Tag: General News

  • Biden’s budget has tax breaks for families, hikes for wealthy

    By Josh Boak and Colleen Long | Associated Press

    WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden on Monday released a budget proposal aimed at getting voters’ attention: It would offer tax breaks for families, lower health care costs, smaller deficits and higher taxes on the wealthy and corporations.

    Unlikely to pass the House and the Senate to become law, the proposal for fiscal 2025 is an election year blueprint about what the future could hold if Biden and enough of his fellow Democrats win in November. The president and his aides previewed parts of his budget going into last week’s State of the Union address, and they provided the fine print on Monday.

    If the Biden budget became law, deficits could be pruned $3 trillion over a decade. It would raise tax revenues by a total of $4.9 trillion over that period and use roughly $1.9 trillion to fund various programs, with the rest going to deficit reduction.

    Biden aides said their budget was realistic and detailed while rival measures from Republicans were not financially viable.

    “Congressional Republicans don’t tell you what they cut, who they harm,” White House budget director Shalanda Young said. “The president is transparent, details every way he shows he values the America people.”

    House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, issued a joint statement with other GOP leaders calling the Biden proposal a “glaring reminder of this Administration’s insatiable appetite for reckless spending.”

    “Biden’s budget doesn’t just miss the mark — it is a roadmap to accelerate America’s decline,” the House Republican leaders said.

    Under the proposal, the government would spend $7.3 trillion next fiscal year and borrow $1.8 trillion to cover the shortfall from tax receipts. Biden’s 188-page plan covers a decade’s worth of spending, taxes and debt.

    Parents could get an increased child tax credit in 2025, as payments would return briefly to the 2021 level funded by Biden’s coronavirus pandemic relief package. Homebuyers could get a tax credit worth up to $10,000 and $10 billion in down payment aid for first-generation buyers. Corporate taxes would jump upward, while billionaires would be charged a minimum tax of 25%.

    Biden said in his State of the Union that Medicare should have the ability to negotiate prices on 500 prescription drugs, which could save $200 billion over 10 years. Aides said his budget does not specify how many drug prices would be subject to negotiations.

    The president is traveling Monday to Manchester, New Hampshire, where he’ll call on Congress to apply his $2,000 cap on drug costs and $35 insulin to everyone, not just people who have Medicare. He’ll also seek to make permanent some protections in the Affordable Care Act that are set to expire next year.

    Biden’s plan would permanently keep Medicare solvent, according to aides, but as noted by Maya MacGuineas, president of the fiscal group Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, it does not appear to fix Social Security, which projections say will be unable to pay full benefits starting in 2033.

    The proposal would provide about $900 billion for defense in fiscal 2025, about $16 billion more than the baseline.

    The Biden administration is still seeking money to help Ukraine defend itself against Russia and aid for Israel. His budget plan reiterates the supplemental funding request made last October for Ukraine, Israel and humanitarian relief for Palestinians.

    It’s also requesting funding to expand personnel and resources at the U.S. southern border. Still, military spending over 10 years would decline $146 billion to $9.57 trillion.

    One key theme in the budget plan is an effort to help families afford their basic needs, as the impact of inflation hitting a four-decade high in 2022 continues to leave many voters feeling as though they’re worse off under Biden.

    The budget proposal includes $258 billion to help build or preserve 2 million homes, helping to address a national shortage that has kept housing prices high. Parents making under $200,000 annually would have access to child care, with most eligible families paying no more than $10 a day.

    It would eliminate origination fees on government student loans, possibly saving borrowers $1,000 over the life of the debt. It also includes $12 billion to help universities develop strategies for reducing their costs.

    All of this is a chance for Biden to try to define the race on his preferred terms, just as the all-but-certain Republican nominee, Donald Trump, wants to rally voters around his agenda.

    “A fair tax code is how we invest in things that make this country great: health care, education, defense and so much more,” Biden said at Thursday’s State of the Union address, adding that his predecessor enacted a $2 trillion tax cut in 2017 that disproportionately benefited the top 1% of earners.

    Trump, for his part, would like to increase tariffs and pump out gushers of oil. He called for a “second phase” of tax cuts as parts of his 2017 overhaul of the income tax code would expire after 2025. The Republican has also said he would slash government regulations. He has also pledged to pay down the national debt, though it’s unclear how without him detailing severe spending cuts.

