Tag: General News

  • Zubaida Umar Becomes NEMA’s First Female DG As Tinubu Orders Repositioning Of Agency

    President Bola Tinubu has appointed Mrs. Zubaida Umar as the new Director-General of the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA), making her the first female to head the agency.

    In a State House release, Tinubu mandated Umar to reposition NEMA for performance and responsiveness.

    Umar, according to Tinubu’s spokesman, Chief Ajuri Ngelale, has over 20 years of experience in diverse fields including Human Resources, Finance, and Administration.

    Ngelale said Tinubu expects the appointee to bring much-needed financial and operational discipline to the agency.

    Umar is a member of the Chartered Institute of Bankers and the Institute of Credit Administration, and holds ACCA certifications in Public Financial Management and Digital and Sustainability Financing.

    In her previous role as Executive Director of Finance and Corporate Services at the Federal Mortgage Bank, Umar drove the bank’s strategy and repositioning, transforming it into a modern, digitized mortgage and financial service provider.

    She succeeds Mustapha Habib Ahmed who has held the office since May 31, 2021.

    In a related development, the President appointed Brigadier-General Lawal Ja’afar Isa (Rtd) as the Executive Secretary of the National Commission for Almajiri and Out-of-School Children Education.

    General Ja’afar Isa, a former Military Administrator of Kaduna State from 1993 to 1996, has been tasked to push the Tinubu administration’s drive to guarantee comprehensive education for Nigeria’s out-of-school children.

    Additionally, President Tinubu appointed Alhaji Tijani Hashim Abbas, the Sarkin Sudan Kano, as his Senior Special Assistant on Chieftaincy Matters.

    Zubaida Umar Becomes NEMA’s First Female DG As Tinubu Orders Repositioning Of Agency is first published on The Whistler Newspaper

    Source

  • Fact Check: Milwaukee Mayor Johnson says the city “never defunded the police.” Is he right?

    Republican U.S. Senate candidate Eric Hovde is criticizing large cities for how much they are spending on law enforcement.

    As in, not spending enough.

    Hovde tweeted out a clip of an interview on the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show podcast on Feb. 25, 2024 where he mentioned conversations he had with Milwaukee voters and criticized the movement to “defund the police,” calling it the “dumbest idea of the last 100 years.” 

    Milwaukee Mayor Cavalier Johnson responded to Hovde on X, saying Milwaukee “never defunded the police.” 

    In his tweet, Johnson included a page of the 2023 proposed budget for the Milwaukee Police Department showing an increase in funding from the $280 million adopted in 2022, to more than $300 million. 

    That’s a piece of evidence, but is it the full picture?

    Funding for police in previous budgets

    We reached out to Johnson’s office for backup, and spokesman Jeff Fleming responded by using the Wikipedia definition of the phrase “defund the police,” which describes it as “removing funds from police departments and reallocating them to non-policing forms of public safety and community support, such as social services, youth services, housing, education, healthcare and other community resources.”

    Previous fact-checks have described “defund the police” as a movement to reduce funding to law enforcement and invest in community services such as social services, youth services and public housing. 

    Fleming said any reduction to the police department’s funding in the past was a result of “across the board cuts” or “transfer of significant numbers of employees out of MPD to the new Department of Emergency Communications. No money has been taken from the police and reallocated for other non-policing forms of public safety.”

    In previous budgets, positions within the police department also were eliminated through attrition.

    Fleming also shared a chart from the city’s budget office showing funding for police at the highest levels since 2018 –  at $304 million in the adopted budget for 2024. We went back to each year mentioned in the chart and verified its accuracy. 

    The lowest amount of funding the department received during that time was in 2022 when it received $280 million. 

    Further, in 2020, several aldermen pushed the city to explore a 10% cut in the police budget for 2021, but no such budget amendments were proposed or voted on. 

    That’s not to say police haven’t been negatively impacted by Milwaukee city budgets. 

    The 2021 budget cut 120 police positions under then-Mayor Tom Barrett. Johnson, as Common Council president, was among those who voted in favor of the budget. 

    In addition, Johnson’s tweet does not mention the number of sworn officers has decreased in Milwaukee from 1,864 in 2019, despite spending more on police. 

    In this year’s budget, the Police Department’s average sworn strength would increase to about 1,645. The increase is a product of a requirement in a 2023 state law that boosted funding for local governments across the state but also required Milwaukee to increase police sworn strength. 

    The city is spending more on police in this current budget, at $304 million, than any other department. And that was the case 15 years ago when the city was spending $230 million on police.

    The total 2024 City of Milwaukee budget is $1.92 billion.

    Our ruling

    When responding to a claim about Democrats defunding the police, Johnson said Milwaukee “never defunded the police.” 

    The city of Milwaukee has continued to fund the police department through multiple budgets and for years no department has gotten more funding than police.

    However Johnson does not mention the reduction in recent years of sworn police officers because of across-the-board cuts.

    Our definition of Mostly True is a statement that is accurate but needs clarification or additional information. That fits here.

      



    Source

  • Trump’s Comments About ‘Cutting’ Entitlements in Context

    Para leer en español, vea esta traducción de Google Translate.

