Category: Fact Check

  • Fact Check: Satirical headline about Pete Buttigieg and the Key Bridge taken out of context

    A recent Facebook post shared a headline from a satire website but not everyone got the joke. 

    “Buttigieg praises cargo ship for helping dismantle racism in American roads,” the headline said alongside photos of Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and the cargo ship that crashed into  Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge. 

    “And these are the people running our country,” one person commented. 

    “I didn’t read the article … but it sounds like something he would say,” someone else said.

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    Reading the article, from the Babylon Bee, may have clarified that this didn’t happen. 

    Comments Buttigieg made in 2021 are being taken out of context since the Key Bridge’s collapse. PolitiFact debunked another social media post that claimed the transportation secretary blamed the bridge’s collapse on “racism.” 

    Rather, in a 2021 interview, Buttigieg said racism has sometimes factored into highway planning and construction. 

    “There is racism physically built into some of our highways, and that’s why the jobs plan has specifically committed to reconnect some of the communities that were divided by these dollars,” Buttigieg said during the interview, which was published April 6. He was referring to President Joe Biden’s American Jobs Plan proposal, which would provide funding for infrastructure including roads, highways and bridges.

    We rate claims that Buttigieg actually praised a cargo ship for helping to dismantle racism in American roads False.



    Source

  • Social Media Posts Inflate Net Worth of N.Y. Attorney General

    Para leer en español, vea esta traducción de Google Translate.

    Quick Take

    New York Attorney General Letitia James, who won a civil fraud case against former President Donald Trump, has a net worth of about $2.7 million, her most recent financial disclosure statement shows. But social media posts baselessly claim she’s worth $15 million. The claim appears to come from a website that says it “cannot guarantee its accuracy.”


    Full Story

    Letitia James, New York state’s attorney general, has a personal net worth of about $2.7 million, according to her most recent financial disclosure statement, an accounting required of all state officers and employees whose annual salary exceeds $108,638.

    But some partisan social media accounts claim she has a personal net worth of $15 million, which they suggest may indicate that she is guilty of “fraud.”

    In February, James won a judgment of more than $450 million in a civil fraud case she had brought against former President Donald Trump and his organization.

    “URGENT! Letitia James should be investigated for fraud immediately,” Terrence K. Williams, a conservative comedian we’ve written about before, said in a March 26 post on Facebook. “Her Net Worth Jumped from a 100k to 15 Million in 2023.”

    Williams didn’t offer any support for his claim about James’ finances. But a website called the Net Worth Club posted a story in October with the headline, “Letitia James Real Estate Deals and $15 Million Wealth.” The story doesn’t cite the sources of its information, and a disclaimer at the bottom of the page says, in part, “We do our best to ensure that the information is accurate and up-to-date, but we cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness.”

    The website is registered to an owner in India, who did not respond to our email seeking details on the sources for the story, so we don’t know how it arrived at the $15 million figure.

    But, as we said, according to the financial disclosure James filed with the state for her 2022 finances, her personal worth was about $2.7 million.

    The disclosure form, which asks elected officials to give ranges for the worth of their assets and debts, shows that James earns between $175,000 and $320,000 a year. That includes income from her position as attorney general, her salary as an adjunct professor and income from rental properties.

    The value of her real estate — which includes a Brooklyn building that has four rental units and a single family home in Virginia that is described as an investment property — is between $3.4 million and $3.7 million.

    And James listed her debts, which appear to be mortgages, as being between $850,000 and $1.3 million.

    We also found no support for Williams’ claim that the attorney general’s net worth in 2023 “jumped from $100k,” suggesting that James has profited from her office as the state’s top law enforcement official. Since James was elected in 2018, her financial disclosures indicate that she had had a personal net worth of about $2 million each year.

    We emailed James’ office asking if there were any assets she had acquired since her last financial disclosure that may have added to her total net worth, but we didn’t get a response. Her disclosure form for 2023 is due on May 15.


    Sources

    James, Letitia. Financial Disclosure Statement – 2022. 12 May 2023.

    New York State Attorney General. Press release. “Attorney General James Wins Landmark Victory in Case Against Donald Trump.” 16 Feb 2024.

    Farley, Robert. “Trump Retweets False Attack on Rep. Omar.” FactCheck.org. 18 Sep 2019.

    Zinsner, Hadleigh. “Viral Post Uses Altered Audio of Interview with Greta Thunberg.” FactCheck.org. 26 Oct 2023.

    Jaffe, Alan. “Romney Not Switching Parties, Contrary to Online Claim.” FactCheck.org. 2 Aug 2023.

    Hale Spencer, Saranac. “Bogus Theory Misinterprets FTX Support for Ukraine.” FactCheck.org. Updated 13 Dec 2022.

    Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. Domain information: CACLUBINDIA.COM. Accessed 29 Mar 2024.

    Source

  • Fact Check: Do Jesse Watters’ claims about the federal budget, LGBTQ+ and DEI funding add up?