    “We’re going to do things that nobody thought was possible,” Trump said after his wins in last week’s Super Tuesday nomination contests.

    House Republicans on Thursday voted their own budget resolution for the next fiscal year out of committee, saying it would trim deficits by $14 trillion over 10 years. But their measure would depend on rosy economic forecasts and sharp spending cuts, reducing $8.7 trillion in Medicare and Medicaid expenditures. Biden has pledged to stop any cuts to Medicare.

    Meanwhile, Congress is still working on a budget for the current fiscal year. On Saturday, Biden signed into law a $460 billion package to avoid a shutdown of several federal agencies, but lawmakers are only about halfway through addressing spending for this fiscal year.

    Source

  • Calls For Investigations Into Shocking Mortgage Discrimination Claims In Class Action Lawsuit

    by Charlene Crowell

    (Trice Edney Wire) – A mortgage discrimination case that began with two plaintiffs last December was consolidated in late February with seven others to form a class action lawsuit alleging that Navy Federal Credit Union – the nation’s largest with 13.4 million members and $170.8 billion in assets – “systematically and intentionally discriminates against minority borrowers across the United States.”

    The lawsuit alleges that Navy Federal, which serves current and former military members from all service sectors, denied loans for 52 percent of Black borrowers and 44 percent of Latino borrowers, while denying only 23 percent of white applicants for home mortgage purchase or refinance loans and Home Equity Lines of Credit.

    Affidavits of affected borrowers told stories of the financial and emotional distressed caused by qualified loan applicants having to find alternative – and often more costly – financing after being denied by their member-owned credit union.

    The lawsuit, led by nationally-known attorney Ben Crump and his associate Adam Levitt, said the lender’s own data show that Navy Federal approved loans for a higher percentage of white borrowersannually earning less than $62,000 a year than for Black loan applicants earning $140,000 or more.  

    And when Navy Federal did approve a loan to a Black or Latino applicant, they often were offered worst interest rates and loan terms than those offered to white borrowers with similar financial profiles. These activities are illegal under federal laws, including the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA).

    “The outright discrimination that occurs when Banking While Black continues to reveal itself in the lending practices of many of America’s largest financial institutions,” said Crump. “It is shameful that Navy Federal, an organization that prides itself in helping the families of men and women who served their country, does not give their Black and Latino customers the same opportunities as white customers.”

    “We hope this legal action will stop racial lending discrimination in its tracks and require Navy Federal to right their wrongs,” said Adam Levitt. “Home ownership is recognized as the cornerstone of the American Dream. We will not sit by while that dream is denied to hard-working and deserving Americans based on discriminatory practices and algorithms.” 

    Navy Federal said in a December 2023 statement that its  more than $3.5 billion in mortgages to Black borrowers in 2022 shows its “longstanding commitment to expanding credit and economic opportunity to Black borrowers.”  

    But the number of people calling to hold Navy Federal accountable is growing, and now includes civil rights activist Rev. Al Sharpton, 10 U.S. Senators, over 20 Members of Congress, consumer advocates and others. 

    Congresswoman Maxine Waters, Ranking Member of the House Financial Services Committee called for federal agencies to begin investigations.

    “Credit unions are owned by their members and while this type of discrimination may be par for the course for a profit-driven megabank, a member-driven credit union should know better,” said Waters.

    “As a private institution that bears the name of an esteemed branch of the United States military, Navy Federal must explain both to Congress and their members how such practices took place, what immediate steps are being taken to correct the harm done, and who in management will be held responsible,” Waters continued. “These abuses will not be tolerated, and I urge the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, National Credit Union Administration, and other appropriate agencies to promptly investigate this matter.”  

    Consumers Union, a nonprofit advocacy group, added its support. “The large racial disparity found between loan approvals for applicants with roughly the same financial profile raises serious concerns that Navy Federal may be unfairly discriminating against Black and Latino applicants,” said Jennifer Chien[, CU’s senior policy counsel for financial fairness..

    In a joint letter on January 11,2024, 10 U.S. Senators led by Senate Banking Committee Chair Sherrod Brown urged the CFPB Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Department HUD to investigate the issue.

    “As the regulators with primary responsibility for enforcing ECOA and the Fair Housing Act, we ask that you thoroughly review Navy Federal’s mortgage lending practices and outcomes for compliance with all federal fair housing and fair lending laws and regulations. Navy Federal’s members have made countless sacrifices in their service to our country. We must do all we can to ensure illegal barriers are not placed on their path to homeownership.” 

