Category: Fact Check

  • Fact Check: No, these images aren’t evidence of a CGI Princess Kate

    After Princess Kate announced in a video that she is being treated for cancer, some social media users asserted the video was computer-generated.

    “Kensington Palace has released a video from ‘Kate Middleton’ thanking the public for their support,” read the text in a screenshot of a Telegram post featuring side-by-side photos of Kate. “Here is a comparison between the new Kate (left) and the old Kate (right). Am I the only one that’s seeing major differences in facial structure? What’s going on?” 

    A March 23 Facebook post sharing the screenshot said: “Look CGI,” using an abbreviation for computer-generated imagery.  

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    The photo on the left in the post showed Kate as she appeared in the original March 22 video in which she revealed her diagnosis. The photo on the left showed Kate in October 2021. 

    Neither photo is evidence a CGI princess stood in for the real thing to discuss her cancer. In the video, Kate appears more casual, with less makeup. In the other photo, nearly 3 years old, she was dressed up in formalwear and styled for an awards ceremony. The older image is also taken closer up and from a different angle.

    But both women look like her. Because they are. 

    We rate this post False.

     



    Source

  • Fact Check: Why Joe Biden surpassing Donald Trump’s lead in 2020 Pennsylvania election doesn’t signal fraud

    Former President Donald Trump’s initial lead in Pennsylvania’s 2020 election is not evidence of voter fraud, as social media users have claimed.

    A March 25 Facebook post contains a screenshot of an X post showing Newsmax election results. They show Trump leading by 57% in Pennsylvania’s election. The screen’s top right corner shows “77%,” referring to the percentage of the votes counted. 

    “Just a reminder how much the demons had to cheat to win,” the post’s caption said.

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    Trump was leading in Pennsylvania on election night in 2020. But Biden eventually won the state’s election by 80,555 votes and the national election by more than 7 million votes. Trump prematurely declared victory in the state, announcing he won the Electoral College votes on X, then called Twitter. 

    PolitiFact previously reported that Biden surpassed Trump’s lead because of mail-in ballots. Biden won a majority of those mailed ballots, and this type of ballot is counted more slowly than in-person votes. 

    Pennsylvania’s election rules mandate that mail-in ballots be counted on Election Day, a process that takes time because election workers must open envelopes, check voters’ signatures and prepare ballots for scanning. That this takes time is not evidence of fraud. Most of the ballots counted in person were for Trump, while Biden won more than three-quarters of Pennsylvania’s mail ballots. 

    We rate the claim that Donald Trump won Pennsylvania in the 2020 presidential election False. 

    Former President Donald Trump’s initial lead in Pennsylvania’s 2020 election is not evidence of voter fraud, as social media users have claimed.

    A March 25 Facebook post contains a screenshot of an X post showing Newsmax election results. They show Trump leading by 57% in Pennsylvania’s election. The screen’s top right corner shows “77%,” referring to the percentage of the votes counted. 

    “Just a reminder how much the demons had to cheat to win,” the post’s caption said.

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    Trump was leading in Pennsylvania on election night in 2020. But Biden eventually won the state’s election by 80,555 votes and the national election by more than 7 million votes. Trump prematurely declared victory in the state, announcing he won the Electoral College votes on X, then called Twitter. 

    PolitiFact previously reported that Biden surpassed Trump’s lead because of mail-in ballots. Biden won a majority of those mailed ballots, and this type of ballot is counted more slowly than in-person votes. 

    Pennsylvania’s election rules mandate that mail-in ballots be counted on Election Day, a process that takes time because election workers must open envelopes, check voters’ signatures and prepare ballots for scanning. That this takes time is not evidence of fraud. Most of the ballots counted in person were for Trump, while Biden won more than three-quarters of Pennsylvania’s mail ballots. 

    We rate the claim that Donald Trump won Pennsylvania in the 2020 presidential election False. ​



    Source

  • Fact Check: No, this isn’t a photo of a black figure on Baltimore’s Key Bridge before it collapsed

    Legend has it that Mothman, a looming, red-eyed monster, appeared above the Ohio River before the Silver Bridge collapsed in Point Pleasant, West Virginia, in 1967.

    An image that has previously been associated with that tale is now being repurposed to suggest something sinister about Baltimore’s March 26 Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse March 26. 

    “Someone shared this photo of a black figure on the bridge before it collapsed,” reads the text above a Facebook post sharing the image of a bridge, with a black shape on one of its apexes highlighted. 