    President Joe Biden said he has caught former President Donald Trump admitting that he wants to cut Social Security and Medicare. The Trump campaign said, in context, Trump was talking about cutting waste and fraud in those programs – not benefits.

    There’s some room for disagreement about what Trump may have meant. But Trump has consistently said at other times — not only in this campaign but also as president — that he would not make any cuts to Social Security and Medicare benefits.

    However, even assuming Trump meant to say that he planned to solve the financial predicament faced by Social Security and Medicare by combating waste, fraud and abuse, experts say that wouldn’t do much to fix the long-term finances of those programs.

    First, here is what Trump said in an interview with CNBC’s Joe Kernen. We bolded the part that Biden and his campaign have highlighted.

    Kernen, March 11: There are stark policy differences, obviously, Mr. President, but one thing that I think that at least the perception is that there’s not a whole lot of difference between what you think we should do with entitlements or non-discretionary spending and what President Biden is proposing. It’s almost a third rail of politics. And we’ve got to what a $33, $34 trillion total debt built up and very little we can do in terms of cutting spending. Discretionary is not going to help. Have you changed your, your outlook on how to handle entitlements Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Mr. President? Seems like something has to be done, or else we’re going to be stuck at 120% of debt-to-GDP forever.

    Trump: So first of all, there is a lot you can do in terms of entitlements in terms of cutting and in terms of also the theft and the bad management of entitlements, tremendous bad management of entitlements. There’s tremendous amounts of things and numbers of things you can do. So I don’t necessarily agree with the statement. I know that they’re going to end up weakening Social Security because the country is weak.

    Later that day, on X, Biden posted a clip of the interview, ending with Trump saying, “So first of all, there is a lot you can do in terms of entitlements in terms of cutting.” Biden commented, “Not on my watch.”

    And on March 12, Biden again posted that audio clip. The tweet from Biden said, “I watched the clip of Trump proposing cuts to Social Security and Medicare. I won’t let Trump take seniors’ hard-earned benefits to give tax breaks to his wealthy friends.”

    The following day, during a speech in Wisconsin, Biden promised not to cut Social Security and Medicare, and criticized Trump for his recent remarks. “You know, just this week Donald Trump said cuts to Social Security and Medicare are on the table,” Biden said. “When asked if he’d change his position, he said, quote, ‘There’s a lot we can do in terms of cutting. Tremendous amount of things we can do,’ end of quote.

    But it wasn’t “end of quote,” as Trump’s full response above shows.

    The Trump campaign responded with a post on X that said, “If you losers didn’t cut his answer short, you would know President Trump was talking about cutting waste.” The post includes a clip of the Trump interview that extends all the way to him saying, “So I don’t necessarily agree with the statement.”

    The Washington Post noted that the Trump campaign also sent out an email blast headlined “President Trump Reiterates Protecting Entitlements Like Social Security and Medicare; Would Get Rid of Waste and Fraud.” Trump campaign spokesman Steven Cheung told MarketWatch, “The transcript of his answer … clearly states he did not say anything about cutting entitlements.”

    In an interview with Breitbart on March 13, Trump said, “I will never do anything that will jeopardize or hurt Social Security or Medicare. We’ll have to do it elsewhere. But we’re not going to do anything to hurt them.”

    “There’s so many things we can do,” Trump said. “There’s so much cutting and so much waste in so many other areas, but I’ll never do anything to hurt Social Security.”

    There are aspects of Trump’s comments that support the interpretations of both campaigns.

    Trump said there is “a lot to do” with entitlements “in terms of cutting and in terms of also the theft and the bad management of entitlements.” The word “also” suggests he was talking about “theft and bad management” in addition to cutting entitlement programs.

    However, it’s also true that Trump frequently says on the campaign trail that he would protect the programs, as he did at an event in Georgia on March 9 two days before the CNBC interview. “As I said, for many years, I will always protect Medicare and Social Security,” Trump said.

    Back when Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley were still in the Republican primary, Trump would often criticize them for saying they would raise the eligibility age for Social Security — and as we have written, Trump sometimes got his facts wrong when doing so.

    During Biden’s State of the Union address, Trump posted on Truth Social, “Republicans have no plan to cut Social Security, a made up story by Crooked Joe!” As we wrote, some Republicans — though not Trump — have proposed raising the retirement age for some future beneficiaries. That would reduce scheduled benefits for those affected, and therefore is considered by budget experts to be a cut of the program.

    When House Republicans in early 2023 began to debate among themselves how to reduce government spending, Trump warned them not to include any cuts to Social Security or Medicare.

    “Under no circumstances should Republicans vote to cut a single penny from Medicare or Social Security to help pay for Joe Biden’s reckless spending spree,” Trump said in a video posted to Truth Social on Jan. 20. Trump listed “waste fraud and abuse” as one potential area to cut the budget. He added, “But do not cut the benefits our seniors worked for and paid for their entire lives. Save Social Security. Don’t destroy it.”

    Waste, Fraud and Abuse

    Kernen was correct that Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid finances are problematic.

