensed and regulated and as a licensed Bureau De’Change there are criteria, you must have an office, you must render returns you must comply with necessary regulations. What is happening is not targeted at licensed Bureau De’Change but the operator of FX street trading.

    “For us, we are against any street trading, and we support any actions that will remove street trading. It affects me also; I have an office, but my clients cannot come to my office because of the menace of street traders,” Gwadabe said.

    The naira is also trailing at the official market closing at N1542.6 per dollar. The CBN had admitted shortage in forex supply, which is mounting pressure on the local currency.

    Nigeria relies on export proceeds from crude oil sales to fund most forex obligations.

    Gwadabe said “It is not rocket science, the liquidity paucity is there and then the demand is high. However, there are a lot of engagements with the CBN stakeholders, especially with the Association of Bureau De’Change Operators of Nigeria.

    “We support any sanitization that can remove street trading. We all see it. There is no place on earth that you can go and see rampant street trading of FX, so we’re in support of it.

    “We’re also putting reforms in place. All we’re asking is for the CBN to support us. We are revolutionising the entire retail exchange market we support any action that will discourage the menace.”

    The ABCON boss said his association has made so many recommendations to the CBN on how licenced traders can use technology, innovation, and automation to address the issue.

    Gwadabe added, “In three weeks, we will automate the system. We already have the automation system in place just for the CBN to give us the request for ‘No Objection’. That is all we are asking.

    “We can entirely automate the industry, any retail trader, we will automate them in three weeks, we already built the automation platform, and it is there for them. We have sent it to them, and let them give us approval for no objection. That’s all we need, then we are live.”

    ABCON Set To Automate Forex Trade With Customers, Says Nationwide Raid On BDCs Targeted At Speculators is first published on The Whistler Newspaper

    Source

  • Fact Check: Donald Trump presume que él ‘hizo pagar’ a los aliados de la OTAN, pero eso es engañoso

    El candidato presidencial republicano Donald Trump causó un alarme internacional cuando dijo que él “alentaría” a Rusia a hacer lo que quiera a un país miembro de la Organización del Tratado del Atlántico Norte que no pague por defensa colectiva. 

    Trump dijo eso el 10 de febrero en un mitin en Conway, Carolina del Sur, mientras describía una conversación con un líder de un país de la OTAN durante su presidencia. Trump usó la anécdota para decir que él era fuerte con la OTAN y que obtenía resultados. Pero Trump malinterpreto varios hechos sobre la alianza y su record en el proceso. 

    “Yo los hice pagar”, dijo Trump. Él dijo que la OTAN estaba en quiebra hasta que él llegó y le dijo a todos que tenían que pagar sus facturas, desde ese entonces supuestamente más dinero comenzó a entrar.

    Un video en Instagram muestra parte del discurso de Trump traducido al español, diciendo, “Si no pagan a la OTAN, no solo no les protegeremos sino que animamos a Rusia a atarcales”. Este también muestra a Trump con subtítulos diciendo, “¡Ustedes tienen que pagar sus facturas, y entonces el dinero vino sin parar!”.

    La publicación fue marcada como parte del esfuerzo de Meta para combatir las noticias falsas y la desinformación en su plataforma. (Lea más sobre nuestra colaboración con Meta, propietaria de Facebook e Instagram).

    El jefe de la OTAN, líderes europeos y el presidente Joe Biden criticaron los comentarios de Trump. Biden dijo que Trump era muy amigable con el presidente de Rusia Vladimir Putin. Algunos republicanos minimizaron lo que Trump dijo; otros lo criticaron. 

    No podemos verificar si esa conversación sucedió, pero podemos examinar cómo y por qué los gastos de la defensa europea cambiaron bajo Trump (y otros líderes). 

    Primero, una clarificación importante: No hay países con pagos atrasados a la OTAN. Por años, Trump ha malinterpretado el objetivo de gasto para la defensa de cada país como pagos debidos a la alianza. 

    “Los países quedándose cortos tendrán defensas más débiles de lo que nos gustaría, pero ellos no están morosos”, dijo Stephen Saideman, un profesor en la Norman Paterson School of International Affairs de Carleton University. 

    Muchos países miembros han incrementado su gasto en defensa nacional desde 2014. 

    Pero los líderes europeos probablemente hicieron eso pensando en otro líder, no Trump.

    “Si alguna persona es responsable de hacer a los europeos gastar más en defensa, es Vladimir Putin”, escribió Ivo Daalder, presidente del Chicago Council on Foreign Affairs, y un Representante Permanente de Estados Unidos en la OTAN durante parte de la administración de Obama, “No Donald Trump”.

