Category: Fact Check

  • Fact Check: PolitiFact’s top 10 fact-checks of politicians and pundits in 2023

    Before we turn the calendar to 2024, we want to reflect.

    From its beginnings, PolitiFact has focused on examining politicians’ statements and rating them for accuracy. We soon started evaluating claims made by pundits, columnists, commentators and other influential members of the media.

    As 2023 ends, we wanted to take a look back at which pundit and politician fact-checks most captured readers’ attention during the year.  

    Our data shows that readers came to PolitiFact for fact-checks on politicians’ statements about the U.S.-Mexico border, the country’s debt and energy independence, and former president Donald Trump’s indictments. Interest in pundit claims included the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack, the COVID-19 vaccines and LGBTQ+ issues.

    Most of the top 10 fact-checks fell on the false side of our Truth-O-Meter. Three were rated Half True and two others, Mostly True.

    Here’s the list.

    10. Matt Walsh: “Tuck-friendly” bathing suits at Target “are available in kids’ sizes.”

    Our ruling: False

    As part of its LGBTQ+ Pride collection, Target sold adult swimwear with “tuck-friendly construction” that had extra crotch coverage to “tuck” private parts. 

    But misleading posts about the swimwear quickly spread online, with conservative commentators, such as Matt Walsh, and social media accounts, such as Libs of TikTok and Gays Against Groomers, claiming that the retailer was selling the bathing suits for children.

    The swimwear was available only in adult sizes, a Target spokesperson told PolitiFact. The retailer’s website labeled the swimsuit seen in the video we fact-checked as a “Pride Adult One Piece Colorblock Swimsuit.” 

    9. Donald Trump: “They are trying to make it illegal to question the results of a bad election.”

    Our ruling: False 

    In August, former President Donald Trump framed the special counsel’s federal indictment against him as an attempt to criminalize raising questions over election results. But the Aug. 1 indictment over Trump’s efforts to subvert the 2020 presidential election results said he “had a right, like every American, to speak publicly about the election” and make false claims. It said Trump also was entitled to challenge the results lawfully through recounts, audits or lawsuits. 

    Trump was indicted for his actions, not for questioning the election. The indictment says he “pursued unlawful means of discounting legitimate votes and subverting the election results,” amounting to criminal conspiracies.

    8. Scott Adams: People not vaccinated against COVID-19 “came out the best.”

    Our ruling: False 

    In January, cartoonist Scott Adams, who created the “Dilbert” comic strip, claimed in a YouTube livestream that people unvaccinated against COVID-19 are better off than those who are.

    But data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and medical experts has consistently shown that unvaccinated people are at greater risk than vaccinated people of getting infected by COVID-19 and dying from it. COVID-19 vaccines have a strong safety record and infection alone provides only limited protection.

    Usually, vaccine side effects are minor and emerge within days, not years later. Some people who get infected with COVID-19 experience “long COVID” — physical effects and disorders that can last for years.

    7. Laura Ingraham: Video clip shows that protesters in Tennessee “made their way onto the state Capitol floor.”

    Our ruling: False 

    A video of a protest at the Tennessee Capitol in March over gun violence didn’t show unauthorized protesters on the House floor, as Fox News host Laura Ingraham claimed.

    Protesters marched on the state Capitol days after three adults and three children were killed in a deadly mass shooting at The Covenant School in Nashville, Tennessee. The video Ingraham shared showed three Democratic legislators who took over the lectern and led chants echoed by protesters who had gathered in the viewing galleries, which were open to the public. 

    6. Gavin Newsom: “Per capita, more Floridians move to California than Californians moving to Florida.”

    Our ruling: Mostly True 

    We found that California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, was on track when he told Fox News host Sean Hannity in June that, per capita, more Floridians have moved to California than the other way around. U.S. Census Bureau data from 2021, the latest available, backs that up. 

    This has been a slight trend for decades, experts said. But the difference between the rate of Floridians moving to California and vice versa is tiny and based on estimates, and there’s debate on whether the difference is statistically significant.

    5. Donald Trump: The Trump administration “built nearly 500 miles of border wall.”

    Our ruling: Half True 

    Trump’s administration built 52 miles of new primary border barriers — the first impediment people encounter if they’re trying to cross the southern border with Mexico — where there were none before.

    The administration built 458 miles of primary and secondary border barriers, U.S. Customs and Border Protection data showed. The majority were replacements of smaller, dilapidated barriers. Replacement barriers and secondary barriers that are behind primary barriers don’t add miles to the southern border’s total coverage.

    4. Donald Trump: “The same people that raided Israel are pouring into our once beautiful USA, through our TOTALLY OPEN SOUTHERN BORDER, at Record Numbers.”

    Our ruling: Pants on Fire! 

    Trump made this claim on his Truth Social platform days after Hamas attacked Israel on Oct. 7. But terrorism experts told PolitiFact that there’s no proof that Hamas’ militants have been “pouring” across the U.S. southern border, and the Department of Homeland Security said there’s no intelligence to back up the claim.

    People aren’t crossing the southern border to conduct terrorist attacks or take over parts of the United States, immigration experts said. A small percentage may commit crimes, such as selling drugs, but most come for jobs and political freedom. 

    3. Gavin Newsom: “We are more energy independent today” under President Joe Biden.

    Our ruling: Half True 

    In a conversation with Hannity after the second Republican presidential debate in September, Newsom said the U.S. was more energy independent under President Joe Biden. His statement came in response to a claim by then-candidate and former Vice President Mike Pence during the debate that the country achieved energy independence during his tenure when Trump was president.

    In several measurable ways, the U.S. has moved toward energy independence in recent years. Experts said, though, that this hasn’t meant genuine energy independence. The U.S. still depends on international crude oil for key elements of its energy needs, making it sensitive to overseas developments in energy, trade and foreign policy. 

    Energy independence gains under Trump’s leadership have strengthened under Biden, data shows.

    2. Joe Biden: “One quarter” of today’s $31.4 trillion federal debt “was accumulated in the four years of my predecessor,” Donald Trump.

    Our ruling: Half True 

    Biden’s number is accurate — about one-fourth of the total debt incurred as of January 2023 came during Trump’s presidency. 

    However, assigning debt to a particular president is tricky, because so much of the spending was approved by decades-old, bipartisan legislation that set the parameters for Social Security and Medicare. A different calculation shows more debt stemming from former President Barack Obama, with whom Biden served as vice president. 

    1. Tucker Carlson: Capitol Police officers “helped” QAnon Shaman Jacob Chansley and “acted as his tour guides.”

    Our ruling: Pants on Fire! 