    Unless the program is changed or new revenues are raised, the reserves of the Social Security trust fund related to the retirement portion of the program are projected to become depleted in 2033. At that time the program would only have enough income to pay 77% of scheduled retirement benefits, according to the latest report from the trustees overseeing the program.

    Likewise, trustees of the Medicare trust funds warn that future expenditures will increasingly outpace workers’ earnings or the projected growth in the economy, such that the trust fund reserves for Part A, which covers hospital expenses, will be deleted in 2031. At that time, revenues would cover just 89% of program costs.

    The trustees estimate that under current policies, the Social Security retirement and disability programs will amass a $22.4 trillion shortfall over the next 75 years. The Medicare trustees estimate a $4.4 trillion shortfall over that same time.

    Trump has been saying all the way back to when he first became a candidate for president that he would solve Social Security and Medicare funding gaps by tackling waste, fraud and abuse in the programs. “Save Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security without cuts. Have to do it,” Trump said at the June 2015 announcement of his presidential candidacy. “Get rid of the fraud. Get rid of the waste and abuse, but save it.”

    But experts told us there’s simply not enough waste, fraud and abuse in the programs to solve their financial challenges.

    “First: you can’t fix Social Security’s finances simply by attacking waste, fraud and abuse,” Charles Blahous, a senior research strategist at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, told us via email. “Social Security is an extraordinarily efficient program, with extremely low administrative costs. Social Security faces a massive funding shortfall, not because of improper payments or administrative waste, but because its scheduled benefits far exceed the amount that worker tax contributions can actually fund. 

    “For perspective, consider that Social Security’s financing shortfall equates to more than 21% of scheduled benefits over the next 75 years, while its administrative cost rate is roughly 0.5% of expenses.

    “Medicaid is a different story,” Blahous said, where “improper payments” are “a significant problem.”

    “Medicare is somewhere in the middle,” he said. “Improper payments are a serious concern in Medicare as well, perhaps one-third to one-half as bad as they are in Medicaid. But Medicare’s financing challenges are so large that they can’t be solved purely by attacking waste and fraud. For perspective, consider my finding that nearly half of the long-term federal fiscal imbalance is due to excess Medicare cost growth alone. That can’t be fixed without taxpayers, healthcare providers and beneficiaries (at least high-income beneficiaries) all contributing to the solution.”

    In 2016, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget wrote that all improper payments from Social Security, including payments to the deceased and the very old, were estimated to be about $3 billion per year. Given that Social Security benefits that year exceeded $900 billion, eliminating all improper payments would have reduced costs “by at most 0.4 percent, extending the program’s solvency by about 3 months.”

    “Social Security cannot be meaningfully fixed with waste, fraud and abuse, as per our post,” Marc Goldwein, senior vice president and senior policy director for the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, told us in an email.

    “Medicare is a different story,” Goldwein said. “There are a tremendous amount of overpayments to providers and insurance companies that one could regard as ‘waste’ and are sometimes connected to fraud and abuse. We could save a tremendous amount of money by reducing these excessive payments.”

    As president, of course, Trump had four years to try to eliminate waste, fraud and abuse. And his proposed budgets sought to make some headway. But again, just addressing waste, fraud and abuse will not solve the long-term finances of Social Security and Medicare.

    As president, Trump proposed budgets that included significant reductions in future Medicare spending. But as we wrote, experts told us the proposals included bipartisan ideas also supported by former President Barack Obama. CRFB said the Medicare proposals “represent reductions in costs not cuts to benefits.”

    Trump did not propose cuts to Social Security retirement benefits — including the age of eligibility for benefits — but, as we wrote, his budgets did call for changes to disability benefits that would translate to cuts for some beneficiaries.


    Editor’s note: FactCheck.org does not accept advertising. We rely on grants and individual donations from people like you. Please consider a donation. Credit card donations may be made through our “Donate” page. If you prefer to give by check, send to: FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Policy Center, 202 S. 36th St., Philadelphia, PA 19104. 



    Source

  • Judge delays Trump hush-money criminal trial until mid-April

    By Michael R. Sisak and Jennifer Peltz | Associated Press

    NEW YORK — Donald Trump’s New York hush-money criminal trial was delayed Friday until at least mid-April as the judge seeks answers about a last-minute evidence dump that the former president’s lawyers said has hampered their ability to prepare their defense.

    Manhattan Judge Juan Manuel Merchan agreed to a 30-day delay starting Friday and scheduled a hearing for March 25 after Trump’s lawyers complained that they only recently started receiving more than 100,000 pages of documents from a previous federal investigation into the matter.

    Merchan said he is holding the hearing to determine if prosecutors should face sanctions or if the case should be dismissed, as Trump’s lawyers have requested.

    The trial had been scheduled to start on March 25. The delay means the trial would start no earlier than April 15. Prosecutors had said they wouldn’t object to a short delay.

    In a letter Friday, Merchan told Manhattan prosecutors and Trump’s defense team that he wanted to assess “who, if anyone, is at fault for the late production of the documents,” whether it hurt either side and whether any sanctions are warranted.