    Contactamos a voceros de Trump y no recibimos respuesta. 

    John Bolton, quien era el consejero de seguridad nacional de Trump en el 2018 y ahora critica a Trump, le dijo a The Washington Post que Trump presionó agresivamente a socios de la OTAN a incrementar el gasto militar, “pero él no dijo nada de defender a nadie contra Rusia”. 

    La agresión de Putin llevó a gastar más a los aliados de la OTAN

    La OTAN fue creada en 1949 para proveer seguridad colectiva contra la Unión Soviética. La alianza tiene 31 miembros, incluyendo a los Estados Unidos. 

    La alianza acordó que un ataque armado contra uno o más de sus miembros constituiría a un ataque contra todos, y cada miembro tomaría acción, incluyendo el uso de la fuerza armada. 

    Los países en la OTAN no pagan dinero a un presupuesto de defensa en común de la OTAN; cada país determina su propio nivel de gasto militar. 

    En el 2014, luego de que Rusia anexó ilegalmente a Crimea, la cabeza de estado y gobierno de la OTAN acordó en gastar 2% de su  producto interno bruto (PIB) de defensa para el 2024, un objetivo discutido por muchos años. 

    El acuerdo fue aspiracional, no obligatorio. Los países no son morosos si no cumplen ese objetivo. 

    “Están negándose a cumplir un compromiso, pero no existe un mecanismo para hacerlos cumplir”, dijo Justin Logan, director de defensa y de estudios de políticas exteriores en el Cato Institute. 

    El objetivo de 2% consiste “en que cada país invierta en su propia defensa para que la alianza en conjunto pueda ser más fuerte, pueda detener o defenderse mejor de varias amenazadas (mayormente Rusia)”, Saideman dijo.

    La OTAN no estaba en quiebra cuando Trump se volvió presidente en 2017. 

    El gasto de defensa de la OTAN ha incrementado desde el anexo de Crimea del 2014, y el gasto aceleró luego de que Rusia invadiera aún más a Ucrania en 2022, Jeremy Shapiro, director de investigación del European Council on Foreign Relations, le dijo a PolitiFact. 

    Logan dijo que los ataques de Rusia y las declaraciones de Trump afectaron las decisiones de gastos de los aliados. 

    “El vertiginoso gasto de Polonia, por ejemplo, tiene todo que ver con el miedo a Rusia”, Logan dijo. Polonia incrementó su gasto en defensa como porcentaje del PIB de aproximadamente el 2.4% en 2022 al 3.9% en 2023. 

    A fecha de julio de 2023, la OTAN reportó que 11 miembros cumplieron con la meta del PIB de 2%: Estonia, Finlandia, Grecia, Hungría, Letonia, Lituania, Polonia, Rumania, Eslovaquia, el Reino Unido y los Estados Unidos. 

    El Secretario General de OTAN Jens Stoltenberg dijo el 14 de febrero que él espera que 18 aliados gasten 2% del PIB de defensa en 2024 — un incremento de seis veces desde 2014, cuando solo tres aliados cumplieron el objetivo. 

    “Políticamente, cumplir el nivel de 2% mantiene a tu país fuera del foco y en un estado general de gracia política”, Logan dijo, “Es por lo cual muchos países pequeños y vulnerables en el este de Europa lo hacen”.

    Logan hizo advertencias sobre centrarse en el objetivo del 2% del PIB.

    El 2% “de la economía alemana es más que el doble de la economía completa de Estonia”, apuntando al PIB. 

    Muchos de los miembros que están cumpliendo el objetivo — Estonia, Letonia, Lituania y Eslovaquia — no ofrecen un poder militar significativo.

    “Francia y Turquía, los cuales no cumplen con el estándar de 2%, tienen mucho más potencia de fuego que la mayoría de esos que cumplen con el estándar”, Logan dijo. 

    Trump está equivocado al decir que esta sola amenaza hizo que los aliados de la OTAN incrementaran sus fondos de defensa. Las administraciones de Barack Obama y Biden también pidieron un incremento en el gasto de defensa europeo. 

    “Es imposible saber si las amenazas de Trump tuvieron más impacto que las apelaciones de solidaridad de Obama y Biden”, Shapiro dijo. 

    Biden y oficiales de alto rango en su administración han apoyado el objetivo de 2%. 

    Cada presidente estadounidense desde Harry S. Truman urgió a los aliados europeos a hacer más, Daalder escribió, añadiendo que Trump no fue el primero ni será el último.

    El Corresponsal Senior de PolitiFact Louis Jacobson contribuyó a este artículo. 

