Category: Fact Check

  • Fact Check: No, photos don’t prove a CNN reporter is a crisis actor or that mass shootings were staged

    “How do you know when it’s a staged event?” reads the text in a March 13 Facebook post. “When CNN’s Barbara Starr is on the scene as a witness crisis actor.” 

    The post shows an image of Starr, a former CNN correspondent who is now a senior fellow at the University of Southern California’s Annenberg Center on Communication Leadership and Policy, alongside four other images of women. The images are labeled “Sandy Hook,” “Boston,” “Watertown” and “San Bernardino.” 

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)


    (Screenshot from Facebook)

    We tried to reach Starr at the Annenberg Center and were unsuccessful. CNN did not comment on the post.

    We identified one of the people in the other photos in the post, and we found no evidence that the photos show Starr — or prove the crimes cited in the post were staged.

    The woman in the image labeled “Sandy Hook” is identified in a YouTube video as Victoria Munoz, a friend of the mother of the shooter in the 2012 attack that left 26 children and staff members dead at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.

    We’ve previously debunked false flag and crisis actor claims about the Sandy Hook shooting and the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing.

    Plus, Starr was busy contributing to CNN’s coverage of two of these incidents: the Boston Marathon bombing and the 2015 fatal mass shooting in San Bernardino, California. 

    False flag conspiracies aren’t new and Facebook is among the biggest sources of mass shooting misinformation. 

    We count this post among those peddling falsehoods. Pants on Fire!

    PolitiFact Researcher Caryn Baird contributed to this report.



    Source

  • Fact Check: Old Senate news repackaged as a chamber drama that didn’t happen

    A recent Facebook post suggests chaos in the Senate chamber, but it’s clickbait. 

    “Chaos unfolds on Senate floor — Chuck Schumer rushes out,” reads text over an image of the majority leader and New York Democrat. 

    But the March 17 post then links to a 2023 blog post that describes no such scene.  

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    The Dec. 27, 2023, blog post has a much different title: “Dem-controlled Senate forced to kick critical bills to New Year.” It doesn’t discuss or allude to chaos or Schumer rushing out of the chamber.

    The Facebook post and the blog post have different images of Schumer. 

    The Facebook post’s image shows Schumer meeting with reporters at the Capitol on Dec. 19, according to The Associated Press caption. 

    The blog post’s image, which shows Schumer walking and talking to reporters in November 2022 after then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said she’d step down as the House Democratic leader.

    We looked for but didn’t find any credible news coverage that Schumer recently fled the Senate amid “chaos.” 

    On Jan. 6, 2021, when supporters of then-President Donald Trump were attacking the U.S. Capitol, Schumer was evacuated from Senate chambers along with other lawmakers, and taken to a secure location. Video footage from that day shows Schumer was wearing a dark blue suit and a blue tie, not a gray suit or orange tie that he was wearing in the images from Nov. 19, 2022, and Dec. 19, 2023.

    We rate the claim that this image shows Schumer rushing out as chaos unfolded in the Senate False.

     



    Source

  • Fact Check: Este video de Javier Milei hablando sobre las protestas en Cuba es de 2021, no actual

    Videos en redes sociales muestran al presidente de Argentina supuestamente apoyando las protestas en Cuba de 2024, pero ese video no es de este año. 

    Una publicación en Facebook del 19 de marzo muestra un video del presidente de Argentina Javier Milei y dice en su subtítulo: “El presidente argentino y ultraderechista #Javier_Milei, hizo una declaración apoyando las protestas en Cuba”.

    “Hola, soy Javier Milei, el liberal libertario y este mensaje es para todos los hermanos cubanos que están despertando las ideas de la libertad, se están revelando contra ese régimen hijo de la remil puta que les está cagando la vida”, Milei dice en el video.

    La publicación fue marcada como parte del esfuerzo de Meta para combatir las noticias falsas y la desinformación en su plataforma. (Lea más sobre nuestra colaboración con Meta, propietaria de Facebook e Instagram).

    Usuarios de X y TikTok también compartieron el video, dando la impresión de que Milei dijo eso en 2024. 

    Este video es real, pero no es en respuesta a las protestas en Cuba de marzo.

    (Captura de pantalla de video en Facebook).