    Even more lawmaker support came on February 28 in a joint letter from the Congressional Hispanic Caucus and the New Democrat Coalition that called upon six federal agencies to investigate and report on their findings.

    “[T]he federal financial regulators have a duty to ‘affirmatively further fair housing,’ which means they must take meaningful actions that overcome and do not further entrench patterns of segregation and systemic disinvestment, such as through redlining, based on protected classes under the law,” wrote the lawmakers.

    ###

     Charlene Crowell is a senior fellow with the Center for Responsible Lending. She can be reached at [email protected].

    Source

  • SATANIC BETRAYAL: American Christian Pastors Coerced Congregants to Take Covid Jabs Through Covert ‘Faith4Vaccines’ Scheme


    False churches ran by fake Christians were used to coerce congregants into taking the lethal covid injections.

    In exchange for cash bribes from the government, thousands of American pastors pushed Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “vaccines” on their congregants, many of whom are now chronically ill or dead as a result.

    The report from America Out Loud explains that a government program called “Faith4Vaccines,” which was birthed out of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) vaccine propaganda machine COVID-19 Community Corps, convinced money-grubbing “faith leaders” to sell out their flocks to Big Pharma.

    The COVID-19 Community Corps has 86 founding members, most of them falling into the “faith leaders” category. They include (but are not limited to):

    • American Baptist Church
    • Catholic Charities USA
    • Episcopal Church
    • National Association of Evangelicals
    • Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America
    • New York Jewish Agenda

    (Related: Remember when Southern Baptist leader Al Mohler tried to manipulated Christians into getting “vaccinated” for COVID because “that’s what Jesus would do?”)

    Manipulating scripture to brainwash

    Some so-called pastors were not just swayed by money to manipulate their congregants, though. Through careful trickery, government officials manipulated scripture and biblical concepts to convince faith leaders that Jesus wanted them to push COVID jabs on their congregants.

    • Winter Sun Plus is NOW 40% off! Boost your natural defenses with this powerful vitamin D3 and K formula!

    Former National Institutes of Health (NIH) “Reverend-Doctor” Francis Collins – yes, he actually calls himself that – spoke to hundreds of faith leaders back in 2021 claiming that COVID jabs were God’s “answer to prayer.” He urged all of them to push the shots as part of a “love your neighbor moment.”

    “In what was a sermon-like address tailored to appeal to these faith leaders, Collins admonished them not to believe ‘conspiracy theories’ about ‘possible side effects’ – which Collins falsely said were untrue,” reports America Out Loud about Collins’ bizarre speech.

    Others in the Biden regime took a similar approach by pushing America’s pastors to push the shots because of some moral obligation to “love thy neighbor.” Many of them fell for it, subsequently crafting topical sermons about the importance of “getting protected” in order to protect one’s neighbors against the “virus.”

    The manipulation scheme began as far back as February 2021, though it was likely hatched in secret long before that. Another program called “Faith in the Vaccine” was used to try to sway religious Americans to put their trust in modern medicine, in this case COVID jabs, to cleanse the country of the “pandemic.”

    “As demonstrated at the Faiths4Vaccines National Summit, powerful government officials resorted to the use of religious doctrine to coerce faith leaders across the country to use their own spiritual influence, positions of trust, and sacred spaces to push the vaccines on their congregants,” says America Out Loud.

    “Government officials claimed to know God’s position on the issue of the COVID-19 vaccines, failing to consider other perspectives or engage in open debate. In claiming that their vaccine ‘theology’ was the correct interpretation, our government leaders implied that any faith leaders with a different view opposed God or had an incorrect understanding of God.”

    Since that time, it has become undeniably clear that COVID jabs are not the “gift from God” that many of these duped religious leaders and congregants believed – unless that gift was to purge much of the population through chronic illness and death.

    “In reality, the purpose of the ‘pandemic’ Purim was to largely target White Christian nations – which had the highest vaccination compliance rates – and the highest death rates due to the ‘vaccines’ – upwards of at least 20 million deaths and counting.”

    (Did you know that Focus on the Family also sold out to the COVID cult by pushing its followers to get jabbed for the so-called “virus?”)

