FDA Issues Flu Vaccine Recommendations After Canceling Routine Meeting
Recommendations for flu shots usually involve input from the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC), but this year, the agency excluded its advisers from the decision-making process
By Aldgra Fredly | The Epoch Times
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued recommendations to vaccine makers on Thursday regarding the virus strains to be used in the 2025–26 influenza vaccines, after canceling a meeting of its vaccine advisers last month that had been scheduled for March 13.
The strain composition recommendations for flu shots usually involve input from the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC), but this year, the agency excluded its advisers from the decision-making process.
Instead, the FDA held a closed session with experts from its Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, along with officials from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Department of Defense, to review U.S. and global surveillance data on currently circulating flu viruses.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) headquarters in White Oak, Maryland, U.S., August 29, 2020
That interagency meeting was held on the same day that the VRBPAC was originally scheduled to meet. In a statement, the FDA said it does not expect any impact on the timing or availability of vaccines for the public.
The regulator recommended using the trivalent formulation of egg-based influenza vaccines for the next flu season, containing two influenza A subtype viruses and one influenza type B virus.
The FDA stated that it has informed vaccine manufacturers of its recommendations and expected “an adequate and diverse supply of approved trivalent seasonal influenza vaccines” for the upcoming influenza season, which covers the fall and winter of each year.
The reason for the cancelation of the VRBPAC meeting remains unclear. The FDA did not offer an explanation.
The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)—which represents over 13,000 physicians, scientists, and public health experts—had urged the FDA to reschedule the meeting, saying that its cancelation could endanger public health as the nation faces its worst flu season in more than a decade.
“Cancelling this meeting means vaccine makers may not have the vital information and time they need to produce and distribute targeted vaccines before the next flu season,” IDSA President Tina Tan said in a Feb. 27 statement.
Seasonal influenza activity has remained high in the United States, with at least 40 million illnesses recorded so far, according to the CDC. Of these, 520,000 patients were hospitalized, and 22,000 have died from flu as of March this year.
The cancelation of the FDA’s advisory committee meeting came after President Donald Trump’s nominee for health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy, was confirmed by the Senate on Feb. 13.
Kennedy told employees at the Health and Human Services (HHS) on Feb. 18 that nothing would be off-limits as he led investigations into children’s health, identifying vaccinations as possible factors behind the rise in chronic diseases.
In his address, Kennedy emphasized that his main mission at HHS is “to reverse the chronic disease epidemic” in the United States.
Besides hearing from its advisers, the FDA typically consults with the World Health Organization (WHO) on the composition of the influenza vaccines before making recommendations. The agency was not included in the FDA’s recent meeting on flu vaccines.
Trump has withdrawn the United States from the WHO, citing the WHO’s “mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic that arose out of Wuhan, China,” and other global health concerns.
The president stated that the WHO had failed to “adopt urgently needed reforms” and was unable to demonstrate independence from “the inappropriate political influence” of member states.
The United States was the largest contributor to the WHO, having contributed about $1.28 billion during the 2022-2023 biennium, according to the organization’s website. It stated that U.S. experts supported nearly half of WHO joint external evaluation missions last year.
Zachary Stieber contributed to this report.
_________
SOURCE
Header featured image (edited) credit: Jens Kalaene/picture-alliance/dpa/AP. Emphasis added by (TLB)
••••
••••
Stay tuned tuned…
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Source: TLB