    The U.S. Senate passed a $1.2 trillion dollar spending package, narrowly avoiding a partial government shutdown. Before the bill was signed into law in the wee hours of March 23, one pundit criticized some of its details.

    “What’s in the new monster bill Congress is rushing to pass?” Fox News host Jesse Watters posted March 21 on X, where it had 2.3 million views as of March 28. He wrote that the bill included:

    • $850,000 for a “gay senior home.”

    • $15 million to pay for Egyptians’ college tuition.

    • $400,000 for a “gay activist group to teach elementary kids about being trans.”

    • $500,000 for a “DEI zoo.”

    • $400,000 for “a group to give clothes to teens to help them hide their gender.” 

    His X post also included a clip of him discussing the earmarks on his show, “Jesse Watters Primetime,” the same night. He posted a similar claim on TikTok, where it amassed more than 500,000 views and 55,000 likes. 

    We contacted Fox News, and a spokesperson shared a list of the funding items Watters was referring to. 

    Joshua Sewell, research and policy director at Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan budget watchdog group, said the majority of federal spending is not distributed through earmarking. Sewell said the earmarks Watters noted “don’t appear to be unique or out of character” or “excessively large” when compared with other projects receiving earmarks. 

    Except for the Egyptian college funding, all of the items Watters cited are from the budget’s Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education portion, which  Sewell said, has approximately 1,000 earmarks. 

    Given the large number of earmarks, “I’m sure everybody could find something they don’t think is a best use of funds,” Sewell said.

    E.J. Fagan, assistant professor of political science at the University of Illinois Chicago, agreed that earmarks “are a teeny-tiny piece of the federal budget.” 

    Fagan also said his “impression from the backlash to these very small set of earmarks is that it is just cherry-picking.” His research on the FY 2022 budget found that 0.6% of all federal earmarks mentioned LGBTQ+ as a target population. 

    Here, we examine each of Watters’ claims. 

    $850,000 for a “gay senior home”

    This needs more context. 

    The $850,000 earmark is for the Boston-based nonprofit LGBTQ Senior Housing Inc. to provide affordable housing for people 62 and older. It will help fund “The Pryde,” a 74-unit housing complex in Boston’s Hyde Park neighborhood that is slated to open this spring. But that complex  is not exclusive to gay people; it is open to anyone who meets the income and age requirements.

    The organization’s mission is to “facilitate access to welcoming, safe and affordable housing for low-income LGBTQ+ seniors,” by developing that housing and establishing onsite services and programming “that addresses the needs of LGBTQ seniors.” 

    The $850,000 will be used for programming and the complex’s community center, which also will be open to older people from the neighborhood who don’t live in the complex.

    The organization says the project is needed because of the challenges faced by LGBTQ+ seniors, some of whom may not have offspring to serve as caregivers or who may face discrimination or isolation. 

    Applicants for the housing complex were not asked about their sexual orientation. 

    “It would be against the law to limit this affordable housing to just members of the LGBTQ+ community,” said the organization’s executive director, Gretchen Van Ness. 

    The money will come from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ funds for community living.

    Van Ness told PolitiFact that she applied for the funding through the office of Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., last year, because The Pryde is in Pressley’s district. 

    $15 million to pay for Egyptians’ college tuition

    This is missing context.

    Fifteen million dollars is allocated to USAID, the federal agency that manages foreign aid, “for scholarships for Egyptian students with high financial need to attend not-for-profit institutions of higher education in Egypt,” that are accredited by agencies recognized by the United States Department of Education or meet equivalent standards, the budget description says.

    Similar Egyptian higher education funding has been provided to USAID over the past four decades, a USAID spokesperson told PolitiFact. The scholarships allow Egyptians to study at universities “in fields critical to Egypt’s sustained economic growth and development.” 

    Spending bills passed during Donald Trump’s presidency provided $10 million per year for the higher education scholarship program from 2017 through 2019 and increased it to $15 million in 2020. 

    “The State Department and USAID have a long history of funding numerous programs to support the spread of democracy and western values throughout the world,” Taxpayers for Common Sense’s Sewell said. “This is not a surprise.”

    $400,000 for a “gay activist group to teach elementary kids about being trans”

    This is misleading.

    Watters is referring to “Garden State Equality,” a New Jersey LGBTQ+ advocacy group and a state affiliate of the Equality Federation, a national network of LGBTQ+ advocacy organizations. 

    The budget describes the $400,000 earmark as funding “for trauma-informed strategies to support LGBTQ+ youth.” 

    Garden State Equality Executive Director Christian Fuscarino told PolitiFact the funding will support programs to educate communities about adverse childhood experiences, or ACEs, traumatic events early in life such as violence, abuse or neglect that can affect long-term health. Research has shown that LGBTQ+ people report higher rates of adverse childhood experiences.

    Fuscarino said some of the federal funding will be used for a summer camp for high school-aged kids that teaches about the importance of diversity, equity and inclusion, and imparts some trauma-informed strategies. That can include sharing techniques such as breathing exercises to cope with trauma’s impacts, Fuscarino said. The money comes from the Department of Education’s funds for “innovation and improvement.”