    (Screenshot from Facebook)

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    It’s clear from photos of the Key Bridge that the image in the Facebook post is not it. 

    And it’s been online for years. 

    A reverse-image search on TinEye found it first appeared online in 2008. Users in other forums, like this Reddit post, recall seeing it on websites even earlier. 

    A 2016 YouTube video exploring Mothman myths further contends that this photo doesn’t show a cryptid on the Silver Bridge, but a piece of metal falling into the water from the Ironton-Russell Bridge in Ohio. 

    That bridge, which has since been demolished, does resemble the bridge in the Facebook post’s image.

    We rate claims that this image shows a black figure on the Key Bridge before it collapsed False.

     



    Source

  • Fact Check: Dr. Oz wasn’t attacked on TV for talking about a new blood pressure treatment

    A video purports to show Dr. Mehmet Oz, a celebrity doctor and 2022 U.S. Senate candidate, being attacked on live television for promoting a new blood pressure treatment.

    A March 22 Facebook video shows two men fighting on a live show followed by video showing Fox News’s Laura Ingraham. “An attempt on the life of a doctor on the air,” a voice that sounds like Ingraham’s says. “The Dr. Oz came to tell about a new innovative tool that allows you to clean blood vessels and normalize blood pressure in a few days.”

    The video cuts to Oz, with several bruises on his face, promoting a product he says will eliminate blood pressure and stroke risk. A chyron on the video reads, “A famous doctor is being gagged over his revolutionary remedy for clearing blood vessels and normalizing blood pressure!”

    Two problems: The man being attacked in the video is not Oz; and Oz is not hawking this blood pressure treatment. In fact, last we checked, the link in the video went to an ad for a work jacket, although it was on a website with a url that started “healthinsurancepage.com/products.”

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    (Screenshot from Facebook)

    The fight video is from a 2017 brawl between two journalists that unfolded on a live Polish television after a Polish journalist called a Russian journalist’s grandparents “red fascists.” 

    The Ingram and Oz videos both have telltale signs of deepfakes, including the audio not syncing with the speaker’s lip movements. And we’ve seen similarly edited video before, also in a baseless claim involving Oz. We searched Google and the Nexis news database but didn’t find a Fox News report of Ingram saying Oz was attacked for his blood pressure treatment. 

    The Oz video is from his 2014 Senate testimony answering questions about his promoting weight loss products as host of “The Dr. Oz Show,” which aired from 2009 to 2022. Oz had no bruises on his face during his testimony. (Members of a Senate consumer protection subcommittee chided Oz for making claims about bogus “miracle” diet supplements.)

    On his official website, Oz tells people to be aware of companies selling fake products using his “name and likeness – sometimes even using AI to generate fake videos of what looks like me, but isn’t.” The disclaimer says the only real videos come from his verified social media accounts.

    We rate the claim that there was an “attempt on the life” of Dr. Oz after he shared a blood pressure treatment False.



    Source

  • Fact Check: This airplane at the Detroit airport flew March Madness basketball players, not ‘illegal invaders’

    Two blurry photos are being used as evidence that immigrants in the U.S. illegally are being bused and flown around the country.

    One image shows part of an Allegiant Air plane between two buildings. The other shows three buses lined up in a row.

    “Happening right now. Three busses just loaded up with illegal invaders at Detroit Metro,” Rep. Matt Maddock, posted at 8:20 p.m. March 27 on X, misspelling buses, along with the images. “Anyone have any idea where they’re headed with their police escort?”

    The post had more than 13 million views as of March 29. But the photos don’t show a plane or buses filled with migrants.

    (Screenshot from X)

    Maddock’s state is hosting the NCAA March Madness basketball tournament’s Sweet 16 and Elite Eight games. The plane and buses in the photos at Detroit Metropolitan Airport (DTW) transported players competing in the games, according to an airport spokesperson.  

    The four teams competing March 29 at Detroit’s Little Caesars Arena arrived at DTW on March 27, a Detroit Metropolitan Airport spokesperson told PolitiFact. The buses in the photos were transporting the teams.

    Gonzaga University’s team flew on the Allegiant airplane shown in the photo. 

    “Allegiant had one flight to DTW March 27. It was a charter flight carrying Gonzaga’s men’s basketball team from Spokane,” Hector Mejia, an Allegiant Air spokesperson, told PolitiFact. He said the flight arrived at 7:25 pm local time. 

