A paedophile who kept a diary where he listed children he wanted to r@pe “some day very soon” has been jailed.
Gerrard Charnley declared in the twisted journal he was “proud to be a p@edophile” as he wrote in horrific detail his depraved desires.
The 52-year-old wrote in his “My P@edophile Diary” the names of children he wanted to r@pe alongside the dates he wanted to carry out the attacks.
He also downloaded “p@edophile manuals” entitled “The P@edophile’s Handbook” and “How to Practice Child Love” which contained advice and guidance about !busing children.
In one disturbing entry dated in June 2019, Charnley wrote: “I want to r@pe [girl’s name] some day very soon. I’m proud to say this as a p@edophile.”
The secret memoir was unearthed by officers when they raided his home in Coronation Drive, Widnes, on February 27 2024 where they seized a total of 12 electronic devices.
Charnley had collected so many child @buse pictures and videos that the police were unable to count just how many files he had downloaded.
He this week appeared at Liverpool crown court where he was jailed for 14 months and was handed a 10-year s£xual harm prevention order.
Charnley was also told to sign the s£x offenders’ register for the next decade.
He nodded when he was told he would be going to prison and told the judge as he left the dock: “I’m guilty. I’m sorry, ok.’
Sarah Holt, prosecuting, one document found on his devices was entitled “My P@edophile Diary,” which “contained references to specific dates and what the defendant wanted to do to particular children”.
This diary also contained a list of Charnley’s favourite websites for viewing indecent images of children and a list headed “preteen s**gs I’d love to rape”. Other Word documents and PDF files he had created included “P@edo Thoughts 2019”.
He was meanwhile found to have used his laptop to access the dark web, with his browser containing bookmarks for sites labelled “p@edo links”, “naughty kids” and “little girls”.
The history of the VLC Media Player app on his Samsung Galaxy tablet also showed that Charnley had watched videos with titles which were “indicative of material containing containing child @buse”.
Charnley was also found to have collected a total of 15,081 pictures and 2,308 videos graded as being in category A, those showing the most serious forms of @buse.
These included images of babies being r@ped.
He further downloaded 17,383 category B images and 169,968 category C images, as well as nine computer generated prohibited images of children and nine extreme p0rnographic images.
More than 230,000 additional images were not categorised by the police due to the sheer volume of material present on his devices.
Under interview, Charnley claimed that he “remembered downloading documents such as a p@edophile manual, but thought he had deleted it without reading it”.
Myles Wilson, defending, told the court that his client had contacted Stop It Now, a charity which works to prevent child s£xual @buse, following his arrest and suffers from “poor physical and mental health”.
He added: “He gives help to his elderly father, who has mobility issues and rarely leaves the house. The defendant does his father’s shopping.
“Clearly he had become obsessed with this type of material, almost a compulsion. He was open with the police in acknowledging that he has issues and that he finds children attractive.
“He does not want to be in this position in the future. He was relieved, he tells me, when he was arrested, because he realised that this chapter of his life was coming to an end.”
Charnley admitted possession of indecent images of children, three counts of making indecent images, possession of prohibited images of children, possession of extreme p0rnographic images and possession of a p@edophile manual.
Sentencing, the Honorary Recorder of Liverpool Judge Andrew Menary KC said: “This court sees, sadly, many cases of this type. But your case, compared to others, is one where the nature of the material recovered and the content of the images depicted is truly shocking.
“There were so many images, something approaching half a million, recovered from your devices.
“I am told that there are 232,000 images which remain uncategorised, such was the sheer scale of the task. It is safe to say that your collection of images was enormous by any standard.
“You appear to have been keeping a diary of the sorts of things you would like to do to children. They are horrific.
“They may well be you playing out your fantasies in writing, but they demonstrate the depraved, perverted nature of your desires and your reason for accessing all of this material.
“This written material demonstrates clearly that yours was not an idle obsession, but one where you were fixated on the abuse of children. It is trite to observe that while you yourself did not generate these images, your accessing of them and collecting of them develops a market for this sort of material.
“I have given very careful consideration to whether or not any sentence other than immediate imprisonment is available for this particular offending. It is often the case that defendants such as you, who have committed this type of offence, will benefit from construction intervention by the Probation Service.
“But there are some offences which fall into a category where the offending can only be described as particularly serious of its type. I am afraid that that is the position so far as you are concerned.
“I am satisfied that only an immediate term of imprisonment is appropriate to deal with offending of the scale and type described in this case where you have quite deliberately, over many years, sought out and collected a huge quantity of appalling material.
“Alongside that you have generated your own material, demonstrating that you have a clear desire to participate in the abuse of these children.”