    The organization also conducts professional development training with kindergarten through 12th grade educators on LGBTQ+ terminology and anti-bullying initiatives. It has developed LGBTQ+ lessons and curriculum resources. 

    Since 2019, New Jersey law has required schools to teach LGBTQ+ history in middle and high schools, and adopt instructional materials that portray society’s diversity including the “political, economic, and social contributions” of LGBTQ+ people.

    A breakdown of how this funding will be spent is not yet finalized, Fuscarino told PolitiFact. Although the money is earmarked, the organization may not access the money until it submits a proposed budget and receives Department of Education approval.

    Fuscarino said Watters’ characterization of the organization’s work as “teaching” elementary kids about “being trans” is inaccurate.

    “We may go to a kindergarten class by being invited and read a story that is about an LGBTQ character,” said Fuscarino, “but that’s not the core of what we’re doing.”

    $500,000 for a “DEI zoo”

    Watters’ framing is misleading. (“DEI” is an acronym for diversity, equity and inclusion.) 

    The $500,000 earmark is for the San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, the nonprofit that manages the acclaimed San Diego Zoo. 

    The money is for the nonprofit’s Nature Biodiversity Corps program that “brings together inner-city high school students from diverse cultural, ethnic, and lived-experience perspectives,” according to the website. The students “design, implement, maintain, and monitor native wildlife gardens on their school campuses,” alongside experts and Wildlife Alliance mentors, the website says.

    The funding comes from the Department of Education’s funds for “innovation and improvement.” 

    In the clip from his show that Watters shared on X, Watters described the biodiversity program as “an anti-racist nature appreciation program where high school kids from diverse backgrounds can observe wildlife.” But the program is more than a trip to the zoo.

    Students spend 10 to 20 hours monthly working on wildlife gardens at their own schools and participating in nature-based learning experiences at wildlife conservation sites.

    The website says that since 2022, 200 high school students have participated, creating 14 gardens. 

    Race and ethnicity are not considerations for participation in the program, zoo spokesperson Jake Gonzales said. 

    The earmark funding will go toward staff salaries, transportation and supplies — including native plants for the gardens — and toward reaching more students at more schools, Gonzales said. The zoo has received federal earmarks in previous years, but for other conservation projects.

    $400,000 for “a group to give clothes to teens to help them hide their gender” 

    This claim is inaccurate.

    The funding is for Briarpatch Youth Services, a Madison, Wisconsin, nonprofit that runs a youth homeless shelter and works with at-risk youth.

    The earmark was requested by Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., and would come from the Department of Health and Human Services’ funds for substance abuse and mental health services. 

    Briarpatch’s website lists several programs including employment services, support for those navigating the criminal justice system and street outreach and counseling for homeless youth.

    The nonprofit’s “Teens Like Us” program has a support group for “queer and questioning youth” beginning at age 13. In 2023, the Teens Like Us program included what organizers called the “Briar-Attire Gender Affirming Clothing Program.” The program provided gender-affirming clothing such as chest binders and tucking underwear to those who could not afford or access them. The Teens Like Us website no longer lists the clothing program.

    Baldwin’s office told PolitiFact the $400,000 earmark can be used only for mental health services and counseling for kids experiencing homelessness, and will not be used for the Teens Like Us program. Briarpatch Executive Director Jill Pfeiffer confirmed that to PolitiFact.



    Source

  • Fact Check: El buque que chocó contra el puente de Baltimore no era un ‘barco chino’

    Desde que el puente Francis Scott Key de Baltimore se derrumbó el 24 de marzo, los verificadores de hechos han investigado afirmaciones falsas que achacaban el incidente a cosas como un ciberataque o a Ucrania o Israel.

    Ahora, algunos apuntan a un conocido adversario de Estados Unidos: China.

    Peggy Hubbard, republicana de Illinois dos veces candidata para el Senado de EE.UU., afirmó en una publicación del 27 de marzo en Facebook que el gobierno de EE.UU. no debería ser responsable del costo de la reconstrucción del puente: “¡Nosotros no (dañamos) el maldito puente de Baltimore! ¡Fue una empresa china la que (hizo) el daño! Que lo sustituyan ellos”.

    Otros relacionaron a China con el incidente. Una publicación de Facebook del 26 de marzo dice que un “barco chino destruye imponente barco en Baltimore”.

    Las publicaciones fueron marcadas como parte del esfuerzo de Meta para combatir las noticias falsas y la desinformación en su plataforma. (Lea más sobre nuestra colaboración con Meta, propietaria de Facebook e Instagram).

    @politifactenespanol ¡Sigue el canal de WhatsApp de PolitiFact en Español para estar al día de lo que es cierto, falso, engañoso o fuera de contexto! #whatsapp #canales #verificacion #factcheck ♬ Querulous Shred – DJ BAI

    Encontramos informes de que las empresas matrices y la gestoría del barco que chocó contra el puente tenían su sede en Hong Kong, una región administrativa especial de China. El barco estaba registrado en Singapur. La tripulación a bordo era india, según la empresa gestora del barco.