    The judge demanded a timeline of events detailing when the documents were requested and when they were turned over. He also wants all correspondence between the Manhattan district attorney’s office, which is prosecuting Trump, and the U.S. attorney’s office, which previously investigated the matter in 2018.

    The Manhattan district attorney’s office declined comment. Trump lawyer Todd Blanche also declined comment.

    Merchan’s decision upended what had been on track to be the first of Trump’s four criminal indictments to go to trial. Trump, the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee, has fought to delay all of his criminal cases, arguing that he shouldn’t be forced into a courtroom while he should be on the campaign trial.

    Trump’s lawyers wanted a 90-day delay, which would’ve pushed the start of the trial into the early summer, and asked Merchan to dismiss the case entirely. Prosecutors said they were OK with a 30-day adjournment “in an abundance of caution and to ensure that defendant has sufficient time to review the new materials.”

    Trump’s lawyers said they have received tens of thousands of pages of evidence in the last two weeks from the U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan, which investigated the hush money arrangement while Trump was president.

    The evidence includes records about former Trump lawyer-turned-prosecution witness Michael Cohen that are “exculpatory and favorable to the defense,” Trump’s lawyers said. Prosecutors said most of the newly turned over material is “largely irrelevant to the subject matter of this case,” though some records are pertinent.

    The hush money case centers on allegations that Trump falsified his company’s records to hide the true nature of payments to Cohen, who paid porn actor Stormy Daniels $130,000 during the 2016 presidential campaign to suppress her claims of an extramarital sexual encounter with Trump years earlier.

    Trump pleaded not guilty last year to 34 felony counts of falsifying business records and has denied having a sexual encounter with Daniels. His lawyers argue the payments to Cohen were legitimate legal expenses and were not part of any cover-up.

    Prosecutors contend Trump’s lawyers caused the evidence problem by waiting until Jan. 18 — a mere nine weeks before the scheduled start of jury selection — to subpoena the U.S. attorney’s office for the full case file.

    District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office said it requested the full file last year but the U.S. attorney’s office only turned over a subset of records. Trump’s lawyers received that material last June and had ample time to seek additional evidence from the federal probe, the district attorney’s office said.

    Short trial delays because of issues with evidence aren’t unusual, but any delay in a case involving Trump would be significant, with trial dates in his other criminal cases up in the air and Election Day less than eight months away.

    The defense has also sought to delay the trial until after the Supreme Court rules on Trump’s presidential immunity claims, which his lawyers say could apply to some of the allegations and evidence in the hush money case. The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments April 25.

    Trump has repeatedly sought to postpone his criminal trials while he campaigns to retake the White House.

    “We want delays,” Trump told reporters as he headed into a Feb. 15 hearing in New York. “Obviously I’m running for election. How can you run for election if you’re sitting in a courthouse in Manhattan all day long?”

    Source

  • Podcast: Addressing The Significant Increase In The Suicide Rates Of Black Youth

    Rhythm & News Podcast interview with Dr. Rosell Jenkins, a licensed psychologist based in Houston, Texas, discussing the Association of American Medical Colleges findings of increased suicide rates of Black youth between 10-24 by 36% between 2018 and 2021 and the factors that have contributed to this increase. Interview by Chris B. Bennett.

    Source

  • SHOCK VIDEO: Foreign Thugs ATTACK Border Reporters Outside Illegal Alien Shelter In El Paso, TX


    Hispanic men pound on windows, test door handles, throw rocks at reporter’s vehicle

    A group of foreign men loitering at a church sheltering illegal aliens in El Paso, TX, swarmed a Border Hawk vehicle today, pounding the windows and trying to force entry before slinging rocks at us.

    Our reporter became trapped in street traffic outside Sacred Heart Church when at least three thugs approached us while making lewd and menacing gestures and cursing at us in Spanish.

    Two of the men circled around to the driver’s side and began testing our door handles and battering our windows. As our reporter took evasive action and began to pull away, one of the men could be seen making a throwing motion to another man, and a rock struck our roof rack moments later.

    We recovered the projectile later on, as you can see. Thankfully it did not strike a window.

    • Introducing Next Level Foundational Energy from Dr. Jones Naturals starting at 30% off! This cutting-edge dietary supplement is designed to elevate your energy levels and support your overall well-being.

    When we reported the incident to the El Paso Police Department and asked what action they planned to take, an officer responded, “I can’t tell you anything more.”

    Sources on the ground tell us authorities have been alerted countless times about criminal activities at Sacred Heart Church, and say it is not likely police will take any action, despite our cameras picking up clear images of the faces of all suspects involved.

    We will share any updates about this incident as they come in. Please consider supporting our work in the field, as it is becoming increasingly dangerous and costly.


    Hidden Camera Inside Boeing Plant Reveals Horrifying Truth About Air Travel Safety



    Source

  • We’ll Defeat Petrol Subsidy Beneficiaries Fighting Us — Tinubu Declares At Meeting With APC Chairmen

    Bola-Ahmed-Tinubu

    President Bola Tinubu has vowed that his administration will overcome any resistance from those who benefited from the former petrol subsidy regime as the government works to implement progressive policies for Nigerians.