    Hicimos una búsqueda de imagen inversa y encontramos que Milei publicó el video en sus redes sociales en julio de 2021. 

    En esa fecha miles de personas en Cuba salieron a las calles gritando, “¡Queremos libertad!” También, cientos de manifestantes fueron detenidos y condenados en juicios por delitos comunes, según Noticias Telemundo. Entonces, Milei le envió palabras de aliento a los cubanos de no rendirse, diciéndoles que la libertad los llevaría a la prosperidad, bienestar y felicidad. 

    El 17 de marzo los cubanos volvieron a salir a las calles para manifestarse pacíficamente, debido a cortes eléctricos de hasta 20 horas en algunas localidades y meses de escasez de alimentos, medicinas y otros insumos básicos. 

    PolitiFact no encontró publicaciones recientes en las redes sociales de Milei hablando sobre las protestas en Cuba de 2024. 

    Calificamos la declaración de que el presidente argentino “hizo una declaración apoyando las protestas en Cuba” de 2024 como Falsa. 

    Lee más reportes de PolitiFact en Español aquí.

    __________________________________________________________________________

    Debido a limitaciones técnicas, partes de nuestra página web aparecen en inglés. Estamos trabajando en mejorar la presentación.



    Source

  • Fact Check: No te dejes engañar: No hay un programa del gobierno que pague tus deudas de tarjetas de crédito

    Una publicación en Facebook dice que hay un nuevo programa oficial para ayudar con las deudas de tarjetas de crédito, pero ese programa no existe. 

    “Este es un cheque por $18,000 para ayuda económica del Programa Oficial de Ayuda para 2024”, dice el video del 18 de marzo. “Y lo que esto es, es un pago que puedes recibir específicamente para cubrir hasta el 60% de tus deudas y sus tarjetas de crédito”.

    La publicación añadió: “Otra vez se llama el Programa Oficial de Ayuda para Dificultades Económicas en 2024 y acaba de ser lanzado oficialmente, vayan a chequearlo hoy antes de que se acaben los lugares”.

    La publicación fue marcada como parte del esfuerzo de Meta para combatir las noticias falsas y la desinformación en su plataforma. (Lea más sobre nuestra colaboración con Meta, propietaria de Facebook e Instagram).

    El video muestra un supuesto cheque con el logo del Departamento de Estado de Estados Unidos, (DOS, por sus siglas en inglés). Pero esta agencia más bien maneja la política exterior del país. 

    Cualquier cheque que se gira por el gobierno (en cuestión de impuestos) es generado por el Departamento del Tesoro, dijo Octavio O. Saenz, portavoz del Servicio Interno de Impuestos del Departamento del Tesoro de Estados Unidos.

    También notamos que al seguir el enlace donde las personas supuestamente deben inscribirse al programa, este lleva a un artículo en inglés sobre cómo manejar los éxitos y fracasos en la vida. No tiene que ver con un programa de alivio de deuda. 

    Al hacer una búsqueda en páginas oficiales del gobierno de Estados Unidos y en medios de comunicación verídicos no encontramos ningún programa del gobierno que ayuda con deudas de tarjetas de crédito. 

    El gobierno de Estados Unidos ofrece programas de alivio para deudas de préstamos estudiantiles en algunos casos. Pero según Debt.com, una organización que proporciona educación financiera, no existen programas del gobierno que alivien deudas de tarjetas de crédito.

    Existen compañías privadas que asisten con el alivio de deudas, pero es ilegal que te cobren antes de ayudarte, y no pueden garantizar eliminar tus deudas, según la Comisión Federal de Comercio (FTC, por sus siglas en inglés). 

    La Oficina para la Protección Financiera del Consumidor (CFPB, por sus siglas en inglés), una agencia del gobierno de Estados Unidos, se asegura de que las compañías financieras traten al consumidor de forma justa. Esta oficina recomienda consultar su base de datos de quejas de los consumidores antes de contratar una compañía de alivio de deudas para asegurarse de que sea legítima.

    Calificamos la publicación que dice que se acaba de lanzar “el Programa Oficial de Ayuda para Dificultades Económicas en 2024” para pagar tus deudas de tarjetas de crédito como Falsa.

