Starmer’s Govt Abandons FIVE Rape Gang Inquiries, Gets Pushback

Starmer’s Govt Abandons FIVE Rape Gang Inquiries, Gets Pushback

ER Editor: So the unpopular-on-steroids UK Labour government appears to have abandoned five inquiries into the rape gang scandal, redirecting 5 million pounds of funding elsewhere. Independent MP Rupert Lowe is attempting to right that wrong. Neil Wilby elaborates below.

Worth reading in full —

Worth listening to (4 minutes) —

***

Daily Sceptic also picked this up —

What’s Happened to the Rape Gang Inquiries?

********

Starmer’s Govt Abandons FIVE Rape Gang Inquiries, Gets Pushback

.

The decision, announced in Parliament earlier this afternoon (8th April 2025), by Safeguarding Minister Jess Phillips, marks a significant reversal from promises made in January this year by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper to investigate the systemic abuse of vulnerable children across Britain.

.

Conservative MP, Katie Lam, led the charge against the policy shift in a passionate speech to the Commons, accusing Labour of perpetuating a cover-up of one of the nation’s most harrowing scandals.

.

Ms Lam, MP for Weald of Kent and a former Home Office adviser, addressed a near-empty chamber this afternoon, decrying the government’s failure to deliver justice for victims of grooming gangs: “Children across Britain have been sexually tortured by gangs of men,” she declared, emphasising the scale of the abuse—estimated to span dozens of towns—and the complicity of those in power who allowed it to persist unchecked. She argued that local inquiries, even when promised, lack the scope and authority to “join the dots” across regions, a point she reiterated in calling for a national inquiry. “Local inquiries are not good enough—they can’t,” she said, cutting off mid-sentence as she underscored the urgency of a broader approach.

.

Her speech, delivered hours before this article’s deadline, has yet to be fully transcribed in Hansard, but its thrust aligns with growing discontent over Labour’s handling of the issue.

.

The policy shift came to light earlier today when Sammy Woodhouse, a prominent grooming gang survivor and campaigner, posted on X: “BREAKING: Labour will no longer be holding five local inquiries into rape gangs. The £5 million will now go towards ‘locally-led work,’ following feedback from local authorities.”

.

ER insert —

Sammy’s statement, timestamped around 4:00 PM BST, preceded a flurry of corroborating posts from named accounts, including news outlets and political figures, confirming Phillips’ announcement occurred in the early afternoon.

.

The redirection of funds—initially pledged to support inquiries in pilot areas like Oldham—has been framed by Labour as a response to local councils’ preferences, though specifics remain sparse pending official records.

.

The decision caps a turbulent three months for Labour’s grooming gang policy. In January, Cooper outlined plans for five local inquiries, backed by £5 million, to be modelled on the Telford inquiry led by Tom Crowther KC.

.

The move followed intense pressure from opposition MPs, including Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch and Reform UK’s Nigel Farage, as well as public outcry amplified by tech billionaire Elon Musk’s interventions on X.

.

By 20th March, however, the funding model shifted to a competitive bidding process for councils, a change criticised as diluting accountability. Today’s announcement scraps the inquiries entirely, prompting accusations that Labour is retreating from its commitments under pressure from local authorities reluctant to revisit past failures. Oldham and Bradford top that particular list of shame.

Public reaction has been swift and scathing. Campaigners, including Sammy Woodhouse, have long argued that only a comprehensive inquiry can expose systemic failings across police forces, councils, and the Crown Prosecution Service—failings Sir Keir Starmer acknowledged in 2012 as DPP, when he admitted the CPS had let victims down.

.

Sammy’s collaboration with independent MP Rupert Lowe on a crowdfunded “Grooming Gang Inquiry,” launched on 28th March with a £100,000 target, reflects this frustration. Whilst lacking statutory powers, their effort—supported by survivors, ex-police, and experts—has been positioned as a grassroots alternative to government inaction, a narrative likely strengthened by Labour’s latest move.

.

The beleagured government, the most unpopular in living memory, defends the shift …

CONTINUE READING HERE

************

Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com

Starmer’s Govt Abandons FIVE Rape Gang Inquiries, Gets Pushback

Starmer’s Govt Abandons FIVE Rape Gang Inquiries, Gets Pushback

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Source: TLB