    Addressing the Forum of State Chairmen of the All Progressives Congress (APC) at the State House on Friday, Tinubu declared “As we are fighting corruption, smugglers, and old subsidy beneficiaries, they most certainly will fight back. All those who falsified records and became losers with the subsidy removal, they will fight back. But we will defend our people.”

    The president reiterated that the nation’s treasury belongs to the citizens and “that sacred trust must not be abused” by those seeking to preserve the discredited fuel subsidy regime which drained public finances.

    He assured Nigerians that his administration is working tirelessly to improve their living conditions through progressive policies like student loans, a consumer credit system, social welfare for the unemployed and graduates.

    Tinubu, however, noted that all Nigerians must obtain the National Identification Number (NIN) to facilitate proper planning and effective implementation of the social intervention programmes.

    “The programme of our government will be truly progressive; student loans, a national consumer credit system, and social welfare for the unemployed, as well as graduates. Every Nigerian will find a place of belonging in our country. In the eye of even the biggest hurricane, we will find that place of tranquility and prosperous harmony for the benefit of all. Nigerians will all partake on this national journey to prosperity,’’ the president was quoted as saying by his spokesman, Ajuri Ngelale.

    “I urge the state chairmen that regardless of party affiliation, let us help citizens by mobilizing them for NIN registration. Not just PVCs. Some are poor Nigerians who have not experienced formal education and have no understanding of what NIN is and how it will benefit their lives. We must teach them. We must care for them.

    “Without NIN, we can not embark on social security interventions for the vulnerable. We will be making faulty moves without accurate data and iron-clad, digital intervention structures. I have established a committee of governors, and it is headed by the Vice President, Sen. Kashim Shettima. It is working on what must be done to further lift our people.

    “We need to give hope, and we are giving it to the country and our citizens. We are working hard, day and night, even though some agents of destabilization are present in the polity. Nigerians, with our focused support, shall defeat them,” the President affirmed.

    According to Tinubu, a major priority of his administration is repositioning and diversifying the economy, particularly through agriculture mechanization and ramping up fertilizer supply to farmers.

    “We are bringing mechanized farming to the fore. Yesterday’s crisis will become today’s opportunity. Fertilizers are being supplied to farmers as we speak. Agriculture and economic diversification provide the answers to our problems. We will not continue to import food. We know how to turn lack into abundance, and the world will watch us do it again,’’ he said.

    In his remarks, the APC National Chairman, Abdullahi Ganduje, said the party will soon establish a Progressive Institute for policy development to benefit members and Nigerians.

    We’ll Defeat Petrol Subsidy Beneficiaries Fighting Us — Tinubu Declares At Meeting With APC Chairmen is first published on The Whistler Newspaper

    Source

  • Fact Check: Donald Trump is wrong. Joe Biden doesn’t have an ‘immunity from deportation’ policy.

    After police said a Georgia nursing student was killed by a Venezuelan immigrant, criticism over President Joe Biden’s immigration policies intensified. 

    Laken Riley, 22, was killed Feb. 22 while on a jog at the University of Georgia. The suspect, an immigrant from Venezuela, entered the U.S. illegally in September 2022, Immigration and Customs Enforcement said. 

    Former President Donald Trump says Riley’s death is evidence of what he termed “Biden migrant crime,” although studies show that immigrants in the U.S. illegally are less likely than people born in the U.S. to commit crimes.

    During a recent campaign rally in Rome, Georgia, Trump cited Riley’s killing to condemn what he characterized as Biden’s deportation policies. 

    “Biden has implemented a formal policy that illegal aliens who intrude into the United States are granted immunity from deportation,” Trump said. “Thus, when this monster showed up at our border, he was set free immediately under the program Crooked Joe created — I call it, ‘Free To Kill.’”

    Trump did not clarify what policies he was referring to, and his campaign did not answer our request for comment.

    ICE told PolitiFact that murder suspect Jose Ibarra was given a temporary entry into the country via a process known as parole, allowing him to be released into the U.S. to await further immigration proceedings. But that’s not evidence that Biden has a policy granting people immunity from deportation, immigration experts said. 

    The U.S. has expelled, removed or returned people out of the U.S. around 3.8 million times under Biden, according to PolitiFact’s analysis of Department of Homeland Security data.

    Because of limited resources, Biden implemented deportation priorities 

    On Biden’s first day in office, the DHS published a memo pausing the removals of certain people illegally in the U.S. for 100 days. But federal courts blocked the pause.

    The memo also acknowledged that because of resource constraints, and increased illegal border crossings, resources should be directed to the border and removals should be prioritized for people who threatened national security or public safety or who entered the U.S. after Nov. 1, 2020. 

    “While resources should be allocated to the priorities enumerated above, nothing in this memorandum prohibits the apprehension or detention of individuals unlawfully in the United States who are not identified as priorities herein,” the memo added.

    The memo would not have applied to Ibarra, who entered the U.S. in 2022. 

    In September 2021, DHS released a second memo detailing similar guidelines, instructing ICE to prioritize the removal of people who have crossed the border in recent years or who threaten public safety. Courts also halted those guidelines in 2021, but they were reinstated in 2023 after a Supreme Court decision.