    También lee:

    Ni los bancos están liquidando deudas en tarjetas de crédito, ni Jorge Ramos lo cuenta

    No, no hay ninguna ley que elimine hasta $15,000 de deuda a los estadounidenses

    Lee más reportes de PolitiFact en Español aquí.


    Debido a limitaciones técnicas, partes de nuestra página web aparecen en inglés. Estamos trabajando en mejorar la presentación.

     



    Source

  • Fact Check: Facebook promise of Federal Emergency Management Agency cash grab is fake

    Recent Facebook posts promised a quick cash flow of $1,000 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

    “Hurry & fill out the application for FEMA assistance so you can get that $1,000 check next week!!!” one March 20 post said. 

    “FEMA GIVING OUT $1K,” another post said.

    Both linked to the same nongovernmental website. That’s a red flag.

    These posts were flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    FEMA sent PolitiFact a statement that said the posts are false and should be reported. 

    “After a disaster, scam artists, identity thieves and other criminals often attempt to take advantage of disaster survivors,” the statement said. “We encourage survivors to watch for and report any suspicious activity.” 

    FEMA’s website has a page dedicated to disaster fraud and warns people not to share personal information “unless you are speaking with a verified FEMA representative.” 

    We rate these posts Pants on Fire!

     



    Source

  • Fact Check: Las Vegas Sphere photo showing anti-Trump message was fabricated

    The Las Vegas Sphere is known for immersive concert experiences, but social media users are claiming it’s now being used to broadcast political messages.

    A March 16 Facebook post showed a photo of the Sphere displaying a derogatory message to former President Donald Trump: “F— Trump.”

    The photo showed the text in giant blue letters on a white background, encircled by a red stripe with white stars that was reminiscent of the American flag. Text on the photo read, “The Sphere in Vegas is so awesome!”

    (Screengrab from Facebook)

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    Sphere Entertainment Co. told PolitiFact that this image is not real and that it was digitally altered.

    We also found no evidence this message was shown on the Las Vegas Sphere. The image doesn’t appear in the Las Vegas Review Journal’s photo gallery of the Sphere’s displays, and we found no news articles about this supposed insult to Trump.

    PolitiFact and other fact-checking news outlets have debunked similar fake images of the Sphere that claimed to show crude messages about Trump and President Joe Biden. We don’t know who created this fake image, although a TikTok filter lets users display faces, designs and messages on the Sphere.

    We rate the claim that the Sphere displayed a derogatory message directed at Trump False.



    Source

  • Fact Check: Miami has the largest asylum case backlog in the U.S. Here’s why.

    An unprecedented 3.4 million cases are pending in immigration courts around the United States. These cases, which typically involve multiple hearings, often take years to be resolved.

    And no court has seen this more than Miami-Dade, said Florida Lt. Gov Jeanette Nuñez.

    “In Miami-Dade county, what we’ve seen is the immigration courts are facing the largest backlog of any court in this country, with 10% of the overall immigration cases,” Nuñez said at a March 15 news conference. 

    Nuñez added: “And, what’s worse, is that the overwhelming majority of those cases that are being addressed by the court, more than 90% of them lose their asylum claim.”

    Nuñez used the statistics to criticize the immigration system under President Joe Biden. 

    Gov. Ron DeSantis, R-Fla., attended the same event, held at the Polk County Sheriff’s Office, to sign legislation that further restricts immigrants who are living in the state illegally, and increases penalties for driving without a license, belonging to “transnational” crime organizations or committing felonies after returning to the U.S. after a deportation.

    When we asked the Florida’s governor’s office about Nuñez’s numbers, a spokesperson pointed us to news reports that covered Miami’s large case backlog but didn’t discuss the asylum denial rate.

    When we looked into the data, we found that one of her numbers is right and the other is exaggerated.

    Miami’s backlog is the largest in the nation 

    Under immigration law, people seeking asylum in the U.S. who cross the border illegally must prove they have a credible fear of returning to their home country. Immigration officials interview asylees to determine whether they have a credible fear. After that, authorities may let them into the country. 

    Some migrants are kept in detention as their requests move through immigration court; other migrants are released. From there, migrants can apply for asylum formally and go through the court proceedings, where they may be approved, denied or offered some other protection.

    These cases take time.

    The Miami Immigration Court has a backlog of about 290,000 pending cases, according to February data from Syracuse University’s Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC). 