    Este artículo originalmente fue escrito en inglés y traducido por Maria Briceño.

    Read this story in English.

    Lea más reportes de PolitiFact en Español aquí.

    __________________________________________________________________________

    Debido a limitaciones técnicas, partes de nuestra página web aparecen en inglés. Estamos trabajando en mejorar la presentación.

     



    Source

  • Post Uses Altered Photo to Impugn Klobuchar’s Comments on Slain First Responders

    Para leer en español, vea esta traducción de Google Translate.

    Quick Take

    Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar posted condolences and support for two police officers and a firefighter killed Feb. 18 while responding to a domestic incident. A post on social media uses an altered photo to falsely claim Klobuchar previously attended a meeting with people holding “DEFUND THE POLICE” signs. The original image shows the people were not holding any such signs.


    Full Story

    Two police officers and a firefighter were shot to death on Feb. 18 while responding to reports of a man armed and barricaded with his seven children in the Minneapolis suburb of Burnsville, Minnesota. Authorities identified the first responders as Officers Paul Elmstrand and Matthew Ruge, both 27, and Adam Finseth, 40, a firefighter and paramedic. The suspect, Shannon Gooden, 38, died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound, the Associated Press reported.

    Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota released a statement on Feb. 18 about the deaths of the first responders, and posted their photos on Facebook. She wrote: “Attended vigil in Burnsville last night with hundreds of community members to honor Paul Elmstrand, Matthew Ruge, and Adam Finseth. They answered the call of duty and now it’s our time to support them.”

    But a Feb. 19 post on Facebook juxtaposes screenshots of Klobuchar’s social media posts supporting the first responders with an altered photo showing Klobuchar, circled in red, and Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison with a group of people holding signs that read “DEFUND THE POLICE.” Text at the top of the Facebook post asks, “… which is it Amy Klobuchar????? You never let a tragedy go to waste.”

    The photo shown on that Facebook post has been digitally altered.

    The original image was posted on Oct. 16, 2022, by Ellison on X. On that post, Ellison wrote: “Minnesotans are fired up to elect DFLers up & down the ballot who will protect their personal freedoms, make sure they take home every $ they earn, protect them from corporate fraud, and protect our multiracial democracy. Let’s build a MN where everybody counts, everybody matters.” (DFL refers to the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, which was established in 1944.)

    Sen. Amy Klobuchar attends a Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party event in 2022.

    The crowd in the original photo are not holding signs, and Ellison’s post makes no mention of “defunding the police.”

    Ellison was appointed by Gov. Tim Walz to lead the 2021 prosecution of Derek Chauvin and three other former police officers for the death of George Floyd, which had sparked calls from some protesters to defund the police.

    Brian Evans, a spokesperson for Ellison’s office, told us in Feb. 21 email, “I can confirm that the photo of Attorney General Ellison speaking in front of a crowd of people holding defund the police signs is digitally altered.”

    “While the photo itself is fake, the idea it puts forward is false as well. Attorney General Ellison does not and has never supported defunding the police,” Evans said. “What Keith Ellison has done is support the work of law enforcement as Minnesota’s Attorney General while also bringing people together to find ways to reduce the use of deadly force during encounters with law enforcement.” 

    At a 2022 Senate judiciary committee hearing on violence against police, Klobuchar said policing practices should be reformed, the Minnesota Reformer reported. “One of the focuses has got to be … reforming some of the practices, but at the same time funding the police,” Klobuchar said.

    Update, Feb. 21: After we posted our article, a spokesperson for Klobuchar emailed us this response on Feb. 21 to the social media post: “Senator Klobuchar strongly and publicly opposed the defund the police measure in Minnesota, has repeatedly made clear she opposes defunding the police, and is in fact the longtime lead author of the bipartisan bill in Congress which funds police.”


    Sources

    CBS News. “Attorney General Keith Ellison To Lead Prosecution Of George Floyd’s Death.” 31 May 2020.

    Ellison, Keith. @keithellison “Minnesotans are fired up to elect DFLers up & down the ballot who will protect their personal freedoms, make sure they take home every $ they earn, protect them from corporate fraud, and protect our multiracial democracy. Let’s build a MN where everybody counts, everybody matters.” 16 Oct 2022.

    Evans, Brian. Spokesperson, Office of the Minnesota Attorney General. Email to FactCheck.org. 21 Feb 2024.

    Fischler, Jacob. “‘Defund the police’ slogan and anti-cop violence debated at U.S. Senate hearing.” Minnesota Reformer. 26 Jul 2022.