    In the top spot is former Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who claimed in March that Capitol Police officers acted as “tour guides” for “QAnon Shaman” Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack. 

    But available evidence rebuts this. Officers repeatedly asked Chansley to leave the building. This is corroborated by the plea agreement Chansley signed and a Capitol Police officer’s account of the events. 

    Capitol Police Chief J. Thomas Manger called Carlson’s claim “outrageous and false” in an internal department memo. He wrote that officers used de-escalation tactics to try to persuade rioters to get one another to leave the Capitol.



    Source

  • Fact Check: No hay evidencia de que un influencer palestino sea un ‘actor de crisis’ en Gaza

    Un influencer en las redes sociales ha publicado videos desde la Franja de Gaza sobre sucesos de la guerra entre Israel y Hamas.

    Saleh Aljafarawi, un palestino de 26 años que vive en Gaza, tiene decenas de miles de seguidores en Instagram, TikTok y YouTube. Varios canales de televisión, incluyendo MSNBC, BBC y Al Jazeera, han sacado al aire algunas de sus imágenes del conflicto. Al Jazeera lo etiquetó como “periodista” en un video. (En uno de sus videos, Aljafarawi tiene una chaqueta que dice “Press” o prensa).

    Un video en TikTok del 15 de noviembre dice en su subtítulo, “MSNBC transmitió un video de este actor de la crisis de Pallywood”. 

    El término “Pallywood”, combina los términos “Palestina” y “Hollywood”. Algunos usuarios en las redes sociales usan la palabra para implicar que los palestinos están manipulando los medios de comunicación durante la guerra.

    La cuenta oficial del gobierno de Israel en X, antes conocido como Twitter, también llamó a Aljafarawi un “actor de crisis”.

    PolitiFact investigó las cuentas de redes sociales de Aljafarawi y estas no revelaron que él sea un “actor de crisis” o que finja la información que comparte. Varias de las  imágenes que supuestamente prueban que eél es un “actor” no muestran a Aljafarawi. Otras imágenes son de él actuando para videos musicales o para sus videos como influencer. 

    Aljafarawi ha dicho que Israel es un “ocupante”, acusó a israelíes de apuntar ataques de aviones a mujeres y niños, y celebró el lanzamiento de cohetes a Israel.

    Un video de Aljafarawi en Instagram del 10 de noviembre lo muestra con sangre en sus manos y corriendo alrededor del hospital al-Shifa. Aljafarawi muestra un hueco en el techo y luego a una niña con sangre en sus manos y cara. El subtítulo del video, originalmente en arabe, dice, según una traducción automática de Instagram: “Ellos bombardearon el hospital”. Su video ya no está en Instagram; una versión archivada (y gráfico) puede verse aquí).

    La periodista de MSNBC, Chris Jansing, reprodujo el video de Aljafarawi durante su programa del 10 de noviembre y categorizó a Aljafarawi como un activista.

    Newsmax dijo que el influencer palestino es un ‘actor de crisis’

    La publicación en TikTok muestra un clip del show de Rob Schmitt en el canal de televisión conservador, Newsmax TV. Schmitt dudó la legitimidad de Aljafarawi el 10 de noviembre diciendo que, “MSNBC sacó al aire un actor de la crisis de Gaza”. 

    Schmitt en el segmento de Newsmax también muestra una combinación de fotos que han difundido personas que afirman que Aljafarawi es un actor. Esas imágenes tratan de mostrar a Aljafarawi en roles diferentes, como un “luchador de la libertad”, “donador de sangre” y “corresponsal de guerra”. Pero varias de las fotos ni siquiera lo muestran a él, y otras son de sus cuentas de redes sociales y presentadas fuera de contexto. Por ejemplo:

    • La foto del “cuerpo revivido” no muestra a Aljafarawi; es de un niño tailandes usando un disfraz de Halloween, según The Associated Press.

    • La del “paciente fuerte”, la cual ha circulado en TikTok desde agosto. The Associated Press reportó que la imagen es de un adolescente herido en una cama de hospital, no de Aljafarawi.

    • La imagen del “luchador de la libertad” de Aljafarawi con una pistola es de un video musical que fue eliminado hace unas semanas. En el video musical, él posaba como un luchador cantante de Hamas. 

     

    (Collage en el video en TikTok que dice que Aljafarawi es un “actor” en Gaza).

    Antes de la guerra entre Israel y Hamas, Aljafarawi, ya era un influencer en las redes sociales, pero su contenido era más que todo de sus viajes y videos musicales. 

    Calificamos la declaración en el video de TikTok que dice que “MSNBC transmitió un video de este actor” en la guerra entre Israel y Hamas como Falsa. 

    Una versión de este artículo fue escrita originalmente en inglés y traducida por Maria Briceño.

    Read this article in English.

    Lea más reportes de PolitiFact en Español aquí.


    Debido a limitaciones técnicas, partes de nuestra página web aparecen en inglés. Estamos trabajando en mejorar la presentación.

     

     



    Source

  • Post Spreads Misleading Information About Texas Abortion Case

    SciCheck Digest

    Kate Cox petitioned to be allowed to have an abortion in Texas to “protect her life, health, and future fertility,” after receiving news that her baby was unlikely to survive, according to her court filing. A popular Instagram post misrepresented Cox’s specific case and also made misleading claims about trisomy 18, the condition affecting her pregnancy.


    Full Story

    Abortion is banned in Texas by multiple laws. Texas law contains exceptions for mothers with emergency medical conditions. But according to some doctors and health policy experts, it can be difficult to determine in practice whether a situation qualifies for an exception or to find a doctor or hospital administrators willing to make that judgment given the legal risks involved.

    Doctors also have argued that it’s not possible or desirable to establish a formulaic definition of a medical emergency given the complexities and nuances affecting each case.

    Even before June 2022, when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that established a constitutional right to abortion, the procedure was already largely banned in Texas. The state had enacted a law in 2021 that outlawed abortions after “cardiac activity” was detected in an embryo, which occurs at about six weeks of gestation, with an exception only for a medical emergency.

    On Dec. 5, Texas resident Kate Cox, her husband and her doctor petitioned for the enforcement of the state’s abortion bans to be temporarily blocked so that Cox’s doctor could legally perform an abortion. The petition argued that continuing the pregnancy, then 20 weeks along, would pose risks to Cox’s life, health and future fertility.

    The petition also said that doctors had concluded, based on multiple factors, that Cox’s “baby may not survive to birth and, if so, will only live for minutes, hours, or days.”