    That makes up almost 10% of immigration cases in the U.S., and represents the largest docket in the country. New York City’s court is second, with about 240,000 cases backlogged.

    Miami’s caseload has grown steadily over the last decade before surging in the last few years, in line with the national trend, the database shows. The single court currently has about the same number of cases that were pending in all immigration courts across the United States  in 2012.

    Reasons why asylum cases are denied

    What about the rest of Nuñez’s claim — are more than 90% of asylum claims rejected?

    No, that’s too high, said Austin Kocher, a Syracuse University researcher and professor who helps oversee the TRAC data.

    In Miami, asylum claims were denied in about 73% of the 67,000 cases that the court decided since 2000. 

    So far in the 2023-24 fiscal year that started in October, the Miami court had an average rejection rate of 67%. That’s higher than the national average of 50%, Kocher said.

    People detained at the Miami-Krome immigration detention center have a 92% denial rate. 

    Kocher said it’s not uncommon for detainees’ cases to be denied at higher rates, and added that Krome has “far, far fewer cases” than the main Miami court. The center is used to detain immigrants who have been arrested for violating immigration laws and are awaiting removal proceedings. Some immigrants are subject to mandatory detention for a specific criminal conviction; others might be considered a flight risk. The Krome center has about 530 pending cases. 

    Asylum cases can be closed for multiple reasons that are unrelated to the cases’ merits; the denial rate doesn’t account for these situations.

    U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement attorneys sometimes use prosecutorial discretion to close or pause removal cases for a number of reasons, including a lack of resources or because the person doesn’t present a public safety risk.

    “These determinations are not indicative of actual eligibility. Low numbers of asylum cases being granted is, in some ways, a product of how few resources and personnel are available to decide asylum cases,” said Kathleen Bush-Joseph, a policy analyst at the nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute. 

    “Certainly, some people aren’t eligible, and when they actually have their cases heard, they’re found ineligible,” she said. “But there are a lot of people who go on to get protection against torture, or some other form of relief that allows them to stay in the U.S.”

    Another way to close a case is to grant someone Temporary Protected Status, which is offered to help people who can’t return to certain countries safely to avoid deportation, said Juan Caballero, an immigration attorney and director of the University of Florida’s Immigration Clinic. He said Temporary Protected Status comes up often in his Venezuelan asylum cases.

    Caballero said approval and denial rates can vary widely among judges. A 2007 Georgetown University Law Center study noted Miami’s outlier status and recommended additional training for asylum adjudicators and improved selection criteria for immigration judges. 

    Other factors, such as having an immigration attorney or a person’s detention status, have been shown to significantly affect asylum applications’ success rates, experts said.

    Our ruling

    Nuñez said that Miami-Dade immigration courts are facing the “largest backlog” of any court in the U.S. and that “more than 90%” lose their asylum claims.

    The county has the largest immigration docket in the U.S. with about 290,000 cases pending as of February, representing close to 10% of all immigration cases in the U.S.

    In Miami, asylum has been denied in about 73% of the 67,000 cases that the court has decided since 2000, with an average denial rate of 74% throughout Biden’s presidency.

    Some asylum cases can also be closed or paused for lack of resources or when attorneys choose to prioritize other cases for prosecution amid the large backlog. The denial rate does not account for those situations.

    Nuñez’ statement is partially accurate. We rate it Half True. 

    PolitiFact Staff Writer Maria Ramirez Uribe contributed to this report.

    RELATED: Jeh Johnson wrong that asylum cases’ approval is ‘only about 20%’ 



    Source

  • Biden’s Misleading Claim About Latino Unemployment

    Para leer en español, vea esta traducción de Google Translate.

    Under President Joe Biden, the Latino unemployment rate reached a low of 3.9% in September 2022 — the lowest rate since September 2019. But Biden recently said that the rate under his presidency was the lowest in “a long, long time.”

    Biden made the misleading claim while making an appeal to Latino voters at a campaign event in Phoenix, Arizona, on March 19. He said he won in 2020 with their support and will need them again to defeat former President Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for president, in a general election rematch.

    “Look, I want to remind folks, because we turned out in 2020, we achieved the lowest unemployment rate for Latinos in a long, long time,” Biden said, according to an NBC News video and White House transcript.

    However, in this case, “a long, long time” is just three years.