    American Christianity looks nothing like what Jesus taught, bearing rotten fruit in the form of corruption and scandals, including Faith4Vaccines. Find out more at Antichrist.news.

    Sources for this article include:

    ChristiansForTruth.com

    AmericaOutLoud.news

    NaturalNews.com

    NaturalNews.com


    Emergency Broadcast! Democrats Prep National Martial Law With Deployment Of Troops In New York


    Source

  • UK Bans Nigerians, Other Foreign Health Workers From Bringing Dependants

    The United Kingdom (UK) has banned health and care workers from Nigeria and other foreign countries from bringing dependants to the country.

    This was announced in a terse statement via the UK Home Office verified X handle (formerly Twitter) on Monday, March 11.

    According to the UK government, the measure was part of its plan to reduce migration into the country, adding that overseas care workers brought an estimated 120,000 dependants to the UK in 2023.

    The statement partly reads: “From today, care workers entering the UK on Health and Care Worker visas can no longer bring dependants.

    “This is part of our plan to deliver the biggest ever cut in migration.”

    The United Kingdom Home Office two months ago, announced the commencement of the implementation of its policy banning Nigerian students and other overseas students from bringing in dependants via the study visa route.

    UK Bans Nigerians, Other Foreign Health Workers From Bringing Dependants is first published on The Whistler Newspaper

    Source

  • How SF Giants’ rotation questions impact their bullpen construction

    SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. — Bob Melvin does not believe bullpen games are the solution to the uncertainty in the San Francisco Giants’ starting rotation. But, he said, it will influence the makeup of his relief corps, which will factor in heavily in their plans to cover innings in the early portion of the season.

    “At this point in time, I don’t want to start with a reliever,” Melvin said. “(But) it may end up being a short start from a starter and then then bullpen covering a lot of the game. … Everybody should be able to throw two innings. We want to have a complete bullpen where all of them can give us more than one inning.”

    There are certain exceptions, such as closer Camilo Doval and the set-up Rogers twins, Taylor and Tyler, who likely won’t be asked to record more than four outs. Also locked in are Ryan Walker and Luke Jackson. The rest of the group may, in part, be determined by who can best cover multiple innings.

    While they possess the pitcher who threw the most innings in the majors last season, Logan Webb, nobody behind him in the Giants’ rotation has a proven ability to pitch deep into games. One member of their rotation, Jordan Hicks, already comes from the bullpen. Another, Kyle Harrison, didn’t pitch much longer than a reliever in most of his minor-league starts last season, and completed six innings just once after being called up.

    In the fourth slot, Keaton Winn and the club are confident he’ll be ready for Opening Day, but a scare with a sore elbow set him back two weeks, so he won’t be ready to pitch deep, either. And, with injuries to Tristan Beck and Sean Hjelle, the competition for the fifth spot is wide open.

    “Depending on who’s in our rotation, if we’re going to be careful with some of these guys early,” Melvin said, “then we’re going to need some bridge guys.”

    That includes non-roster invitees fighting for a role of any kind, such as Daulton Jefferies, Amir Garrett and Cody Stashak, but also some of their top pitching prospects who have previously been used as starters.

    Melvin singled out Landen Roupp and Carson Seymour, both 25, as pitchers who could get looks in the major-league bullpen.

    Seymour, one of four players acquired from the Mets for Darin Ruf, started 23 of his 28 games at Double-A Richmond last season, posting a 3.99 ERA with about a strikeout an inning, and Melvin called him “a guy that I’m pretty interested in. Big arm, big breaking ball.”

    On Saturday, Roupp made his first appearance of the spring, striking out two over one shutout inning against the A’s.

    A 12th-round pick in 2021, Roupp made 10 starts for Richmond with a 1.74 ERA before a disc slipped in his lower back, ending his season. That slowed him to begin camp, so while he doesn’t have time to get stretched out as a starter, “there might be a different need here,” Melvin said, “and he looks pretty good.”

    Source

  • The American Journal: Season Of The False Flags Approaches Ahead Of 2024 Election


    The globalists will pull many stunts leading up to their second attempt at stealing the election from Trump

    “The American Journal” is live every weekday from 8-11 am CST.