    The Supreme Court said that no administration has had enough resources to arrest or remove all people illegally crossing the border. The federal government therefore had to prioritize the use of available resources, the court said.

    “It may be that Biden’s choice means that certain criminal offenders will not get deported,” said Rick Su, a University of North Carolina Chapel Hill immigration law professor. “But it is not really granting any legal ‘immunity.’ And criminal sentences are still served.”

    Foreign relations, immigration law, resources can dictate deporations 

    Many people who cross the border illegally cannot be immediately deported, but not because of a Biden administration policy. Immigration law, congressional appropriations and foreign policy all factor in what happens to a person at the border. 

    Under immigration law, when people cross the border illegally they can be quickly deported without a formal proceeding in immigration court, unless they’re requesting asylum. That rapid deportation is known as expedited removal. Asylum officers must determine whether migrants have a credible case for seeking asylum.

    “Even those folks, seeking asylum, are certainly not ‘immune’ from deportation and must prove that they meet the standard for either asylum protection, withholding of removal protection, or protection under the Convention Against Torture, in order to remain in the United States,” said  Lindsay Harris, the International Human Rights Clinic director at the University of San Francisco. 

    The volume of people coming to the border and the limited resources appropriated by Congress mean the government must release people to await formal immigration court proceedings,  Theresa Cardinal Brown, the Bipartisan Policy Center’s senior adviser for immigration and border policy, said in a February interview with Katie Couric. A backlog of millions of immigration court cases means it could take years for these new cases to be resolved.

    People’s nationality also affects what happens to them at the border. 

    Under Biden, people are arriving at the border from more countries than in the past, the Migration Policy Institute wrote in a January report. And to deport people, the U.S. needs a working relationship with their countries of origin.

    For example, because of fraught diplomatic relations between the U.S. and Venezuela, Venezuelans cannot be easily deported. Ibarra crossed the U.S.-Mexico border before October 2003, when Venezuela did not accept its own deported nationals and before Mexico began accepting a limited number of deported Venezuelans. People from countries that don’t cooperate with U.S. removals must be released because federal law prohibits indefinite detention.

    “That is not immunity for deportation,” said Sarah Sherman-Stokes, associate director for Boston University’s Immigrants’ Rights and Human Trafficking Program. “It may be a temporary delay in deportation but those people who are slated for deportation and who the administration is unable to remove are under surveillance.”

    Programs to quickly release people aren’t deportation immunity, immigration experts say

    The number of people reaching the border has been rising, stressing resources. That has led the Biden administration to apply different processes to quickly move people out of Border Patrol processing centers. 

    “Due to limited resources, DHS cannot respond to all immigration violations or remove all individuals who are determined to be in the U.S. without lawful immigration status,” a September 2022 Government Accountability Office report said.

    One of these processes, used in fiscal years 2021 and 2022, was called “parole + ATD.” Under that process, people were enrolled in the Alternatives to Detention program, which uses technology such as GPS tracking, ankle monitors or a smartphone app to track people’s locations. They also were paroled into the country and required to appear at an ICE office a few weeks later to officially begin their removal proceedings in immigration court.

    People who threatened national security or public safety or presented an “unmitigable flight risk,” could not be enrolled in the program, according to a CBP memo. A federal court blocked the program in March 2023. 

    But these processes don’t exempt people from deportation, immigration experts said. 

    People under parole “can be deported if they affirmatively do something that is deportable, like commit an ‘aggravated felony’ or a ‘crime involving moral turpitude,’” such as murder or rape, Su said.

    “Parole is not immunity from deportation,” Sherman-Stokes said. “Parole provides a temporary entry into the United States, but people on parole are placed into deportation proceedings and have to make a claim for why they should be able to remain in the United States with authorization.”

    Our ruling

    Trump said, “Biden has implemented a formal policy that illegal aliens who intrude into the United States are granted immunity from deportation.”

    The U.S. has expelled, removed or returned people on about 3.8 million occasions during Biden’s administration, PolitiFact’s analysis of DHS data shows.

    And immigration experts told PolitiFact that DHS’ priorities for deportation and processes under the Biden administration intended to quickly move people out of Border Patrol processing centers are not giving people immunity from deportation. 

    We rate Trump’s claim False.



    Source

  • How Kacey Musgraves opened herself back up to love – Paradise Post

    Mikael Wood | (TNS) Los Angeles Times

    NEW YORK — Kacey Musgraves pulls her iPhone from the pocket of her black puffer vest and starts tapping her way to a recent exchange with a friend.

    “We were literally just talking about this last night,” she says. “Hold on — I want to see how I phrased it.”

    The 35-year-old country star is an enthusiastic user of Apple’s audio message feature, which she says offers two advantages over regular texting: “less time staring at a god— screen,” as she puts it, and the valuable emotional data contained in a person’s voice. “I can read a note from someone and think they’re mad at me,” she says. “But then I’ll hear it, and I’m like, Oh, they’re not!”

    Musgraves finds the previous evening’s monologue and zeroes in on a section where she’s musing about how “there’s so much encoded in us from childhood — past trauma, past experiences — and all that goes into falling in love with someone.” She looks up and sighs. “It honestly freaks me out to think about just how much of chemistry with another person is beyond our control.”