    !function(e,n,i,s){var d=”InfogramEmbeds”;var o=e.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];if(window[d]&&window[d].initialized)window[d].process&&window[d].process();else if(!e.getElementById(i)){var r=e.createElement(n);r.async=1,r.id=i,r.src=s,o.parentNode.insertBefore(r,o)}}(document,”script”,”infogram-async”,”

    Initially, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the unemployment rate for Latinos was 3.8% in September 2022, which the Labor Department said was the lowest rate since 1973, when the BLS started tracking the statistic. BLS defines the unemployed as people who don’t have a job but have looked for one in the prior four weeks.

    But the first monthly estimates from the BLS are preliminary and subject to change. The agency later revised its estimate of the unemployment rate for that month to 3.9% – the same as the rate had been in September 2019, during the Trump administration.

    Biden’s claim that it was the lowest rate “in a long, long time” may have given his audience the impression he was referring to a much longer period.

    Besides, as of February, the unemployment rate for Latinos was an estimated 5%, for the third consecutive month, according to the most recent BLS data. That’s the highest it has been since it was 5.4% in February 2023.

    On the other hand, the 5% unemployment rate is lower than the rate of 8.5% at the start of Biden’s presidency in January 2021, when the economy was still recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic. Just prior to the pandemic, the rate had been 4.3% in February 2020.


    Editor’s note: FactCheck.org does not accept advertising. We rely on grants and individual donations from people like you. Please consider a donation. Credit card donations may be made through our “Donate” page. If you prefer to give by check, send to: FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Policy Center, 202 S. 36th St., Philadelphia, PA 19104. 

    Source

  • Fact Check: No, Tyson Foods didn’t announce it would hire 52,000 migrants

    Some people are boycotting Tyson Foods because of misinformation about the company’s hiring practices. 

    Social media users shared a Fox Business clip with the headline, “Tyson Foods lays off 1,200+ American workers in Iowa as it plans to hire 52,000 migrants.” 

    In the clip, taken from “The Bottom Line,” co-host Sean Duffy, a former Republican representative from Wisconsin, said, “Tyson laying off 1,200 workers after closing its pork factory in Perry, Iowa, only later to announce 52,000 jobs for migrants.” Co-host Dagan McDowell then partially quoted a Tyson Foods human resources executive as saying the migrants have been “very loyal. They’ve been uprooted and what they want is stability — what they want is a sense of belonging.”

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    The full Fox Business segment aired March 16. The Tyson Foods human resources manager’s partial quote came from a March 11 Bloomberg News article titled, “Tyson is hiring New York immigrants for jobs no one else wants.” Fox Business did not immediately respond to our request for comment.

    Bloomberg News reported that Tyson “plans to hire about 52,000 people” this year at $16.50 an hour, without specifying who would fill those roles.

    A Tyson Foods spokesperson said the company did not make an announcement to hire 52,000 migrants and does not have 52,000 jobs available, calling  the figure an “inaccurate representation of job openings at Tyson Foods.” “Nor do we earmark any available jobs for any one group of people,” the spokesperson said in an email. Anyone who is qualified and legally authorized to work in the U.S. can apply for their jobs, the company said. 

    The Bloomberg News article also said that Tyson is partnering with Tent, an organization that helps businesses hire refugees. Refugees are people who had to leave their country because of persecution based on their race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership in a specific social group, according to U.S. law. Refugees are in the country legally. They apply for the refugee program before arriving in the United States and must pass biometric and biographical checks as well as interviews with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

    Tent says it is partnering with more than 400 global companies to help integrate refugees. Tyson Foods has partnered with Tent since 2022, when it made a three-year commitment to hire 2,500 refugees in the U.S., according to information on Tent’s website. 

    But this year was the first time Tyson Foods participated in a Tent hiring event, a Tyson Foods spokesperson said. 

    “Any insinuation that we would cut American jobs to hire immigrant workers is completely false,” Tyson Foods said in an undated statement published on its website. “Today, Tyson Foods employs 120,000 team members in the United States, all of whom are required to be legally authorized to work in this country.” 

    Scripps News, a broadcast news network, on March 13 retracted a story headlined “Tyson Foods wants to hire 52,000 asylum seekers for factory jobs” because it contained “serious factual inaccuracies,” and Scripps was “unable to verify that number.” 