    Social media posts from the Gonzaga team show photos and a video of the players arriving in Detroit on an Allegiant airplane.

    X users added a community note to Maddock’s post.

    “This is the Gonzaga men’s basketball team, not a group of migrants,” the note read. “The police escort is taking them to the NCAA Men’s Sweet Sixteen.”

    Multiple outlets also fact-checked Maddock’s claim. 

    Despite this information, Maddock doubled down, creating a thread of additional replies filled with incorrect and misleading information about immigration. Maddock did not respond to PolitiFact’s request for comment.

    “Everyone knows that Biden and (Michigan Gov. Gretchen) Whitmer are flying and bussing in illegals,” Maddock said in one of the follow-up posts.

    We’ve previously debunked claims that President Joe Biden is flying immigrants in the U.S. illegally. The most recent claims were about a Biden administration parole program allowing eligible immigrants from certain countries to work and live in the U.S. for two years. People in that program are responsible for booking and paying for their own flights.

    “The radical left has one goal. Flood us with tens of millions of illegals to be counted in the 2030 census to create dozens of new Democrat Congressional Seats,” Maddock said in the thread on his March 27 post. PolitiFact also has explained why that claim is flawed.

    Immigration officials have encountered immigrants at and between ports of entry 9 million times during Biden’s administration. But that does not mean 9 million people entered the country and are now living in the U.S. 

    Encounters represent events, not people, so the same person can be stopped multiple times and each time would count as a separate encounter. Additionally, the U.S. has expelled, removed or returned people from the U.S. around 3.8 million times under Biden, according to PolitiFact’s analysis of Department of Homeland Security data.

    Through September 2023, the most recent data available, about 2.3 million people had been released into the U.S. during Biden’s administration, Department of Homeland Security data shows.

    Our ruling

    Maddock said on X that photos showed, “Three busses just loaded up with illegal invaders at Detroit Metro.”

    The buses transported the four men’s basketball teams playing in the NCAA March Madness tournament’s Sweet 16 games hosted in Detroit. The Allegiant airplane in the photo Maddock shared was transporting the Gonzaga team. 

    Maddock’s claim is not accurate and makes a ridiculous claim. We rate it Pants on Fire!



    Source

  • Fact Check: Instagram posts – Baltimore bridge accident, fire near Ohio bridge aren’t connected

    A March 26 bridge fire in Ohio is related to the collapse of Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge.

    Source

  • Fact Check: No, Donald Trump did not pay off the mortgage of a man who fixed his flat tire

    In an oft-told tale, former President Donald Trump thanks a stranger who fixed his flat tire.

    “How can I repay you?” Trump asks, according to multiple Facebook posts that detailed the story.

    The stranger, who was described in the posts only as “a black man walking by,” replied by saying his wife always wanted flowers.

    “A few days later, the black man’s wife gets a beautiful bouquet of flowers with a note saying, ‘Thanks for helping me. By the way, … the mortgage on your house is paid off.’”

    The posts describe other instances of Trump’s generosity: giving $25,000 to a U.S. Marine who was beaten in a Mexican prison; sending $10,000 to a bus driver who saved a suicidal woman’s life; and chartering a private flight for a rabbi’s critically ill son. 

    Those, we found, had some factual basis. The flat tire story, however, did not.

    These posts were flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    The flat tire story has been repeated several times through the decades. And it has been frequently debunked.

    The story was shared as far back as 1996 in Forbes, our review of Nexis news archives found. The details, including the location of the flat tire and the message Trump sent the good Samaritan, have changed throughout the years. Forbes did not name the purported tire fixer.

    In 1997, The Globe and Mail, a Canadian newspaper, asked an assistant at Trump’s New York office about the rumor. “We’ve heard the story,” the assistant said, according to the article. “No, it isn’t true.” 

    There are reasons to believe the other anecdotes in the post. Trump in 1988 used his private jet to help transport a critically ill child to a hospital, Snopes confirmed. In 2013, he gave $10,000 to bus driver Darnell Barton who talked a suicidal woman off a Buffalo, New York, bridge, a number of news organizations reported. In 2014, Trump gave $25,000 to U.S. Marine Corps Sgt. Andrew Tahmooressi after he was imprisoned in Mexico.

    Trump didn’t pay off the mortgage of a man who fixed his flat tire. That is False. 

    PolitiFact Researcher Caryn Baird contributed to this report.