    The precarity of romance is on Musgraves’ mind because … well, really, the idea is never not on her mind. “I’m always making something a little more sad than it needs to be,” she says with a laugh of her music, including on her breakthrough 2018 LP “Golden Hour,” which documented her whirlwind marriage to a fellow Nashville, Tennessee-based singer-songwriter, Ruston Kelly. Blissed-out yet laced with a stoner-ish melancholy, “Golden Hour” won the coveted album of the year prize at the Grammy Awards, vaulting Musgraves from insider-y critics’ darling to pop-crossover fashion plate; three years later, she followed it up with “Star-Crossed,” which presented the tale of her and Kelly’s divorce as a Shakespearean tragedy.

    Now she’s on the cusp of releasing “Deeper Well,” a gorgeous new LP inspired in part by the act of welcoming love back into her life.

    “Please don’t make me regret/ Opening up that part of myself/ That I’ve been scared to give again,” she sings in “Too Good to Be True,” her close-miked vocal swaddled by finger-picked acoustic guitar. Later, in the Celtic-accented “Heaven Is,” she defines that place as “lying in your arms so safe and warm.”

    Yet “Deeper Well,” due Friday, is also about cultivating one’s own strength through the rituals of therapy and self-care. In the title track she sings about setting aside her gravity bong and learning the lessons of her Saturn return — a trendy astrological reference similarly deployed lately by SZA and Ariana Grande. “Saturn can be a bitch of a planet,” Musgraves acknowledges, “but it’s having a moment.” In another track, “Sway,” she describes her determination to go with the flow like “a palm tree in the wind.”

    “Kacey just wants to grow,” says Shane McAnally, the prolific Nashville songwriter who’s counted Musgraves as a friend and collaborator for more than a decade. “And this record feels like roots — like something you put down with your feet solidly on the ground.”

    That goes for the album’s sound as well as its outlook. After toying with the sleek textures of Y2K-era pop and R&B for “Star-Crossed,” Musgraves returns on “Deeper Well” to the kind of rootsy, hand-played arrangements that defined her early work — and just as country music has become a go-to style for acts such as Beyoncé, Post Malone and Lana Del Rey, all of whom have country (or perhaps country-adjacent) projects on the way.

    “Deeper Well” opens with the strummy “Cardinal,” in which she recounts being visited by that bird — a favorite of her mentor John Prine — not long after Prine’s death in 2020. Then there’s the waltz-time “The Architect,” a classic bit of down-home philosophizing she co-wrote with McAnally and Josh Osborne: “Even something as small as an apple/ It’s simple and somehow complex/ Sweet and divine, the perfect design/ Can I speak to the architect?”

    “‘Star-Crossed’ was more hard-edged and acidic than all my other music,” she says today. “It was more affected in terms of production. And that was fun to play with. But I was definitely craving something different for this.” What she landed on feels both cozy and exploratory — a homecoming disguised as a vision quest.

    Says Reese Witherspoon, who teamed with Musgraves last year to create the Apple TV+ series “My Kind of Country”: “I think it’s her most ethereal and introspective work.”

    It’s a few days before Musgraves is set to perform this month on “Saturday Night Live,” and the singer is seated at a corner table in a restaurant on the Upper East Side. Dressed in black athleisure wear, her long hair tucked beneath a Polo ball cap, she speaks wistfully about New York City, where she and her two producers, Ian Fitchuk and Daniel Tashian, decamped from Nashville last year to make “Deeper Well” amid a motivating change of scenery.

    “There’s always something weird to see here,” Musgraves says. “Last night we got stuck behind this trash truck that for some reason had bouquets of flowers tied to it.” She fondly recalls a late night singing karaoke and another one downing Guinness at an Irish dive bar; she describes the smell of weed in Washington Square Park as though it were a cherished childhood memory.

    Tashian identifies one benefit to their immersion in New York’s much-ness. “I think for someone who has maybe slight ADHD tendencies — I don’t know if Kacey’s copped to that, but I can tell you from experience that she most certainly has a little of that going on — sometimes you need to be overwhelmed by the world to focus,” the producer says.

    Indeed, there’s an almost Zen-like quality to the sparsely arranged “Deeper Well” that makes even the tasteful “Golden Hour” sound busy by comparison. “The small details define everything,” says John Janick, chairman and chief executive of Musgraves’ record company, Interscope Capitol Labels Group. “Each song is a delicate expression of self.” With echoes of Jim Croce and Simon & Garfunkel in their heads, Musgraves, Fitchuk and Tashian set up in the same warmly appointed attic space that Jack Antonoff favors at the historic Electric Lady Studios in the Village; for “Heaven Is” they moved out onto the building’s roof to catch a vibe.

    Musgraves compares the album to “a walk through nature,” which she knows registers as an irony in light of the urban setting. But there’s something to that in the way the stripped-down music showcases the essentials of her astute songwriting and her high, clear voice.