    Karnowski, Steve. “A shaken Minnesota community gets some answers on the killings of 2 officers and 1 firefighter.” Associated Press. 20 Feb 2024.

    Klobuchar, Amy. @amyklobuchar “Attended vigil in Burnsville last night with hundreds of community members to honor Paul Elmstrand, Matthew Ruge, and Adam Finseth. They answered the call of duty and now it’s our time to support them.” X. 21 Feb 2024.

    Klobuchar, Amy. “Klobuchar Statement on Death of First Responders in Burnsville.” 18 Feb 2024.

    Minnesota DFL. dfl.org/about. Accessed 21 Feb 2024.

    Spears, Baylor. “Q&A with Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison on stopping police violence.” Wisconsin Examiner. 20 Oct 2023.



    Source

  • Judge rules MyPillow CEO must pay $5M for data contest loss

    By Katelyn Polantz | CNN

    My Pillow owner and right-wing conspiracy theorist Mike Lindell will have to pay $5 million because of a contest he initiated at one of his “cyber symposium” events after the 2020 election, a federal judge confirmed Wednesday.

    Robert Zeidman, a software developer, took Lindell up on a so-called “Prove Mike Wrong” challenge at an event the election-denier hosted. Participants in the challenge could win $5 million if they proved data Lindell provided about the 2020 election wasn’t real election data, according to rules the participants agreed to. The contest allowed participants to arbitrate if needed.

    Zeidman responded in the challenge with a 15-page report saying that the data Lindell put forth wasn’t complete or representative of possible data that had been captured in real time from the internet, according to a federal court decision Wednesday.

    Zeidman lost the challenge initially, but then took Lindell to arbitration, and won.

    Lindell had hoped a federal judge would wipe out the $5 million award to Zeidman. But the judge, John Tunheim of the US District Court in Minnesota, refused to do so on Wednesday.

    “The panel was tasked with the difficult job of interpreting a poorly written contract,” Tunheim wrote, about the prior decision to award Zeidman the $5 million. “The Court fails to identify evidence that the panel exceeded its authority,” he added.

    “The data was just so obviously bogus,” Zeidman previously told CNN. “It surprised me.”

    CNN’s Sara Murray contributed to this report.

    Source

  • Nearly 153,000 People Enrolled In Biden’s New Student Loan Plan Will Get An Email Wednesday That Their Debt Is Canceled

    President Joe Biden speaks in the State Dining Room of the White House on February 13 in Washington, DC. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images via CNN Newsource)

    By Katie Lobosco, CNN

    Washington (CNN) — Nearly 153,000 student loan borrowers currently enrolled in a new repayment plan launched by the Biden administration are expected to get an email Wednesday notifying them that their remaining federal student loan debt will be canceled, totaling about $1.2 billion.

    The email is expected to include a congratulatory message from President Joe Biden, whose administration is eager to remind voters what it has done to address student loan debt as the presidential election ramps up.

    “From day one of my Administration, I vowed to fix student loan programs so higher education can be a ticket to the middle class—not a barrier to opportunity,” the message reads.

    Biden’s plans to provide student debt relief were dealt a significant blow when the Supreme Court rejected his signature student loan forgiveness program last year – but that hasn’t stopped his administration from finding other ways to help borrowers.

    Nearly $138 billion of federal student loan debt has been canceled for almost 3.9 million borrowers since Biden took office.

    The latest round of debt relief, announced Wednesday, will impact some borrowers who are enrolled in a new repayment plan known as SAVE (Saving on a Valuable Education), which the administration launched in August as the pandemic-related pause on payments was ending.

    Under that plan, remaining federal student loan balances are erased for those who originally borrowed $12,000 or less and have made payments for at least 10 years.

    At first, debt relief under SAVE was not scheduled to begin until July – but the Biden administration said last month that it would start ahead of schedule in February.

    Most of the federal student loan debt cancellations that have taken place under Biden have come through programs that existed before he took office. These programs are generally limited to specific categories of borrowers, such as public-sector workers, people defrauded by for-profit colleges and borrowers who have paid for at least 20 years.

    Under Biden, the Department of Education has canceled more federal student loan debt than during any previous administration – in part due to efforts to temporarily expand some debt relief programs and to correct past administrative errors made to borrowers’ student loan accounts.

    Here are some of the ways the Biden administration is forgiving federal student loan debt:

    A new repayment plan

    The new SAVE plan offers the most generous repayment terms for low-income borrowers. Currently, about 7.5 million borrowers are enrolled.

    Like other income-driven repayment plans, the monthly amount owed is based on a borrower’s income and family size, regardless of how much outstanding student debt is owed.