    Source

  • Fact Check: Yes, many Wisconsin police agencies have two officers present during the analysis of drugs

    U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin spoke about the fentanyl crisis in a March 7 media call ahead of the State of the Union, alongside the Waukesha police chief, who attended President Joe Biden’s speech with Baldwin. 

    Fentanyl is an extremely powerful synthetic opioid, known for its ability to kill in small doses. The drug is commonly mixed into drugs such as heroin and cocaine, but can also be found in pressed pills and even in marijuana, police say.

    PolitiFact has looked at claims regarding fentanyl and accidental overdoses before, when envelopes containing unknown substances were sent to elections officials in 2023. 

    According to a Nov. 10, 2023, fact-check, although fentanyl is dangerous, and it can be lethal in small doses, it must enter the bloodstream to have an effect. The drug isn’t absorbed well by the skin, meaning it must be snorted through the nose, ingested or injected with a needle. 

    People also cannot get sick by being in a room with powdered fentanyl, because it doesn’t easily vaporize. A source in the fact check said to cause toxicity from breathing it in, “You would probably have to be in a wind tunnel with dunes of fentanyl around you.” 

    But people can get sick if they touch the drug and then touch their mouth, nose or eyes.

    In 2022, there were over 1,400 opioid-related deaths in Wisconsin, many of them tied to fentanyl, according to a February 2024 PolitiFact. 

    During the call, Baldwin made a claim that initially had us — and probably others — scratching our heads: 

    “We’re facing situations these days where you have to have two officers in the evidence room in case there’s an accidental (fentanyl) exposure. We are facing situations where first responders have been exposed to fentanyl at the crime scene and that is scary and we need to provide the support, the tools, the test strips, and all the training necessary to keep our first responders safe so that they can keep all of us safe.”

    Why would two officers need to be present to test a drug? 

    Is it a safety precaution or something else?

    Many agencies have policies to have two officers present during drug analysis

    When we asked Baldwin’s team about the claim, press secretary Alanna Conley pointed us toward the Sheboygan County Sheriff’s Department, which recently shared its policies with Baldwin. 

    Sheriff Cory Roeseler said in an email to PolitiFact Wisconsin that several years ago someone was exposed during testing of a suspected narcotic, which ended up having fentanyl in it.

    “As a result our testing procedure changed. First we started using two officers, one in the room where the drugs are being tested and one outside the room in the event that there was an exposure,” he said. 

    “Second we purchased a specific chamber to use to test the drugs so that it might limit any potential exposure and this chamber is vented/filtered. Lastly, we have Narcan readily available in our testing area in the event that there was an exposure where it might be needed.”

    He said there have been exposures for at least one deputy, who was transporting a drug in to be processed, and another for a corrections officer, who was exposed during booking and had to be hospitalized.

    The Sheboygan sheriff’s department isn’t the only agency that uses two people when narcotics are being handled. 

    Jim Palmer, a member of the Board of Directors for the Wisconsin Law Enforcement Accreditation Group, said in an email that “the practice of having two individuals work in an evidence room as a safety precaution has become increasingly common.”

    He said that a second person can be used in handling certain types of dangerous evidence, according to standards created by the group. The standards also recommend the use of gloves, a respirator, a fume hood and having naloxone available. 

    Palmer pointed to the Madison Police Department, whose guidance takes the standards into account. 

    According to the department’s document on handling evidence and contraband, “the best practice is to be paired up with at least one other officer.” 

    “The second ‘safety officer’ will not be directly involved in the testing, handling or packaging of the drug, but can perform other support functions such as computer entries.”

    Waukesha Police Capt. Dan Baumann said his department handles drugs similarly, given that so many different substances can be cut with fentanyl. 

    There is the evidence room, and within that, there is a smaller processing room about the size of an office bathroom. In that smaller room, there’s a hood providing a gentle amount of filtered air. 

    “An officer that would stand outside the room, and then an officer that stands on the inside of the room that’s actually collecting and packaging the evidence, testing it, weighing it and all that fun stuff,” Baumann said in a phone call with PolitiFact Wisconsin.

    There is also Narcan on hand, in case there is a large enough exposure. 

    “Somebody with medical training is going to be present with you, just in case something were to happen,” he said. “We’re going to take all precautionary measures.”