    “Kacey sings just like she talks,” says Chris Thile, whose band Nickel Creek will open for Musgraves on the road this fall. “The honesty of it disarms you at every turn.” Adds singer Madi Diaz, who recruited Musgraves to appear on her 2023 single “Don’t Do Me Good“: “She delivers the complexities of life the way we actually go through it.”

    Does she ever regret writing so nakedly about relationships given that they’ve all eventually ended? (Some of the tenderest songs on “Deeper Well” refer to her romance with poet Cole Schafer, with whom she broke up last year.) Musgraves shakes her head.

    “I think if you’re lucky you’re able to experience love several times,” she says. “Some people just have one. Look at my sister, who met her husband when they were 14 and 16, and now they’ve got a kid. Or my grandparents, who met in second and third grade — they’ve literally lived their entire lives together. I’m just different in that way. I’ve experienced many loves, and I just gather more information about myself with each one.” She smiles. “And then I write about it.”

    Musgraves grew up in tiny Golden, Texas, and started singing (and yodeling) as a precocious kid in an oversize cowgirl hat. At 18 she flamed out on the televised singing competition “Nashville Star” but used the springboard to land work as a pro songwriter on Music Row; in 2011 she co-wrote “Mama’s Broken Heart” with McAnally and their pal Brandy Clark then watched as Miranda Lambert turned the song into a No. 2 country hit.

    Her success behind the scenes led to a major-label record deal of her own. Yet right away Musgraves was scraping against country orthodoxy: “Follow Your Arrow,” from her 2013 debut, advised listeners to “roll up a joint” and to “kiss lots of boys — or kiss lots of girls if that’s something you’re into.”

    “From Day 1, I feel like people have known exactly what I’m about,” she says. “Still one of the greatest compliments anyone’s ever paid me has been people in the LGBTQ community saying, ‘I’ve always loved country music but I never felt like I was invited to that party until I heard your music.’”

    Nashville is more inclusive these days than it was a decade ago thanks in part to Musgraves, who’s maintained her efforts to diversify the industry, as with “My Kind of Country,” a competition show meant to spotlight talent from underrepresented backgrounds. (Asked what she makes of the broader political climate in Tennessee, where Gov. Bill Lee recently signed a law restricting drag performances, she says, “Pretty bleak,” and adds, “I don’t think it’s the drag queens that are desecrating society.”)

    Still, she says, “I don’t feel like I need to be the spokesperson for country music.” In 2018, genre purists debated what it meant that “Golden Hour” contained a disco song in the shimmering “High Horse“; in 2021, the Recording Academy ruled that “Star-Crossed” wasn’t eligible for the Grammys’ country album category. Musgraves finds all the gatekeeping a bit boring. “I just do my own thing,” she says with a shrug — including cutting “I Remember Everything,” her hit duet with Zach Bryan that won the country duo/group performance award at this year’s Grammys ceremony.

    Six months after it debuted atop Billboard’s Hot 100, “I Remember Everything” is still hanging around inside the chart’s top 10, which you can take as proof that the much-discussed country boom is real. But if Musgraves is always eager to reach new listeners — see her collaborations with Troye Sivan and Camila Cabello and her stint as Harry Styles’ warm-up act — she’s also wary of what she calls the “trap” of modern pop stardom, in which “people want you to be extremely authentic until your authenticity doesn’t align with whatever they want.”

    There’s a song on “Deeper Well” called “Lonely Millionaire” that suggests she’s encountered fame’s illusory comforts. “Look, I’m not saying money doesn’t make things easier,” she says. “But the deeper I get into my career, the more I find refuge in the real, tangible, irreplaceable stuff.”

    Next month Musgraves is due to launch a world tour behind “Deeper Well,” and she’s been trying to figure out how to bring the album’s intimate truths into an arena. She’s also considering covering SZA’s “Nobody Gets Me” — “It’d be sick, right?” she asks — and Sivan’s “One of Your Girls.” “So sweet, that little boy,” she says of Sivan. “I just want to put him in my pocket.”

    A couple of years ago, Musgraves would’ve viewed a tour as a welcome opportunity to leave home. She’d bought a big fancy place in Nashville after her divorce — you can watch her give a tour to Architectural Digest on YouTube — but discovered before long that she didn’t feel comfortable there by herself.

    “I was kind of scared of alone time — not scared, but trepidatious,” she says. “I’d get anxiety about being alone and not having anything on my schedule.” One night in 2022 she started perusing Zillow; she found a spot in the woods she liked and decided to live there instead.

    Now she’s “gotten really good at being alone,” she says. “I actually feel recharged by it, which is the opposite of how I used to be.” She laughs. “When I’m home now, I could not see anyone for days and not give a s—.”

    ©2024 Los Angeles Times. Visit latimes.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

    Source

  • Podcast: Discussing the State Of Florida’s DEI Programs And Their Affect On Black Athletes

    Rhythm & News Podcast interview with political commentator Opio Sokoni discussing the NAACP president and CEO Derrick Johnson’s recent call on Black student-athletes to reconsider their decisions to attend public colleges and universites in Florida due to a new state policy preventing institutions from utilizing government funds for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. Interview by Chris B. Bennett.

    Source