Kiev, February 2, 2023
Photo: spzh.news
The State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Policy and Freedom of Conscience announced the results of its examination of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church’s status 
Ukraine takes another step towards banning the Church—declares UOC is still part of Moscow PatriarchateThe Ukrainian state has taken another serious step towards banning the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
“>yesterday, declaring that it’s still part of the Moscow Patriarchate—a clear step towards outright banning the Church throughout the country.
However, the UOC continues to defend itself. In comments for the UOC’s Information-Education Department, Archpriest Alexander Bakhov, the head of the Church’s Legal Department, characterized the examination as “illegal, conducted in violation of the law, and going beyond the bounds of its object of study.”
According to Fr. Alexander, the conclusion of the examination would shock any lawyer, because it was written by people who had no clear grounds for participating in such work.
In early January, the UOC submitted an appeal for clearly biased members to be excluded from the “expert group” and for international religious scholars to be brought in, but their appeal was ignored.
As Fr. Alexander notes, several members of the “expert group” are well-known to have made not only biased, but openly hostile statements against the UOC, while at the same time they were expected to ensure an objective an unbiased study.
Meanwhile, Viktor Yelensky, the head of the State Service for Ethnic Policy and Freedom of Conscience, declares that Ukraine is a paragon of religious freedom.
Further, the “expert group” was 
Presidential decree: Submit bill to ban churches connected to Russia, examine UOC statutes for such connection, check legality of UOC’s presence at Kiev Caves LavraThe head of the State Service for Ethnopolitics, Elena Bogdan, has warned several times that a ban on the Ukrainian Orthodox Church is ill-advised and would certainly cause destabilization in society.
“>tasked with the studying the statutes of the UOC, but instead they drew their conclusion from the statutes of the Russian Church, which still include a special section dedicated to the UOC, dating to before the UOC Council in May where it separated itself from the ROC.
As the analysis of the Union of Orthodox Journalists points out, defining the status of the UOC based on documents of the ROC is like defining the borders of Ukraine based on Russian-produced maps.
“So this examination absolutely doesn’t correspond to the subject of the study,” Fr. Alexander emphasized.
What is happening is nothing less than the gross violation of the freedom of religion of the 12,000 religious registered parishes representing millions of citizens of Ukraine, the UOC legal head said.
“If a decision is made based on this conclusion, we will defend ourselves by all legal means, both at the national and international levels,” he assured.
His Eminence Archbishop Sylvester of Belogorod, rector of the Kiev Theological Academy and Seminary, also spoke on related matters in an interview with dialogtut.org.
While the Ukrainian state’s “expert group” concluded that the UOC is part of the ROC because it hasn’t declared its own autocephaly, Abp. Sylvester explains that this simply isn’t how things work in the Church—that autocephaly can’t simply be declared, but must be recognized by the other Local Churches.
“Thus, the difficulties that a unilateral declaration of autocephaly would create are obvious, but the benefits are questionable,” His Eminence says.
Follow OrthoChristian on Twitter, Vkontakte, Telegram, WhatsApp, MeWe, and Gab!