    These factors included ultrasound images that revealed serious conditions affecting the fetus. They also included a diagnosis in the fetus of full trisomy 18, also known as Edwards syndrome, in which cells throughout the body contain an extra copy of chromosome 18. The condition, which affects the development of multiple organs, is often lethal before birth, or soon after in children who are born alive.

    Cox ultimately left the state of Texas to seek an abortion elsewhere, and the Texas Supreme Court ultimately concluded on Dec. 11 that Cox’s petition should not be granted, directing a local court to vacate its prior decision to the contrary. However, misinformation about the case and the survival odds for children with trisomy 18 have continued to circulate online.

    A popular Instagram post made a number of misleading claims. For instance, the post stated that “90% of kids with Trisomy 18 live when given proper medical care,” while giving examples of children who defied the odds. According to studies, the median survival time for the condition among babies born alive was four to 14.5 days, and just 5.6% to 8.4% of those born alive lived to their 1st birthday.

    The post also misleadingly stated that Cox “does not want to go through labor or c-section for a disabled child.” But Cox’s petition said that doctors concluded based on her specific case that her child would not survive beyond a few days at most.

    Dr. Alireza Shamshirsaz, a maternal-fetal medicine specialist, told us that many women who continue a pregnancy with trisomy 18 will end up needing a cesarean section, with all the associated risks for the mother and her future pregnancies.

    “If we look at this way, we are increasing the risk to the mom with having no good outcomes for baby,” Shamshirsaz said.

    Shamshirsaz is a spokesperson for the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, which wrote an amicus brief advocating that Cox be permitted to receive an abortion.

    The Facts About Trisomy 18

    Trisomy 18 most commonly arises when an egg cell or sometimes a sperm cell ends up with an extra copy of chromosome 18. The condition is not generally inherited, and risk increases with maternal age.

    The Instagram post called trisomy 18 “a genetic condition that causes physical growth delays during fetal development.” Trisomy 18 is indeed associated with slow fetal growth, but this leaves out many other serious problems that may come with the condition. The extra genetic material also leads to issues with the development of multiple organs, including the heart, lungs and brain. 

    Among trisomy 18 pregnancies that make it to 12 weeks, nearly three-quarters are expected to end in miscarriage or stillbirth, according to a study of pregnancies in England and Wales published in the American Journal of Medical Genetics. In pregnancies that make it to 24 weeks, more than half are expected to end in stillbirth.

    As we’ve said, the Instagram post also made the misleading claim that most children with trisomy 18 survive “when given proper medical care.” 

    While there are children with trisomy 18 who do survive beyond a year of age, this is not the outcome in the majority of cases. In one study, published in the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics, babies with trisomy 18 who were born alive in the U.S. between the late 1960s and late 1990s died at a median 10 to 14.5 days of age. Just 5.6% to 8.4% of the babies survived until their 1st birthday. A Swiss study, published in the American Journal of Medical Genetics, found that babies with the condition who were born alive between 1964 and 2003 died at a median age of 4 days old and that just 6% were alive after a year. 

    The Instagram post also did not mention the factors particular to Cox’s case. Her petition stated that ultrasounds showed multiple abnormalities affecting the pregnancy, adding that her specialist doctor told Cox and her family that “given the results of the ultrasound alone, their baby was likely to pass in utero, be stillborn, or only live for a week at most.”

    Shamshirsaz said that it’s possible to stratify risks of trisomy 18 based on ultrasound. Factors such as complex heart defects, growth restriction of the fetus and other elements predict worse outcomes. He also said that full trisomy — in which all of a fetus’s cells are affected — is predictive of worse outcomes. 

    Post Misrepresents Risks of Continuing Pregnancy

    The Instagram post also misrepresented the risks of abortion versus continuing the pregnancy, incorrectly stating that the “claim that abortion is the safest option for Kate is false.”

    “The risk of the abortion in general is less than continuing the pregnancy” at the gestational age of Cox’s pregnancy, Shamshirsaz said.

    Based on medical advice, Cox concluded that dilation and evacuation abortion — a form of procedural abortion — was “the safest option for her health and her best medical option given that she wants to have more children in the future,” according to the petition. 

    Shamshirsaz said that continuing a pregnancy exposes the mother to risks, including gestational diabetes and preeclampsia, a pregnancy-associated form of high blood pressure.

    Cox’s petition said that she was at particularly high risk for gestational diabetes, high blood pressure and other pregnancy complications, based on a test indicating elevated glucose along with “other underlying health conditions.” 

    The petition also stated that she had been to the emergency room multiple times due to severe cramping, diarrhea and fluid leaks of undetermined origin. The amicus brief said these symptoms are “associated with obstetrical complications.”

    The petition said that if unable to get an abortion and if the fetus’s heart stopped beating before term, Cox would receive a labor induction. For people like Cox who have had prior C-sections, induction is associated with elevated risk of uterine rupture, which can lead to complications including removal of the uterus, excessive bleeding and death. Cox is a 31-year-old mother of two children, according to the legal filings.

    If the baby reached term, the petition said, Cox would receive a C-section. Trisomy 18 comes with an increased rate of C-section, Shamshirsaz said, and Cox’s history of two prior C-sections makes the surgery even more likely.

    Under any circumstances, C-sections come with risks to the mother and her future pregnancies. Risks increase with each C-section a person receives. 

    Risks to subsequent pregnancies associated with repeat C-sections include uterine rupture, hysterectomy and problems with the placenta. They also include other surgical complications, such as harm to nearby organs like the bladder.

    “While Ms. Cox’s life may not be imminently at risk, she is at high risk for many serious medical conditions that pose risks to her future fertility and can become suddenly and unexpectedly life-threatening,” the petition said.


    Editor’s note: SciCheck’s articles providing accurate health information and correcting health misinformation are made possible by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The foundation has no control over FactCheck.org’s editorial decisions, and the views expressed in our articles do not necessarily reflect the views of the foundation.

    Sources

    “Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe.” Guttmacher Institute. 20 Dec 2023.

    “Now that the Supreme Court has overturned Roe: Texas is enforcing its trigger ban, which prohibits abortion and includes civil and criminal penalties.” Center for Reproductive Rights. Undated, accessed 20 Dec 2023.

    Felix, Mabel et al. “A Review of Exceptions in State Abortion Bans: Implications for the Provision of Abortion Services.” KFF. 18 May 2023.

    Goodman, J. David. “Abortion Ruling Keeps Texas Doctors Afraid of Prosecution.” New York Times. 13 Dec 2023.

    Cox v. Texas. “Brief of Amici Curiae American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine in Opposition to Petition and Emergency Motion for Relief.” Supreme Court of Texas. 11 Dec 2023.

