A Tightrope Between Diplomacy & Force — Trump’s Iran Strategy

A Tightrope Between Diplomacy & Force – Trump’s Iran Strategy

INTRO BY GLOBAL AFFAIRS

In a pre-hearing session with the Senate Armed Services Committee, retired Air Force Lieutenant General Dan Caine, who has been nominated by President Donald Trump to serve as the nation’s top military officer, indicated that relying solely on military force may not suffice to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, as stated in his remarks.

A Tightrope Between Diplomacy & Force — Trump’s Iran Strategy

“The United States may also require economic incentives and diplomatic engagement” Retired Air Force Lieutenant General Dan Caine noted

The White House is currently evaluating an Iranian proposal for indirect nuclear talks mediated by Oman, while simultaneously increasing the U.S. military presence in the Middle East in anticipation of potential military action. Trump has previously warned Iran that military intervention could occur if a nuclear agreement is not reached. In response, Iran formally addressed Trump’s letter, suggesting new negotiations on nuclear issues and cautioning about possible repercussions if a swift agreement is not achieved. Meanwhile, Russia has criticized Trump’s military threats against Iran, warning of potentially “catastrophic” consequences. Reports indicate that Trump is willing to negotiate a new agreement to replace the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which he had himself abandoned, while also deploying military assets to deter aggression and prepare for possible action if negotiations fail and tensions rise.

Although the US intelligence agencies have issued a warning indicating that Israel might initiate an assault on Iran’s nuclear facilities within this year, Iran urges the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to address Trump’s threat of military action while reiterating its commitment to not pursuing nuclear weapons…

A Tightrope Between Diplomacy & Force — Trump’s Iran Strategy

Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA) reports…

Iran presses the IAEA on Trump’s ‘bombing’ threat, reaffirms no nukes pursuit

Tehran, IRNA – The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) must adopt a clear position regarding threats against Iran’s civilian nuclear facilities, Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said Tuesday, days after U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to “bomb” Iran.

Araqchi was speaking on the phone with the secretary general of the IAEA, Rafael Grossi.

He emphasized that given the recurrence of such threats, the Islamic Republic will take every necessary measure to protect its nuclear program.

Grossi, for his part, said he would talk with other parties to create a suitable atmosphere to help resolve existing issues. He also asked to visit Iran, which Araqchi accepted.

Trump said on Sunday that he would order military strikes against Iran if Tehran did not strike a new deal with Washington on its nuclear program. “If they don’t make a deal, there will be bombing,” he said in an interview with NBC News.

Iran has warned to respond swiftly and decisively to any act of aggression on its soil.

Reacting to Trump’s threat, a senior adviser to Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei said that even though Iran doesn’t seek nuclear weapons, any strike on the country by the United States or Israel on that false pretext would force the country to develop atomic bombs for defensive purposes.

“If America or Israel bomb Iran under the nuclear pretext, Iran will be compelled to move toward producing an atomic bomb,” Ali Larijani said during a televised interview on Monday.

Araqchi, however, once again clarified Tehran’s long-standing position, which is based on a religious decree (fatwa) by Ayatollah Khamenei prohibiting the development, possession, and use of nuclear weapons, reaffirming that the country will never produce or acquire any atomic bombs under any circumstances.

He said in an X post on Tuesday that ten years after signing the Iran deal and seven years after the U.S. unilaterally walked away from it under Trump’s first term, “there is not ONE SHRED OF PROOF that Iran has violated this commitment.”

Meanwhile, UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric was asked on Tuesday to comment on Trump’s threat, to which he said, “We urge everyone to avoid inflammatory rhetoric.”

“I think the UN Charter is very clear in encouraging Member States to settle all disputes through diplomatic means,” he said in response to the question asked by IRNA’s correspondent.

On March 12, Trump sent a letter to Iran via an emissary from the United Arab Emirates (UAE), requesting that negotiations be opened into a deal that he says would stop Iran from building a nuclear weapon. This is while, in 2018, he pulled out of a multinational nuclear deal with Iran. On February 4, the U.S. president signed a presidential memorandum to restore a hostile policy from his first term of “maximum pressure” on the Islamic Republic.

Iran, which has relayed its response to the U.S. president’s letter via Oman, has ruled out direct negotiations with the United States as long as the “maximum pressure” policy and the military threats are in place.

“Diplomatic engagement worked in the past and can still work. BUT, it should be clear to all that there is—by definition—no such thing as a ‘military option’ let alone a ‘military solution,’” Araqchi said in his X post.

See more news from IRNA

Header featured image (edited) credit: Org. post content. Emphasis added by (TLB)

••••

A Tightrope Between Diplomacy & Force — Trump’s Iran Strategy

••••

Stay Tuned…

A Tightrope Between Diplomacy & Force — Trump’s Iran Strategy

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Source: TLB