    The Milwaukee Police Department has a similar policy, according to its controlled substances procedures: 

    “The ‘buddy system’ shall always be used when testing suspected controlled substances, regardless of the type or quantity. Two members shall be present, one to test and one to witness,” the procedures document says. 

    Our ruling

    Baldwin said police are “facing situations these days where you have to have two officers in the evidence room in case there’s an accidental (fentanyl) exposure.” 

    In Wisconsin, there is guidance from the Wisconsin Law Enforcement Accreditation Group to have two officers present, and several agencies have guidance calling for one officer inside the room where drugs are being handled and tested, and another stands outside to ensure the other is safe. 

    We rate this claim as True.

     

     



    Source

  • Fact Check: Baltimore bridge is not the same bridge as seen in Obama-produced Netflix film

    Many people who saw real-world footage of the Francis Scott Key Bridge’s March 26 collapse likened the scene to a disaster movie.

    But an online claim we saw circulating on social media went one step further.

    “For those of you that don’t know,” a March 27 Facebook post said, “The Francis Scott Key bridge is the same bridge that was shown in the Netflix movie ‘Leave the World Behind.’ The production company is owned by the Obamas. Open your eyes people.”

    The post included an image of a person sitting on the edge of what looks like a hospital bed, staring out across the water at the bridge crash in Baltimore. Similar posts were shared on X.

    The Facebook post were flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    The 2023 apocalyptic Netflix hit film “Leave the World Behind,” starred Julia Roberts, Ethan Hawke and Mahershala Ali. It was based on a 2020 novel of the same name and produced by Higher Ground, a media company co-founded by former first lady Michelle Obama and former President Barack Obama.

    The film does not feature the Francis Scott Key Bridge. And the image in the post is not from the movie; we found a version of it on a stock image site. The original stock image shows a cityscape view out of the window, not the collapsed Key Bridge.

    “Leave the World Behind” was filmed largely on location at a house on Long Island, New York. “The house at the center of ‘Leave the World Behind’ is a real location; exterior shots and some interiors were filmed in Old Westbury, New York,” Netflix said in Tudum, its behind-the-scenes online magazine.

    Newsday, a news outlet covering Long Island, reported about the movie’s crew filming in several locations in the area in April 2022.

    PolitiFact reviewed scenes from the film and found no match for the Baltimore bridge.

    “Leave the World Behind” has some scenes with bridges, including one in which a long pile of self-driving Teslas crash. Atlas on Wonders, a website that uses crowdsourced information to identify film locations, identified that bridge as the Jones Bay Bridge in Long Island, New York. 

    The bridge in another scene showing New York City in ruins appears to be a computer-generated image of the George Washington Bridge, which connects New York and New Jersey. In another scene, a ship runs ashore, forcing beachgoers to run to safety. The ship did not crash into a bridge.

    Officials and investigators probing the Baltimore bridge collapse have called it an accident and say there is no evidence that the bridge was targeted. 

    We rate the claim that the Key bridge is the same bridge that was shown in “Leave the World Behind” False.

    RELATED: No, the movie “Leave the World Behind” didn’t predict the Baltimore bridge collapse



    Source

  • Fact Check: In debate over sanctuary policies, patchwork of laws and edicts limit cooperation in New York

    In New York, a debate rages over whether local police should work with federal authorities to deport people who are in the country illegally. Immigrant advocates and Democrats support state and local measures that would further weaken any existing cooperation. Meanwhile, state Republicans are calling for a new law that would require local authorities to notify immigration enforcement when a noncitizen is arrested. 

    Gov. Kathy Hochul was asked about Republican elected officials who are concerned that New York’s sanctuary policies prevent local law enforcement from coordinating with federal immigration authorities. 

    “That narrative is false,” Hochul said. “There’s no barriers to law enforcement, state or local, to work with the federal government when it comes to immigration laws. There are 100 crimes that if migrants or anyone here commits that there’s a close connection and a desire from local government to hand them over.”

    We wondered whether Hochul is correct. Is there really no barrier to state or local law enforcement agencies to work with the federal government when it comes to immigration laws? Are there 100 crimes for which cooperation is permitted? 

    City barriers

    Sanctuary policies are written differently in every jurisdiction, but they concern the relationship between state and local authorities and federal immigration enforcement. They do not prevent Immigration and Customs Enforcement from using its own resources to detain people and they do not protect unauthorized immigrants from being criminally prosecuted as any other suspect would. 