    Cox v. State of Texas. “Plaintiffs’ Original Verified Petition for Declaratory Judgment and Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Permanent Injunction.” District Court of Travis County, Texas. 5 Dec 2023.

    “Trisomy 18.” Medline Plus. Undated, accessed 20 Dec 2023.

    Cox v. Texas. No. 23-0994. Supreme Court of Texas. 11 Dec 2023.

    Lila Rose (@lilaroseofficial). “The Kate Cox case is being heavily misrepresented.” Instagram. 13 Dec 2023.

    Rasmussen, Sonja A. et al. “Population-Based Analyses of Mortality in Trisomy 13 and Trisomy 18.” Pediatrics. 1 April 2023.

    Niedrist, Dunja. “Survival With Trisomy 18—Data From Switzerland.” American Journal of Medical Genetics. 14 April 2006.

    “Trisomy 18 and 13.” Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Undated, accessed 20 Dec. 2023.

    Fisher, J.M. et al. “Trisomy 18: studies of the parent and cell division of origin and the effect of aberrant recombination on nondisjunction.” American Journal of Human Genetics. Mar 1995.

    Cereda, Anna and John C. Carey. “The trisomy 18 syndrome.” Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 23 Oct. 2012.

    “Trisomy 18: Disease at a Glance.” National Center for Advancing Sciences, Genetic and Rare Diseases Information Center. Undated, accessed 20 Dec. 2023.

    Morris, Joan K. and George M. Savva. “The risk of fetal loss following a prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 13 or trisomy 18.” American Journal of Medical Genetics. 4 Feb 2008.

    “Abortion Care.” The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Undated, accessed 20 Dec 2023.

    Motomura, Kenichiro et al. “Incidence and outcomes of uterine rupture among women with prior caesarean section: WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health.” Scientific Report. 10 Mar 2017.

    “Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request.” Committee Opinion No. 761. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Jan 2019.

    “Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery (VBAC).” The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Undated, accessed 20 Dec 2023.

    Source

  • Fact Check: ‘How is this not a Pants on Fire?’: What PolitiFact readers thought of recent fact-checks

    Republican voters in Iowa and New Hampshire are preparing to cast ballots in the presidential primary in January. At PolitiFact, we fact-checked the Republican candidates more than 80 times and President Joe Biden about three dozen times in 2023.

    We heard back from many of our readers via Instagram, TikTok Meta, X, and email. 

    Here’s a look at some responses, which have been lightly edited for length and clarity. Readers can email us fact-check ideas and feedback at [email protected].

    President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris

    Biden likes to tell stories about his past that sometimes are exaggerations, wrong or misleading. In September, he said, “I taught at the University of Pennsylvania for four years.” We rated that Half True.

    A reader asked, “What half is true? … The facts are, he never did any classroom teaching and was only involved in panel discussions and the like for a little over two years.” (Here is a guide to our ratings from True to Pants on Fire.) 

    Vice President Kamala Harris, meanwhile, said Biden entered office during the coronavirus pandemic, but “because of our economic policies, we now are reducing inflation.” We rated that Mostly False, saying the credit goes more to the Federal Reserve, which is independent of the administration, and international factors such as a slowdown in China and dropping crude oil prices. 

    A reader replied: “Imagine believing that the White House has no influence on Federal Reserve policy. Imagine believing that government agencies approving oil drilling doesn’t mean more supply that lowers oil prices. Oh well, I guess that both rising and reducing inflation isn’t caused or influenced by the White House.”

    Former President Donald Trump

    Trump said at a December Iowa rally, “Gasoline prices are now $5, $6, $7 and even $8 a gallon.” We rated that Mostly False, noting that a tiny portion — a fraction of 1% — of the nation’s 150,000 gas stations were charging at least $5 at the time Trump made his remark.

    Readers on Meta responded with their own fact-checks citing gasoline prices in their communities, including $2.11 per gallon at a Costco in Colorado and $2.65 per gallon at a Wawa convenience store in St. Petersburg, Florida.

    “How is this not a Pants on Fire?” one reader wrote. “Right now gas is the lowest I’ve seen in years.”

    We road-tested Trump’s claim about driving an electric vehicle in New Hampshire. Trump told a Nov. 11 crowd in Claremont that electric vehicles “don’t go far.”

    A New Hampshire reader who has had an electric vehicle for more than five years replied: “It is considerably easier to get charging now than it was when I got my car. It’s possible that I would have passed on the opportunity BACK THEN if I wasn’t a homeowner. It cost me just over $800 to purchase and install a Tesla HPWC 240V charger in my garage.” During the time the driver has had the car, the number of Tesla Supercharger stations expanded from three in the area to 11 or even more, when counting stations just across the state border. 

    Inflation 

    We fact-checked a TikTok video that said the federal government and Federal Reserve were “raising inflation,” something that “had nothing to do with … getting our economy back in line” but rather to fund a “war against a bunch of civilians.” We rated that False.

    A reader replied: “Thank you for taking this up. Over the last couple of months, news reports indicated that 40-50% of younger people source their news from Tik Tok and about 10-15% of older people do the same. Pair this with the sort of story you’ve looked at here, it makes me wonder whether Tik Tok’s People’s Republic of China ownership might have something to do with emphasizing stories that mine and highlight controversial stories that might affect people’s views on the state of the U.S. economy and other matters. It’s difficult for me to explain why so many people think we are in such bad economic straits when, objectively, the economy is not nearly as bad as it’s been portrayed particularly on social media.”

    Hunter Biden

    Then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., said in September that “bank records show that nearly $20 million in payments were directed to the Biden family members and associates through various shell companies.” We rated his statement Half True.

    One reader replied that our rating lent undeserved partial legitimacy to McCarthy’s statement that Republicans had uncovered evidence of a Biden family “culture of corruption.”

    “The rest of the fact check debunks the spin of McCarthy’s words,” the reader wrote, adding that the money went to Biden family “associates” and Hunter Biden. “This is not proof of a culture of corruption of the Biden family, which includes the president!”

    PolitiFact has found that so far none of the inquiries into the president’s son has produced clear evidence of wrongdoing by the president. (Hunter Biden has been indicted on tax and gun charges.)

    Debates

    During the December Republican presidential debate, Tom Fitton, president of the conservative group Judicial Watch, discussed Trump’s legal cases and contrasted approval ratings for the FBI, Justice Department and the U.S. Postal Service: “A recent Gallup poll shows that Americans think more highly of the U.S. Postal Service than they do the FBI or Justice Department.”