    El buque Dali fue construido por la empresa surcoreana Hyundai Heavy Industries en 2015. Está registrado en Singapur, es propiedad de la empresa Grace Ocean Private Ltd., con sede en Singapur, y está gestionado por la compañía de gestión de embarcaciones Synergy Marine Group.

    El New York Times informó que Grace Ocean Private Ltd. es propiedad de Grace Ocean Investment Limited, con sede en las Islas Vírgenes Británicas. 

    Lloyd’s List, una publicación de inteligencia marítima, informó en 2021 de una infracción cometida por un granelero propiedad de Grace Ocean Investment. El artículo de Lloyd’s List dijo que la empresa tenía su sede en Hong Kong. Pero el New York Times descubrió que los registros de empresas de Hong Kong muestran que una empresa con ese nombre y dirección se disolvió en 2015.

    Según el informe del New York Times, entre los cuatro directivos de la empresa figuran dos ciudadanos filipinos, un ciudadano de Singapur y un ciudadano japonés, todos ellos con domicilio en Singapur.

    Por su parte, Synergy Marine Group tiene 28 oficinas en 14 países, incluidas dos oficinas en China. Según CBS News, su empresa matriz, Unity Group Holdings International, tiene su sede en Hong Kong. 

    Synergy Marine Group tiene su sede en Singapur. Su fundador y director ejecutivo es Rajesh Unni, de nacionalidad india. Según un informe de 2022, la empresa empleaba a más de 18,000 marineros, más del 80% de los cuales son indios.

    Todos los 22 tripulantes que iban a bordo del buque eran indios, según Synergy.

    El Dali había sido fletado por la compañía danesa Maersk para un viaje previsto de Baltimore a Sri Lanka y transportaba en ese momento carga de clientes de Maersk. Maersk dijo que ninguno de sus tripulantes y personal abordaron el barco.

    Estados Unidos y otros países inspeccionaron el buque. Los inspectores del puerto de San Antonio en Chile descubrieron en junio de 2023 que el Dali tenía un problema relacionado con “la propulsión y la maquinaria auxiliar”, pero el buque siguió en servicio. También se sometió a una inspección en septiembre por parte de la Guardia Costera de EE.UU. en Nueva York y se le realizó un mantenimiento rutinario de los motores antes de salir de Baltimore.

    USA Today informó que la legislación marítima obliga a los prácticos con licencia estatal a pilotar buques de bandera extranjera en puertos estatales. 

    La Autoridad Marítima y Portuaria de Singapur declaró que colaboraría “plenamente” con los guardacostas estadounidenses y que también investigaría el incidente. La Oficina de Investigación de la Seguridad en el Transporte de Singapur llevará a cabo su propia investigación para identificar formas de prevenir futuros siniestros e incidentes marítimos, no para determinar responsabilidades.

    Los grupos y las personas que supervisaban directamente las operaciones del Dali no eran chinos. Calificamos esta afirmación de Falsa.

    Caryn Baird, investigadora de PolitiFact, contribuyó a este informe.

    Una versión de este artículo fue escrito originalmente en inglés y traducido por Marta Campabadal.

    Read a version of this article in English.

    Lee más reportes de PolitiFact en Español aquí.


    Debido a limitaciones técnicas, partes de nuestra página web aparecen en inglés. Estamos trabajando en mejorar la presentación.



    Source

  • Fact Check: Former Wisconsin governor’s statement on layoffs is correct, but it’s lacking context

    Jobs continue to be a major talking point during this election cycle, and there are many ways to measure the current state of joblessness in Wisconsin. 

    During a March 3 appearance on CNN, former Republican Gov. Scott Walker cited one of them: Layoffs. 

    When asked about how people in Wisconsin are feeling about the presidential election, Walked declared: “We just had 100% increase in layoffs.” 

    At that point in the year, we were two months into 2024. Had there really been a 100% increase in layoffs?

    How many people have been laid off this year versus last year?

    Although he was unclear on what timeframe he was talking about, Walker’s staff told us he was comparing the first two months of last year with this year. It is easy to check that by reviewing the Worker Adjustment and Retaining Notification (WARN) notices for January and February. 

    In January 2023, there were about 850 people laid off in Wisconsin. In February 2023, there were 288 people laid off, adding up to 1,140 workers. 

    Meanwhile, in January of this year, 1,794 people were laid off, followed by 1,112 in February. That’s a total of 2,906. 

    When we asked Walker’s office for more evidence it shared an article from WKOW from Feb. 3 stating layoffs are up 109% in January. 

    And clearly, that trend continued in February.

    What are other job indicators showing?

    On the layoff front, 2024’s first two months have been rough, but there are other measures of the economy in general, and joblessness in particular.

