Dollar Reverses Losses After Trump Blasts WaPo’s “Fake News” Tariff Report
(Tyler Durden Reports) – Update. On Truth Social, President-elect Donald Trump blasted the Washington Post for “quoting so-called anonymous sources, which don’t exist, incorrectly states that my tariff policy will be pared back.”
“That is wrong. The Washington Post knows it’s wrong. It’s just another example of Fake News,” the [president elect] said.
Right away, we called out this malarkey.
2 hours
From Trump: “The story in the Washington Post, quoting so-called anonymous sources, which don’t exist, incorrectly states that my tariff policy will be pared back. That is wrong. The Washington Post knows it’s wrong. It’s just another example of Fake News.”
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) January 6, 2025
WaPo’s fake news reporting sent the Bloomberg Spot Dollar Index tumbling by over 1%, one of the biggest intra-day drops since 2023.
Thanks WaPo for the 300 pips,
you fake news garbage— zerohedge (@zerohedge) January 6, 2025
There is nothing like fake news from legacy corporate media to start the week.
Investigate WaPo for market manipulation on behalf of hedge fund “anonymous sources”
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) January 6, 2025
* * *
[Original story below, before update. (TLB) ed.]
The US dollar slid on Monday after reports emerged that President-elect Donald Trump’s aides are considering a revised, less strict tariff plan. While Trump’s 2024 campaign promised a universal tariff on most imports, the new proposal would focus instead on imposing tariffs specifically on critical imports, according to the Washington Post, citing three people familiar with the plan.
Trump repeatedly claimed during the campaign that he would implement a “universal” 10% to 20% import tariff on all foreign-made goods into the United States. He also spoke about a 60% import tariff on Chinese goods and a 100% tariff on all imported cars.
According to WaPo:
Two weeks before Trump takes office, his aides are still discussing plans to impose import duties on goods from every country, the people said.
But rather than apply tariffs to all imports, the current discussions center on imposing them only on certain sectors deemed critical to national or economic security — a shift that would jettison a key aspect of Trump’s campaign pledge, at least for now, said the people, who cautioned that no decisions have been finalized and that planning remains in flux.
While the Biden administration has not rescinded most of the existing tariffs enacted under Trump 1.0, a universal blanket of tariffs on all imports would have been part of the ‘America First’ trade policies. However, it seems unlikely that Trump would abandon such a key policy initiative right out of the gate.
The sources familiar with the potential tariff change were unclear about which imports would be affected.
More from WaPo…
Preliminary discussions have largely focused on several key sectors that the Trump team wants to bring back to the United States, the people said. Those include the defense industrial supply chain (through tariffs on steel, iron, aluminum and copper); critical medical supplies (syringes, needles, vials and pharmaceutical materials); and energy production (batteries, rare earth minerals and even solar panels), two of the people said.
WaPo’s report sent the Bloomberg Dollar Index tumbling early Monday, breaking below $108. This marked a sharp reversal following the multi-month 9% rally that started at the beginning of October.
Here’s Bloomberg’s Markets Live desk’s take:
The dollar’s reaction to the Washington Post’s report that the incoming US administration might consider targeting import taxes at certain industries, rather than across the board, shows how much of the currency’s strength is based on anticipation of broad, and early, tariffs. It also suggests that the dollar’s recent strength is more dependent on fiscal rather than monetary policy. Bloomberg’s gauge of the dollar is falling the most since November.
Lots of currencies are benefiting from the dollar slump, which makes sense given the Washington Post report was vague as to which industries might be exempt. The euro, pound and Mexican peso are all at their strongest levels of the year.
That so much of the dollar’s strength should be reliant on tariff policy has implications for inflation and rates as well. All things being equal, adding taxes to imports pushes up consumer prices. But how much of that increase feeds through into living costs depends on lots of factors, notably how much pain companies are prepared to absorb (lots, if you cut their taxes elsewhere, presumably) and how much the currency rises. Today’s moves will shed light on how much of the tariff pain would be softened by a stronger dollar.
There is no confirmation from the incoming Trump administration regarding the validity of WaPo’s report.
How long until Trump denies all of this?
*TRUMP MULLS ‘UNIVERSAL’ TARIFF PLANS FOR CRITICAL IMPORTS: WAPO
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) January 6, 2025
For all we know, this could be a case of a dollar trader leveraging the media outlet.
_________
(SOURCE)
Header featured image (edited) credit: Org. post content. Emphasis added by (TLB)
••••
••••
Stay tuned tuned…
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.