    A reader replied that in northern Nevada, “we are lucky to get our mail picked up or delivered. 2 months ago we went over 2 weeks with NO mail delivery. If we are lucky we get our mail about 8:00 – 9:00 at NIGHT … IF… we get it at all!!!!! The Post Office sucks.”

    We fact-checked the debate between Gov. Gavin Newsom and Gov. Ron DeSantis on the topics of immigration, abortion, book bans and a poop map.

    “What’s funny and amazes me the most about this debate is not what either did right or wrong or how much better one was than the other, it’s that Newsom actually got DeSantis to debate him, a non candidate for the Republican nomination or the presidency,” a reader replied.

    And now for some fun 

    We brought our fact-checking skills to our MovieFact feature as we watched “Oppenheimer.” We found that it hewed close to the historic record, but took a few liberties.

    A Texas reader replied: “For a Hollywood movie, including your corrections, this was the movie industry @ its best. The subject material is incredibly important with an extremely high degree of accuracy especially considering this is a form of entertainment for profit, not a historical documentary. I have not stopped thinking about the information in the movie since I saw its premiere. Thank you for your evaluation.”

    Finally, we fact-checked a false Instagram post about the cost of a shopping trip in the movie “Home Alone.” It said $19.83 of groceries in 1990 would cost $72.28 in 2023. Adjusting 8-year-old Kevin McCallister’s $1 orange juice coupon for inflation, the discount would be equal to $2.35. So, the total cost of these items would have been $56.84. 

    One reader took issue with one of our calculations: “I get why you’d adjust for inflation on the coupon but that feels unnecessary. Is anyone actually getting a coupon for more than a dollar off OJ today?”

    In response to our TikTok, one viewer wrote: “and you know what? He should have spent more. It’s what his parents get for treating him like trash.” 

    Happy Holidays from PolitiFact! 

    RELATED: All of our fact-checks about elections 

    RELATED: Sign up for PolitiFact’s newsletter



    Source

  • Fact Check: PolitiFact en Español: 5 cosas Ridículas y Falsas que verificamos en 2023

    PolitiFact en Español verificó más de 125 declaraciones en 2023, calificando algunas como Ridículas y Falsas por su nivel de absurdidad. 

    Nosotros determinamos la calificación de una declaración usando el Truth-O-Meter, un medidor que tiene seis calificaciones en niveles decrecientes de veracidad (desde Cierto a Ridículo y Falso). La calificación de “Ridículo y Falso” aplica cuando una declaración afirma algo totalmente incorrecto y ridículo. 

    Las siguientes 5 afirmaciones causaron revuelo en las redes sociales a pesar de su distancia de la realidad (no fueron las únicas que calificamos como Ridículo y Falso, pero llamaron mucha atención). Estas publicaciones fueron marcadas como parte del esfuerzo de Meta para combatir las noticias falsas y la desinformación en su plataforma. (Lea más sobre nuestra colaboración con Meta, propietaria de Facebook e Instagram).

    1. Videos falsos usando imágenes de famosos para vender servicios o productos fraudulentos

    Muchas publicaciones usaron los rostros de los periodistas Julio Vaqueiro de Telemundo y Jorge Ramos de Univision para promover información engañosa sobre perdón de deudas de tarjetas de crédito. Otras publicaciones compartieron información falsa usando la imagen del Dr. Juan Rivera, el cual sale en programas de Univision.

    Una de esas publicaciones, la cual califica de Ridículo y Falso, falsificó la voz del Dr. Rivera para vender un supuesto medicamento para la artritis y artrosis. En el video, los gestos de labios del doctor no concuerdan con lo que él supuestamente dice. Las imágenes fueron sacadas de una entrevista con ABC News en 2021 sobre COVID-19. Pero ni Rivera, ni Univision promueven los medicamentos mencionados en el video. 

     

    2. Publicaciones esparciendo mitos sobre COVID-19, vacunas y efectos

    Videos compartieron declaraciones falsas sobre el COVID-19. Un video dijo que el famoso actor Jamie Foxx “quedó ciego y paralizado” debido a una dosis de vacuna contra el coronavirus. Otra publicación dijo que las vacunas del COVID-19 contienen “óxido de grafeno”. 

    Un video calificado Ridículo y Falso dijo que COVID-19 es “un supuesto virus que nunca existio”. Los datos y realidad de la severidad de la enfermedad confirman la ridiculez del video. Más de 1 millón de personas fallecieron en Estados Unidos por COVID-19. En 2020, la Organización Mundial de la Salud declaró COVID-19 como una pandemia y emergencia de salud global.

    3. Los “reptilianos” que no existen

    La teoría sobre “reptilianos” alega que hay seres que son híbridos: humanos y reptiles. Verificamos dos videos que decían mostrar pruebas de supuestos reptilianos, ambos ganaron la calificación de Ridículo y Falso. 

    Un video fue manipulado para mostrar a Lee Rosenberg, un abogado de la American Israel Public Affairs, con dientes afilados, y lo catalogo como reptil. Otro video mostró al CEO de Pfizer, Albert Bourla, tragando saliva en una entrevista y la publicación dijo que él es un “lagarto demonio”. Pero la manera en que Bourla traga saliva no prueba que sea un lagarto. Teorías similares han sido difundidas sobre la reina Isabel II y el presidente Joe Biden. 

    (Captura de pantalla de video en Facebook).

    4. Imágenes falsas del satanismo en las escuelas y Target

    Varias publicaciones en Facebook dijeron que Target vende ropa con motivos satánicos, usando como evidencia imágenes de pasillos de supuestas tiendas Target, niños vestidos con este tipo de ropa y supuestos empleados montando la colección. Pero las imágenes no son reales.  La creadora de las imágenes, The Pumpkin Empress, dijo que ella creó las imágenes usando inteligencia artificial. Target también negó vender ropa satánica. 

    Otra publicación calificada como Ridículo y Falso mostraba a niños con cachos, sentados alrededor de una persona disfrazada de Baphomet, una figura que representa a satanás. La publicación dijo que la imagen mostraba a  “satanistas” adoctrinando a niños en bibliotecas de Estados Unidos. Pero estas imágenes también fueron creadas con inteligencia artificial.

    5. No te asustes, no hay hamburguesa de carne humana en Estados Unidos

    Un video mostró lo que aparentaba ser una fábrica de carne y gente comiendo felizmente hamburguesas. “En América noquean a los prisioneros, luego los limpian y los meten en bolsas con una licuadora en marcha. Pronto son convertidos en pulpa y luego son comprimidos por la máquina y se hace una hamburguesa”, dijo la publicación en Facebook. 