    We rate the claim that Tyson Foods announced it would hire 52,000 migrants False.



    Source

  • Post Misrepresents Which Administration Sent Stimulus Checks to Dead People

    Para leer en español, vea esta traducción de Google Translate.

    Quick Take

    Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, some stimulus checks were sent to people who had died. The issue was explained in government reports and the media when it happened in 2020. But a social media post has resurrected the issue and falsely claimed that it occurred during the Biden administration. It actually happened during the Trump administration.


    Full Story

    Disinformation dealers often rehash old claims in order to stir up reactions from their followers on social media. For example, one recent post on Facebook revisited an issue from 2020 and added a new, false twist.

    The post came from OpenTheBooks.com, a project of the nonprofit organization American Transparency, which has recently been featured by two conservative outlets, the Epoch Times and Newsmax, that have a history of spreading false claims. The post said: “Biden paid 2.2 million dead people $3.6 billion during the covid pandemic.”

    It’s not true that the payments happened during the Biden administration. But here’s what is true about the old issue that the post is reviving.

    On March 27, 2020, shortly after the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic, then-President Donald Trump signed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, or CARES Act, into law. That act offered several programs aimed at easing the economic impact of the pandemic, including one that provided stimulus checks of up to $1,200 to eligible individuals, plus $500 per child under age 17.

    Most of those checks — the first three batches, which made up about 72% of them — had been sent out by May 31, 2020, according to a report from the Office of the Inspector General published June 25, 2020. And some of those checks had gone to people who were dead, the report said.

    “Typically, IRS uses third-party data, such as the death records maintained by the [Social Security Administration] to detect and prevent erroneous and fraudulent tax refund claims,” the report explained. “However, Treasury and IRS did not use the death records to stop payments to deceased individuals for the first three batches of payments because of the legal interpretation under which IRS was operating.”

    Lawyers for the IRS thought that they couldn’t deny payments to people who had filed taxes in 2018 or 2019. Because the CARES Act mandated that the payments be distributed as “rapidly as possible,” the U.S. Treasury and the IRS “used many of the operational policies and procedures developed in 2008 for the stimulus payments which did not include using death records as a filter to halt payments to decedents,” according to the Government Accountability Office report.

    As a result, as of April 30, 2020, almost 1.1 million payments worth about $1.4 million had gone to dead people, according to the report.

    This news was covered by the media at the time, so there’s nothing new here.

    A later report, issued on May 24, 2021, by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, found that as of July 16, 2020, before Biden took office, 2.2 million payments totaling $3.5 billion had gone to dead people. That’s where the social media post got its numbers.

    The OpenTheBooks.com post linked to its report “The COVID Aid Waste Compendium,” which cited a San Francisco Chronicle article about IRS payments to dead people. That news article, which relied on the inspector general’s report, also said the IRS had later asked for those payments back, and that the second- and third-round stimulus payments approved later by Congress specifically excluded people who had died.

    In the inspector general’s report, researchers removed duplicate payments and payments that had been cancelled or returned as undeliverable, as well as those that had been returned voluntarily. They arrived at a final figure of 1.4 million payments totaling $2.5 billion that had gone to dead people.

    So, the Facebook post from American Transparency uses estimates from an old report about an issue that has already been publicized. And it names the wrong presidential administration — this happened under the Trump administration, which ended Jan. 21, 2021.


    Sources

    U.S. House. “H.R.748, CARES Act.” (As passed into law 27 Mar 2020.)

    U.S. Department of the Treasury. “About the CARES Act and the Consolidated Appropriations Act.” Accessed 20 Mar 2024.

    U.S. Department of the Treasury. “Economic Impact Payments.” Accessed 21 Mar 2024.

    Government Accountability Office. “COVID-19: Opportunities to Improve Federal Response and Recovery Efforts.” 25 Jun 2020.

    Konish, Lorie. “About $1.4 billion in stimulus checks sent to deceased Americans.” CNBC. 25 Jun 2020.

    Faler, Brian. “The IRS thought it wasn’t allowed to withhold stimulus checks from the dead. So it paid more than 1 million of them.” Politico. 25 Jun 2020.

    Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration. “Implementation of Economic Impact Payments.” 24 May 2021.

    Source