    For instance, Wisconsin’s unemployment rate has been at or below 3% for the last 12 months according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Nationwide, the unemployment rate is 3.9%.

    According to the most recent data, in 2023, Wisconsin had more than 3 million people working, which was a record high, and so far that trend is continuing as the state Department of Workforce Development reported in February that nonfarm jobs increased by 22,400 in the month, to 3.03 million jobs overall.

    When Walker made the statement, in January, the department reported the state in December hit a record high number of jobs for the second straight month, topping 3 million. That information was available to him at the time of the statement.

    Also at the time of the statement, Wisconsin’s unemployment rate was 3.3% in December, below the national average of 3.7%. 

    In Wisconsin, the labor force participation rate is 65.7%, which is higher than the national average of 62.5%, according to the Department of Workforce Development, which is roughly where it was when Walker made the statement.

    So, there is data that suggests Wisconsin’s job situation is in good shape, but Walker cherry-picked one data point when making his point 

    Our ruling

    Walker said March 3 on CNN that Wisconsin “just had 100% increase in layoffs.” 

    The number is accurate, comparing January and February of this year with the same months last year. But Walker ignores other data points on jobs, such as the low unemployment rate and high labor force participation rate. 

    Our definition of Mostly True is that the statement is accurate but needs clarification or additional information.

    That fits here. 

     



    Source

  • Fact Check: Did the 2020 presidential election in Wisconsin really come down to a few votes per ward?

    At a rally in suburban Waukesha earlier this month, first lady Jill Biden and other Democratic officials laid out what’s at stake in the 2024 election, focusing on abortion and health care access.

    Secretary of State Sarah Godlewski was one of the speakers who took the stage before the first lady, asking a crowd of mostly women voters to talk to their neighbors and help get out the vote.

    “When it comes to how many votes (President) Joe Biden won, it was literally less than a few votes per ward,” Godlewski said.  

    We often mention that Biden won Wisconsin in 2020 by a little more than 20,000 votes. But taking a look at the votes by ward could give an interesting picture of how competitive the election was – and could be again this fall.

    And other Democrats seem to be repeating the same message, including when Biden visited his new campaign headquarters in Milwaukee. 

    “In Wisconsin, every election comes down to three to four votes per ward,” the state party’s Deputy Organizing Director Jaliah Jefferson said at that event.

    As the state heads for a rematch between Biden and former President Donald Trump, let’s look at how many votes it came down to by ward last time.

    Number came from dividing votes by total number of wards in Wisconsin

    When we asked for backup, Nathan Schwantes, Godlewski’s chief of staff, said the secretary of state was talking about the entire state of Wisconsin, not a specific city or county.

    He explained that Biden won the state by 20,682 votes (which is correct) and that Wisconsin had 6,656 wards where voters lived. 

    That division results in 3.1 votes per ward. 

    He added that there’s a slightly different count of wards in Wisconsin, which includes wards where no voters live. That number was 7,078, giving a result of 2.9 voters.

    State law says that wards are the “building blocks” for creating districts for local, state and federal offices. And “all territory, even if unpopulated, must be contained in a ward.”

    That explains why some wards might not actually have voters in them. 

    Schwantes shared an email from the nonpartisan Legislative Technology Services Bureau, which confirms the 7,078 number. That total was from July, because the next count was not taken until January. 

    Whichever total ward number is used, the calculations result in around a few votes per ward. 

    So, Godlewski’s math is correct.

    Calculation takes wards together as an average, though certain areas voted differently

    Wards vary widely in population. And blue areas of the state would have delivered many more votes for Biden per ward, and red areas would have delivered much less. 

    For example, Biden lost Waukesha County to Trump — where Godlewski made the claim — by 55,743 votes. 

    Looking at the ward-by-ward report of 2020 presidential results, Waukesha County had about 387 wards, so that comes down to about 144 votes per ward that Biden lost by.

    The similar claim, from Jefferson, simply said that elections in Wisconsin come down to a few votes per ward — not that Biden specifically won or lost those few votes everywhere.

    For comparison, in Milwaukee County — where Jefferson made her claim — Biden won over Trump by 183,045 votes. 

    Milwaukee County had about 572 wards, coming down to about 320 votes per ward that Biden won by.

    Counties use “reporting units” to report results, which can be one ward or a group of wards. 

    So, our analysis of those counties is an estimate and includes wards where no voters live — there are many like that in the City of Waukesha.

    Biden certainly didn’t win — or lose — by three votes per ward in every county, but it is the right average. 

    It’s clear that Godlewski was speaking generally about the entire state. And presidents are elected based on how many electoral votes the entire state has, not by counties or wards. 

    Our ruling

    At a Waukesha rally, Secretary of State Sarah Godlewski said “when it comes to how many votes Joe Biden won, it was literally less than a few votes per ward.”

    Although “less than a few” is open to interpretation, 2.9 or 3.1 is certainly a small number, considering that several hundred voters can live in one ward. 

    And although her claim doesn’t require a caveat because presidents are elected statewide, we should still note that Biden’s vote-per-ward margin would have been larger or smaller in certain areas of the state.  