    These policies can create prohibitions on a range of activities, such as sharing information or local resources, communicating with federal authorities about a suspect, holding a suspect who is not a citizen so ICE can take the suspect into custody, or allowing local law enforcement to perform the duties of an ICE agent. In New York, there are certain policies like this at the state level, as well as in some local governments. 

    Some of the strongest sanctuary city laws are in New York City. One of the first was an executive order from Mayor Edward Koch in 1989, which limited the information that city employees could give federal immigration authorities. It was a way to encourage people in immigrant communities to cooperate with the police in criminal investigations without fear of deportation. The laws have been strengthened over the years, creating more distance between local criminal prosecution and federal immigration enforcement. 

    ICE had operations on Rikers Island, and when noncitizens were sentenced, they would go to ICE for removal, said Kenneth Genalo, ICE’s New York City field office director for enforcement and removal operations. 

    In 2014, the city passed a law that led to the removal of ICE’s permanent office on Rikers Island, and it also put limits on how corrections officers and police could talk to and assist ICE, which marked a turning point for ICE. 

    “These policies stopped all the collaboration and cooperation,” Genalo said. 

    Immigration experts said that ICE can apprehend more people in city custody through something called a detainer if the federal agency would obtain a judicial warrant, but it does not do so. ICE presents administrative warrants, signed by an ICE official, not a judge. 

    “It’s uncomfortable to be subject to judicial scrutiny,” said Peter L. Markowitz, a law professor and co-director of the Kathryn O. Greenberg Immigration Justice Clinic at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law. “That’s why they don’t do it.” 

    The city’s ICE detainer law, passed in 2014, allows the New York Police Department and the Department of Corrections to hold people who are wanted by ICE for 48 hours past their release date only if certain conditions are met. The requirements for each department have slight differences, but generally, ICE must have a judicial warrant, and the person has to have been convicted of one of approximately 177 violent or serious crimes, or be a possible match on a terrorist watchlist.    

    Hochul’s reference to “100 crimes” very likely refers to the list of crimes in the detainer law that create exceptions for cooperating with ICE. 

    The city’s laws and ICE’s lack of judicial warrants result in few detainer requests being fulfilled. In fiscal year 2023, the NYPD received 109 detainer requests but fulfilled none of them. The Department of Corrections received 201 requests, and transferred 10 people to ICE. The Corrections Department, however, can communicate with ICE about people in custody without receiving a judicial warrant in cases in which the person has been convicted of a violent or serious crime or is a possible match in the terrorist watchlist. 

    The NYPD and other city agencies can still cooperate with federal law enforcement in certain circumstances, including investigations into gangs, human trafficking and terrorism. 

    Genalo told PolitiFact that ICE detainers are typically honored at state prisons. 

    Another city law prevents city resources and personnel from being used for immigration enforcement. 

    State barriers

    At the state level, several policies prevent cooperation: 

    • Hochul has kept in place an executive order that limits when state employees can ask about immigration status or share with federal immigration authorities information tied to immigration enforcement, unless they are required by law. The order also prohibits law enforcement officers from asking someone about their immigration status unless that person is under investigation and unless their alleged criminal activity is related to their immigration status. Police also can’t use equipment or resources just to investigate and arrest people who are here without authorization and are not suspected in any other crimes. Also, ICE can execute a civil arrest in a state facility only if it has a judicial warrant or order, or if the arrest is related to a proceeding in the facility. 

    • An appellate court ruling, known as Francis v. DeMarco, found that state law bars state and local law enforcement from holding people for ICE past their release date without a judicial warrant. 

    • The Protect Our Courts Act, passed in 2020, prevents ICE from showing up at state and local courthouses where it knows noncitizens will be and arresting them there. 

    We reached out to Hochul’s office by phone and email and did not receive evidence to support her claim. 

    Our ruling

    Hochul said that there were “no barriers” in New York to local law enforcement’s cooperation with federal immigration laws and that there are 100 crimes for which noncitizens could be handed over. 

    New York City has some of the strongest laws prohibiting cooperation between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities, but there are circumstances under which cooperation is possible. If someone is in the country without authorization and has been convicted of one of approximately 177 crimes, they can be turned over to ICE if other conditions are met. 

    There are also barriers to cooperation between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities across the state. However, if people who are in the country illegally are convicted of crimes and go to prison upstate, they likely will be turned over to ICE, experts told us. 

    Because Hochul’s statement contains some element of truth but ignores critical facts, we rate this Mostly False. 



    Source