    Follow The American Journal on Telegram:


    Source

  • NFF: Let Peseiro Be The Last Colonial Master

    After Jose Peseiro failed to renew his contract, the Nigeria Football Federation is looking to hire another foreign coach! Yes, there are even news reports claiming the NFF was trying to lure Peseiro back with a more juicy offer! The NFF advertised for a new coach and threw it open to anyone from anywhere instead of restricting it to Nigerian coaches or simply picking one of Nigeria’s best coaches. When will this football body get it serious with Nigerian football?

    A career news scrolling on the website of the NFF says it is “looking for a visionary leader to take the helm of our Senior Men’s National Team, the mighty Super Eagles! “The main qualifications for the Super Eagles head coach are: possession of necessary coaching qualifications to lead a national team, Proven experience managing football at the highest level, a successful track record of leading teams to victories and knowledge of African football.”

    If you have what it takes, the NFF invites you to apply for the job.

    I found the advert disturbing, and I believe there are many Nigerians who feel same way. If those are the requirements for the national team coach, why do we need to look far? Aren’t there enough talent pool in Nigeria to pick from? Why do we need to even advertise the position at a time Nigeria is competing in the 2026 World Cup qualifiers?

    The NFF is in a situation that requires what, in the Nigerian Public Service parlance, is called “emergency procurement,” which exempts contracts from the encumbrances of the due process. It means the NFF could have simply summon a technical meeting and decide on a new national team coach.

    The advert is unnecessary and sends the wrong signal that the managers of Nigerian football are not looking inwards to take the Super Eagles to the next level. The advert’s last sentence states: “This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to make history with Nigerian football. If you’re a coach who thrives on pressure and dreams of etching your name in footballing lore, we want to hear from you.”

    After Nigeria’s defeat to the Elephants of Ivory Coast in the last AFCON , I wrote an article calling for the sack of Jose Peseiro as Super Eagles coach, and urged the NFF to give the job to Nigeria’s former winger, Emmanuel Amuneke. My reason was that Nigeria is too big to have a foreign coach. I felt embarrassed that the Elephants who beat us and outplayed us at the AFCON final were coached by a home boy, a rookie coach who had never coached any national team in his career.

    Emerse Fae , an ex-international football player for Ivory Coast, was one of the assistant coaches to the Frenc tactician, Jean-Louis Gasset, who was the national team coach that took the team to AFCON. Gasset could not win any of his matches at AFCON and the team was on the verge of elimination when Emerse Fae was asked to take over the team. Gasset was asked to go.  Fae’s appointment changed the trajectory of the team and they eventually won the cup!

    It was the kind of fairy tale story that only coaches hungry for success and stardom can script, not some so-called accomplished foreign coaches who know little or nothing about Nigerian or African football.

    I had suggested the name of Emmanuel Amuneke as a replacement for Peseiro before he was disengaged. I chose Amuneke, just as many others have done, because of his pedigree as a Super Eagles player and coach of Nigeria’s U17 national team which won the World Cup in 2015. He was also the coach of the Tanzania national team when they qualified for AFCON in 2019.

    Yes, his CV is not all successes. But is there a coach who wins all matches? Even the best coaches in European football have lost games they were not supposed to lose. Wining or losing games is not just down to the quality of the coach. The quality of the players also matters, and their levels of motivation. Great football coaches have said as much. When Manchester United lost the 2010 UEFA Championship to Barcelona, the great Alex Ferguson who was then the manager of Man U, said his team lost to a better team, not to a better coach!

    If there’s any reason why Amuneke is not suitable for the job, there are several of his former colleagues who can do the job, and who have also gone into coaching. It doesn’t matter that someone had been tried in the past and failed. We should try them again. Anyone that fails can be fired. There should be such a clause in their contract agreement.

    Finidi George is also a former national team winger and current coach of Enyimba FC. He was assistant to Peseiro in the Super Eagles. He led the People’s Elephant to their ninth NPFL title in his second year, and are on course to successfully defend their title. There is also the stylish Daniel Ogunmodede of Remo Stars. He has led Remo Stars to a top-two finish this season and a historic place in the CAF Champions League.  

    There’s no forgetting Fidelis Ikechukwu of Enugu Rangers who has earned accolades over his achievements in NPFL clubs like MFM, Plateau United and Enugu Rangers. Other coaches in the NPFL who have earned the priviledge to be considered for national service include Paul Offor of Sporting Lagos, Kennedy Boboye (who has won the NPFL twice with Akwa United and Plateau United), Abdul Maikaba (the current Kano Pillars manager), and Lobi Stars manager Eugene Agagbe, among others.