    We rate her claim True. 

     

     



    Source

  • Fact Check: El papa Francisco no dijo ‘come lo que quieras en Semana Santa’

    Una publicación en Facebook dice que el papa Francisco dijo que se puede comer lo que sea en Semana Santa, pero eso no pasó. 

    “ESTA SEMANA SANTA, PUEDES COMER LO QUE SEA: PAPA FRANCISCO”, dice la publicación del 24 de marzo de 2024. 

    Esta publicación cita al papa supuestamente diciendo: “Come lo que quieras en Semana Santa, el sacrificio no está en el estómago, sino en el corazón”.

    La publicación fue marcada como parte del esfuerzo de Meta para combatir las noticias falsas y la desinformación en su plataforma. (Lea más sobre nuestra colaboración con Meta, propietaria de Facebook e Instagram).

    (Captura de pantalla de la publicación en Facebook).

    ¿Qué es la Semana Santa?

    En la religión católica, este es un periodo de ocho días que comienza con el Domingo de Ramos y culmina con el Domingo de Resurrección (de Jesucristo). Esa semana de celebración es un tiempo para reflexionar sobre la pasión y muerte de Cristo, las personas guardan ayuno y se abstienen de comer carne. Este año el Domingo de Resurrección es el 31 de marzo.

    @politifactenespanol ¡Sigue el canal de WhatsApp de PolitiFact en Español para estar al día de lo que es cierto, falso, engañoso o fuera de contexto! #whatsapp #canales #verificacion #factcheck ♬ Querulous Shred – DJ BAI

    El papa Francisco no alentó a creyentes a dejar el ayuno en Semana Santa

    PolitiFact hizo una búsqueda en Google de la frase supuestamente dicha por el papa y no encontramos ningún discurso o fuente verídica que reportara que el papa dijo eso. Al contrario, encontramos varias verificaciones de otros medios legítimos desmintiendo la declaración. 

    También hicimos una búsqueda en la página web de La Santa Sede (la ciudad del Vaticano) del mes de enero, febrero y marzo y no encontramos ningún discurso en donde el papa dijera esa frase. 

    En el mensaje del papa Francisco para la cuaresma 2024, él habló sobre la importancia del ayuno para acercarse a Dios. El papa también mostró apoyo al ayuno en 2020 durante una audiencia general y en una homilía en 2014. 

    Aunque PolitiFact desconoce de dónde se originó esta declaración, varios medios argentinos reportaron que un sacerdote de la provincia de Neuquén, Ruben Capitano, dijo una afirmación similar en 2018. 

    En el 2022, El País reportó sobre otra versión similar que decía, “Coman lo que quieran en Semana Santa”, esta fue adjudicada al sacerdote Juan Andrés Verde, quien terminó desmintiendo el hecho. 

    El papa Francisco no dijo, “Come lo que quieras en Semana Santa, el sacrificio no está en el estómago, sino en el corazón”. Calificamos la publicación en Facebook como Falsa. 



    Source

  • Fact Check: Choque de carguero contra puente de Baltimore bajo investigación, no hay evidencia de ciberataque

    Las especulaciones en redes sociales se dispararon después de que un carguero con bandera de Singapur chocó contra un puente de Maryland y lo derrumbó.

    PolitiFact ha desmentido las afirmaciones de que el incidente fue una operación diseñada para distraer a la gente. Otras publicaciones alegan que esto es parte de un ataque coordinado.

    “Barco que impactó contra el puente Francis Scott Key en Baltimore fue atacado cibernéticamente”, afirma una publicación en TikTok del 27 de marzo. Pero no hay pruebas de que eso sea cierto.

    PolitiFact se ha asociado con TikTok para combatir los contenidos falsos, engañosos o inauténticos. Más información aquí.

    @politifactenespanol ¡Sigue el canal de WhatsApp de PolitiFact en Español para estar al día de lo que es cierto, falso, engañoso o fuera de contexto! #whatsapp #canales #verificacion #factcheck ♬ Querulous Shred – DJ BAI

    Funcionarios estatales y federales dijeron que no encontraron pruebas de que el choque fuera otra cosa que un accidente.

    El Gobernador de Maryland, Wes Moore, la oficina del FBI en Baltimore, el Secretario de Seguridad Nacional, Alejandro Mayorkas, y el Presidente Joe Biden han declarado que no hay indicios de que el accidente fue intencionado o relacionado con el terrorismo. 

    El video del accidente muestra luces que se encienden y apagan en el carguero, gestionado por Synergy Marine Group, con sede en Singapur, antes de chocar contra el puente.

    Según Moore, la tripulación del buque informó que había perdido potencia antes del choque y emitió una llamada de socorro que permitió a las autoridades limitar el tráfico en el puente.

    Aún no está claro por qué el barco perdió potencia. La presidenta de la Junta Nacional de Seguridad en el Transporte, Jennifer Homendy, dijo el 26 de marzo que es demasiado pronto para confirmar si un fallo eléctrico a bordo del buque contribuyó al accidente.