    But monthly payments are typically going to be smaller for most borrowers enrolled in SAVE when compared with other plans. Plus, unpaid interest will not accrue if a borrower makes a full monthly payment.

    Under other income-driven plans, borrowers are required to pay for at least 20 years before seeing their outstanding balance wiped away. But SAVE offers a shorter time to forgiveness – requiring as little as 10 years of payments for those who borrowed $12,000 or less.

    Every additional $1,000 borrowed above that amount would add one year of monthly payments to the required time a borrower must pay. For example, someone who borrowed $14,000 in federal student loans will receive full debt relief starting this week if they have been in repayment for 12 years and are enrolled in SAVE.

    A recount of past payments to fix errors

    The Biden administration is currently conducting a one-time recount of borrowers’ past payments to fix what officials have called “past administrative failures.” The agency expects to complete the recount by July.

    The Department of Education has historically had trouble tracking borrowers’ payments.

    In 2022, the US Government Accountability Office recommended that the department do more to ensure that borrowers receive the forgiveness they are entitled to, after it found that there were thousands of loans still in repayment that could already be eligible for forgiveness.

    Generally, the recount will give borrowers credit toward forgiveness for any months in which they made payments regardless of what repayment plan they were enrolled in at the time, according to the Department of Education. The recount especially helps borrowers who may have been inappropriately steered by their student loan servicing company into a long-term forbearance, a period in which they stopped making payments.

    Expanding a debt relief program for public-sector workers

    One loan forgiveness program, known as PSLF (Public Service Loan Forgiveness), aims to help borrowers who work in a government job or at a nonprofit – including teachers, social workers, some nurses and doctors, and government lawyers.

    The PSLF program cancels outstanding federal student loan debt for public-sector workers who have made 120 qualifying monthly student loan payments, or about 10 years’ worth of payments.

    The program was created by Congress in 2007 but was plagued with administrative problems before Biden took office.

    In 2021, Biden put a temporary waiver in place, expanding eligibility so that some borrowers could retroactively receive credit for past payments that did not otherwise qualify for PSLF.

    The one-time recount of past payments that the Biden administration is conducting has also helped some borrowers qualify for PSLF.

    Relief for people defrauded by for-profit colleges

    The borrower defense to repayment program was created by Congress decades ago and aims to deliver student debt relief to people who were defrauded by their college. But it was rarely used until Corinthian Colleges, a for-profit network of schools, collapsed in 2015.

    Under Biden, the Department of Education has made progress in whittling down a backlog of borrower defense claims that built up during the Trump administration.

    At one point, more than 200,000 borrower defense claims were pending as former Education Secretary Betsy DeVos made efforts to limit the program. Those efforts were ultimately unsuccessful.

    Cutting red tape for disabled borrowers eligible for debt relief

    The Biden administration has also made it easier for disabled borrowers to receive the debt relief to which they are entitled.

    Previously, borrowers were required to provide documentation from a physician, the Social Security Administration or the Department of Veterans Affairs to show that they qualified for debt relief.

    But the administration changed the rule so that the Department of Education can provide automatic discharges for disabled borrowers who are identified through administrative data matching with the Social Security Administration – without the borrowers submitting paperwork.

    This headline and story have been updated.

    The-CNN-Wire
    & © 2024 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

    Source

  • Pennsylvania Supreme Court says GOP subpoena for voter information over 2020 election ‘unenforceable’

    The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that state GOP subpoenas for voter information after the 2020 election are “unenforceable,” overturning a lower court ruling.

    Republican Pennsylvania Senate lawmakers moved to subpoena voter information in 2021, but the state’s Democratic attorney general legally challenged the effort and argued the real purpose of the subpoenas was to bring 2020 election results into question.

    The Supreme Court threw out the subpoenas on procedural grounds Wednesday, declaring they are no longer valid because the legislative session has ended.

    Pennsylvania Republicans argued at the time voting took place to issue the subpoenas for voter information that they were intended to investigate possible changes to election law. State Sen. Cris Dush (R), who led the effort, labeled it an “election integrity investigation” that would “uncover information which is necessary for the legislature to potentially take future legislative action.”

    President Biden defeated Trump by more than 80,000 votes in the Keystone State in 2020.

    Copyright 2024 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

    Source

  • Top Lawyer: Alex Jones Lawfare Set Course For Corrupt Trump Case In NYC


    Constitutional lawyer Robert Barnes breaks down how the Alex Jones precedent has been set and is now being used against Donald Trump — tune in!

    Constitutional attorney Robert Barnes joins Alex Jones to describe how the weaponized judiciary is being used to punish political dissidents.




    Source