    I listened to a popular sports programme on radio a few days ago, and the topic was the search for a new Super Eagles coach. I felt dejected that many of the people who called in during the programme had no confidence that the Ibrahim Gusau led NFF will do the right thing. It’s a pity for our football that those saddled with administering it don’t care about the country. If they do, they will never hire a foreign coach for the Super Eagles. That is the flagship national team that we’re putting in the care of a foreigner. It’s self-imposed colonialism!

    NFF: Let Peseiro Be The Last Colonial Master is first published on The Whistler Newspaper

    Source

  • Expect 49ers’ Shanahan, Lynch to have familiar plan

    The NFL’s annual yard sale is underway. There will be no shortage of fans interested, too, as if they’re driving the neighborhood looking for open garage doors and used items at good prices.

    Yet here’s an annual reminder as media coverage for expendable players goes wall-to-wall as free agency begins  — let the buyer beware. The brightest shiniest items should go quick — a Kirk Cousins here, a Danielle Hunter there, even a well-worn Tyron Smith. Teams can enter into agreements with players on other teams today at 9 a.m., but nothing official can happen until Wednesday.

    The earlier they agree, the bigger the contract. The better deals will come later, when the lawn is clear and the garage door is about to be shut for the night.

    History tells us the 49ers will be on the lookout for one expensive item that fills a need, then fill gaps with the rest. If you’ve been to the NFC Championship Game four times in five seasons, won it twice and have your star players under contract, it says your roster is in good shape whether you’ve won a Super Bowl or not.

    The 49ers will be good again and chances are they’ll be in the same place come January of 2025 as they were last season: In the playoffs, with a chance to either appease their fan base with a championship in New Orleans or leave them disappointed and bitter over yet another near-miss.

    You can already sense the grumbling on social media when right tackle Colton McKivitz got a relatively modest contract extension (through 2025 worth $7 million and $4.5 million in guarantees). McKivitz was perceived as a weak link all season but wound up being solid enough to make 17 starts and play 1,040 snaps — the most on the team.

    McKivitz isn’t going to make any All-Pro teams and he’s not Trent Williams. His pay suggests if some stud right tackle became available either in free agency or the draft, he could change positions (guard) or roles (swing tackle).

    San Francisco 49ers offensive lineman Colton McKivitz (68) blocks during an NFL preseason football game against the Green Bay Packers, Friday, Aug. 12, 2022, in Santa Clara, Calif. (AP Photo/Scot Tucker)

    A.P. Photo

    One of the 49ers’ last moves before free agency was extending the contract of right tackle Colton McKivitz (68).

    Signing McKivitz isn’t a sign of weakness, it’s a sign of a 49ers team that has a clue about how to go about their business. Coach Kyle Shanahan and general manager John Lynch haven’t been perfect since they arrived seven years ago in rebuilding the franchise after the Jim Harbaugh/Trent Baalke dynamic imploded and begat Jim Tomsula and Chip Kelly.

    But here’s what Shanahan and Lynch have done, once you throw out the first year with a pathetic roster and the two seasons that were derailed by catastrophic injury (Jimmy Garoppolo in 2018, Nick Bosa and Garoppolo in 2020): They are 48-19 in the regular season, have advanced to the NFC Championship Game four times, are 8-0 in the wild card and divisional playoff rounds and have played in two Super Bowls.

    Preseason rhetoric aside, no team goes into the season convinced its going to win the Super Bowl. It’s a brutal 17-week marathon. Teams play for a chance at a championship, then lay it on the line. A team is built to get to the precipice. Then it’s up to luck, skill and avoiding Patrick Mahomes if you want to win it.

    So in the final year of Brock Purdy’s bargain phase before he irreversibly alters the 49ers’ salary cap structure with an extension befitting his new place in the pecking order of NFL quarterbacks, expect them to go about their business as they have the last two years.

    They can bring back Brandon Aiyuk on an extension at more than $20 million per year on a contract that will drop his cap number below his scheduled $14 million as a first-round pick on a fifth-year option. Cornerback Deommodore Lenoir and others could be in line for upgrades. Wide receiver Jauan Jennings is a restricted free agent and under team control. Money can be moved and the cap is not really a huge impediment.

    The release of Arik Armstead, who reportedly declined a pay cut Sunday after missing 13 regular season games due to injury over the last two seasons, gives the 49ers more financial flexibility.