    PolitiFact contactó a la oficina del FBI en Baltimore y con Synergy Marine Group, pero no recibimos respuesta inmediata.

    La información disponible más veraz sobre esta investigación en curso nos lleva a calificar la afirmación de que el incidente fue un ciberataque como Falsa.

    Una versión de este artículo fue escrito originalmente en inglés y traducido por Marta Campabadal.

    Read a version of this article in English.

    Lee más reportes de PolitiFact en Español aquí.


    Debido a limitaciones técnicas, partes de nuestra página web aparecen en inglés. Estamos trabajando en mejorar la presentación.



    Source

  • Fact Check: Biden exaggerates Trump’s pandemic comments about disinfectants, UV light

    During a speech in North Carolina this week, President Joe Biden misrepresented comments by former President Donald Trump about potential treatments for COVID-19.

    Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris visited Chavis Park in Raleigh to speak about their efforts to expand access to affordable healthcare. Biden said Trump’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic shows he can’t be trusted to protect American lives.

    “Four years ago this month we saw how my predecessor didn’t care much about science and reason,” Biden said Tuesday, noting that more than 1 million Americans died during the pandemic.

    “Trump didn’t level with the American people,” Biden said. “He told Americans all they had to do was inject bleach in themselves, remember that? Not a joke, you think I am making this up. Just take a real shot of UV light.”

    Biden made similar remarks at a fundraiser after his speech.

    The White House confirmed that Biden was referring to Trump’s comments during an April 23, 2020, press briefing — six weeks after the World Health Organization officially declared the outbreak was a global pandemic.

    The spread of COVID-19 prompted government officials to issue stay-at-home advisories and shutdowns as scientists and healthcare workers rushed to develop vaccines and life-saving treatments. At a time when Americans looked to the White House for specific advice for combating COVID-19, Trump went off-script, riffing on how disinfectants and ultraviolet rays might be used against the virus.

    The Trump administration invited William Bryan, who was undersecretary for science and technology at the Department of Homeland Security, to the White House to publicly share his team’s observations about the virus’ survival under certain conditions. 

    Bryan said sun exposure and cleaning agents such as bleach can kill COVID-19 when it is on surfaces and in the air, but his comments created confusion. At one point during Bryan’s presentation, he used the word “inject” while talking about introducing ultraviolet light into a scenario where the virus lay on a surface. 

    “Door handles, stainless steel, and if you look at as the temperature increases as the humidity increases with no sun involved, you can see how drastically the half-life goes down on that virus,” Bryan said. “So, the virus is dying at a much more rapid pace just from exposure to higher temperatures and just from exposure to humidity.”

    “If you look at the fourth line,” Bryan said, referring to test results displayed on a slideshow.

    “You inject the sunlight into that, you inject UV rays into that, the same effects on line two as 70 to 75 degrees with 80% humidity on the surface and, look at line four, but now you inject the sun, the half-life goes from six hours to two minutes,” he said. “That’s how much of an impact UV rays has on the virus.”

    Trump took the mic and asked Bryan several questions about his findings — making comments that have been roundly criticized by scientists and medical experts as misleading and ill-informed. 

    Trump’s statements were confusing, but a look at his exact words shows that Trump didn’t specifically instruct Americans to “inject bleach” or “take a shot” of ultraviolet light to prevent COVID-19. He did, however, inquire about whether UV light and disinfectant could be studied inside the human body.

    Here are Trump’s full comments:

    “A question that probably some of you are thinking of if you’re totally into that world, which I find to be very interesting. So, supposedly we hit the body with a tremendous, whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light. And I think you said that hasn’t been checked, but you’re going to test it. And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way. And I think you said you’re going to test that, too. Sounds interesting, right?

    “And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in one minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning, because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs, so it’d be interesting to check that, so that you’re going to have to use medical doctors with, but it sounds interesting to me. So, we’ll see, but the whole concept of the light, the way it kills it in one minute. That’s pretty powerful.”

    To summarize: Trump expressed interest in studying whether it’s possible to bring ultraviolet light “inside the body … through the skin or in some other way” and whether disinfectant could be used against the virus “by injection.” 

    Responding to a reporter’s question moments later, Bryan clarified that researchers didn’t study any injection methods. “We don’t do that within that lab at our labs,” Bryan said.

    Trump appeared to understand Bryan’s clarification, telling the reporter: “It wouldn’t be through injections, almost a cleaning and sterilization of an area. Maybe it works, maybe it doesn’t work, but it certainly has a big effect if it’s on a stationary object.”

    Trump’s comments led to confusion as multiple news outlets reported Trump’s words on disinfectants and UV rays as though Trump was suggesting they could be used as a treatment. 

    The next day, Trump and his press secretary said people were misinterpreting Trump’s comments. Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany said Trump had repeatedly said that “Americans should consult with medical doctors.” In an exchange with reporters, Trump said he was suggesting disinfectants and UV rays could be used on hands and that, when he spoke about injections, he was being “sarcastic.”