    Aunque suena espeluznante, las imágenes del video no son reales de prisioneros convertidos en hamburguesas. PolitiFact hizo una búsqueda de imagen inversa y encontró que las imágenes son escenas de la película de terror ficticia, “American Carnage”. Por lo tanto, también calificamos esta declaración como Ridículo y Falso. 

    Lee más reportes de PolitiFact en Español aquí.


    Debido a limitaciones técnicas, partes de nuestra página web aparecen en inglés. Estamos trabajando en mejorar la presentación.



    Source

  • Fact Check: Christie’s claim on Trump’s China trade deal is on the right track, but hinges on the math

    LONDONDERRY, N.H. — Republican presidential candidates on the 2024 campaign trail are unwaveringly critical of China, and often of U.S. policy toward the economic giant.

    At a town hall in Londonderry, New Hampshire, presidential candidate and former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie directed the discussion of China toward agriculture and trade, taking a shot at one of his campaign rivals, former President Donald Trump.

    Christie told the audience that Trump “said he made the greatest trade deals with China, right? You’ve heard him brag about his trade deals. Do you know, on the agricultural trade deals that he made, China’s only fulfilled one-third of the promises of agricultural products that they were supposed to buy from our farmers? One-third.”

    We examined the data and found that Christie’s math conflicts with the standard way these numbers are calculated. But his approach is reasonable.

    China’s promises

    In January 2020, about a year before he left the White House, Trump signed what he called a “historical trade deal” with China. 

    Under the agreement, China pledged to purchase $200 billion of additional U.S. exports before Dec. 31, 2021. The agreement was widely regarded as unsuccessful, partly because of the coronavirus pandemic, which struck within weeks and prompted a worldwide recession.

    It was “a terrible agreement,” said Derek Scissors, a senior fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute. 

    Overall, calculations by the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank, show China bought about 58% of what it had pledged in 2020 and 2021, the two years that were officially part of the agreement.

    China bought 37% of its promised amount in energy, 54% in services, and 59% in manufacturing.

    However, China fared the best in the one remaining major sector — the one Christie cited in his town hall. In agriculture, China met 83% of its goal, which is far higher than the one-third Christie said.

    Within the agriculture sector, China’s progress varied, Peterson Institute for International Economics data shows. China bought more than it had promised of pork, corn, wheat and sorghum, a grain used heavily as livestock feed. It missed goals for soybeans; cotton; lobster; and raw hides and skins.

     

    “Overall, China is way short of its promises, but for agricultural products it may be somewhat closer to the mark,” said Gary Clyde Hufbauer, a nonresident senior fellow with the Peterson Institute.

    The agreement covered only two years, 2020 and 2021, but since the agreement ended, agricultural exports to China continued to climb, reaching $40.9 billion in 2022, a 14.5% increase from 2021, according to the Agriculture Department.

    Christie’s calculation

    Trade experts pointed PolitiFact to the standard calculations the Peterson Institute made. However, Christie’s campaign offered an alternative way of measuring the numbers.

    The Peterson Institute’s calculation compared the total amount China promised to purchase with what it bought. Over the two years, it promised to buy $73.9 billion in exports and it bought $61.1 billion — or 83%. 

    Rather than looking at how much of the total commitment China met, Christie’s campaign measured how much China spent in 2020-21 beyond its 2017 levels. 

    Plugging the Peterson Institute data into the Christie campaign’s formula shows that the additional Chinese spending in 2020 and 2021 accounted for 40% of its commitment over 2017’s baseline level. That’s higher than one-third, but relatively close.

    One note: Christie’s team used Chinese import data, rather than U.S. export data, so the numbers, for technical reasons, differ slightly from the export data used to calculate the 83%.  For example, that same value, calculated with import data, shows China met 77% of its commitment. This difference does not account for the gap between 40% and Christie’s claim of “one-third,” however. 

    Our ruling

    Christie said that under Trump’s trade deal, “China’s only fulfilled one-third of the promises of agricultural products that they were supposed to buy from our farmers.”

    By conventional calculations, China met 83% of its commitment for agricultural purchases. Christie offered an alternative calculation that doesn’t credit China for the purchases it was already making in 2017. This calculation produces a result of about 40%, which is higher than the one-third Christie cited.

    Experts say that overall, China did not fulfill its commitments for buying U.S. goods and services, though the rate was better for agricultural goods than for other categories.

    We rate the statement Half True.



    Source

  • Fact Check: Donald Trump claimed the Lincoln Project used AI to make him ‘look bad.’ But the clips are real

    Truth Social post by Donald Trump (archived), Dec. 5, 2023

    The Lincoln Project, “Feeble,” Dec. 4, 2023

    The Lincoln Project, “Welcome to the clown show…,” Dec. 3, 2023

    The Lincoln Project, “Christian Trump,” Dec. 4, 2023

    The Lincoln Project X post, Dec. 5, 2023

    Guardian News, The moment Donald Trump is warned not to look directly at the sun, Aug. 22, 2017

    C-SPAN, National Security Strategy Address, Dec. 18, 2017

    Shutterstock, Stock video 1088533907, accessed Dec. 6, 2017

    Shutterstock, Caregiver helping senior man to walk with walker indoors in retirement nursing home, accessed Dec. 6, 2023

    C-SPAN, President Trump Rally in Montana, Sept. 6, 2018

    C-SPAN, President Trump Remarks at National Historically Black Colleges and Universities Conference, Sept. 10, 2019

    Forbes Breaking News, JUST IN: Trump Makes Audience Laugh Doing Impression Of Biden Getting Lost On Stage During Event, Oct. 23, 2023

    Alamy, Fred Trump Donald Trump, Dec. 31, 1976

    iStock by Getty Images, Carer Leading Group Of Seniors In Fitness Class In Retirement Home stock video, Dec. 4, 2018

    Right Side Broadcasting Network YouTube video, FULL SPEECH: President Donald J. Trump Speaks to the Pray, Vote, Stand Summit – 9/15/23, Sept. 15, 2023

    Guardian News, Trump confused over fire-hit town Paradise: ‘Pleasure, what a name’, Nov. 18, 2018

    GovInfo, Remarks During a Tour of Areas Damaged by the Woolsey Fire and an Exchange With Reporters in Malibu, California, Nov. 17, 2018

    MeidasTouch Network, Confused Trump Forgets Where He Is During Speech, Local Handler Steps In, Oct. 29, 2023

    FOX 5 Atlanta, Former President Donald Trump attends World Series Game 4, Oct. 31, 2021

    Daily Star, Awkward moment Melania Trump’s smile drops after turning away from Donald Trump, Nov. 1, 2021