    No sense in gambling on someone else’s players when you know what you’ve got in your own.

    The 49ers had a first-day surprise in each of the last two seasons. In 2022, it was cornerback Charvarius Ward (three years, $42 million) and last year it was defensive tackle Javon Hargrave (four years, $84 million). Ward was a second-team All-Pro this season. Hargrave probably wasn’t as much of a force as they hoped but that’s the thing about the first wave of free agency — overpaying is part of the deal.

    Tim Brown, who in his playing days was a member of the NFLPA executive board, told me long ago that with the franchise tag, no team loses a player it truly wants to keep. It’s pretty much the truth. That takes pass rushers Brian Burns (Carolina) and Josh Allen (Jacksonville) out of the picture as well as Tampa Bay do-everything safety Antoine Winfield Jr. and Kansas City corner L’Jarius Snead. (Snead, at least, has been given permission to seek a trade, but the Chiefs’ demands are liable to be too steep). Any one of those players would have been a difference-maker on the 49ers’ defense.

    So maybe the 49ers make an early strike at Hunter, the Vikings’ edge rusher whose previous deal prohibited the franchise tag. Hunter had 27 of his 87 1/2 career sacks in the last two seasons. He’ll turn 30 during the 2024 season so a multi-year deal is a roll of the dice, although when playing amateur GM it’s pretty appealing to put him on the opposite side of Nick Bosa and turn them both loose.

    Source

  • Lawmakers set to grill Biden special counsel

    Special counsel Robert Hur is set to testify on Capitol Hill this week, roughly one month after he published a controversial report that stopped short of bringing charges against President Biden for “willfully” retaining classified documents, but raised questions about his mental state and memory.

    The report sparked outrage on both sides of the aisle: Republicans seized on the description of Biden’s memory, using it as fodder to argue that he should not be re-elected to the White House, while Democrats slammed Hur for writing a “gratuitous” report that, they said, inappropriately commented on the president’s mental state.

    Those reactions will collide on Tuesday, when some of Biden’s fiercest critics and most loyal defenders grill Hur during a hearing that will dive into the president’s biggest vulnerability — his age — heading into the November general election.

    Also this week, the House will vote on a bipartisan bill that will force ByteDance, the China-based parent company of TikTok, to divest from the app or face a ban in the U.S.

    And Republicans in both chambers are headed on their annual retreats, as House Republicans look to reset after a chaotic year and the Senate GOP conference prepares for a high-stakes leadership race.

    Hur to discuss controversial report before House panel

    Robert Hur, the special counsel who investigated Biden’s handling of classified documents, will discuss his report on Capitol Hill this week during a highly anticipated hearing that is sure to focus on the president’s age, which has emerged as his top weak spot ahead of the November presidential election.

    Hur is scheduled to appear before the House Judiciary Committee at 10 a.m.

    The hearing comes after Hur released a nearly 400-page report last month that declined to charge Biden for “willfully” retaining classified documents because, he argued, it would be difficult for a jury to convict him because he would likely have presented himself as “a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.”

    Republicans pounced on the body of work, arguing that it is evidence of their claim that Biden is not mentally fit to occupy the White House for another four years. They also criticized Hur for declining to pursue charges because of his concerns over Biden’s memory, juxtaposing it with the charges former President Trump is facing for his retention of classified documents — despite the key differences between the two cases.

    “Having a poor memory does not absolve you from violating the Espionage Act. Being old and elderly does not absolve you from violating the Espionage Act,” Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.) said on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures.”

    Democrats, meanwhile, have denounced Hur for including commentary about Biden’s mental state in his report, and they have argued that the president is up for the job of commander-in-chief. Biden himself told reporters “my memory is fine” during a fiery press conference hours after Hur’s work was released.

    That message resurfaced last week after Biden delivered his State of the Union address that, many said, was a strong speech for the president at a crucial moment in the 2024 campaign.

    And Democrats once again took aim at Hur.

    “President @JoeBiden at SOTU showed in real time that he was sharp, agile and strong. You know who really looks like a fool and a total partisan hack? Dr. Robert Hur,” Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), a member of the Judiciary Committee, wrote on X last week.