    Still, some companies and state agencies issued warnings about ingesting disinfectants. The maker of Lysol said in a statement that “under no circumstance” should its products be used in the human body.

    This is not the first time Biden has criticized Trump’s comments from that 2020 press conference. Three months after Trump’s statements, Biden accused Trump of saying that drinking bleach could help fight the coronavirus. We rated that claim Mostly False.

    Karoline Leavitt, the Trump campaign’s press secretary, said Biden’s latest comment is intentionally misleading.

    “It’s more misinformation and lies from President Biden,” Leavitt told WRAL-TV in an interview on Tuesday. “He continues to utilize the statistics and data from the worst of the COVID crisis to try and paint (an) unfair negative reality about President Trump’s time in the White House.”

    Our ruling

    Biden said Trump “told Americans all they had to do was inject bleach in themselves. Just take a shot of UV light.”

    During a nationally-televised press conference, Trump publicly floated the idea of studying whether bringing UV rays “inside the body” could help treat the coronavirus and asked an adviser whether a “disinfectant” could be injected for the same purpose. 

    But Trump didn’t specifically instruct Americans to do either of those things — and he and his press secretary attempted to clarify his words the next day.

    Biden’s statement about Trump contains an element of truth but ignores critical facts that would give a different impression. We rate it Mostly False.

    WRAL state government reporter Will Doran contributed to this report.



    Source

  • Fact Check: Ship that struck Baltimore bridge was not a ‘Chinese vessel’

    Since Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse March 24, fact-checkers have looked into false claims blaming the incident on everything from cyberattacks to Ukraine to Israel.

    Now, some are taking aim at a familiar U.S. adversary: China.

    Peggy Hubbard, an Illinois Republican who ran twice for U.S. Senate, in a March 27 Facebook post said that the U.S. government should not be held responsible for the cost of rebuilding the bridge: “We didn’t (damage) the damn Baltimore bridge! That was a Chinese company that (did) the damage! Let them replace it.”

    We saw others connecting China to the incident, including this March 27 Facebook reel from a man who called it a “Chinese vessel.” 

    (Screenshot from Facebook)

    These posts were flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    We found reports that the parent companies of the owner and manager of the ship that struck the Francis Scott Key Bridge were based in Hong Kong, a special administrative region of China. The ship was registered in Singapore. The crew onboard were Indian people, according to the ship management company.

    The ship Dali was built by South Korean shipbuilding company Hyundai Heavy Industries in 2015. It is registered in Singapore, owned by Singapore-based company Grace Ocean Private Ltd. and managed by ship management company Synergy Marine Group.

    The New York Times reported that Grace Ocean Private Ltd. is owned by Grace Ocean Investment Limited, which is based in the British Virgin Islands. 

    Lloyd’s List, a maritime intelligence publication, in 2021 reported an infraction by a bulker owned by Grace Ocean Investment. The Lloyd’s List article said the company was based in Hong Kong. But The New York Times found Hong Kong company records show that a company with that name and address dissolved in 2015.

    The New York Times report said the company’s four directors include two Filipino citizens, a Singaporean, and a Japanese citizen, all of whom have listing addresses in Singapore.

    Meanwhile, Synergy Marine Group has 28 offices across 14 countries, including two offices in China. According to CBS News, its parent company, Unity Group Holdings International, is based in Hong Kong. 

    Synergy Marine Group’s headquarters are in Singapore. Its founder and chief executive is Rajesh Unni, who is Indian. According to a 2022 report, the company employed more than 18,000 seafarers, more than 80% of whom are Indian nationals.

    The crew of 22 who were aboard the ship were all Indians, Synergy said.

    The Dali was chartered by Danish shipping company Maersk for a planned trip from Baltimore to Sri Lanka and was carrying Maersk customers’ cargo at the time. Maersk said none of its crew and personnel were onboard the ship.

    The U.S. and other countries inspected the ship. Inspectors at the port of San Antonio, Chile, found in June 2023 that the Dali had a problem related to “propulsion and auxiliary machinery,” but the ship continued to be in service. It also underwent inspection in September by the U.S. Coast Guard in New York and had routine engine maintenance before it left Baltimore.

    USA Today reported that maritime law mandates that state-licensed pilots must pilot foreign-flagged vessels into state ports. 

    Singapore’s Maritime and Port Authority said it would provide “full cooperation” with the U.S. Coast Guard and said it will also investigate the incident. Singapore’s Transport Safety Investigation Bureau will carry out its own investigation to identify ways to prevent future marine casualties and incidents, not to determine liability.

    Ultimately, the groups and the people that directly oversaw the Dali’s operations were not Chinese. We rate that claim False.

    PolitiFact Researcher Caryn Baird contributed to this report.

    RELATED: Angela Chao was CEO of a shipping company, but it doesn’t own the ship that hit Baltimore bridge



    Source