    13News Now YouTube video, Republican presidential candidates prepare for upcoming debate, minus Donald Trump, Aug. 21, 2023

    The Guardian, ‘Dangerous’ Trump: 50 key Republicans sign letter warning against candidate, Aug. 8, 2016

    Fox News, Trump halts speech to sip water, sparks Marco Rubio flashback, Nov. 15, 2017

    National Post, Thirsty? Trump’s two-handed swig from Fiji water bottle upstages his White House speech, Nov. 16, 2017

    MSNBC, After Mocking Rubio, President Donald Trump Has A Water Bottle Moment | The 11th Hour | MSNBC, Nov. 16, 2017

    C-SPAN, Former President Trump Speaks at America First Policy Institute Summit, July 26, 2022

    C-SPAN, Former President Trump Speaks at California Republican Party Convention, Sept. 29, 2023

    PinkNews, Trump signals 2024 run with anti-trans rant – but admits he has ‘no idea’ what he’s talking about, July 28, 2022

    Shutterstock, Stock Video ID: 1099894695, accessed Dec. 7, 2023

    Shutterstock, Stock Video ID: 1054288487, accessed Dec. 7, 2023

    PBS NewsHour, WATCH: Joe Biden holds first official presidential campaign rally in Philadelphia, May 18, 2019

    NBC News, President Biden Signs $1.9 Trillion Covid Relief Bill | NBC News, March 11, 2021

    Guardian News, Melania Trump leaves Donald Trump alone in front of the cameras, Jan. 23, 2021

    Guardian News, Trump and Abe dump fish food into precious koi pond, Nov. 6, 2017

    Snopes, Did President Trump Impatiently Dump Fish Food in a Japanese Koi Pond?, Nov. 6, 2017

    Factbase Videos YouTube video, Speech: Donald Trump in Washington, DC – September 25, 2015, Oct. 28, 2017

    C-SPAN, President Trump Rally in Greenville, North Carolina, Oct. 15, 2020

    Factbase Videos YouTube video, Bloomberg: Mark Halperin and John Heilemann Interview Donald Trump – August 25, 2015, Nov. 4, 2017

    Grabien, Trump Dodges Question Asking ‘How Has Your Faith Grown?’, July 21, 2023

    Moms for America YouTube video, President Donald J. Trump Sits Down with Moms for America, Nov. 20, 2023

    The Washington Post, Trump questions Carson’s Seventh-day Adventist faith, Oct. 25, 2015

    CBN – The Christian Broadcasting Network YouTube video, The Brody File: April 12, 2011 – CBN.com, April 12, 2011

    CNN YouTube video, Donald Trump full interview part 2 (CNN interview with Anderson Cooper), July 22, 2015

    C-SPAN, Presidential Candidate Donald Trump at the Family Leadership Summit, July 18, 2015

    CBN News, Brody File Video Exclusive: Donald Trump Understands Evangelicals Want Him To Play Nicer But…, Sept. 16, 2015

    The Washington Post, Donald Trump likes that Proverbs verse that might not exist, Sept. 16, 2015

    Associated Press photos, Trump Classified Documents, June 9, 2023

    97.1 The Ticket YouTube video, Donald Trump Michigan Republican Rally Full Raw, Aug. 12, 2015

    C-SPAN, President Trump Departs for Louisville, Kentucky, Aug. 21, 2019

    Right Side Broadcasting Network, LIVE: President Trump to campaign in the Iowa cities of Ankeny and Cedar Rapids – 12/2/23, Dec. 2, 2023

    Politico, Trump moves to put the nail in DeSantis’ campaign coffin, Sept. 18, 2023

    LinkedIn account, Alex Meyer, accessed Dec. 19, 2023

    X account, Mark Lucas, accessed Dec. 19, 2023



    Source

  • Fact Check: Biden’s net worth is around $10 million, not $41 million

    Before he was vice president or president, Joe Biden was one of Congress’ least wealthy members. Now one critic says Biden’s net worth more than quadrupled since before he moved into the White House.

    Actor James Woods shared an image on social media that said Biden’s net worth has increased from $9 million in 2019 to $41 million in 2022. Net worth is the value of people’s income and assets minus the debt and other liabilities they owe.

    “I’m shocked,” Woods, an outspoken supporter of former President Donald Trump, wrote Dec. 10 on X, formerly Twitter. The image Woods shared also questioned Vice President Kamala Harris’ assets, but we focused on the Biden claim.

    Financial disclosures, tax filings and news reports show that Biden’s net worth has grown slightly since entering the White House, but nothing on the scale Woods suggests.

    Forbes in August wrote that Biden’s net worth was at $10 million, up from about $8 million when he entered the White House in 2020.

    “The increase has nothing to do with family business dealings in far-flung countries,” Forbes wrote. “Instead, he is getting richer by doing what a lot of 80-year-old Americans are doing: sitting on real estate. The president owns two homes in Delaware that are worth an estimated $7 million combined, $1.8 million more than they were when he took office.”

    Much of the Bidens’ current net worth is from the combined value of their two Delaware homes, which include a six-bedroom mansion in Rehoboth Beach that they purchased in 2017, Forbes reported. 

    After leaving the vice presidency in 2017, Biden’s income increased substantially. In 2017 alone, Forbes found, Joe and Jill Biden brought in $11.1 million — nearly double their total earnings from 1998 to 2016. In 2018, they brought in another $4.6 million.

    Speaking engagements and book deals drove much of that new wealth before 2020.

    As president, Biden earns $400,000 a year. His 2022 financial disclosures, published by the White House in May, show he has assets between $1 million and $2.65 million. But these figures represented little change from 2021, his first full year as president.

    We rate the claim that Biden’s net worth was $41 million in 2022 False.



    Source

  • Fact Check: Haley is correct that fentanyl deaths top casualties from 3 wars combined

    ATKINSON, N.H. — Addressing a conference room full of New Hampshire voters, Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley shared a grave statistic about the synthetic opioid fentanyl.

    “We’ve had more Americans die of fentanyl than the Iraq, Afghanistan, and Vietnam wars, combined,” the former South Carolina governor said Dec. 14 at the Atkinson Resort and Country Club in Atkinson. 

    Fentanyl is a potent synthetic opioid. It is used legally in pharmaceuticals, but most deaths are connected to its illegal manufacture and distribution. Small amounts can be lethal. The opioid factored in nearly 400 New Hampshire deaths in 2022, numbers from New Hampshire’s chief medical examiner show. The state’s high rate of opioid-related deaths have been a leading public health concern for several years, just as national overdose deaths have also climbed.