    Biden’s age has emerged as a key issue in the 2024 presidential election. A New York Times/Siena College poll released earlier this month found that 61 percent of voters who supported the president in 2020 strongly or somewhat agree that he is “just too old” to serve effectively. Of the respondents who said they plan to back Biden in 2024, 59 percent said he is too old to be an effective president.

    House to weigh in on TikTok ban

    The House this week will vote on a bipartisan bill that could ban the popular app TikTok in the U.S., as lawmakers sound the alarm about China being able to access information about Americans.

    The measure — titled the “Protecting Americans From Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act” — would require ByteDance, the China-based parent company of TikTok, to divest from the application or face a ban in the U.S.

    Consideration of the legislation comes as lawmakers raise national security concerns about whether the Chinese government is able to access data of Americans who use TikTok. The app, for its part, has pushed back on the allegations pertaining to national security.

    The effort to ban has sparked intense opposition from the platform and its users. Last week, the platform urged users to call their lawmakers and voice opposition to the bill that could lead to a ban of the app, prompting swarms of calls on Capitol Hill.

    The legislation, sponsored by Reps. Mike Gallagher (R-Wis.) and Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.), advanced out of the House Energy and Commerce Committee in a unanimous vote last week, tee-ing up a referendum in the full chamber.

    The House is scheduled to consider the measure under suspension of the rules, a fast-track process that is used for bills that have bipartisan support. The legislation requires a two-thirds vote for passage.

    Biden told reporters last week that if Congress passes the TikTok bill, he would sign it.

    “If they pass it, I’ll sign it,” he said.

    House, Senate Republicans embark on annual retreat

    House and Senate Republicans are set to attend their annual retreats this week as the conferences look to reset — and prepare for the future — after a chaotic year on Capitol Hill.

    The House GOP retreat — taking place in West Virginia from Wednesday through Friday — comes after a year of intense infighting for the conference, which led to the successful ousting of their Speaker, prompted a number of shutdown showdowns and brought lawmakers to the brink of what would have been the first-ever economic default.

    The House GOP conference has also seen its razor-thin majority slim even further over the past year, which has made it difficult for Republicans to pass various pieces of legislation on the floor.

    This week’s retreat will be the first for House Republicans with Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) at the helm of the conference.

    The Senate GOP retreat, meanwhile, comes as Republicans are getting ready to select the next leader of their conference for the first time in nearly two decades, as Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) prepares to step down from the top job after a long tenure in the position.

    Senate GOP Whip John Thune (S.D.) and Sen. John Cornyn (Texas), who previously served as whip, are both in the race to succeed McConnell. Some other Republicans, however, are mulling runs.

    Copyright 2024 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

    Source

  • ‘This Is Shameful’ -Peter Obi Raises Concerns Over Alleged N3tn Budget Discrepancy

    The Labour Party, (LP), presidential candidate in the 2023 election, Peter Obi has expressed concerns over an alleged N3tn discrepancy between the budget approved by the National Assembly and the one being implemented by the Presidency.

    Obi noted that the discrepancy represents over 10 per cent of the national budget, which prompted demand for transparency and accountability from both the Nigerian Senate and the Presidency.

    Senator Abdul Ningi of Bauchi Central had raised concerns about the missing N3tn in the 2024 N28.7tn budget.

    In response, Bayo Onanuga, Special Adviser to the President on Information & Strategy, dismissed Ningi’s claim, asserting that the National Assembly increased the budget by N1.2tn in line with democratic principles.

    While reacting, Obi expressed disappointment and criticised the lack of transparency in handling public funds, emphasizing the breach of trust involved.

    Posting on his X on early Monday, Obi wrote: “I find it deeply disconcerting and a matter of grave concern and even shameful to read about the alleged N3tn discrepancy between the budget approved by the Nigerian Senate and the one being implemented by the presidency.

    “One Senator claims there is a separate budget, allegedly containing the N3tn, that differs from what was passed by the National Assembly.

    “This alleged discrepancy is especially worrying because it represents over 10 pet cent of our national budget (estimated at N29tn) and is more than the combined education (N1.54tn) and health (N1.38tn) official budgets.

    “We also deserve full accountability of all our scarce resources placed in public trust. Therefore, we, the Nigerian people, demand a public explanation from both the National Assembly and the Presidency regarding the purpose and process of adding this alleged N3tn.”

    ‘This Is Shameful’ -Peter Obi Raises Concerns Over Alleged N3tn Budget Discrepancy is first published on The Whistler Newspaper

    Source