    Federal data shows Haley’s math is accurate when measuring national fentanyl deaths against U.S. military deaths. About 127,000 Americans died from drug overdoses involving a synthetic opioid other than methadone (primarily fentanyl) in 2020 and 2021 alone compared with 65,278 U.S. military personnel who died in Iraq, Afghanistan and Vietnam.

    Although public officials have long compared drug deaths with war fatalities, U.S. health officials approach addiction issues as public health matters and typically compare opioid deaths with deaths from other public health causes.

    Military and drug overdose deaths

    Military data from the Defense Department’s Defense Casualty Analysis System shows 65,278 people died during the three conflicts when counting hostile battles and other nonhostile, in-theater situations. These figures include deaths from accidents, illness, injury and or self-inflicted causes. 

    In 2021 alone, the National Center for Health Statistics reported more than 106,000 drug overdose deaths. Of those, 70,601 involved synthetic opioids other than methadone. Fentanyl overdoses are not specifically separated out, but the agency’s reports say that the fatalities in this category are primarily because of fentanyl.

    That was up from 2020, when 56,516 people died from drug overdoses involving synthetic opioids other than methadone. 

    With just a few years worth of data, it is clear that the fentanyl death toll surpasses the wartime death toll Haley specified.

    We have seen this war death comparison before 

    This is not the first time we have seen war deaths used to illustrate a public health issue’s direness. Politicians and television commentators have used military conflicts to illustrate the toll of gun violence, and more recently President Joe Biden used them to quantify deaths from COVID-19. 

    Drugs-and-war parallels have been hard to avoid since 1971, when President Richard Nixon declared a “war” on illegal drugs. 

    “Comparing deaths linked to public health crises to war deaths, and especially the Vietnam War, is a pretty common thing,” said David Herzberg, a drug historian and professor at the University at Buffalo. “And on its face it is a reasonable strategy for conveying gravity,” or seriousness of a crisis.

    Fentanyl has taken a deadly toll , especially on younger adults. A Washington Post analysis found that fentanyl overdoses are the leading cause of death for American adults aged 18 to 49. 

    Drug overdose deaths are counted among the entire U.S. population of over 330 million people; casualties of soldiers occur within a smaller population, so deaths will never surpass the number of people who serve in a given conflict. For Vietnam, that was about 2.7 million, according to the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    But experts like David Luckey, a senior international and defense researcher at the global policy think tank Rand Corp., said that this sort of comparison can “show the scope of this problem” and put the scale of the illicit fentanyl crisis in a perspective that people can understand.

    Comparing the fentanyl death toll to other public health crises such as heart attacks or car accidents, “would technically be more accurate,” said Herzberg, “but might not get the idea across because the public may not know whether those other things are really big problems or not — so they aren’t as useful as a benchmark.”

    The CDC counts drug overdose deaths in the category of “accidents (unintentional injuries).” In 2021, heart disease, cancer and COVID-19 claimed more lives than those who died in accidents. The CDC reported that 695,547 died from heart disease, 605,213 from cancer and 416,893 from COVID-19. The overall number of death counts from accidents was 224,935, of which opioid deaths made up a major portion.

    Fentanyl as a Chinese threat

    Haley’s other comments hint at why she’s invoking war numbers. She said fentanyl deaths are among many reasons why she believes China is the United States’ leading national security threat. “China has been preparing for war with us for years,” Haley said.

    China was the primary source of illicit fentanyl early in the U.S. opioid epidemic, we found. But when the Chinese government banned fentanyl production in 2019, producers switched tactics.

     A 2022 Congressional Research Service report found that Chinese traffickers no longer send fentanyl directly to the U.S. Instead, chemists send the materials to Mexican criminal organizations who then produce the fentanyl. Data shows that the vast majority of people sentenced for fentanyl trafficking are U.S. citizens.

    Our ruling

    Haley said, “We’ve had more Americans die of fentanyl than the Iraq, Afghanistan, and Vietnam wars, combined.”

    Her numbers are right. About 127,000 Americans died from drug overdoses involving a synthetic opioid other than methadone (primarily fentanyl) in 2020 and 2021 compared with 65,278 U.S. military personnel who died in Iraq, Afghanistan and Vietnam.

    We rate this claim True.
     



    Source

  • Fact Check: No, all Gaza school children have not been killed in Israel-Hamas war

    The Israel Hamas war has been particularly deadly for Gaza’s children, but one social media post overstated the toll in a claim about children’s deaths. 

    “Breaking News: The Ministry of Education in Gaza has officially announced the end of the 2023/2024 academic year as all students have been killed,” said the Dec. 7 Instagram post sharing a screenshot of an X post.

    The Instagram post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    We found similar social media posts alleging that all Gaza schools had closed because all students had been killed by Israel.

    (Instagram screenshot)

    We could find no formal announcement that Gaza’s Ministry of Education had ended the school year early because of the war, but government social media posts show classroom activities were suspended for the safety of the children, teachers and staff. Some lessons may be taught remotely, based on a Dec. 14 press release on Palestinian Teacher’s Day, which said, according to a Google translation, “The Ministry is proud of all the teachers who continue to give and demonstrate their affiliation, by continuous giving in person or remotely.”

    A Nov. 6 essay by a Gaza schoolteacher published in Al Jazeera said the year had been suspended, as did a report the same day in the Middle East Monitor, a publication that calls itself a supporter of the Palestinian cause. 

    None of Gaza’s 625,000 students has had access to education since Oct. 7, said Kurtis Albert Cooper, a UNICEF spokesperson.

    About 69% of Gaza’s schools had been damaged or destroyed, Cooper said.

    The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, also known as OCHA, also said in a report on the war’s impact that no Gaza students have access to education. But the number of reported deaths in Gaza doesn’t back the claim that all 625,000 of Gaza’s school children have died. 

    The death toll for both adults and children in Gaza is more than 19,000 from Oct. 7 through Dec. 15, according to the Gaza-based Health Ministry, which is part of the Hamas-controlled government and the only official source for casualties in the territory. The Guardian reported that 7,700 children have been killed, though not all are school age.

    Cooper, the UNICEF spokesperson, said more than 3,800 students and 200 teachers and staff members have been killed, citing the Palestinian Ministry of Education. 

    The X post claiming all Gaza’s students have died was shared Oct. 28 by a user who later the same day clarified in a reply that all the students in some classes had been killed, not all of the students in Gaza. That clarification was not noted when the X post was reshared in December on Instagram.

    We rate the claim that Gaza’s education ministry “officially announced the end of the 2023/2024 academic year as all students have been killed” False.



    Source